Tumblr search function is shit. So here's a pinned post with my frequently used tags I guess.
noise dept.
official daine visual archive

tannertan36
h
Jules of Nature

Kiana Khansmith

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available
icyghini twinkie

gracie abrams

Product Placement
will byers stan first human second

bliss lane
No title available
The Bowery Presents
Cosmic Funnies

ellievsbear

izzy's playlists!
RMH

#extradirty
seen from Mexico
seen from Thailand
seen from Italy
seen from Russia
seen from Azerbaijan

seen from Venezuela
seen from Italy

seen from Bangladesh
seen from China
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from Iraq

seen from France

seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from Indonesia
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
seen from United States
@biglawbear
Tumblr search function is shit. So here's a pinned post with my frequently used tags I guess.
once I snorted a fat line of nuance and everything started depending. watch out
whee whoo days
Hey everyone, looks like the “cat summoned for jury duty” was ai generated - even has the ai symbol at the top. Thanks for the heads up, @cannot-all-throw-inkpots . My apologies- I did not realize when I shared it.
Aww dangit. Guess that makes sense, but it was so believable because I can 100% see that kind of goofup happening
Some positive news: There really WAS a cat summoned for jury duty back in 2010. Turns out the error was quickly corrected and the cat did NOT actually have to travel to the courthouse. But at least we can enjoy the fact that a papereork glitch did once try to give a cat jury duty XD
You know, there are actual centrists who just don't want the Democratic Party to be left-wing, but I think it's dishonest to act like that's the only objection more mainstream Democrats have to DSA types. Even aside from the issue of the whole party getting smeared with attack ads about like 3 House members holding fringe beliefs, it's that a lot of these people hold beliefs that are illiberal, as in, opposed to liberal ideals. Take someone like Chevalier opposing interracial relationships ~but leftistly~. Like yeah man, liberals think it's fine for people of different races to date. It's actually inherently conservative to say otherwise. In addition, DSA types tend to support Putin, support cutting USAID, disparage gay marriage as assimilationist bullshit (and "identity politics" more broadly as a distraction from the Real Issues), present antisemitism as social justice praxis, and say women who have professional (or, god forbid, political) ambition are evil, corporate girlbosses. It doesn't matter what word games you play to pretend these are progressive positions, being an asshole about these things will make liberals dislike your crackpot candidates
It’s the same shit it’s been for years and years now. You can’t say shit like this or enable Republican victories by withholding your vote and relentlessly lying about the Democratic Party or openly say you don’t care about handing the Supreme Court to the far-right in 2016, and then cry that people hate you for being “too left." No, it’s that you’re much too similar to Republicans, not simply in enabling GOP victories, but in your reactionary bullshit.
tl;dr (screenshot from mariacallous, as I try to stay off twitter)
Turns out the DSA left are the 'centrists' they decried all along. All they do is refuse to vote and then support the GOP with everything they do.
So much of the DSA has been the proof that if someone doesn't have any actual ethical or moral framework underpinning their belief systems then you can easily get them to support anything so long as you couch it in the right vibes and vocabulary
Suddenly Russian imperialism is "Land Back," stomping on small businesses, artists and academia is "fighting the petite bourgeoisie" advocating for Islamic theocracy is "defending traditional indigenous sovereignty," lynching Jews is "combating white supremacy" and stopping terror groups from buying weapons is "neo-colonial imperialism"
Really weird to be a lawyer and in fandoms cuz people talking about their OCs could mean either their original characters or their opposing counsel
Choose from 10 albums I really like
The Family Jewels - Marina and the Diamonds
Evermore - Taylor Swift
Apsurdistan - Dubioza kolektiv
Lemonade - Beyonce
The Fame Monster - Lady Gaga
Transgender Dysphoria Blues - Against Me!
Death of a Bachelor - Panic! At The Disco
Sour - Olivia Rodrigo
Dookie - Green Day
Masseduction - St. Vincent
Two World Cup finalists from opposing teams in this fucking picture, this sport isn't real
Context for anyone who is wondering: Lamine Yamal's parents won an UNICEF raffle for a charity photoshoot in which Barça players posed with kids, and 5 month old Lamine happened to get 20yo Messi. Which is like. Literally insane
