❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
titsay
Love Begins
No title available
Show & Tell
if i look back, i am lost
sheepfilms
taylor price
Cosimo Galluzzi
@theartofmadeline
★
No title available
Cosmic Funnies
YOU ARE THE REASON
occasionally subtle
Kiana Khansmith
Product Placement
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Not today Justin
macklin celebrini has autism
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Ecuador
seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States
seen from Czechia
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Czechia
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@noloadofhooey-blog
I drew the first one for @table-jump-yes
And then I kept drawing and I just recently went back and started colouring and remembered why I hate colouring traditionally. I don’t really have any explanation or background besides cyborg David because why not
i don’t see anyone talking about how sad that this is?? like,, it’s heartbreaking to me.
harrison is only a kid. he’s so young and yet his parents are terrified of him because he can do magic, and they’re terrified so openly that he expects this reaction.
it’s also sad that he forgot that they were scared, because at camp, nobody reacted like this to him. regardless of how fun and/or safe he actually thought camp was, at least people treated his magic like it was a normal thing and they didn’t act terrified of him.
i just,, really feel for harrison here because it seems like he doesn’t have a good home life at all, and i hope people recognize this instead of only looking at main characters like max or nikki.
no you do not understAND HOW MUCH I internally scream during this part he is my baby and it's just not okay and I love him
Farewell online privacy
What happened?
Trump happened.
just get a VPN?
You can’t just tell people to ‘get a VPN (Virtual Private Network)’. Buying a VPN is like buying a house. It’s very very important. Having no VPN or having a ‘wrong’ one can seriously damage your life. Especially for Americans because their privacy laws are garbage. I am going to try explain why you should get a VPN but bare with me, I am from Germany and my English is far from perfect.
Let’s start with a simple test. Click this link here: https://whatismyipaddress.com/ It will tell your IP adres, your ISP (internet service provider), and your location. The location might not be very accurate, but then again, it’s just a simple website. Imagine what the government can do!
So basically, everyone can find out where you live. But there is more danger. Your ISP. Your ISP logs your every move online and they are required to keep it in case the government wants access to it (or if a 3rd party wants to buy your data (yikes). They have everything. What websites you visit. How long you stay on a website. What you download. Your search terms. European laws are more subtle on this but if you are from the US you are #@*#&, especially because Trump doesn’t support the open internet. It’s scary but maybe in the future you can’t get a job because the recruiter knows your searched on ‘how to deal with depression’ or anythings else that’s supposed to be private because it’s your f*cking right. Or you get a $100k fine because you pirated a movie 15 years ago. You need a VPN. You’re dumb for not using one. but what does a VPN do?
A VPN encrypts all your data so if it were be intercepted no one can ‘crack the code’ and damage your privacy.
Usually being online goes like this (simplified): Your computer —-> ISP (—–> keeps data —–> sells it)
But with a VPN it goes like: Your computer —–> VPN (encrypts data)—–> ISP (ISP can’t see shit)
Furthermore, a VPN hides your IP address and location by giving you another IP address located in Spain for example (you can often choose from a list and change as many times as you want).
Now that you know why you should get a VPN and what is does it is important to educate yourself because people often choose the wrong VPN. VPN providers are also businesses and have to obey the law. If you choose a VPN provider located in the US then you are throwing your money away because the laws in the US shits on your privacy. If the US gov wants the provider to give all their logs they have to obey. The ISP still can’t see what you are doing online and sell your data but the US gov can interfere with your VPN provider so NEVER CHOOSE A PROVIDER LOCATED IN THE US.
I just wanted to make that very clear so my followers don’t buy false security.
There is still more danger! Who says your VPN provider isn’t selling your data? You need to check their logging policy. Do they keep logs? If yes, what for? For how long do they keep them? Tip: Choose a provider who doesn’t keep logs
More about law The US is part of the Five Eyes program (the worst):
The Five Eyes, often abbreviated as FVEY, is an intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. These countries are bound by the multilateral UKUSA Agreement, a treaty for joint cooperation in signals intelligence (source)
There is also a Nine Eyes (bit better) and Fourteen Eyes Program (better). You don’t want a VPN provider who is located in one the Five Eyes countries. If you had to choose go for a provider located in a country that’s part of the Fourteen Eyes Program or even better, go for a country that isn’t part of any program!
