Carl Sagan - Cosmos, 1980.
cherry valley forever
No title available

tannertan36

Andulka
todays bird

PR's Tumblrdome
noise dept.

No title available

oozey mess
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Origami Around

Janaina Medeiros

JBB: An Artblog!
taylor price
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Game of Thrones Daily

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

JVL

No title available
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Hungary

seen from United States

seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
@pearsinatree
Carl Sagan - Cosmos, 1980.
Tokyo Story (1953) Yasujiro Ozu
THIS FLAMENCO SINGER GETS IT
CRAZY RICH ASIANS — Official Trailer
I swear if y’all let this flop……
Alright, I’m super happy that this looks so beautifully shot and makes Singapore look pretty cool. But part of me is still annoyed as hell because it misrepresents my country as a first world asian country, with only extremely rich Chinese people who live here. Sure they’re (Chinese people) the majority group here but we’re culturally rich with many different races and ethnicities etc. We already have a prevalent issue locally with how mainstream media and pop culture very largely represents the Chinese, and this film will perpetuate the same.
Singapore’s diverse and BROWN PEOPLE EXIST IN SINGAPORE just fyi.
So yeah, y’all should definitely support the film because hell yeah fucking Asian-American representation, but don’t forget that for us, Singapore’s more than wealthy Chinese family empires, and this movie seems to have sidelined the minorities in Singapore completely.
It's interesting to see the positive mostly American response to this as being 'finally' a representation of POC people. But when contextualised in the setting that is Singapore – a multicultural city where Chinese people are the majority (70~%) – this is almost the equivalent of whitewashing. But this is just a trailer so who knows. I see numerous local spaces such as a hawker centre (Newton?) and Tanjong Pagar. How are these more relatively more local spaces being portrayed? Beyond the protagonists, who will be represented?
On a side note, that many fireworks at Marina Bay? Psh, yea right.
Have their noses gotten bigger over the years because they keep pinching them??? The robo dads?
….
I’m totally down for this headcanon ̶i̶t̶ ̶a̶m̶u̶s̶e̶s̶ ̶m̶e̶ ̶
Necromancer: Did you know that dinosaur skeletons in museums are usually fake casts?
Someone: Did the Internet tell you that?
Necromancer: Nope, just a series of disappointing museum trips.
Source For more facts follow Ultrafacts
EVERY TIME SOMEONE BRINGS UP THE LIBRARY OF ALEXANDRIA I GET SO ANGRY.
Because it got burned. All of that knowledge, lost forever.
The library was destroyed over 1000’s of years ago. The library consisted of thousands of scrolls and books about mathematics, engineering, physiology, geography, blueprints, medicine, plays, & important scriptures. Thinkers from all over the Mediterranean used to come to Alexandria to study.Most of the major work of civilization up until that point was lost. If the library still survived till this day, society may have been more advanced and we would sure know more about the ancient world.
That graphic grinds my gears every time I see it
romans.
Julius Caesar to be precise
Remember this when you’re conquering. Keep the books.
THIS HURTS MY HEART SO MUCH EVERY TIME ITS BROUGHT UP
Julius Caesar needs to be stabbed for this
I know we should totally stab Caesar
Does March 15th sound good for everyone??
hey everyone, guess what day it is
Jesus fucking Christ, no, the burning of the library of Alexandria did not in any way slow down human progress. It wasn’t the only library to have existed in the world at the time.
“Alexandria was hardly the only library in the world, and the libraries at Pergamum and later Rome herself rivaled Alexandria in scale. Antony replaced the losses of the fire during the Alexandrine War with copies made from the library at Pergamum, and libraries in gymnasia or simply founded for citizens abound during that period in the Greek world, they’re in like literally every city of any size. If anything at all was lost it was almost certainly mainly critical commentaries on various authors, as well as catalogs of their works–both the Alexandrian library and the Pergamene one were famous for producing such commentaries. Pretty much everything else of value would have existed elsewhere. It’s possible that a few (at that time probably little-known) philosophical texts might have been lost, but even such texts are likely to have had other copies elsewhere.” Here’s an extensive and well sourced post debunking the utter bullshit myth that the burning of the Library somehow shot human progress back thousands of years until the 16th century dragged Europe out of the “Dark Ages”.
Which is also a term very few historians use or take seriously anymore because it is, again, based off of inaccurate misconceptions about Medieval history, AS WELL as being an EXTREMELY Eurocentric viewpoint that ignores scientific and scholarly work done in other areas of the world like China and the Middle East.
