Prototype's Lawyer

A blog to defend Poppy Playtime's The Prototype

[prototype1006defense]

As of Chapter 4 of Poppy Playtime, Safe Haven, I have decided to be the Prototype's unofficial unlicensed defense attorney

People of the tumblr, my client is not innocent. But he is not a devil, either.

In this court I will prove to you that my client only was reacting in defense to his enemies trying to destroy his home as well as all the toys living under his rule.

I will prove he did not attack innocent civilians, but enemy soldiers.

(I love Doey and Safe Haven but the idea that they're pure good while Prototype was pure evil sits so so so so wrong with me. We were in the process of VAPORIZING PROTOTYPE'S HOME WITH EVERYONE IN IT. WAS HE SUPPOSED TO STAND ASIDE AND DO NOTHING.)

In this blog I will share various bits of info. That lead me to believe Prototype was defending himself and has been for the past several years.

[prototype1006defense]

While I would say Poppy is someone to be cautious around, she is NOT pure evil.

It's obvious The Bomb Plan she's convinced Safe Haven to go along with is a result of stress, despair, and frustration with the current situation. The fact that she evidently wishes to include herself in the blast further shows. When this blog talks about Poppy it's not to say "she's evil". Rather it's just, "she's wrong". I believe that a great deal of her more questionable issues are a result of trauma and madness, not conniving. OF COURSE she can still not be allowed to convince a group of children to blow themselves up along with Poppy herself and other unwilling children, but she is a complex character.

[prototype1006defense]

The Hour Of Joy Would Have Failed if the Innocent Workers had been spared

First off, in Chapter 4 we learn Prototype forbade anyone from leaving the place to ensure the research is hidden. This is supported in a Chapter 3 death message:

THIS RESEARCH MUST STAY BURIED. NOBODY MAY LEAVE.

This is supported by Poppy's remark in Untitled Tape.

Poppy: [Deep breath] "Prototype says we can't leave. Not now. Not ever… I hate him. I hate him, and I hate this place, and I hate that he's… Right. He explained everything, and he's right. We can't leave. It's too risky. What they did to us… We can't let it happen to us or anyone ever again."

It'd be pretty much impossible for the toys to hide their existence from the innocent workers after killing the ones that did not know. PW says in the Orientation Notebook that the older counselors in Playcare knew and the younger ones didn't.

And The Higher Up offices are way above where the labs and the prison were.

Their unawareness would mean they wouldn't see the toys as righteously angry, they would see them as monsters who randomly showed up and started slaughtering coworkers. The would be seen as "the bad guys". If they got the chance to live, they would panic and call the cops (who Playtime had bought off) or the government (who would be the LAST people who should hear about these experiments)

The Hour of Joy would fail if any of them were spared. And if there were workers who were genuinely willing to never leave the building and keep mum? Well, if YOU were The Prototype would you risk it?

It's exactly the fact that Prototype HAD to kill everyone in the building for his plan to work. It was either nobody or everybody.

But the other fact is prototype DID TRY to minimize HOJ casualties. The Orientation Notebook shows HOJ was "conveniantly" scheduled to happen when not on a tour day.

Mondays, Tuesdays, and Weekends.

Otherwise No Tours.

If you check your calendar, you will see that August 8th, 1995, fell on a Tuesday. This is a little too specific to be a coincidence on Prototype's part - and to me it suggests that he tried to avoid a little bit of bloodshed when he had the ability.

Prototype didn't have everyone killed because he was a bloodthirsty monster, he had everyone killed because he HAD TO. Everything he did had a reason, not necessarily a reason everyone would agree with, but he didn't do it just to be mean.

[prototype1006defense]

Poppy's Hypocrisy Regarding Cannibalism

They clearly hate how the Prototype and his side eats human corpses as shown by this mural.

But...then Doey eats Pianosaurous. And doesn't seem even that bothered by it.

(Also it's tragically funny how hard poor Prototype is trying here. This is why I don't think he was previously a human. He just keeps dangling the body thinking, "Why aren't the eating?" He's a little confused, but he got the spirit X,D) Notice rather then attacking them like Theo or Harley Sawyer, Prototype just tries to give them a "snack". XD Poor poor Protie.

Now I don't think if Doey went against the group's moral standards, he would be so careless about it afterwards. And Doey's components are all children, so he is simply following what has been modeled for him by the leader (who might not be a child herself): Poppy.

Is what Poppy saying, "it's bad to eat humans, but only if they look like humans"? Is that what Poppy's teaching her side in the war to think?

