while it's great to see Jade come second without her full difficulty back and for Skye Blakely to come first in bars and beam it's not great that that the top gymnasts of this quad are basically the same people as two Olympics ago

if i look back, i am lost

pixel skylines
Cosimo Galluzzi

Product Placement

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Mike Driver
Sade Olutola

No title available
todays bird
One Nice Bug Per Day
occasionally subtle
noise dept.

#extradirty
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
🪼

Love Begins
ojovivo
EXPECTATIONS

Andulka

seen from Japan
seen from Nepal

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Peru

seen from Singapore
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from T1

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Bulgaria
seen from T1
@oneflexedfoot
while it's great to see Jade come second without her full difficulty back and for Skye Blakely to come first in bars and beam it's not great that that the top gymnasts of this quad are basically the same people as two Olympics ago
Take my gay cats, Tumblr!
This is part 1, the next part will be gender identity centered :)
many such foolish cases of things left unsaid :)
I'm in this picture and it's awkward.
"everyone should get more aromantic" can appeal to tumblr's sensibilities but I genuinely think everyone should also get more asexual. I don't mean everyone stop having sex, what I mean is
Sex is not essential. You can live without it. Full stop.
Not having sex isn't shameful or a sign of failure. It also doesn't make anyone boring.
You are not entitled to having sex with anybody and nobody is entitled to having sex with you.
Sex is not what makes someone an adult.
Nobody's worth is defined by how much sex they have or don't have.
Sex is not equally important to everyone.
You can have fulfilling and happy relationships without sex.
You should only have sex on your own terms, not because you feel like you owe it to someone, or because you feel like you'd be incomplete without it.
Know your boundaries around sex and be firm about them. Know how to respect other people's boundaries.
The previous point also applies when it comes to discussing sex. If someone doesn't wanna talk about it or hear about it you have to back down.
Anything can be sexual but not everything has to be sexual.
Sex should never be the most important part of a relationship. Someday, you will be elderly and unattractive and neither partner will have much of a sex drive. When that day comes, you'd better hope you have something else you love about your person besides sex and the way they look.
My partner and I have sex maybe once a month or less. Sure, we would love to have more but we both work full time at jobs that are physically demanding. Some people might be shocked by the lack of frequency, and I guarantee I have a far more fulfilling relationship physically, emotionally and intimately than some of these people have had in their whole lives. Why? Because sex has never been the most important part of our relationship and it never will be.
I think people could learn a lot about how to love a whole person from asexuals and I think people could learn a lot about the value of emotional intimacy in a non sexual context from aromantics/asexuals. Any relationship that is based primarily on physical attraction and sex is doomed to failure, probably hurting both parties a lot in the process.
I’m not Christian, I don’t go to church anymore, and my pastor died, but when he was alive I’d sometimes go to his sermons and I remember one time he said “it feels good to hate, but we know that it isn’t allowed, so when we’re told that we’re allowed to hate someone we get so excited that we forget we’re supposed to love”, and if my humble atheist ass might borrow some church talk I’d like to perhaps submit that
Anyhow sometimes on the day to day I feel disgust or revulsion and I have to ask myself “is this a danger to anyone at all or am I just looking for something I’m allowed to hate” and a solid 98/100 times it’s the latter so once again thank you pastor D
Some more sweet bangers from Pastor D
Following the rules of the church are less important than following the attitudes Jesus exemplified [in a debate about if it would be okay to break traditional rules and give the leftover loaf of communion bread to a hungry and poor attendee]
Don’t get so caught up in observing ceremonies and following traditions that you forget why they started to begin with
The words you use aren’t as important as what you mean when you use them [new kid was somehow wildly confused about his name and started respectfully calling him Batman]
There is one very important thing I need people without major dietary restrictions to understand: the distress caused by allergies, celiac disease, and other food restrictions is largely not about the food.
Do I miss some foods I can't eat anymore without getting sick? Sure, but that's not what really bothers me. What bothers me is being excluded from a huge portion of human social life of which food is a crucial component. What bothers me is the stress and social stigma of trying to figure out what I can safely eat. What bothers me is the amount of extra work and cost that is required of me to identify, obtain, and prepare safe foods. What bothers me is people treating my needs like a nuisance, as though I chose to be like this - as though their brief inconvenience to check an ingredients list is unreasonable, when I deal with this every day of my life forever.
