Homes are expensive because of landlords hoarding them for profit, not because of regulations.
Time to bring back my favorite picture: The reason there have been so many food and consumer good recalls in the past few years. (If you got listeria from cold cuts? Direct result of Trump's actions!) Regulations exist to protect consumers from profit-hungry corporations.
Remember, there is no "lesson learned" from those regulations. They aren't safety procedures where now that people know putting lead in cinnamon is a bad thing that they won't do it even if you take the regulation away. The regulations were created because, when given a chance, these people leapt at the chance to destroy housing, poison food, and blight the planet.
Everytime a regulation like that is removed you should be concerned about who was being "held back" by a law preventing them from selling disease riddled meat.
A salient example, since lead got brought up specificallyā
A while ago it occurred to me to wonder how long weāve known lead is poisonous, since it was so ubiquitous in paint and construction and so many other places until just a few decades ago, so I went on a wiki dive to see when the first alarm bells were sounded about the health hazards of lead.
Want to guess?
Ancient Rome.
People have known lead is poisonous since at least Ancient Rome.
It didnāt stop people using it.
Your safety regulations are written in blood, not by accident, not because people didnāt know there were dangers, but because without them, blood is cheap.
Lead was used as a pesticide in the early 20th century, so I reckon we knew it was poison
Okay actually, I regret not adding a comment to my original reblog. I knew I wanted to add something but I wasn't sure what.
Yes, actually, there ARE some regulations jacking the prices of housing up. You know what they are?
Single-family zoning laws.
You know. The regulations supported by NIMBYs that make even the slightest attempt at dense housing impossible? The regulations that make it so you can't put apartment buildings anywhere in whole neighborhoods because the people who already own houses want there to be fewer people there? The regulations that are designed with a low density car- and suburb-centric economy in mind?
You know, the regulations that pretty much every single Republican supports?
Those are the kinds of regulations that do need to be loosened: ones made not out of safety concerns, but out of people feeling annoyed at the existence of others. I have a strong feeling those aren't the kinds of regulations Trump was talking about.















