Two very different statements:
JD:
*talks about: him, his children, his family, others, fellow survivors of abuse no matter the gender; then goes on to thank everyone working in the courts & his legal team; Goal: truth*
AH:
*talks about: her, JD, other women abuse survivors (aka #MeToo who she is still hiding behind), JD's legal team, the UK trial, her & by implications all Americans since now this is another group of people she is lobbying to be the figurehead of apparently but basically HER); Goal: her freedom of speech*
You don't even need to see the "mountain of evidence" (girl, what mountain of evidence? pictures of him sleeping & a video of him slamming kitchen cabinet doors shut?). It's very clear right here who was the survivor (and views themselves as someone whose mission is the truth no matter how they might look in its light) and who was the actual abuser (and views themselves as the victim and whose goal was not the truth but to be able to say what they wanted to say, not happy at all how they look in the light of the truth).