I know this is a shitty explanation and please pardon my english but now it’s time to do your own research. Take your privacy seriously. Maybe WWIII breaks out and you get killed for liking the ‘wrong’ FB-page.
Go to this website: https://thatoneprivacysite.net/simple-vpn-comparison-chart/
Make sure that your future VPN provider both has green boxes for Privacy Jurisdiction and Privacy Logging.
I recommend ovpn.se and trust.zone. ovpn is located in Sweden so they are part of the 14 Eyes Program and they keep minimal logs. Their business ethics, however, are alright.
Trustzone is located in the Seychelles. No country can interfere and their privacy jurisdiction is the best you can get. The US want your data but needs to get it from Trustzone? The Seychelles will simply give them the finger and wave them goodbye. However, this makes this provider very appealing for people who torrent and criminals because they keep no logs (and that is how it shoud be) Also, there are almost no marketing efforts so this provider is one the cheapest)
Also, often providers such as ExpressVPN are being called ‘The Best’ on websites about VPNs but know that this is just marketing which also makes those provider more expensive (and they too shit on your privacy)
This must be the worst article you have ever read but please, please take your privacy very seriously.
EDIT: I got many people asking me which provider I use. For those who want to know, I use Trust Zone. They offer a free 3-day trial with no strings attached. But still do your own research!
I am also with Trustzone but I think you forgot to explain one of it’s most important features. It protects you when you are using someone else’s Wi-Fi. If you are at Starbucks and you use their Wi-Fi your privacy is at risk. Anyone with ill intentions could steal your information. Especially if you are using an unsecured Wi-Fi hotspot. With a VPN your data gets encrypted so no one can steal it.
Wait, what’s going, on? Did trump destroy internet privacy with a bill or something? Where’s the news? Oh wait, why am I getting visions of Alex Jones and selling water purifiers?
He hasn’t yet but he says he wants to. And if he is serious about it it would be really easy to do. Since all our data is already recorded, as the person above explained.
Trump wants more surveillance of Muslim Americans. This in a country where internet privacy is already close to non-existent.
Trust.Zone has a free trial. Use it.
btw this post only has 11k notes? That’s quite disappointing for something this important.
Don’t reblog this post to save a life. Reblog this to protect an entire family!
@earth-ruins @writing-prompt-s Should I get trustzone for my mobile device?
If you use public Wi-Fi, then yes. Which VPN you use is up to you, amigo. Take @earth-ruins advice. Do your own research first.
@elvesfromthedeep just brought the current situation in the US to my attention (March 30, 2017).
Sources
Anger as US internet privacy law scrapped
Congress just voted to let internet providers sell your browsing history
To all my friends in the US, please read this entire post. Making everyone aware of VPNs is going to be my mission. Your privacy matters. Please reblog this post.
Don’t tell me you just wanted to scroll past this. Stop looking at pictures of cats for a moment, okay? Don’t you realize how important this is? This is dangerous! ‘America, the best FREE country in the world’ my ass.
With this new law your ISP can sell your Internet history which could include passwords, usernames, religion, credit card numbers, race and much more to the highest bidder. So here is what I want you to do. You are going to read the whole thing and before you think ’this is so important. Let me reblog this real quick and go back to admiring cats again-’ NO! Don’t reblog this. Take action first. Then reblog. Sign up for a free trial! Trust.Zone offers one (here). Yes. It might be difficult to set up a VPN for some people. But is that going to stop you from protecting yourself and your family? 30 minutes. 30 minutes is all that it takes. 5 if you know how to install software. The problem with some of you is that you see ‘difficult’ as something negative. I want you to see difficult differently. I need you to push through this stuff. You are going to protect yourself. There is nothing negative about that. VPNs are fun and costsaving too! A VPN bypasses geographical restrictions so you can access websites you normally can’t or you could start Netflix’s one month free trial over and over again- forever. And it’s legal! (unless you use it to buy weapons etc.,) Don’t tell yourself that you are too tired and that you will do this tomorrow. Because that isn’t going to happen and you know it. You have to do this right now. You only have to click on it. Don’t let this/shit/life just happen to you. Take yourself seriously. Get a VPN.
