if I see one more "why age verification is bad" post that doesn't even bother to mention that locking young people out of huge sections of the public sphere - literally the stated goal and primary impact of this shit - is wrong in and of itself I will simply start hitting people with bricks
yes yes biometric data privacy blah blah adults can hypothetically by harmed by this too. what about the immediate and deliberate and not at all hypothetical harm to youth. why are you acting like a potential data leak about what your face looks like, which if it ever happened would at least be generally recognised as a problem, is a more serious issue than cutting millions of people off from information and community and public expression which is happening right now in the open with large scale support
it's got the stench of fucking "banned books week" on it. thousands of adults congratulating themselves for reading books literally no one is trying to stop them from reading while doing nothing to improve access for the young people who are the ones actually having those books made off-limits to them.
[normal person voice] as we all know, the public sphere consists largely of strip clubs and pools of glowing green acid
Given these 3 options I would draw the line at strip clubs, just personally. As I'm in a country with some youth rights, you can be at the club here at 14 years old (with restrictions), as I believe you should be.
I understand that all of these are supposed to sound as ridiculous as exposing children to chemical leaks, but it's really a cultural thing. Some places do actually treat teenagers a little bit like humans. Excluding them from everything is a culturally and religiously motivated choice, not some universal truth about how to raise people.
Also: actually yes. Removing someone from public life for their identity is as close as you can get to actual evil.




















