you know that even if you're gay that by being in church leadership and encouraging people to remain in the church you're complicit in the psychological torture of children right
I accept that remaining in a church that actively promotes homophobia & transphobia is a form of passive complicity. From an outside perspective, my presence can be seen as tacit approval of the church's teachings and I am part of a community that creates an unsafe environment for queer individuals.
I'm not silently standing by as harmful policies are enacted, I challenge the homophobic & transphobic teachings and attitudes. Also, unlike your accusation, I don't encourage gay people to remain. Most of my queer friends have left this church and I'm happy for them. As for me being in "church leadership," I'm a secretary, I have no authority other than being able to share my viewpoint in meetings when leaders council together.
I don't think that abandoning spaces entirely to homophobes is beneficial to vulnerable members, particularly those who are young & required to attend or who are in the closet. I provide an alternative viewpoint and an affirming voice.
I admit that there is a cost to leaving which is high as it would damage ties with my family and friends, and would also mean abandoning my cultural upbringing. But also, I've paid a high price for being in this church, I've had many mental health issues because of it and am still dealing with the effects.
It's easy to stand on the outside and make judgements, I'm glad it seems simple to you. You're not the one who has to deal with the costs of staying or leaving. I do weigh the personal costs of staying versus the benefits, and whether the difference I can make as an insider is outweighed by the passive complicity.
It's fine to disagree with my decision to be here, and it's fine to point out the problematic aspects of my being in this church. I hope my response gives some understanding of my choices.