Privacy is not a privilege, it’s a fundamental human right
I use TrustZone myself; I seriously recommend them! Their prices are great, too, so if you want to keep using TrustZone and you’re financially able to, DEFINITELY GET A SUBSCRIPTION. IT IS AN EXCELLENT VPN!!
Jesus, i just wanted camp camp stuff on my dash, but your blog is just discourse??
I am on a rant streak right now and I was gonna get rid of it in the morning tbh but I can go delete that garbage.
my bad, y’all! the scourge has been removed and the dragon’s wrath has been sated. Y’all should be safe for the next four and a half years or so
little vent
literally somebody just told me to ‘be decent and block people who disagree with you’ and uhm??? that‘s not how the world works???? who hurt you?????
Preston: *smiles from across the lunch room*
Max: *slams hand down on the table* That's fucking it, I'm killing him
Neil: Or you could grow some balls and ask him out
Max: K-Killing... is easier
Mangoes
Word Count: 498 Prompt: ‘mangoes‘ Max is 22, Preston is 26.
“Preston, if I come home from school one more time and the kitchen smells—” “Chris recommended it,” Preston interrupted, plugging in the blender as Max peered into the kitchen. “Could you get anymore hipster teenage girl?” Max raised an eyebrow. “You’re making a fruit smoothie?”
this is the perfect grade of good luck
reblog in 5 seconds and all of your grades will inch ever closer to perfect
You can stop saying that cartoon fan art and fanfiction is “illegal” now.
And before you cry about anyone “supporting pedophilia!!!”, the point here is that what you’re complaining about (aka, shipping teenage cartoon characters, which has been a thing for decades) IS NOT PEDOPHILIA. Literally no one else has ever even considered it to be that before, and you’re abusing what that word means.
According to the 18 U.S. Code § 2256 (yes, the same code that antis have been using a screencap of, but omitting the last part of in order to conceal the truth):
“The term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.”
Also note the phrase “recognizable as an actual person” in 9ii.
(For real though–I have to laugh if you’re gonna tell me cartoons and anime characters look like real human beings. Like, who the fuck has eyes the size of fists and heads the size of pumpkins??? You guys are idiots…)
This is also further upheld by the Supreme Court ruling of Ashcroft vs Free Speech Coalition, and again in Ashcroft vs American Civil Liberties Union (the PROTECT Act has also had related portions–specifically 1466A, which antis love to parade around–judged as unconstitutional on a federal level, as was a result of United States v. Handley, in which the defendant was convicted due to a guilty plea bargain, and not actually convicted on the initial charges of obscenity. The plea bargain was made under the belief that the jury chosen to judge him would not acquit him of the obscenity charges if they were shown the images in question). Handley’s case is the only one so far that dealt solely with drawings of characters that did not exist in real life (as in, without further discovery of more serious content in the defendant’s possession–or ties to illegal sites–which is what occurred with other cases that antis tend to cite).
Also:
13-17-year-olds (aka minors) only make up 15% of this site’s user base. Meanwhile, the site has always allowed adult content. This means that staff is trusting you to browse appropriately, and to take responsibility for your browsing using the tools they have given to you (like blocking, and filtering search results). They are allowing you to be here under the assumption that you are mature enough to handle it. Your behavior is only showing staff that they might want to raise the minimum age limit (which is 17+ for mobile users, by the way). When faced with the choice of either trying to monitor/control millions of people, or simply adding a new age limitation, a company will always choose the easier option. Don’t ruin the site for all the teens that aren’t huge, easily-offended pissbabies.