imagine a goat with a hat
STOP-
what hat did you give the goat what is the instinctual hat you gave to this goat
Gen-Z women are paying for, and parenting, their boyfriends.
At first, McKayla didn’t care that her boyfriend worked for Instacart. He had just finished college, after all, and she was in her senior year, busy writing papers and trying to figure out her adult life. But once McKayla landed a full-time job as a reporter at a local newspaper, just a few months after graduating, she started to see things differently. She moved into her own studio apartment and still found the time to freelance for extra cash. Meanwhile, he was living at home with his parents and in no rush to put his economics and history degree to use. “I would send him links to jobs every couple of weeks and he wouldn’t open them,” she said. “He just wasn’t motivated to find anything.” She picked up the bill when they went out to dinner and bought them tickets to see Chris Rock and Bill Maher (the latter, she says, was her boyfriend’s choice). Sometimes she’d help him deliver other people’s groceries during their date nights.
Since the dawn of paychecks, women have made less than men. But while the overall wage gap persists, some Gen-Z women are living through a more hopeful reality. They are ten points more likely than men their age to get a college degree and are more likely than their male peers to find work once they graduate. While pink-coded jobs in therapy and health care are growing at record-high rates, there have been hiring dips in traditionally male-dominated fields like tech, finance, and blue-collar trades like construction and plumbing. A few years ago, a Pew study found that in a handful of cities, like New York, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C., young women are actually earning more than their male peers. With that extra money they are also buying almost twice as many homes as young men and saving for retirement at higher rates. Women of this generation are more likely than any other time in history to date a man who makes less than them — or who makes nothing at all.
Young men, I assumed, must be humiliated by this state of affairs, their masculinity in tatters. But for the most part, they seem comfortable with being pampered and paid for — maybe a little too comfortable. On TikTok, they call their girlfriends “mommies” and refer to themselves as “sugar babies.” “My girl makes more than me, and it’s awesome,” one guy told me. “She’ll be buying me all the fancy tools I want,” said another. I recently came across a Reddit post by a 23-year-old who wasn’t sure how he felt about making less than his girlfriend. All the commenters told him to get over it. “Bro just love your girl, and do what you can,” one said. “If she’s taking you with her on the trips, you’re gucci.”
Women are less thrilled about being treated like ATMs. Men, they say, are in their “princess era.” “I feel like when I go out with a guy that I need to show up with flowers and I need to open his car door,” said one woman. “Like, ‘Anything for you, princess!’” Things are so dire that on TikTok, women are lip-syncing to a new country song about how “If those fairy tales were re-written today / The tramp would wine and dine the lady / And then he’d make her pay.” “All the girls in my life are investing in real estate, they’re making ‘fuck you’ money in sales, they run a business,” one woman said in a car confessional. “And all the guys that we meet our age are just not.” The women I spoke to don’t mind being breadwinners. But they feel like babysitters too.
Naomi’s worst fear was turning into her boyfriend’s mother. But in truth, the 24-year-old paid for everything, helped him with his résumé, and made sure he was looking for jobs. He reassured her that he’d make some changes, like going to therapy and showing up on time when they hung out. Instead, things got worse. While she cobbled together a six-figure income working two retail jobs, he talked about applying to law school while lying in bed at her apartment on the Upper East Side, watching Reels on his phone.
It wasn’t a big deal that he couldn’t buy Naomi dinner at Le Veau d’Or. But she didn’t like how he used money as an excuse to shirk basic responsibilities. He never planned dates and didn’t even get her a birthday present. “If you can’t afford something, write me a love letter,” she says. “He could have literally made me Kraft mac and cheese.” They talked about moving in together, but Naomi couldn’t justify the cost. “If I wanted to finance a human being,” she says, “I’d have a kid.”
