ever since i was a little kid i knew i wanted to be someone who is very sorry

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available

ellievsbear
Cosimo Galluzzi
Sade Olutola
sheepfilms

bliss lane
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
RMH
art blog(derogatory)
Cosmic Funnies
The Bowery Presents
Doug Jones
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Phantogram Three

@theartofmadeline
Noah Kahan

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Color Me Curious

Discoholic 🪩
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Brazil

seen from Iraq
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Kenya
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Portugal

seen from India

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Ireland
@mystic-bone-mage
ever since i was a little kid i knew i wanted to be someone who is very sorry
Hi Violet I love you you're so cool okay that's it send ask!
hiiii hi hi hi i love you too!! :D my cool and awesome friend!! hugs you and bites you. bites you again.
went here and everyone knew u
*slaps girl like a car* this baby’s just BEGGING to be forcibly stripped of its personhood
Sie transvestigaten meinen ikea hotdog…
The Silmarillion is a book that fills me with many emotions, but the only part that makes me feel anger -not tragic grief at the narrative, but real anger- is the ending where the Lord of the Rings is summarized in three paragraphs.
It makes me feel anger because it gives a comparison for just how summarized the rest of the Silmarillion is. The entire fall of the Noldor, written in a way that condenses Frodo and Sam’s whole journey to “alone with his servant he passed through peril and darkness and came at last in Sauron’s despite even to Mount Doom”.
What else did Tolkien imagine over five hundred years of history that didn’t make it into any of his notes? What did he not imagine that still must have occurred? Who are the Boromirs and the Eowyns and the Bilbos of the first age? What witch-kings did they slay and what quests did they begin? What were the riddles and the detours and the love stories?
Its all been forgotten. No one knows anymore, and it’s likely that no one ever did. Not even Professor Tolkien.
What did he not imagine that still must have occurred?
this is one of my favorite phenomena that occurs when you have really really good world building! the world is so comprehensively fleshed-out that the reader really can feel that they are reading a history, which means they are only reading about a selection of events and facts and happenings out of a whole world’s worth of events and facts and happenings. the reader feels as if any question about the history of that world really has a true answer, whether or not that answer is revealed anywhere in the work, even independent of whether the author has any internal conceptualization of what the answer may be!
in mathematical logic, one of the main things considered is a “theory,” which is a collection of facts expressed in some specific (formal) language (in first-order logic). a theory is incomplete if there are (first-order expressible) facts in the same language of the theory that can’t be determined to be true or false based on the facts in the theory. on the other hand, if you can deduce the truth or falsity of any fact from the stuff in the theory, it’s complete. here is a colloquial example:
let’s say my language lets me identify someone’s hair color (red, blond, brown, black, other) and whether one person is taller than another, and let’s say my theory has the following facts in it:
there is a person with red hair
there is a person with red hair who is shorter than every other person
this is not a complete theory, because it doesn’t tell me if “there is a person whose hair is not red” is true or false. I could get two redheads of different heights in a room and both facts in my theory would be true, but I could also put a short redhead and 20 tall people with blue hair in the room and my facts would still be true.
okay so why did I bring this up?
all of the canon facts of a work of fiction is like a theory, and the theory of lotr feels complete to me. and this is so wacky!!! like, yes, of course there are things that we can’t prove to be true or false about the lotr universe from what we know of it, but it feels like that’s not because there is no true answer, it’s just that we can’t access it or something. the math analogy is breaking a little here but yeah, idk I think about this a lot and it’s one of my favorite things about lotr and it’s something I haven’t really felt about other works
"my son turned out fine" fuck you that's my dog and shes eating kibble from my hand right now
silly
Gideon the Ninth naming system notes appreciation post
[Image ID:
Photos of the notes
Image 1. Lyctor. LICK-tor. In order to facilitate "Lyctor? I hardly touched her," stand-up routines in the Nine Houses.
Image 2. NOTE: Naberius is one of the demon princes of Hell. Will this mean anything significant later on?? (No.)
Image 3. NOTE: "Dulcinea" is the famously illusory persona assigned to the prostitute Aldonza in Don Quixote: a case of a woman you want to exist, but who really doesn't. In this essay I will
Image 4. Palamedes Sextus. Pal-AM-a-dees. At first I had a coarse comparison here, but then I removed it. SEX-tus. "Us" as in "bus" rather than the "oos" of Nonagesimus. "Sex" as in "you'd have to be weird to want this with Harrow."
Image 5. NOTE: In the original, Ianthe and Corona were “Cainabeth and Abella," a feat of naming so unsubtle that I might as well have just gone with "Goodtwin" and "Badtwin." And it's not even accurate! It should be Badtwin, and Lessbadtwin.
Image 6. NOTE: Protesilaus is the first hero to die at Troy. He is also the first man who dies as a result of the Lyctor trials. “Johnny Quickdeath" would've also been a good pick.
Image 7. Priamhark Noniusvianus. PRY-am-hark. Three distinct syllables; avoid eliding the H. NOH-nee-us-vee-AHN-us. You should have the trick of the "us" sound by now. If you don't, it's fine, nobody cares, it's a random name in a novel about bonermancy.
/End ID]
me putting the little tag back on the bread bag
How well done do you want your steak?
my wife stooe my phone
@weirdvic ?
i know i’ve made this post before, but i just, really like how category theory tends to lead people to write sentences that use diagrams as clauses??
like, you look at
and it’s a completely normal sentence! which feels very natural to write or read! but, well, there’s no way to convert those diagrams to… words. there’s no order in which they’re supposed to be read, no convention for how it’s supposed to turn into sounds in your brain, and in fact it… just doesn’t, yknow? you switch between “read words” mode and “decrypt diagram” mode without even thinking about it and the whole thing somehow parses as a sentence in your brain anyways.
you also get incredibly cool stuff like
i mean just look! he put a semicolon after the diagram! a semicolon actually needs to be there or the thing won’t be grammatical! here after something that is not written to be expressable in words! it’s so! ugh! i love it!!!
in fact there’s like, multiple conventions as to where the punctuation is supposed to go after diagrams. johnstone above has been kind of old fashioned w/ putting the punctuation after the first line, these days people tend to write stuff like
where the punctuation goes after the rightmost symbol of the bottommost line of the diagram.
anyways. isn’t that neat? like, linguistically.
fursona doodles <3
who up hitting the rick and morty genderbent incest meth bong
did you hear they started drawing anthropomorphic animal people with human-like qualities, such as bipedalism, the capacity for speech, and even human breasts?