No, fiction does not affect reality the way you want to believe. The statistics for rape, child abuse, assault, murder, etc. have all experienced a dramatic decline over the past few decades, in spite of our media becoming more graphically violent, and pornography being more easily accessible. Your logic just doesn’t hold up to the facts (by the way, this also applies to stories with mature themes like rape or murder, or stories with abusive or taboo relationships. IT’S JUST FICTION, PEOPLE. It’s a reflection of various aspects of our humanity, which includes the things we most fear. Writing and reading about them is one way we can strip them of that fear and power they hold over us. It doesn’t mean we stop recognizing those things as morally wrong–it’s just a way of reconciling their existence, and coping with it).
No, children wouldn’t find truckloads of porn in Google’s Safe Search. In fact, for most fandoms, you’ll have a hard time finding adult content even with Safe Search OFF. Google tailors its results to your browsing. If you’re finding “problematic” content, all that proves is that you were searching for it in the first place.
The internet is not a babysitter. Small children shouldn’t be on it unsupervised to begin with. If you wouldn’t let them go to a heavily crime-ridden neighborhood by themselves, then they shouldn’t be online by themselves. Public spaces are not “safe”. It’s not the job of millions of strangers to constantly look out for other people’s children (nor are they obligated to look out for you, for that matter). That’s the responsibility of their PARENTS. PERIOD.
An abuser can groom a victim without ever using anything sexual whatsoever. It’s about trust. It can be something as simple as an interest in model airplanes–does that make those “problematic”? As for those abusers, chances are that they’re not some random stranger on the internet, but someone known to the victim. You may not want to hear this, but the greatest threat to children statistically? It’s their own mothers.
Antis only came about within the past two years. Before that, there was no real drama in fandoms beyond the occasional shipping war, which no one treated like anything but a shipping war. You are the ones that made fandoms toxic. Fan art and fanfiction didn’t affect any of us the way you’re claiming before. Hell–people have been sexualizing cartoons for literally as long as they’ve existed. That’s almost 100 fucking years, and it hasn’t caused a goddamn thing. You’re abusing and trivializing extremely serious issues in order to use as leverage to threaten and silence others, and you bloody well know it. You choose the things that you’re aware that everyone hates: Pedophilia, abuse, etc. You know that just mentioning these things causes an instant knee-jerk reaction–one that few people will bother to look into beyond the initial claim. You’re deliberately emotionally manipulating others. Those are the tactics of abusers (and don’t even say “UM you’re calling survivors abusers!!”, because those who have been abused are the biggest demographic at risk for becoming abusers. No, it doesn’t mean every abused child grows up to be an abuser, but the number of serial killers that were abused as children is hard to ignore).
Adult content of fictional characters could actually help prevent cases of child sexual abuse. But then, we all know this was never about children for any anti, or you wouldn’t limit your concern to just the cartoons that you’re personally interested in. Honestly, I would think you’d be more concerned about the fact that sites like Pornhub and Redtube require no age verification, account, password, or credit card to access.
Point blank: What you are doing is called “crying wolf”, and it has real consequences. For example: Anti-vaxxers. All it took was one man claiming a link between vaccines and autism, and now diseases like polio are turning up again because of people who refuse to vaccinate their children. If you make claims of pedophilia where it doesn’t actually exist, you are hurting legitimate claims of pedophilia.
So, anyway, if you could stop accusing teenage girls (yes, the majority of the people you’re harassing are young women–usually minors themselves) of being “pedophiles” over something that’s 100% legal (which is shaming them during a period of their life where they’re using fan art and fanfiction as a safe means of exploring their own sexuality, and is honestly misogynistic as hell of you), and that was going on long before you came along without any issue, that’d be super.
Oh, and by the way–if you choose to falsely accuse another user of pedophilia, that IS enough of a violation of the Terms of Service for staff to delete your account. I’d tell you to just ask “bipolaramyrose”, but well…she no longer has an account for that very reason.
I’m going to tag a few blogs that may be interested in this:
@educating-antis, @shippingisnotactivism, @shipwhateveryouwant, @antisdontdoshit, @antiantis-saltmine
Feel free to tag anyone else you think might find this useful. Lemme know what tags I should add to the bottom for better exposure as well.