But perhaps the most enraging part of their now-finished relationship is that Naomi’s boyfriend used politics to justify his apathy. He considered himself a communist, read Marx in his spare time, and was part of a friend group full of other jobless men who found it embarrassing to care about work. “They hate the finance bro,” Naomi says, “But in their push to reject that, they’re now doing nothing.” McKayla, who requested a pseudonym along with the other women in this story, has clocked a similar phenomenon. She says her boyfriend and his friends are “super-granola crunchy liberals” who see striving for power as anti-feminist. They want to separate themselves from predatory CEOs and men on the right who think women are working pretend “email jobs” and shouldn’t even have the right to vote. “They think treating women respectfully cannot exist with being a hyperambitious provider,” she says. “They think if you make six figures, you’ll suddenly wake up and hate women.”
One 27-year-old, who describes himself as a “modern leftist,” says that he and his friends are more concerned with finding jobs that align with their values than with getting rich. “A lot of the women I know are hyperambitious,” he says. “A lot of the men they date are not.” I heard from one guy who said that while he has no problem with his partner making more money than him, he always tries to pay in public, lest a barista judge him for “taking advantage of his girlfriend.” Another man, whose girlfriend earns twice as much as him, told me he provides in other ways: His work-life balance means he has the “emotional availability” to comfort his girlfriend when she comes home from a stressful day at work. “I’m a caretaker to some degree,” he says. “What I bring to the relationship is arguably not traditionally masculine, but it is fulfilling and valuable.”
The women I spoke with had a different definition of “valuable.” While their boyfriends struggled to chip in for groceries, they also seemed strangely reticent to contribute in other ways — like, you know, doing the dishes or handling the laundry. Jessica couldn’t seem to escape this kind of guy. A few years ago, while the then-19-year-old juggled an engineering internship with a part-time job, she dated someone who was supposedly in the process of applying to med school. Not only did Jessica pay for everything, she organized all their dates as well. “I would buy the candles, do all the cooking, pick the music, and pick a time,” she says. “All he had to do was show up.” More than once she heard him boast to his friends that he didn’t have to worry about money because “Jessica’s such a mommy.” At the club, he’d ask her to flirt with single guys to score free drinks. She broke up with him right before graduating from college and soon started dating a fellow engineering classmate who talked a big game about getting a corporate job. “At that point I was like, ‘I just want someone who will pay for things sometimes,’” Jessica says. “He was like, ‘Don’t worry, baby girl, I’ll take care of you.’” Then he moved back into his parents’ place while complaining about how tough the job market was.
She worked long hours at her consulting job and still picked up the bill when he felt like having a $300 meal (“he had expensive taste,” she says). “I was again trapped in this role of planning activities and doing chores because he would say he ‘didn’t have the capacity,’” Jessica says. “At a certain point it felt like there’s nothing this guy is adding to my life that I can’t just provide for myself.” She dumped him, too, and found a new man who, despite making less money than her, at least brings something to the table. Now that Jessica is getting her master’s degree while running a group focused on educating people about climate change, she needs help getting the rest of her life together. Her boyfriend recently quit his job to go back to school and spends his free time driving her to work events, booking her yoga classes to help her relax, and packing her leftover pasta for lunch. “He’s like, ‘You’re going to change the world,’’’ she says. “‘So I need to help you do that.’”
McKayla resents her boyfriend’s nonchalance. As someone who didn’t have money growing up, she’s clawed her way toward a quality of life she refuses to give up. Her boyfriend, who was raised in an upper-middle-class suburb, is not as forward thinking. When they spoke about moving in together, he told McKayla he has only $1,000 in savings. “I was like, ‘Oh, he isn’t taking this seriously,’” she says. “He just thought that he would somehow come up with the money we need for first and last months’ rent and a security deposit.” When she talked about sending their future children to an Ivy League school, he responded, “Why would we do that?” “I just wish he would exhibit more hunger,” she says. “I know what I could do with the leg up he has, and he just sits on it.”
