The director Joel Schumacher has passed away, and everyone’s reactions have boiled down to two topics: 1.) “He was the guy who made the bad Batman films,” and 2.) “Hey, he did lots of great films besides the bad Batman films!”
Thing is… I get it. I remember being a teenage comic fan in the 90’s. Not just any comics: especially Batman! But ESPECIALLY Bart especially Two-Face. I remember how “Joel Schumacher” was a name that could invoke white-hot rage in myself and everyone in the fandom. He was our modern equivalent of Dr. Fredrick Wertham, the boogyman who had (far as we were concerned) single-handedly destroyed the mainstream credibility of superheroes.
Look at that picture, and try to imagine that this was the face so loathed and mocked by Batman fanboys in the 90′s.
Never mind that Schumacher didn’t WRITE the Batman films. The main credit for that goes to Akiva Goldsman, who has gone on to win an Oscar and continues to find A-list success despite ruining other geek properties like Jonah Hex and Dark Tower. Never mind that Schumacher was at the mercy of producers who wanted the movies to be nothing more than merchandise machines and toy commercials. No, Schumacher was the only name associated with the films, and he was cast at the villain.
The fact that he was openly gay played no small part in making him an easy target.
One year after the disastrous release of the infamous Batman & Robin, the beloved fan-favorite cartoon Batman: The Animated Series (then rebranded as The New Batman Adventures on the WB network) produced an episode that featured a pointed jab at Schumacher. The episode was titled “Legends of the Dark Knight,” a reworking of a classic 70’s Batman tale where a group of kids share their own ideas of what the mysterious Batman is really like.
Halfway through the episode, the kids are overheard by another kid, who shares his own ideas about Batman. The kid, whose name is Joel, has long dirty-blond hair, and works in front of a store which bear the sign “Shoemaker,” despite clearly being a department store. He waxes dreamily about the reasons he loves Batman: “All those muscles, the tight rubber armor and that flashy car. I heard it can drive up walls!”
This last line–a reference to a silly bit in Batman Forever–he says as he flamboyantly tosses a pink fur stole around his neck. To drive home the joke, one of the kids dismisses, “Yeah, sure, Joel.”
At the time, it seemed like a cathartic joke for us REAL Batman fans. Now, it’s clearly just cheap and gross. Instead of any actual criticism about the films, Joel Schumacher was just seen–even if just subconsciously–as the fruit who ruined Batman.
Over time, the hatred for Schumacher lessened. Starting with Blade, X-Men, and Spider-Man, on through to Batman Begins, Iron Man, and onward, superhero movies became huge mainstream successes, with greater fidelity to the source material than most adaptations we saw up to the time that Schumacher “killed” the superhero movie. There was no point in hating him anymore, if there ever was (again, Goldsman more deserves that ire, if you’re gonna be angry about anyone. Why does he still get work?! WHY IS HE NOW WRITING FOR STAR TREK?!?!).
But even still, especially among Millennial and Gen-X fans, Schumacher is still–at best–considered a low point for fandom. Even though the same generations have come to appreciate and love some of his other films, such as The Lost Boys, Phone Booth, and the chillingly-prescient Falling Down, there’s still this need for people to dismiss the Batman films as embarrassments that are best forgotten in favor of Schumacher’s better films. And if they’re to be remembered at all, it’s to trash them all over again in a tone suggesting that the films are objectively, irredeemably bad.
Except they’re not. Oh sure, if you go in looking for a grim and gritty capital-M “Mature” take on Batman, of course you’ll hate them, just like you probably also hate the Adam West Batman show. Remember, that show also used to be hated by decades of Batman fans because of how it didn’t take the comics seriously.