I want to see this post everywhere. I especially want to see this post on the blog of people who have ever reblogged a piece of erotica/sexually explicit content. It’s time to give back to the artists who have provided for you – regardless of their preferred medium. This is the least you can do, to speak for them when militant groups are trying to silence them. Especially on platforms like Tumblr, ideas can spread like wildfire, and the pervasive appropriation of criminal terminology for the sake of censoring content needs to stop.
Whoever has used criminal terminology in an attempt to discredit legally permissible content is implicit in watering down important definitions and creating opportunity for the ‘normalization’ these users are trying to prevent. Every instance of ‘calling out’ someone over legally permissible content and falsely accusing them of criminal behavior is an instance of ‘libel’. (As mentioned above.) If you take an extremist stance on fictional content, you’re doing demonstrably more harm than good. You need to stop. It needs to stop.
Here are some free-form posts (partially sourced) I’ve written regarding the subject, and related subjects:
„Antis will not, ever, be held responsible for their own consumption of problematic content, no matter which level or iteration we’re talking about.“ – A post regarding how the way Antis think content is spread and affects people is highly flawed.
„More often than not (on Tumblr especially), it’s always about someone’s personal agenda, and what they want - and if they can’t have it, and if not everyone wants the same, they’ll fucking come for whoever wants something else.“ – A post about the logical structure behind ‘shipping discourse’.
„That’s not just accusing someone of thoughtcrime, that’s accusing someone of being a criminal, because crime exists as a concept. That’s some next-level moral policing.“ – A post on how the criticism ‘aging up fictional characters’ receives is inherently flawed.
„Fictional characters aren’t real people. Real people law doesn’t apply to them. You need to understand this.“
– Regarding ‘pedophilia’ discourse specifically, and how it creates an overwhelming amount of ‘alarm fatigue’ among Tumblr’s userbase. (That’s bad. That’s real bad. You’re essentially enabling actual predators to slip through the cracks.):
A thread specifically about the definitions of ‘pedophilia’, and the importance of consent. A thread specifically about how the effect fiction has on people is misunderstood and misrepresented, also frank talk about ‘grooming’ statistics.
A thread about how censorship is already affecting large swaths of LGBT+ content creators.
„Shipping is amoral. Every single instance of it, whether generally considered ‘good’, or ‘bad’. Theoretical concepts are amoral.“ – A post regarding how theoretical concepts can’t be judged on the same basis as actions.
„It took 1333 words to determine whether ’fiction influences reality’ is a statement that could be true, and the conclusion I came to without referencing any proof whatsoever and treating it as a ‘simple’ logical problem is … inconclusive. It’s too vague, too depending on many factors to be generally true.“ – A post further deconstructing ‘fiction affects reality’ rhetoric.
„Propositions for studies like these also don’t attract sponsors/funding. The thing is – and this might be naive – that alone to me is an indicator for how important or relevant the subject actually is. That’s quite the mouthful, and I realize as much. Yet, when the assumed outcome is a 'null hypothesis’, I feel that says something about the hypothesis itself.“ – A post regarding studies centered around the idea how and if 'fiction affects reality’.
And here’s a brief introduction to LIBEL LAW – just in case any one of you want to sue the people making false accusations. I also included links to legal sources for those with limited or low income. Some pro-bono lawyers specialize in 'cyber bullying’, which all of this bullshit absolutely falls under.
Every single argument used by 'Antis’ has been proven wrong or flawed over, and over, and over, and over, and over again. By others, by common sense, by basic logic, by science, by law. They still cling to their aggressive rhetoric and spread it with a complete disregard for the health and safety of other users, because they want to police and control shared content according to their own wants and needs. It’s a selfish, ignorant, hostile and harmful movement.
If you know all this, if you’re aware of all this, and you still choose to subscribe to their ideology, then I don’t know what to tell you – other than that your future self will be ashamed of your present actions.