For many young women, ambition doesn’t feel like a choice. If they want careers that pay the bills, they can’t afford to lay around, putting off job applications and 401(k) contributions while bragging about their perfect politics. They need to buckle down, fast. While it might seem like their boyfriends are lagging far behind, they’ll probably catch up anyway. Historically, the wage gap tends to be narrowest before the age of 35; it gets much wider later on, especially after women have kids. While fathers tend to get a pay bump, women make half as much as they did before becoming mothers. It’s one thing to pick up the tab for your boyfriend who’s genuinely struggling to find work. It’s another to subsidize rent for a guy who spends leisurely afternoons on the couch because he has a feeling that, eventually, he’ll get what he wants.
At least McKayla’s not going to wait for her boyfriend to get himself together. “If the New York Times called me tomorrow and was like, ‘Can you move here in 48 hours,’ I don’t even think I would tell him,” she says. “I would just do it.”
I wish irl grinding was as fun as in videogames tbh. Like yeah i need to go to work a thousand times but after that i have enough materials to buy a house. But alas, houses arent real
My garden, with the innumerable herbs and alliums I let flower instead of pulling out, has suddenly acquired a myriad of wasps. They’re mostly solitary species and fairly chill so of course I had to stick a camera in their faces.
So far I’m really happy with these!
These will eventually make their way to the @animalphotorefs repository, once I sort the uh…. Six thousand and seven hundred something bug photos I just took.
Oh man I am so pleased with today’s attempt.
#jfc 4000 iso...#<- im a beginner. i've never seen iso that high#or shutter speed that fast prev tags from @time-teller
What you'll find - for prev but also anyone interested - is that the faster the moving animal you're trying to photograph the higher the shutter speed gets. I normally shoot birds at 2000-3000 frames per second in order to get sharp feathers in flight, and after a bunch of trial and error anything under about 8000 was just not enough for these little wasps while in flight if I wanted to see detail. They're so fast that even getting these shots required setting my focus distance when they were sitting on the flower, shooting burst, and hoping they took off during the burst.
The reason the ISO is so high is because that lets me use a higher aperture (how wide open the lens is). The narrower the aperture - the higher the F number on the screen - the less light gets in, but the deeper the depth of field is. If you have a shallow depth of field, you get photos like a lot of my early macro attempts... where the nose of an animal facing the camera is in focus but the eyes and ears are not! When you're shooting with a high ISO your images can get really noisy, especially in low light, but I was working in really strong direct sunlight so I had room to mess around with settings. (You can push this too far. I accidentally took a bunch of baby elephant pool wrestling photos on 12000 ISO because I was exhausted and forgot to reset after messing with settings in a really dark reptile house. There's a reason those aren't online.)
I also just want to point out that I am also fairly new at photography overall - I've only really been doing animal photography seriously for the last three years - and that a lot of what will help you get better is trial and error. I have two photography mentors who are both super technical guys and they repeatedly tried to explain the exposure triangle theory to me (the relationship between ISO, aperture, and shutter speed). It never stuck. Y'know what did? Taking a truly astounding number of photos and just messing around with my settings until it started making sense. I shoot with all my settings on manual now, but I absolutely did not start there.
So even as a beginner you too can learn to use ridiculous settings! Find a thing you want to photograph, put the settings where you think they need to be to get what you want. Get enough photos to make you happy, and then change one setting a little bit and try again. I suggest using auto settings where you only have to pick a value for one setting manually and then the camera automatically adjusts the other two for the best photo. Play with a couple adjustments to the same setting on the same subject so you can compare the photos. Over time, it really will start to make sense and come more naturally. And then you can join me in the "your shutter speed was what?" club!
If you want to take higher aperture macro photos without hitting ISO numbers like that, I cannot recommend enough using a flash unit. Even(and honestly especially!) in sunlight. The flash even gives you room to knock the shutterspeed down-- I've gotten beautiful "freeze-frame" shots working at 250.
(ISO 100, F11, 1/250)
(ISO 100, F11, 1/250) (dont be fooled, this guy was not actually sitting still)
(okay this ones mainly just here because its funny) (ISO 200, F13(ish, manual aperture ring so some fudgy inbetween value), 1/250)