During the so called ‘European Dark Ages’, architecture achieved complexities the Romans could only dream of, the first universities were opened, scholarship was kept alive, metalurgy advanced rapidly.
There wasn’t ONE renaissance, there were THREE. The one we think of had it’s roots as far back as the 14th century. They didn’t come out of nowhere, the advancements were built off of work of hundreds of years of work by educated folk from across Euroasia and they fed into one another.
In fact, here’s a handy list of Medieval European scientists, from the 5th to 14th century.
That fucking graph up there is one of the most offensivley bad pseudo-historical memes. It’s so infamous, /r/BadHistory simply calls it “The Chart”.
Let this fucking bullshit die already.
Stop with the Eurocentric and romanticised approach to history!!! The supposed European 'Dark ages' is a term no longer applied academically! The people in the Medieval times were just doing things differently (i.e. not being like the 'classic' civilisations of the Greeks and Romans). Other civilisations (e.g. the Chinese, the Arabs, the Native Americans, etc.) were also doing their own thing. The loss of one library in the West, and the decline of the classical civilisation does not mark the end of human progress. Stop glorifying the 'Classical' civilisations! Human progress should not solely be held to an european standard!
finally watched the Australia Open Finals with Federer vs Nadal and holy shit that was such a good game!
Federer’s backhand and volley!!!
That rally!!!!
Watch: Trust us that it’s not clickbait when we say this speech about punching Nazis was so fired up that it changed our lives
The theme of the 2017 SAG Awards was unity, unity, and more unity. For one of the final speeches of the night, David Harbour of Stranger Things collected the award for best performance by an ensemble, slinging (or rather, shouting) unity at the audience. The crowd got on its feet. In the audience, Courtney B. Vance, Lea DeLaria, and Viggo Mortensen can be spotted standing at attention.
Gifs: The SAG Awards on TNT
WATCH THE VIDEO
The movie Jaws, tangibly and irreparably, damaged public perception of Great White Sharks, to the point of reducing beach turnout for years to come
Since the movie Fight Club was released, numerous emotionally stunted men have tried to create their own Fight Clubs, all over the world
After the Matrix movies were released by the Wachowski sisters, there were multiple instances of people using the film as a justification for murder - to the point where “The Matrix Defence” has its own wikipedia page
Why am I telling you all these facts?
Because popular media affects reality, it can have measurable influence on public feelings and perception, and in some ways can affect you on a deeper and more visceral level than any straight-forward lesson can.
So if you don’t think that the movie Split can cause serious stigma and harm towards people with psychotic mental illnesses - though particularly Schizophrenia and DID - through turning public perception against them, and portraying them as dangerous monsters, then you haven’t been paying attention.
Don’t give your money to this dangerous, misinformed garbage.
Based on my impression from publicity, like Jaws, the narrative of Split seems to take advantage of the ignorance or misconceptions surrounding an issue to drive its story forward. But besides that, not only do none of the other two movies seek to perpetuate misinformation or to exploit it, but in fact counter them. Fight club villified toxic notions of masculinity. The Matrix is inspired by Plato's Allegory of the Cave, and while exploring drawing inspiration from other philosophical ideas, may be interpreted as being a critique of the blindness of our media-driven society (the very aspect this post is trying to warn against). It's like saying 500 days of Summer promotes infatuations as the basis for a healthy relationship and the existence of manic-pixie dream girls. I agree, be aware and informed of the dangers of misinformation. Sadly people do misinterpret and fear out of ignorance, or appropriate the media as excuses for real-life actions. But do not vilify every film or piece of literature or fiction or artwork for its roots in reality or the issues it explores. That too is fear mongering; a fear of media and the arts and its influence, which very much inspires efforts to denounce, police, and censor such forms of expression. (Which seems to be what a certain individual in a certain country is trying to achieve with his denouncement of journalistic efforts).
Adventure Time Islands was so good helppp
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them → Newt Scamander performing the Erumpent mating dance
He begins to perform a “mating ritual”, a series of grunts, wiggles, rolls, and groans to gain the Erumpent’s attention. Newt rolls along the floor, the Erument copies, moving nearer and nearer to the open case.
[Video of venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough standing amid vegetation. On a near-horizontal branch above his head is a brown and yellow greater bird of paradise, about the size of a crow, with big floaty yellow plumage puffing out along its back.]
