Sade Olutola
đ
trying on a metaphor
Game of Thrones Daily
ojovivo

Origami Around

romaâ
Today's Document
đȘŒ

blake kathryn
Noah Kahan
cherry valley forever
Not today Justin
Misplaced Lens Cap

ellievsbear
No title available

â
DEAR READER
No title available

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ

seen from Germany

seen from Ireland
seen from Syria

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Qatar
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from United States
@nekusarthemindrazer
Me. YEEN, we are in need of a professional opinion on Sol Ring. Is it too good, or fair?
GUD FOR TEETH
GIVE TO TEETHING PUP TO GUM
SOL RING IS FINE IN THE GAMES OF MANY PEOPLE
IS ONLY AS BAD AS WAT COMES AFTER
MAKES TWO TURNS FASTER YES
IF LOSE BECAUSE TURN ONE SOL RING DEGENERACY IS NOT IN CARD ITSELF
BUT IN DECK PLAYED IN
So I was reading the gatherer rulings for Sovereignâs Realm.
When The Old Gods Return.
This is the kind of art that you never forget, a way of painting that leaves you with silence on your tongue and terrified beauty in your hands.
And a 10/10 protection from everything amirite?
I will never be able to take the art for progenitus seriously cuz of the one head stretching off to the right like Oooooo what's over here
Poke-walkers Go!:
Machop-Gideon (âGide-opâ?)
Jace-Psyduck (âJace-duckâ)
Gengar-ObNixilis (âGengObâ)
Geodude-Koth (âKothDudeâ)
Bulbasaur-Nissa (âNissasaurâ)
Pikachu-RalZarek (âRalachuâ)
Dragonite-NicolBolas (âNicoliteâ)
(Pokemon and its images property of the Pokemon CompanyâŠPlaneswalkers property of Wizards of the CoastâŠ[legal things] plz donât get me in trouble ;___; )
Reblog if you play Magic: the Gathering. letâs find out how many of us there are here
âŠâŠ..
Reblog if youâre a Magic the Gathering blog
I need more of you to follow!!!
Appreciate him
Shadows Over Innistrad
GET. HYPE.
BOLAS???
OH. MY. FUCKING. GOD. WHAT.
Group hug
This is tooooo accurate.
Source: /r/magicTCG
âKhans & Dragonlordsâ
Oh how time changes things.
Can you recommend any other mtg blogs that are about casual, or just cool mtg stuff in general?
Bloggers!
Assemble and explain yourselves!
hi i make memes
iâm not 100% mtg and im not sure if iâm cool but i have a blog
I think Iâm posting around %50 mtg stuff, then odd thoughts and neat reblogs. Occasionally I post something cake related.
Hello, Iâm trash and post MtG sometimes, but itâs really swept up in the tide that is so much garbage. Follow if you like MtG, memes,and garbage!
Solid 80% MtG - more legacy and modern than standard
Reblog this post with the ONE card you want to see in Eternal Masters more than any other
Mine is mana crypt.
Mine is a cycle: Zendikar Fetches
Iâd be surprised if they arenât in, to be honest.
If they reprint Mana Crypt Iâm going to cry. They need to ban it (and sol ring) in commander.
I hope they reprint Corpse Dance.
Corpse Dance is on the Reserved List, thatâs a no-go. :(
Wasteland, but it was already confirmedâŠSo either Liliana of the Veil or Crucible of Worlds.
Dark ritual tbh.
But Dark Ritual is like less than a dollar.
crucible of worlds or microsynth lattice
So apparently Britney Spears shared @noahbradleyâs artwork for the card Temple of Mystery, seemingly unaware of the source, which is strange, since she invented Magic: The Gathering in 1998.
Damn, beat me to it lol Just finished editing the photo
Matt Tabak said, "creatures with power 4 or greater have flying." wouldn't work as expected. Can you explain why?
Itâs not that it wouldnât work, it just would work really really unintuitively.
Letâs try a little thought experiement: You control the enchantment with âCreatures you control with power 4 or greater have flying.â You also control these creatures:
Vile Aggregate (and three other colorless creatures)
Crater Elemental (with its formidable ability resolved)
Timberpack Wolf (and two other Timberpack Wolves)
Hooded Hyrda (with five +1/+1 counters on it)
Calcite Snapper (with P/T switched through its landfall ability)
Siege Rhino (just Siege Rhino)
Which of these six creatures would you expect to gain flying from the aforementioned enchantment?
All of them, right?
Well youâre wrong. Out of these six creatures, only Siege Rhino would have flying.
Welcome to one of the major quirks of the layer system. Because of how itâs set up, effects of different types are handled in a specific order.Â
(That order is copy effects, control-changing effects, text-changing effects, type-changing effects, color-changing effects, ability-modifying effects, power and toughness -modifying effects.)
This means that the effects that modify things in earlier layers canât look at things from later layers without giving unintuitive results.
When our hypothetical enchantment goes to grant flying to creatures, we havenât applied any power and toughness modifying effects at all, so our example creatures donât have any of their buffs applied and it sees them with the following stats:
Vile Aggregate as 0/4 (Its power is undefined, so 0 is used instead.)
Crater Elemental as 0/8Â
Timberpack Wolf as 2/2
Hooded Hydra as 0/0
Calcite Snapper as Œ
Siege Rhino as 4/5 (smug bastardâŠ)
So yeah, thatâs why it wouldnât work. It would only work for creatures with an actual printed power of 4 or greater and ignore any other effects that would modify that.
(BTW, the first five creatures are each examples of the five P/T sublayers. These are all the classes of abilities that wouldnât be taken into consideration. In order: characteristic-definining abilities, power and/or toughness setting effects, increases or decreases to power and/or toughness not from counters, increases or decreases to power and/or toughness from counters, and power and toughness switching.)
Great explanation!
Layers⊠MTGâs black box.