I can honestly see it. Poppy's reaction to eating the corpses seems to be more shallow disgust then actual moral outrage.

Poppy: "Doesn't make me feel better about the bodies, though. What he was saying about them. I know there's not really another option. The toys will starve otherwise, they'll die… But it's still disgusting."

And in Chapter 4, not once but twice Doey accuses her of subtly dehumanizing the experiments, including herself. And though she denies it, her words are hollow.

Doey: "Us, everyone in there, we're not just things gone wrong. We're people...Can't you see that?" Poppy: "I can... And I'm sorry..."

Chapter 4 Death Message, Presumably Doey: Is what she wants right? Are we less than the people we were?

I hope Poppy didn't start the war over her being personally icked by what was genuinely the best food source the toys had that point in time. That would really really suck of her.

Again, I do blame Poppy more then Doey here, since Doey's components are all children, and it's unclear if Poppy is or not. Either way she is clearly the most mature and the way Doey looks up to her pre-abandonment and feels totally lost without her indicates that Poppy is at least somewhat older then even Matthew. (How else do you explain the strongest BBI being scared without one little porcelain doll?)

Doey: "I … can't find Poppy anywhere… I don't know what happened… or where she went… But it's scary here without her."

[prototype1006defense]

To keep this blog Prototype focused, I've made a new sideblog to discuss the inner workings and responsibilities of various key figures at Playtime Co

It's called @playtimecoexposed - it's pretty empty now aside from some reblogs of some relevant posings from here, but you're welcome to swing by and drop an ask!

[prototype1006defense]

We Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Programming for a Stella Greyber Call Out Post

Everyone says: "Stella didn't harm the kids directly" Tell me: 1) Is permanently taking away an orphan's toy - one that they're probably very attached to due to their situation as an orphan, for the sole reason that the toy is not Playtime brand, "harm to the kids"? 2) Is gaslighting the kid that the toy whose brand you took away by pretending that toy and company never existed, "harm to the kids" and 3) Is coercing children into a cult of personality by writing a curriculum so questionable that you can't hire an ordinay certified teacher from the outside "harm to the kids"? And furthermore conditioning them to be opening to "sacrificing themselves?" 4) Is policing children's opinions on the playtime toys, even older kids who are starting to grow out of them, to "maintain their attachment" to the toys, denying them free choice and will, "harm to the kids"?

Because playcare did ALL OF THAT under Stella's leadership, and the book says she directly coauthored the new curriculum with Leith

So yeah. Let's dispense of the notion that "Stella didn't directly harm the kids". She DID directly harm the kids. This is psychological abuse at its most heinous. She might not have cut them open, but this is gaslighting, brainwashing, indoctrination, and emotional abuse all rolled in one. she harmed them directly and all of it to make the experimentation go more smoothly

[djsherriff-responses]

Stella is an awful person but I do want to make some counter arguments here, not necessarily to even defend her so much as bring up she's not equal in authority compared to her fellow higher ups despite her position but is still enabling abuse for her own survival and (maybe) desire to stay young forever

For points 1 and 2 we do not know for certain Stella herself had any influence on this choice, or when this choice was even made. It could've been company policy before Leith took over Elliott's position. I'll explain more with point 3 but I don't think Stella "actively" (for lack of a better word) went out of her way to be strict with said policy. Gaslighting children into believing non-playtime toys never existed is pretty messed up though, no matter how "gentle" you go about it

Point 3. I'm gonna bring up that the tape of Leith interviewing Stella in which she is fawning hard in that. Her behaviour isn't that of someone who is genuinely on board with human experimenting on orphans, it sounds more like she's trying to say what Leith wants her to hear. It's debatable if Stella even had a choice to refuse the offer given to her. Considering what happens to Rowan and other staff who "knew too much" , the alternative was not leaving the factory alive

The tape where Leith cuts her off regarding Harley crossing her boundaries with the children shows she's not respected as a fellow head. Stella has also made note she doesn't like "thinking about" it whenever there's a violent or unpleasant incident (like the theatre incident). It's entirely likely that Leith was mostly in charge of the curriculum, with Stella nodded her head at his suggestions while trying to steer it into being semi-decent at teaching the orphans life skills. If nothing else, some of those kids are gonna get adopted so they should be able to know basic maths at least

IDK if we'll learn about her family history or if it impacts her behaviour as an adult (that seems more headcanon territory) though with her discussing about how toys "can take you to another place entirely" when she was a child , I don't think this was the first time her fawn response acted up

4. I actually don't have anything for this one, someone called CPS on her ass please

Basically Stella is harming children but she's doing so backed into a corner by men who can easily threaten her life and nodding her head along at their suggestions while I'm confident she doesn't even like any of them

[prototype1006defense]

Thank you for acknowledging that Stella isn't innocent however there are points in your argument that I want to address.

