Chiyo/Chris| 20’s| Capricorn| ND| Queer| Black | Femme NB| Shinji Ikari is aromantic | King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard fanatic| Icon: @yourfavisyourfav| If it's an old sound chip, it's cool as shit to me| Used to be a kpop blog, now is not one but the tags are still there. I am not into anymore for various reasons. I am open to discussing these reasons with people who want to listen. I do not hate kpop fans; I am just very uncomfortable with the fandom and genre in general. But my general thoughts are: music’s meh, don’t agree with how the industry treats people, people take their hatred of the fandom too seriously just as fans take the whole thing too seriously. Please calm down.| This blog is hardly for those who are underage. I won’t block you, but you have been warned. Proceed however you need to. Anything unchristian-like (aka: n/ot suit/able for w/ork content) will be tagged as “leather” and “nasty leather” for gore. I moved most of this to a separate blog so if I accidentally post something without tagging let me know. One can find this Unchristian blog if you ask for the url off anon! | If a post says “dont @me,” please don’t. Not even as a joke. It is rude. Instead just send a message because I’m not replying to your mention.| Please take the time to scroll through my blog before you follow! Look at what i stand for and determine whether or not you want to follow (most of which can be found in the tag “k post” or “queer tag.” Not all of it but some.). I do not have “BYF,” look through yourself and determine if you want to be following me. The only thing i will say for certain is that i am ABSOLUTELY anti-censorship. This means i do not believe in censoring pretty much anything for ANY reason.| If you see something you personally do not agree with, block me and move on! Thank you!! Trust me, sending a long message about why i should or shouldnt be doing/thinking/supporting xyz will waste your time and mine, as I don’t want your opinion. I am sometimes open to discussion but for the most part people are very rude and upity. I do not have discussions with people like this. If you seriously want to talk about something approach me with respect as I would do the same of you. Please be aware that i still have the right to deny a conversation that i do not want to have. :)| Find me at these other places: Yusukekitagawa<= Mastadon account, Yusuke Kitagawa#4840 <= Discord, Yusukekitagawa <= Dreamwidth
i finally read the actual full passage where JKR has her cop self insert threaten a young trans woman w prison rape and its like … wow i forgot how bad of a writer she was. like, this girl’s ‘chest heaved’ like 3 times in 2 pages and like in the space of 3 pages Joanne mentions her long red nails like 6 times
“Bringing animals into the world only to kill them is not part of the ‘cycle of nature’. We artificially inseminate animals, kill them years before their life span is up, then justify it as ‘natural’, comparing ourselves to ‘other animals who kill to survive’. Last time I looked, lions weren’t breeding gazelles.”
but ants breed and care for aphids, some species of fish partake in farming-type behavior. Humans do what we do because we’re smart enough to make things easier for ourselves, our greatest tool and weapon is our brain
Not to keep beating a dead hippogriff, but considering that it's this generation's definitive work of speculative fiction, there's remarkably little philosophical meat on the bones of the Harry Potter franchise. It has no themes beyond the boring Cultural Christian "good vs. evil" narrative, its worldbuilding is haphazard at best, and its central revelation about human nature is that everyone is either primarily brave, smart, evil, or miscellaneous. It's a fun read with enough mysteries to keep you interested, but it's a true shame that it's become a universal cultural referent when there's really just not much there.
Going outside with autism/adhd like *feels all the bushes* *stops to look at a bug* *reads all the signs out loud* *stops to look at a bug* *stops to look at a bug* *feels all the bushes* *stomps on a leaf* *reads all the sign ou
When you learn you have a ND disorder or mental illness (whether you self diagnosed or were told about it by a therapist) you'll see a lot more signs/traits in yourself than you did before because you know why you exhibit those traits now
This doesn't mean you're faking it
This doesn't mean it's "getting worse"
This DOES mean that you're still going through the process of understanding yourself and your diagnosis better
This DOES mean that you need to be more patient with yourself and focus on self care and positivity
Your shitty mother isn't a narcissist. Your toxic ex isnt a psycho. You were not a victim of "bpd abuse". Your abuser was not sociopathic and did not have antisocial personality disorder/was not antisocial. People with harmful and illogical opinions such as government leaders aren't delusional.