I don't miss the food that much. I miss not having to worry about what I eat. I miss freedom. I miss when trying new foods and new restaurants was fun instead of a minefield. I miss not having to plan my entire life around the need for safe foods.
Food is such a basic human need, and a lot of people don't really need to think about it. When your danger foods can be anywhere and everywhere, suddenly your entire life revolves around avoiding them, and it massively sucks. You get used to it and it's not a big deal most of the time, but then you go to a new restaurant, or your office has a potluck, or you've been invited to a party and suddenly it feels just as miserable and exhausting as it ever has.
So much this. Eating outside my own home is exhausting with celiac disease. I miss being able to just eat whatever didn't offend my taste buds. I miss not needing to do extra research any time we're away from our town, to find safe food options (if there even are any).
I've become extra appreciative of the people in my life who are genuinely supportive. When we have to stop for food on a long drive and MIL goes to bat for me unasked: "my daughter is celiac; what can she eat here?". My D&D group who make a point of bringing snacks that are GF, checking ingredients at the table, and making sure I know which things I can't eat. My mother who likes to bake and doesn't hesitate to pivot to GF baking any time there's a chance I might share what she's made. My husband doing a cooking course and consulting with the instructor about making dishes GF where possible, so that I can eat some of the tasty things he's learning to make.
It doesn't repair comments like "I find this GF thing annoying" from people who should know better, or make meals prepared by other people/restaurants easier. But I know how much harder this would be if I didn't have those supportive people in my life.
BHS + LOSO + LOSO
Conection Value: 0.1
Serie Bonus: 0.1
Gymnast: Viktoria Komova
Why is this so mesmerising?
Artemis II launch tower view
Very cool to see from this angle.
That's us, together.
While we're looking up at the Artemis II astronauts journeying to the Moon, they're looking back home at us.
In this image, Earth peeks through the capsule window, reminding us that a view like this relies on the ingenuity and hard work of countless people back home.
In the second image, we see our home planet as a whole, lit up in spectacular blues and browns. A green aurora even lights up the atmosphere.
Follow the Artemis II astronauts on their journey to the Moon:
People are being so weird about Ilia Malinin performing the Bonaly at the Olympics.
Like I keep seeing people say "it's racism that this move is celebrated when a White boy does it but derided when a Black girl did it" and... Yeah 100% it was fucking racist how Surya Bonaly was treated at the Olympics but that's not Ilia Malinin's fault, he wasn't even born yet?
And I keep seeing people saying "how could everyone forget about Bonaly?" but like. Idk, I googled "Ilia Malinin backflip" and of the top five articles I got, four of them did in fact talk pretty significantly about Bonaly. The other one didn't talk much about Malinin's backflip at all, it talked about the components of his entire program. People aren't forgetting her.
The backflip wasn't banned because Bonaly did it. She did it because it was banned. The judges had made it clear that they were not going to judge her fairly because they were racist shitheads. She did the backflip to prove to the world she was the superior athlete in defiance of the rules. If the rules weren't going to be applied fairly to her, why should she follow them at all? Why not just do whatever the fuck she wanted to put on the best show she could? And that's what she did.
And then the rules changed and this Olympics is the first one since the rule change, and Malinin did the newly legal move, and that seems fine to me? But some people seem to think it's not fine?
I guess I just don't understand what people want to have happen instead. If you're upset that the rules changed and Malinin did the backflip and that people are excited about it, what did you want instead? Should the backflip have stayed illegal? Should it have become legal but then we should all be assholes to someone who does it like people were assholes to Bonaly? Idk how either of those options would bring her justice.
She was robbed and we can't change it. We can't go back in time and change that for her. It seems to me that recognizing that the move is a valid feat of athleticism that can be included in an Olympic program is a recognition of her legacy, not a derision of it. It seems to me that celebrating someone who can pull the move off now legally is a celebration of Bonaly's legacy. She should have gotten to do that, but she didn't, but now someone can, and we can celebrate that for both of them.
One of the authors of the articles I read even called Bonaly to ask her what she thinks. She's happy to see her backflip performed on Olympic ice. She said: "I broke ice for other skaters. Now everything is different."