I only say this because high ISO plus a high aperture is a surefire recipe for fuzzed out photos-- As you raise your aperture value, once you hit the diffraction point, your resolution begins to go down, which when combined with the noise can be a huge pain.
(Though that also depends on your lens. I could get up to F32 on my nikkor without the resolution getting too bad, but F16 and above on my laowa are a pain. Such is life)
The increased clarity of lower ISO can be worth it in my opinion cause you can get stuff like this
Queer leftists abandoning Jews and thinking Muslims are their allies when they're the second/third largest homophobic religious group in the country - behind Jehovah's Witnesses and white Evangelical Protestants depending on the poll - will go down as one of the greatest self-owns ever.
Y'all really need to get over this hurdle of thinking that just because a group is a minority it automatically makes them your ally. The majority of American Muslims have shown over and over again they hate LGBT people (especially LGBT Muslims, since nonbelivers are already going to hell) and they don't want their tax money going to help us. You'd literally be better off casting your luck with Mormons.
Muslims deserve freedom of religion and freedom from intolerance, just like everyone else, but they're not uwu smol beans, they're the second largest religious group on the planet.
If they don't support LGBT people, they don't deserve your support. You wouldn't give it to the Baptist preacher telling you you're going to hell. Have some fucking self-respect.
And can we PLEASE stop with the belief that because Muslims are an oppressed minority in the US, that's true everywhere? Muslims aren't oppressed at all in the Middle East. They're fine. Islam is the state religion of several countries. Jews are not oppressing Muslims worldwide. The idea that Jews have more power than Muslims in Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, etc., is fucking laughable.
Christianity isn't always the oppressor, either. There are marginalized Christians who are being harmed. (In Palestine, that happens a bunch. Christians are very much the minority!)
The demographics in your country apply to your country and that's it. Stop thinking that racial issues will map onto another country half a world away with an entirely different history.
Islam and Christianity are the two most politically powerful religions on the planet.
There are only two countries in the entire world where Jews outnumber Muslims (Israel and USA) and only one where Jews outnumber Christians (Israel).
The obsession with casting Muslims as politically powerless smol beans is insane. As soon as American Muslims became the political majority in a single city (Dearborn), they teamed up with white supremacists.
“I don’t want you to publish this,” Melissa Chaudhry, a candidate for US Congressional District 9, said during an explicitly on-the-record i
Queers for Palestine deserve this betrayal.
“When asked which LGBTQ rights she supported, her laundry list included justice, health care, and protections in housing and employment.
“Then why is that not on your website?” an SECB member asked.
“Because a lot of Muslims do not feel that way, unfortunately,” she said. According to a 2025 report from Pew Research Center, 41 percent of US Muslims believe homosexuality should be accepted by society. The only religious group included in the survey with a lower acceptance rate were Evangelical Christians, only 36 percent of them are cool with homosexuality.”
Progressive candidates chasing the Muslim vote frequently ditch queer rights.
I feel like I'm going insane
"oh those poor Muslims who hate queer people I don't want to offend them so I'm going to stab queer people in the back"
No maybe conservative Muslims or conservative anyone who oppose LGBTQ rights and protections are wrong and you should tell them to fuck off. What the fuck are we doing here.
“I don’t want you to publish this,” Melissa Chaudhry, a candidate for US Congressional District 9, said during an explicitly on-the-record i
Queers for Palestine deserve this betrayal.
“When asked which LGBTQ rights she supported, her laundry list included justice, health care, and protections in housing and employment.
“Then why is that not on your website?” an SECB member asked.
“Because a lot of Muslims do not feel that way, unfortunately,” she said. According to a 2025 report from Pew Research Center, 41 percent of US Muslims believe homosexuality should be accepted by society. The only religious group included in the survey with a lower acceptance rate were Evangelical Christians, only 36 percent of them are cool with homosexuality.”
Progressive candidates chasing the Muslim vote frequently ditch queer rights.
I feel like I'm going insane