The 'Anti’ mindset creates a community where aggressive bullying has become an accepted norm, where criminal terminology is being abused to slander innocent individuals, where words lose all meaning because their definition depends on individual motivation and intent, where death threats are frequent and just as often dismissed as a 'joke’ – over what amounts to mere words and lines on paper. This is the most toxic Tumblr has ever been.
See the problem is,people use ‘it’s fictional so it’s not pedophilia’ to justify supporting rule 34 of underage characters. Which isn’t illegal, at least not everywhere, but it’s super gross, and is still pedophilia.
See, the real problem is – I don’t know what you mean. You have to be more specific. There are several issues with what you said:
„‘it’s fictional so it’s not pedophilia’“
No one says that. Literally no one in their right mind says that. What is being said is that fiction doesn’t have a significant effect on reality – which is absolutely, demonstrably true. It certainly hasn’t a quantifiable or lasting effect on our perception of right and wrong, and it really doesn’t make us any more likely to commit any crime. The suggested effect fiction might have – that it turns the reader of 'problematic’ content into a ticking time bomb – is ridiculous. It’s completely unscientific and has been proven as such many times over.
If fiction deals with the subject of pedophilia (a person being attracted to a prepubescent child), the content might still be, well, that – but that doesn’t automatically make the author a pedophile, and it doesn’t automatically make the reader a pedophile. That’s not how that works. That never has been how that works, and it never will be. No matter how 'problematic’ your interests when it comes to fiction, they don’t determine how you view those issues in real life.
„rule 34 of underage characters“
– is fine, as long as the characters are not depicted as prepubescent. Also, what do you mean when you say 'characters’? Personally, I’m excluding characters when they’re characters in a movie – meaning: when they’re actors. I’m excluding real people. Entirely fictional characters, and characters played by real people are two completely different subjects.
„Which isn’t illegal, at least not everywhere, but it’s super gross, and is still pedophilia.“
The legality is entirely debatable and differs a lot – especially because I don’t know what you’re talking about specifically. If the characters are depicted as prepubescent-looking, then yes, the legality varies greatly. If they’re not, then the question is rather whether sexually explicit material is legal at all in the respective countries. If the character isn’t depicted as prepubescent-looking, it’s not simulated CP. That’s just how it works, and it’s how it has to work.
Also, if the characters aren’t specifically depicted as prepubescent-looking, and they’re rather depicted as having reached late adolescence or adulthood, then there’s nothing inherently 'gross’ about it. Artists – visual artists and writers alike – are usually reasonably capable of dealing with the subject respectfully, or even informatively. Sexually explicit material often gets an outrageously bad reputation, because people don’t understand it. Solely judging that material from a perspective of 'sexualization’ and 'objectification’ is absolutely insufficient and dishonest.
Finally, it’s not pedophilia, when it isn’t pedophilia. We can’t just randomly label things as such. Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children. That’s what pedophilia is. Creating sexually explicit works featuring underage characters isn’t pedophilia, unless the characters are prepubescent – but then it’s not pedophilia, it’s simulated CP. Those terms aren’t interchangeable, either. A work of fiction can deal with the subject of pedophilia, and that doesn’t even require it to be sexually explicit, and even if it is sexually explicit, it’s not automatically simulated CP (this is where Obscenity Law specifically comes into play). I know, that sentence was quite the journey, but you absolutely need to understand.
Be that as it may, I’m just going to allow myself to get a little personal – you’re one to talk. It took a couple scrolls down your blog to find a couple of gifs of young-looking anime girls grabbing each other’s bare chests. So, the “”“rules”“” don’t apply to you, I guess. This is what fucks me up the most about all this. Discourse is overall so incredibly dishonest. Especially when it’s about sexually explicit material, or kink, or anything related. It’s unquestionably performative. I’m going to guess that 60-80% of anti-NSFW hardliners have separate blogs where they follow NSFW artists/etc. Historically, that’s how repression works – being viciously vocal and condemning those 'gross’ depictions of sexual intimacy (for example), while secretly indulging in the very thing.
oh, hello there new follower! very nice to meet you
??? okay that’s weird, and they followed one after the other. maybe the same person has two viking blogs? but why would a viking blog be following m–
w h a t
OKAY WHAT THE HECK I WAS WONDERING WHY THIS SIMPLE ASK GOT SO MANY NOTES AND THEN
THERE ARE MORE
W H Y A R E T H E R E M O R E
Are these the new porn bots? Viking Bots?
