PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Peter Solarz

Kaledo Art

if i look back, i am lost
No title available
dirt enthusiast
noise dept.
Misplaced Lens Cap
Today's Document
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

shark vs the universe
Three Goblin Art
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
NASA

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

JVL

izzy's playlists!
Acquired Stardust

oozey mess
RMH
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Türkiye
seen from T1

seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from India
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Uruguay

seen from Netherlands
@persimonperson
Hot takes that will probably get me called a bigot on this hellhole
Probably reblogged this already before but FUCK IT I’m doing it again!
@tariqah
Oh my god…
There are three breeds of cat:
Chonk
Goblin
Yeah that looks like a cat
Subcategories of breeds:
Floof
Naked
Normal
ya’ll this cool new site lets you know if a certain movie or TV show has any affiliation with anyone who was accused of sexual assault. this is important for those of us who are passionate about not supporting work that associates itself with sexual abusers, for the sake of the victims.
I keep seeing this post making rounds so here’s my two cents.
Firstly, lest I get hate, which I probably will anyway, I am not condoning the actions of the accused. Sexual assault is capital B - Bad.
But this site does pose a question: Should an entire work be condemned because an individual who has done unsavory acts is somehow connected to it?
Perhaps the answer isn’t so black and white.
The example that comes to my mind is J*hn L*sseter’s involvement with Moana and more recently Coco. Moana is the role that gave Auli’i Cravalho wide recognition; it’s a role that will cement her career for years to come. It was an opportunity that few in Hollywood will ever get. Think about how special it was for Indiginous islanders to see a film in their own language, even though the Maori are a largely forgotten and persecuted people. Similar things can be said about Coco and the impact it’s had.
Hundreds of people contribute to the making of a film. Some are getting their first taste of success, some have spent years enjoying their job. Do these people deserve to have their work blacklisted?
I’m not saying you shouldn’t boycott. For example, I’ve heard (feel free to link because I could not) that L*sseter only signs off on Pixar movies these days and actually contributes very little. Should you condemn those movies? What about a movie written, directed, and starting W**dy All*n? What if that movie gave your fave their big break?Does that change things? Again it’s a choice you need to think about. Ask yourself if these films deserve your money and viewership. Sometimes the answer will be yes and sometimes it will be no. And that’s okay.
This site should be used to help you make a decision, not to make the decision for you.
^ Exactly. And if you check Moana out on the website, it shows “Rotten Apples”
and we all know how Moana is a groundbreaking concept and evidently had a positive significant global impact
I also think the website’s use of “one rotten apple spoils the barrel” is a false analogy when it comes to media since this saying is mostly linked to one person being a bad influence to everyone it comes in contact with so to call it “rotten apples” seems unfair when there are hundreds and thousands of staff who have worked their asses to create a film. Movies, music, and literature or any form of media can offer a good positive and important message to their audience despite them being problematic by association.
So I guess what we can take home from this is that it is best to be critical about the media we consume and see the bigger picture. You never know one of these days, one of those movies with a “fresh apples” rating could get “rotten apples” because an allegation pops up connected to a staff from the movie.
It is unfortunately not black and white. I think the best thing we can do to support the victims is to donate to organizations who help victims and boost their message.
I also think the bigger problem lies in the industry itself where these corporations allow these offenders to still work under them. If they end up arrested and punished, then it’ll be a much better outcome than boycotting a good work that was unfortunately tainted by them.
Imagine...
…Being a new teacher at Hogwarts and Snape being absolutely smitten by you.
Who Me
How deep does the hole go?
Art by Penzilla
God, I fucking LOVE the color of the sky
tubby ran out of wet food and i couldn’t get to the pet store before lunch so i had to improvise and made her a scrambled egg
she is intensely dubious about this non-salmon food item
despite how much she loves eggs when i’m eating them, she had no interest in eggs that had been prepared especially for her. fortunately we were able to escape our driveway and get her preferred salmon and gravy, and while we were out i bought a frame for the @viv-draws print i bought her
her standards have finally been met
a couple of people have expressed concern about tubby breaking her dishes, so i just want to note that sometimes when the cups are misaligned in their tray they wobble a little and make a tiny clinking sound. when this happens instead of eating directly out of her dish, tubby will use her paw to bring the food to her mouth in order to prevent any unseemly noises.
Your cat is a very prim cat.
not to be dramatic but I’d die for tubby
im losing my mind
unstoppable force vs. immovable object
wow i love this
One of the truest things I’ve ever heard is that people who say they’re “brutally honest” are more interested in the brutality than the honesty.
this is peak comedy
i feel like i have rabies but like emotionally
That’s hysteria, babe!
Enchantress: I turn you into a hideous Beast. What are the names of your servants?
The Prince: Lumiere, Cogsworth, Mrs. Potts -
Enchantress:
lachryphagy is the term used to describe the behaviour of tear drinking in nature, typically in environments - like the purvian amazon shown here - where sodium and other micronutrients are hard to find.
bees and butterflies need sodium for egg production and metabolic purposes, but their diets of nectar are low in salt. so the orange julia and sulfur yellow butterflies you see here turn to the salty tears of often stationary turtles and caiman.
and though the caiman and turtles seem to receive no reciprocal benefit from the interaction, they’re apparently happy enough to just help out. (x, x, x, x, x, x)