Bird: Pwuk. Pwuk. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: This, surely – Bird (hopping along the branch): WUKWUKWUkwukwukwukoooh. Oooh. Oooh.
[Cut. Same shot.]
Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: This, surely, is one – Bird: Kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark kark. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: This, surely –
[Cut. Same shot but the bird is on the other side now and venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough has his hand on the branch.]
Bird (hopping up and down on venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough’s fingers): Eh-eh. Eh-eh. Eh-urrrr. Eh-urrrr. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: Close up – Bird (hopping away from him): Tiktiktiktik. Tiktiktiktik. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – the plumes – Bird (hopping around): Huek. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – are truly – Bird: Huek. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – exquisite. Bird: Huek. Eh-eh. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: The gauzy – Bird (hopping and spinning on the spot): HukWUKWUKWukwukoooh. Oooh. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: …
[Cut. Same shot but the bird is back on the original side of the branch.]
Bird: Aark. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: Of course, by the eighteenth century – Bird: Ehhh. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – naturalists realized that birds of paradise – Bird (hops across to the other side of the branch) Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – did have – Bird (hopping back again): Krrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – legs. Even so – Bird: WUKWUKWUKWukwukwukooh.
[Cut. Same shot.] Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough (apparently trying to tickle the bird’s tummy): – by about the eighteenth century – Bird (hops away and spins round) Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – and so – Bird: AAAAAK AAAK AAAK AAAK AAAK AAAK AAAK AAAK AAAK AAAK AAAK aaak. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough (wearily): … Very well.
[Cut. Same shot.]
Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – but Karl Linnaeus, the great – Bird (vibrating rapidly on the spot and then flapping its wings): PWAAAAAAAK. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – classifier of the natural world – Bird: AAAAAUUUH AAAUUUH AAAUUUH AAAUUUH AAAUUUH AAAUUUH AAAUUUH AAUUH. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – when he came to allocate a scientific name – Bird: … Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – to this bird – Bird: … Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – called it – Bird: Wooo-ooo. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – wooo-ooo – Bird (surveys the surroundings with a dignified turn of the head) Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: ‘paradisia apoda’: the bird of paradise – Bird: Hoooo. Venerable TV naturalist David Attenborough: – without legs. Bird: Eh-eh.
[Close-up of the bird.]
Bird: WUKWUKWUKWUkwukwukwukwukoooh. Ooh. Bird: Ooh.
[Fade to black.]
I’ve been planning to teach students how to describe videos and write transcripts and I shall save this post for this very purpose.
Yes, I did reblog this yesterday too. It’s good.
For teaching: ???
I think I’ve skipped this video so many times in the past. Thank you, transcriptionist. Please do not skip this video again, friends. I am laughing til tears form in my eyes.
I want you all to know that an Arab Muslim from Tunis proposed the Theory of Evolution near 600 years before Charles Darwin even took his first breath. Don’t let them erase you.
his name is Ibn Khaldun
Also, it was not the apple falling from a tree that made Issac Newton “discover” gravity. He was reading the books of Ibn Al Haytham, an Arab Muslim from Iraq, who pioneered the scientific method, discovered gravity and wrote about the laws governing the movement of bodies (now known as Newtons three laws of motion) some 600 years before Newton existed. Without him, modern science as we know it wouldn’t exist. Read on him. His achievements are far greater than what I’ve just mentioned here.
yo, the two people you’re talking about are both really cool dudes and yes they should be more widely known but stop spreading misinformation. do not use lies to spread the word about cool people and things.
the concept that things evolved from other things was already an idea floating around for basically ever in any scientific circle not completely dominated by creationism. like, darwin didn’t come up with it and he never claimed to. you can find dozens of natural philosophers throughout history like “yo i’m pretty sure that there’s some evolution going on here.”
it was not like the scientists in the 1850s were finding fossils of transitional forms and being like “LOL well dragons i guess!” it was already getting pretty obvious to academics in the 19th century that the earth was really old, life had gone through some serious changes, and there were common ancestors and related species. once maps got good enough for people to go “fuck dude africa and south america fit together” young earth creationism was fucked.