GIMMIE THE VIKING BOTS
reblog in 15 seconds or you will never be followed by a blessed viking bot
Yup im talking about this…
NET NEUTRALITY!
WE NEED TO SPEAK UP!
JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE SAYS,
If we don’t speak up…
Bye bye, fandoms 👋
Bye bye, Memes 👋
Bye bye, fanart 👋
Bye bye, fanfics👋
SO PUT #netneutrality and reblog!
WE HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 14TH!
“hey can I make fanart for your fic?”
yes
“hey can I make fic for your fanart?”
yes
“hey can I-”
the answer is yes and I’m probably screaming on my end of the computer because someone thinks my stuff is cool so please send me the thing you make
Truth
Truuuuuuuuth
This is glorious and even thought it doesn’t fit in the range of all the paranormal, I MUST share
It works like this: You tell Kitestring that you’re in a dangerous place or situation, and give it a time frame of when to check in on you. If you don’t reply back when it checks your status, it’ll alert your emergency contacts with a custom message you set up.
It doesn’t require you to touch anything (like bSafe) or shake your phone (like Nirbhaya) to send the distress signal. Kitestring is smarter, because it doesn’t need an action to alert people, it needs inaction.
MORE INFORMATION
reblogging because this is seriously amazing.
This shouldn’t even be an app this should be an integrated feature into all phones on every OS
Ok, guys. Thi is really important. You have to reblog that and read the whole article.
This will never happen to me. You can’t tell. Otherwise, if you don’t want to do for yourself, maybe among your follwers someone need this information.
I’m a man, i don’t care. You should care the more. What if it was your sister? Again, spread the word. There may be someone needingths.
You can never tell. As far as we can’t handle back maniacs, PLEASE, prevent yourself <3
Safety is important
Stay safe
If you need this. It seems like a great option
Stay safe everyone, I hope this helps someone in need of it
even more random series of prompts
“Or, you know, you can not be boring and help me.“
"HAH, you’re as alone as I am!"
"911? Yes, I’d like to report a loser."
"See you in prison, pal!"
"Thank god, I thought you were serious for a second there."
"That got a lot more complicated than it needed to be."
"Do I look like a cat to you?!"
"Know this; I have all the baggage."
"Time to ruin everything."
"Did you know you have enough bones in your body to make a skeleton?” (B: “…Please stop talking.”)
“Well this is a predicament."
"I built this town with my bare hands."
"Are you labeling me? And not in the metaphorical fashion, you are literally putting a label on me."
"Is this what it’s like being average?"
"That sigh was a lot louder than I intended it to be."
"Hold me."
"Hasta la vista, jackass."
"This can’t be real."
"I’m a romantic, I know ALL the pick-up-lines. Every single one."
"Well isn’t this tubular?!"
"They deny it, but they have no idea what they’re doing."
"Quick, hide me!”
please
I will write anything as long as it’s camp camp and gay bois
this is the money ammy. reblog for blessed funds
small change chibiterasu to charge!!!
now THIS is a money spell post I can get behind!
h.... h-h..... hOOEY
NOOOO!!!!!!
HOOEY!!!!!
YEAH HOOEY!
(insert Nerris picking up Davey) HOOEY!!!!!
*oh no he’s started chanting* Hooey! Hooey! Hooey!
*she starts chanting with him* Hooey! Hooey! Hooey! Hooey!!
WHO WANTS TO JOIN THE HOOEY BRIGADE
i’ll join the hooey brigade!!
*he picks up the ex-floof and puts them on his shoulders. Boom triple stack* OUR CAUSE GROWS STRONGER @ask-miss-nerris !!!
??????
Shhhh...do not question the Hooey for it is a power you cannot hope to grasp...
What happened to me!??! I don't like hooey anymore!? -davey
What????
I think we’ve confused the non-believers