… except it did. The show was VERY faithful to the Batman comics of the 50’s, which often out-weirded and out-sillied its TV counterpart. If anything, the show made some of those stories even more entertaining with camp value and jokes that added different levels of enjoyment to the adults watching. Comic fans resented how Batman became a pop culture joke, and increasingly fought against anything that was colorful and campy (which makes me wonder if this might also be related to latent homophobia). Whether or not they admitted/realized it, the Batman fans of the 70’s and 80’s carried a chip on their shoulder about a show that DARED to make Batman FUN.
And really… how is that any different than Schumacher’s two films?
You don’t have to agree, but I think Schumacher’s films are fun. I think Batman Forever is highly entertaining, that Tommy Lee Jones and Jim Carrey are bringing their hammy A-games as much respected actors like Burgess Meredith and Caesar Romero brought to their roles. Same goes for Arnold and especially Uma in Batman and Robin. They KNOW what movies they’re in, and they’re all having a blast.
(How many of us remember the exact line Eddie says at this moment? I bet you probably do too, which should tell you something about how memorable this movie is)
Now, BF and particularly B&A are by no means GOOD movies, but you can’t tell me that you couldn’t have a blast putting the latter on at a party and riffing it with friends. It’s not a pretentious, ponderous, self-serious slog like, say, the shit Zack Snyder cranked out (apologies to the one or two cool Snyder fans here, I just find his films interminable). Even besides the many things I could say to defend Schumacher’s Batman films (that’s a whole other essay), you can’t say they were boring. They were entertaining, even if on a level of making fun of the film, and that is NOT as easy as it looks.
Let me put it to you this way: Batman Forever has, objectively, one of the worst takes on Two-Face I’ve ever seen. He’s one-note, he’s kind of a rehash of Nicholson’s Joker, he gets completely overshadowed by the Riddler, he gets killed by Batman in a way that completely betrays the whole “DON’T KILL HARVEY” arc with Robin, and worst of all, he CHEATS on the coin toss. That alone would be enough for me to condemn this depiction in any other Two-Face story.
And yet, even I–the most passionate, opinionated, and picky Two-Face fan you will EVER know–still have a soft spot for Tommy Lee Jones’ take on ol’ Harv. He’s just too fun, too flamboyant, too damn extra not to love. If only all bad takes on Two-Face could be this fun!
But that’s the thing: it’s not because the script was good. Oh god no. I’ve read the script, and if it were put on the page like a comic, I would have hated it just like any other bad Two-Face comic. I have to imagine that, as director, Joel Schumacher deserves the bulk of the credit for pushing the restrained and laconic Tommy Lee Jones into that oversized performance, and making it a delight to watch despite everything it does wrong.
I’m rare for my generation to have learned how to stop worrying and love Schumacher’s Batman. But the younger generation, the up-and-coming Gen-Zs getting into Batman, don’t share the same grudges we did. There’s a genuine, shame-free enjoyment of those films among The Kids, many of whom are LGBTQA+, who love the jokes, the silliness, the camp, the Freeze puns, the swag of Uma Thurman, and the homoerotic subtext between Two-Face and the Riddler. Maybe it’s just a reaction to so much GRIM, SERIOUS shit that DC and their fanboys are trying desperately to push even today.
But comics–especially Batman–have a long history of colorful, stupid, fun shit. Schumacher’s films carried on in that tradition, and they should be appreciated on their own merits by those of us who aren’t limited by narrow ideas of what Batman “should” be, and who still remember how to have fun.
Schumacher’s Batman films should no longer be seen as embarrassments. They didn’t ruin superheroes. They didn’t ruin Batman. They didn’t even ruin Two-Face. Nor should they be disregarded in favor of Falling Down, like losers in a respectability competition. They’re fun. They’re entertaining. And they didn’t pretend to be anything else.
And if you still think they’re bad… I mean, objectively, you’re not wrong! But be mindful of the reasons WHY you think they’re bad, because on another subjective level, you may not be right either. And it’s certainly not worth holding a geek-grudge over after twenty-five years.
ellievsbear
romaincrisis
tangentwithtanner
origamiaround
