What Jonathan Anderson has achieved at Loewe is remarkable. Excited to see what he’ll bring to Dior.
One Nice Bug Per Day
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Cosmic Funnies
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
$LAYYYTER
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Game of Thrones Daily
official daine visual archive
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Not today Justin
almost home
No title available
Today's Document
wallacepolsom
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Noah Kahan

tannertan36
Fai_Ryy
NASA
Xuebing Du
seen from Netherlands

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from Poland
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam

seen from Pakistan

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore
seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
@nouveaumirai
What Jonathan Anderson has achieved at Loewe is remarkable. Excited to see what he’ll bring to Dior.
Loewe: From the Palaces to the Provinces
The one percent of the one percent have always been aggressive in exerting their power—it is they who elevated dressing as a domestic ritual and legitimised fashion as the snob’s art form. Here, history is synonymous with authenticity, and the Spanish, who have surrendered their pride to exalted French glamour—Balenciaga is the country’s most stinging loss—continue to boast that Loewe bloomed from their very own earth. “There’s so much goodwill for Loewe in Spain,”says Jonathan William Anderson, the London-based designer who, in 2013, succeeded Stuart Vevers as Loewe’s creative director. “They see it as their only luxury brand, so they’re very protective of it.”Loewe was acquired by French luxury goods conglomerate LVMH in 1996; LVMH acquired a 46 per cent stake in Anderson’s company just two years ago. Vevers’ first catwalk presentation proposed aphotic fantasies of Gothic excess that displaced the little black dress and consecrated the leather black dress. He was inspired by the work of German photographer Chris von Wangenheim, in particular, a 1977 shot of Christie Brinkley and a shadowy mare that had originally appeared in Vogue—eroticised mammals, both leggy, of two very different kinds. This season, Anderson described his woman as “someone who wears the trousers,”though she won’t be able to conquer the feat without a dash of impiety.
Loewe (pronounced low-ay-vay) doesn’t loll on manic cheers of devotion, certainly not to the extent of its flashier siblings—Louis Vuitton, Givenchy and, perhaps now, Céline. The name isn’t easy to pronounce, the company suffers an atomised archive, and its biggest market outside Spain is Japan (a quick Google search for Australian stockists diverted me to a home electronics company of the same name). Loewe was established in 1846, in Madrid, with two royal marriages approaching. Isabell II of Bourbon, at just sixteen years old, was set to wed her distant cousin, the Duke of Cadiz. That very same day, the teenage royal’s younger sister, Princess Maria Luisa Fernanda, two years her junior, married French noble Antoine d’Orléans, Duke of Montpensier. A group of artisans exploited the momentous double wedding to hawk their wares, and, in 1879, were joined by Enrique Loewe Roessberg, a German craftsman who lent his name to the company (he is erroneously dubbed the founder, though, born in 1842, would have possessed audacious sleight of hand to yield a carving knife at four years old). In 1905, Loewe was declared the Official Supplier to the Spanish Court, then under the auspices of King Alfonso XIII. Loewe launched a small apparel line in 1965, just months before Yves Saint Laurent launched Rive Gauche. The ready-to-wear department was fully realised in the 1970s, and designers including Enrique Õna Selfa, Narciso Rodriguez, Giorgio Armani and Karl Lagerfeld—the first German since Loewe Roessberg to spearhead creative operations—have fattened the archives.
I wrote about J.W. Anderson’s recent work for Loewe. Read the rest on Manuscript.
Reversing, aestheticising, revisiting and reinventing some of the more obvious stereotypes not only restates them but above all reveals the conflicts of power and all the contradictions characterising relations between Western fashion and contemporary China.
Simona Segre Reinach, “China Chic: On Orientalism Revisited and the Presence of Soft Power.” Vestoj: On Fashion and Power (Issue Four)
two of the best
The problem is not simply that white people claim to know Asia, but that the Orientalist political economy of the fashion industry bestows their claims with an aura of authority that translates into profits, while foreclosing both possibilities for most Asians. The results is a 'sanitized encounter with an imagined Asian 'other'' that serves the interests of multinational capital by both generating profit and erasing, subduing, or containing alternative, potentially more threatening, aspects of cultural and racial difference.
Anna Marie Leshkowich and Carla Jones, "What Happens When Asian Chic Becomes Chic in Asia?" Fashion Theory, 2003
Fashion...is a power-laden endeavor that can be used to communicate myriad forms of hierarchical difference. It performs the doubled and ideologically necessary task of visually displaying power structures while denying inequities in access to power through a discourse of beauty and art. These differences become especially acute when mapped onto racialized cultural differences. [Jennifer] Craik argues that fashion operates through the creation and manipulation of 'exoticism,' which she defines as pertaining to 'the enticing, fetishized quality of a fashion or style, or to foreign or rare motifs in fashion.' The very premise of fashion...justifies an appropriation of the novel, often from spaces of Otherness
