Okay, so I live in the UK, where even the police rarely carry guns. Gun control works here. Gun crime is incredibly rare. There's a lot of knife crime, but you can't have a massacre with a knife, so that's an improvement.
…you can’t have a massacre with a knife…
William Unek - Killed 21 people with an axe.
Bai Ningyang - Killed 12 children with an axe.
Antakin - Killed 6 women with a knife.
25 dead and 115 injured from knife, hammer, and cleaver attacks in China
12 killed with a spear
12 dead in a knife attack
20 dead and 12 wounded, killer used bladed melee weapons.
16 killed, killer used a spear and a bolo knife.
33 Dead, 130 injured in China knife spree
The list goes on and on…
Hey. Isn’t your country the place where people were beheaded in the streets and everyone was forced to just stand by and watch because no one could do anything about it?
ho lee shit
I don’t even have that kind of stamina! How many people do any of us know, who wouldn’t have to train for a few months for a knife massacre?
>uses non Brit examples 😩
It’s still a good example of non-gun massacres
But not in the country with gun control. Gotta keep your bad arguments on target
Wait. Are you implying that China doesn’t have strict gun control?
Because they really do.
Furthermore what on earth does a country’s gun control laws have to do with the existence and prevalence of mass stabbing sprees?
Less gun control means more law abiding citizens carry weapons, because a law abiding citizen will use it TO ABIDE BY THE LAW. Simply put: dude with knife tries to stab people. Concealed carry holder sees him going crazy, shoots him before he can kill any more before the po-po get there. Same with dude going on shooting spree. In 2012/13, for instance (annual data is from September to September), British police recorded 871,712 crimes against persons, 54,509 sexual offenses, and 75,101 robberies in England and Wales. Based on the 2010 population of 55.6 million, this gives a staggeringly high violent crime rate of 1,797 offenses per 100,000 people. Whereas the United States has a higher number of violent acts committed, ours is still a lower rate per capita at 466 per 100,000 people.(Daily mail/citizensreportuk.org) My dude @therevenantrising cited some more stats from other countries that don’t allow personal defence weapons, and they show the same outcome. From these stats we get the following point: A society where an individual has to depend on the government for protection has more casualties than a society where the individual can fight for himself. It is more violent, and more law abiding citizens/victims are killed, injured, raped, or assaulted.
It's just a shame all your concealed-carrying capeless heroes don't seem to show up when some wanker starts shooting heaps of people...