Start finding vocabulary that isn't ableist here are some examples of more accurate and less harmful descriptions.
"My mother is conceited and self centered, which impacts me negatively still and led to abuse"
"My ex is violent and seems out of control a lot, and they've traumatized me through their abusive behavior"
"My abuser [describe their actions without mentioning their bpd bc its not what fucking makes some one abusive . that would be like saying "my abuser had depression....I am a victim of depressed abuse and distrust those with depression now because they're abusive" ]
"My abuser didn't have any sympathy or compassion for others and objectified me."
"My abuser lashed out at others and was always very cold and distant to me."
"They're willfully ignorant and hiding behind their privilege."
Gonna be blocking some ppl in the notes trying or start debates despite breaking my DNI and thinking slurs don't exist later
But friendly reminder that you don't get to fucking say what is or isn't ableism towards a group of people that you aren't in.
Also I understand that when you're an abuse survivor you want to find any vocabulary that makes people take you seriously, and people take you more seriously if you can take advantage of an abusers mental illness or use terms that are referring to a mental illness. But that's still blatant ableism and it hurts entire communities. You cannot justify your bigotry with your desperation to be heard.
anyone else relate to internalized ableism causing you to put off taking meds because people "worry you take too many" and insist you "try natural remedies first"?
and because you put them off, you suffer for hours just because you can?
it's hard for me to remember but you don't have to force yourself to be in pain just because you're expected to, or just because you can
I think this version of consent politics that's developing on social media, where strangers need to ask for the public's consent not to perform any kind of sexual act towards the public or in front of it, but to be allowed to dress provocatively or skimpily at all, is starting to sound less like actual consent politics and more like the anarcho-capitalist concept of the Non-Agression Principle.
The only caveat is that this principle is deployed with extreme inconsistency because none of it's advocates would be caught telling cis women to "stop dressing like sluts" in a normal non-pride context, if anything because it makes them sound like misogynists or fundies, but will absolutely say this if the style of slutty dress reminds them of some fetish that internet radfems told them is bad or, in many cases, if the skimpy outfit in question in worn by a gay man or a trans woman.
Ableism isn’t a new age oppression/issue. Pretending it is some new thing millennials made up is literally preposterous. There is a long history of the abuse, torture, hospitalization, and institutionalization of disabled/neurodivergent people. Pretending lobotomies, electroshock therapy, eugenics, and murder weren’t practices used against disabled people is ableism itself.
I'm gonna stop posting about this because discoursing about this on the one year where no street pride is happening is absurd but I think the "no kink at pride" people trying to reignite this shit might want to reconsider their definitions and their understanding of what constitutes a "public sexual act" if they think that wearing a leather harness or a dog mask is a sexually explicit act. projecting your disgust to the point you treat non-explicit acts as sexually explicit solely because they make you conjure mental images of people having Icky Sex is not actually rational behavior and is in fact one of the key ways in which homophobes rationalize their disgust for gay pda.
@therapysword You don't actually need to ask for the consent of every stranger you encounter to have the right to dress provocatively or slutty, because provocative dress is not an explicit sexual act that you're involving people in. A dog mask is no more explicit than a woman in a revealing dress, and is only treated as such by people with a deep attachment to a sexual politics of disgust. Unless you intend on banning everyone from dressing slutty in public then you have absolutely zero ethical grounding to say that a dog mask or a leather harness require being given consent from every stranger that might see you to be worn (due to their alleged sexual explicitness), but a particularly short miniskirt or a slutty crop top does not. Follow the logical conclusions of your ideas and you'll realize they lead to really awful places.
If you think a harness is perverse and a violation of onlooker's consent think of the children omg so wrong, but a microkini is fine to wear to public beaches full of playing children, well, there's a double standard in there somewhere, and it's either thinking male sexuality is inherently perverse and female sexuality inherently nonthreatening or it's homophobia, and I know what I'd vote on.