I want justice for her. We can't go back in time and give her what she deserved. But I do think making her move legal so that maybe it can be seen and celebrated regularly is a little step toward justice, not away from it.
How do you process grief?
by running from it until it finds me in the middle of a sunny street on a beautiful day
prev had extremely beautiful and profound thoughts i had to share
Yeah, that’s it.
Grief always is a sucker punch to your heart.
I'm about to have a hot take and I would say it shouldn't be controversial but this is Tumblr so who knows.
A few weeks ago, I saw Jurassic Park for the first time, and there is a scene in there I think every aspiring filmwriter should be forced to watch and dissect. You may be thinking it's a Big Moment, like the timing on getting the power back on, or whatsisface IT guy shutting down the system to go steal embryos. You may think it's the kids and whatsisface who kinda looks like but isn't Harrison Ford* seeing the brontosauruses for the first time. Or the moment the first T-rex crashes the fence. But it's not any of those.
No, it's when Ellie finds Hammond in the dining room and he's eating whatever was supposed to be served for dessert and he's like "it was melting. I didn't want it to go to waste."
Because there is so much humanity in that line. It's not some big, grand theme statement. But I guarantee each and every one of us has been in a situation where life is going to hell in a handbasket for whatever reason, and we sit down and we may not be crying outwardly but we're screaming inside, and we wash the dishes. Or fold the laundry. Or eat the leftover Chinese so it won't be thrown away. We have exactly one point of control over one tiny little thing that seems (and often is) absolutely futile, and fuck it all, we need that control. Just for a moment. Just to feel something that isn't black screaming despair.
Hammond's guests and grandchildren are in grave danger. There is nothing he can do about it. Ellie's fiance is one of those guests. There's nothing she can do about it. They're in a severe thunderstorm in a place with mostly dirt roads in the middle of the night and all of the power is out and there are animals that dwarf skyscrapers outside. They. Can. Do. Nothing.
So they sit down and they eat the ice cream.
And then when Ellie says "it is good," Hammond just very quietly says "spared no expense."
His entire dream is in ruins. I know in the book he's more morally dubious, but in the movie I think he really genuinely believed he was doing something that could be wonderful and got stars in his eyes. In this moment he's grieving the potential loss of his grandchildren. The knowledge that even if (if!!) they survive, they will likely never see him the same way again--nor will his children. He's grieving because his beautiful dream has killed multiple people and he's realized he created a nightmare. He's grieving because he's in a hell of his own making and there's nothing he can do about any of this.
The animatronics are amazing, the CGI is top-notch (especially for its era), the story is solid, the cinematography is ace, but the moment that made that movie to me was that scene in the dining room lit only by the lightning, where two terrified human beings eat a dessert they almost certainly aren't really tasting, and say "it was melting" and "it is good" because if either of them says what they're really thinking, even breathes so much as a "do you think--", they will both scream until they go insane.
We've none of us faced dinosaurs run amok but we've all of us eaten the ice cream. And I think every prospective filmwriter out there, and a whole lot of shitty execs who wouldn't know a real emotion if it danced naked in front of a neon sign, need to see that scene and be forced to really sit with it.
I think movies would be the better for it.
*I would apologize for only learning half of these characters' and/or actors' names but frankly my facial recognition was already bad and has gotten worse in the last couple of years so you'll just have to deal with that.
Also.
Nothing actually important happens here. You could cut this scene entirely, and it wouldn't affect the audience's understanding of events. While there's some wonderful character exposition on the part of Dr. Hammond, it doesn't really tell us anything we don't know.
The "deleted scenes" reels of hundreds of movies are full of scenes like this, that were "removed for pacing reasons," because Hollywood seems to think that modern audiences will get bored if there's not an explosion every two and half minutes.
"there's room now" made me choke on my ginger ale
Amazing.
Hello new gym fan here, how are you watching this years worlds? Is it on YouTube?
qualifying was streamed on eurovision sport but i dont think any of the finals are. if you're in the US it's going to be live on peacock, which i have a login for. i dont know where else it will be or if there's a bootleg stream, hopefully someone else on here can help point you in the right direction? pretty please?
I'm watching on YouTube after the fact since I can't watch live.
WAG quals have been uploaded by MostepanovaFan:
Share your videos with friends, family, and the world
And here is the MAG All-Around Final:
Crochet beholder dice bag for a dear friend. ❤️