the problem was that there was no mechanism they could devise that would explain how creatures changed from one form into another, which was really kind of the vital piece of the whole thing. they had evidence that there was an evolution of life, but no way to build a theory because they had no way of showing how it might happen. some people were playing with the idea that creatures picked up traits from the environment and passed those to their kids.. somehow, but they had no evidence. they had a chain with no links.
then darwin comes along with some sketches of birds and he’s like “hey so here’s what going on. gregor mendel has shown that traits can be passed along, i’m gonna propose that what’s happening is, creatures that are best suited for an environment to flourish, so this preserves and eventually exaggerates certain traits over time to cause divergences. you go back far enough, like billions of years, all life coulda started from just a few basic types, or maybe even just one ancestor.”
darwin didn’t discover evolution. he proposed evolution by natural selection and he was right.
i mean, mostly. we had to correct his theory a whole bunch as we learned more about things like genetics and dna. he was actually kinda wrong about a ton of shit but that’s to be expected.
secondly, what’s important about newton wasn’t his observations, it was his math. ibn al haytham made a lot of important discoveries and advanced a lot of ideas about physics, especially optics, the big science of the middle ages, but the principles he talked about weren’t quite there yet.
like, he did this whole essay talking about planetary motion which, while more accurate than his contemporaries, was fundamentally inaccurate clockwork universe stuff because he actually hadn’t discovered gravity as a useful theory and he wasn’t able to use it to make predictions about motion.
that doesn’t make him stupid or worthy of being forgotten or nothin’. thats not how science works. he made advances, he didn’t quite have the shape of things yet, his work was important.
newton, building on his successes, was like, yo dawg, orbital mechanics. its like falling, but you miss. here’s a form of math i fucking invented to show some proof. lets check that against the universe.
and we did. and when it turned out his predictions were slightly wrong, some other motherfucker named einstein fixed it. and when he was wrong, etc.
its almost like science is totally built in increments on people who came before and trying discrediting the people who made some of those increments for political reasons is basically just as fucked as forgetting the folks who did the foundation work.
spreading misinformation to try to lionize historical figures so they are acknowledged has the opposite effect. it makes people who know shit roll their eyes and ignore similar posts later on. it makes the people who do read them look like dumbasses when they try to spread the word. it makes you look like one of those liberal stereotypes who disregards reality when it is politically convenient and that is not a good thing to look like.
minor point:
then darwin comes along with some sketches of birds and he’s like “hey so here’s what going on. gregor mendel has shown that traits can be passed along, i’m gonna propose that what’s happening is, creatures that are best suited for an environment to flourish, so this preserves and eventually exaggerates certain traits over time to cause divergences. you go back far enough, like billions of years, all life coulda started from just a few basic types, or maybe even just one ancestor.”
Darwin’s work preceded Mendel’s, actually. On The Origin Of Species came out in 1859, Mendel’s paper on inheritance in 1865. That traits could be passed along was known to everybody, though not how; Mendel discovered some particular rules that inheritance follows.
Darwin spent a good chunk of his life wondering what the mechanism of natural selection could be, while ignoring Mendel completely.
To be fair, Mendel was publishing in some obscure-ass local Moravian natural history society journal. I’m not sure how much of that made it into Darwin’s circles.
(And on the original topic: Ibn Khaldun did pretty much legit invent historiography though, as far as we can tell, so there’s that)
This is anecdotal but I’ve heard that in one of the journals in Darwin’s collection, he had scribbled notes on an article across the page from an article by Mendel, which he had ignored entirely.
Probably apocryphal but I love the irony.
@ohnofixit
As I am both a Person Who Loves Promoting Obscure Historical Figures (Especially Non-Western and PoC Figures Who Have Been Shamefully Overlooked) AND a scientist, the original posts made me pretty damn tired and I didn’t have the energy to post corrections about Ibn Khaldun’s work on evolutionary biology. thanks to everyone who did have the energy. It’s a great topic for discussion and those who are interested in the history of science will always appreciate sharing their knowledge with the public, so I’m glad we had this talk.
one of the most famous quotes by Isaac Newton is “If I have seen further [than others], it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants.”