Anjali Vats and LeiLani Nishime, "Containment as Neocolonial Visual Rhetoric" Quarterly Journal of Speech, 2013
Great cover of The New Review from today’s Independent. Article of the spectacle of McQueen’s shows based on my V&A catalogue essay. That’s alright too.
Why are people commercializing Alexander McQueen’s life. He’s become an icon of tragedy and creator of beauty in the fashion industry - someone that everyone will desire to know more and consume. A play about him seems unnecessary though. I understand books about his life (although now everyone seems to be writing books about him and the collection is growing every year, which I’m not quite sure if that’s even necessary). But someone explain to me why a play.
Why
It used to be that our consumption was tightly controlled by a few big corporate beasts. We were their captive audience; they knew who we were, our appetites seemed predictable enough and so they all fed us much the same thing. Now however, they’ve emerged blinking into a new environment populated by many different species, each of which seems to want different things… Survival in this new terrain, however, is not of the fittest but of those with the best fit with their environment. More than anything, it depends on finding something you feel strongly about and cultivating it. Find a clear niche and you make it fantastically easy for people to find you. Fail to do so and you risk ending up on the list of endangered species.
James Harkin, "Niche: Why the Market No Longer Favours the Mainstream" (2011)
デザイナー、ニコラ・ゲスキエールのルイヴィトン
ルイヴィトンの新しいアーティスティックディレクターに昨年指名されたニコラ・ゲスキエール氏は、19世紀にさかのぼる歴史を持つルイヴィトンの伝統を継承し探求しつつ、将来に向け自身のデザインへのこだわりを保守している。ゲスキエール氏はバレンシアガの元デザイナー。
MASTER OF THE HOUSE: Ghesquière was appointed artistic director of Louis Vuitton’s women’s collections last year.
nicolas ghesquière innovates at the legendary house of louis vuitton. nicolas ghesquière photographed by jamie hawkesworth for wsj magazine.
I DID NOT EXPECT THIS I can’t entirely connect Galliano with MMM, especially in relation to the image of the brand as well as in comparison to Martin Margiela himself. This is so unexpected and such an interesting match, Galliano’s comeback with MMM will definitely be something to look forward to (in both positive and worrisome light, I suppose, in that Galliano has returned to fashion and hopefully he does not hinder the image/style associated to MMM).
but i'm crying at all the shows Choi Sora has been walking this season
I have often spoken of what I call the inadequate imagery of today’s civilization. I have the impression that the images that surround us today are worn out; they are abused and useless and exhausted. They are limping and dragging themselves behind the rest of our cultural evolution. When I look at the postcards in tourist shops and the images and advertisements that surround us in magazines or I turn on the television, or if I walk into a travel agency and see those huge posters with that same tedious image of the Grand Canyon on them, I truly feel there is something dangerous emerging here. …As a race we have become aware of certain dangers that surround us. We comprehend, for example, that nuclear power is a real danger for mankind, that over-crowding of the planet is the greatest of all. We have understood that the destruction of the environment is another enormous danger. But I truly believe that the lack of adequate imagery is a danger of the same magnitude. It is as serious a defect as being without memory. What have we done to our images? What have we done to our embarrassed landscapes? I have said this before and will repeat it again as long as I am able to talk: if we do not develop adequate images we will die out like dinosaurs.
— Werner Herzog
Kim Won Joong by Hong Jang HyunㅣWild Magazine May 2014
Digital avatars or virtual humans produced through 3D body scanning and animation software to replace models. (ScienceDaily, Dazed & Confused)
It's a fascinating technological development, but it's a scary thought that technology is becoming more and more powerful and that attempts are constantly being made to replace human activity. Removing any human hand/labour/action with digital, robotic minds is worrisome. I don't think it could totally remove us from what we are doing or completely overrule our jobs. It will need a lot of time for such innovation to really take over the fashion industry or performing arts or sports, as mentioned in the article. I don't know how advanced the avatars may be, but I just can't get my head around the idea of watching a runway with un-human beings who doesn't have the "real" mind and "real" behaviourial characteristics as that of a human (although this can be argued that avatars are created from imitations of humans, but that's more discussion). But it's something to think about, I'm still not sure about this.
So Ra Choi
This job is about challenge. It's about changing and moving [...] You have to be very curious and take in as much as you can, but stay true to yourself and don't compare yourself, because you're different, and that's what will make your work unique. Keep an open mind, be creatively flexible and be patient. If you have to spend time answering the phone, just answer the phone in the best way you can - eventually people will notice. You have to use what you have and then maximise it. That will earn you people's trust. It doesn't come easily.
Marie Chaix, Stylist (BoF)