Points 1 and 2: Yes, we don't know who came up with the idea. We do know when it was implemented.

And the book says "orphans are no longer permitted to bring toys made by other companies" so this is something that got implemented around the publication of this edition of the notebook. It also says that "if employees see toys from other brands while working here, they are to remove them".

In the orientation notebook there's a poster advertising Boogie Bot that says "Coming Soon in December of 1993" indicating that the book takes place in 1993.

So maybe it wasn't Stella's idea. But Stella is in charge of Playcare where it was enforced. Stella is the one who the counselors who enforced this rule answer to and may have enforced it herself.

It's like how Harley Sawyer is still responsible for experimenting on the orphans, even though the ARG points to Leith being the one who came up with experimenting on orphans and offering them to Harley to begin with. Of course, it doesn't matter to me whose idea all this horrible stuff was! Sawyer chose to experiment on the orphans and Stella chose to implement the rule.

Also PW's note indicates that this rule was implemented quite strictly. Since his note about the policy he only adds "...And the kids are not allowed to ask what happened to their old toys [...]". Not only does this sound like behavior of a loosely implemented policy, but if it weren't as harsh as it sounded it seems like something he would comment on.

Point 3

I've developed a fawn response and escapism tendencies myself which I believe are due to childhood experiences, so I understand what you're trying to say. Because while yes, directly saying "No" to Leith would have gotten her killed almost certainly, she had so much time to do something behind his back. To report it. She had many opportunities to leak the documents to someone and figure out who would be safest to tell. She's been part of the experiments since January 1991, possibly even earlier.

There is a theory she was the one whose omni hand was used to kick off The Hour of Joy, and maybe she's just very scared, I used to think before Chapter 4 The Schoolhouse's new curriculum was just something Leith ordered Stella to write, but honestly Chapter 4 really has completely made me do a 180 on her. The way she says, "I see." when Leith tells her they're still "working out a timeline". The way the caption "Stella makes her decision" which doesn't really sound like she's just saying what Leith wants to hear.

Leith is very clearly abusive towards Stella, I picked up on that as well. However, the moment you are referring to ("We did what was necessary, Ms Greyber") is in the aftermath of the theater incident. However, I don't think that that one exchange is entirely indicative of Stella's role in Playtime Co. Yes, Leith talks over her and intimidates her when she speaks in a way he doesn't like. But she's not completely powerless.

The tape where Stella talks about boundaries is in "The Doctor" VHS. Leith actually cuts her off only once to say "I'm not disagreeing". I mean he is lowkey disrespectful to her, but she does get to speak up without being punished.

Actually the tape where Leith cuts Stella off in the aftermath of the theater incident, not "The Doctor" VHS where Stella talks about her boundaries at all.

The tape where Stella talks about her Playcare boundaries (The Doctor VHS) she actually is much more outspoken and talkative towards Leith. When Leith firmly tells Eddie they can't kill Sawyer Stella (quite loudly and with a great deal of conviction) declares, "Eddie's right though - Sawyer can't keep leading this project!" And Leith initially acts dismissive, he quickly placates her by adding "I'm not disagreeing". So yes, Leith does talk over her and verbally abuse her on occasion. But this isn't their entire dynamic. Stella is one of the four holders of the omni-hand in the factory. She has power.

I'm glad that you recognize this, I just feel like it's really important we don't dismiss what power she does have.

[prototype1006defense]

We Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Programming for a Stella Greyber Call Out Post

Everyone says: "Stella didn't harm the kids directly" Tell me: 1) Is permanently taking away an orphan's toy - one that they're probably very attached to due to their situation as an orphan, for the sole reason that the toy is not Playtime brand, "harm to the kids"? 2) Is gaslighting the kid that the toy whose brand you took away by pretending that toy and company never existed, "harm to the kids" and 3) Is coercing children into a cult of personality by writing a curriculum so questionable that you can't hire an ordinay certified teacher from the outside "harm to the kids"? And furthermore conditioning them to be opening to "sacrificing themselves?" 4) Is policing children's opinions on the playtime toys, even older kids who are starting to grow out of them, to "maintain their attachment" to the toys, denying them free choice and will, "harm to the kids"?

Because playcare did ALL OF THAT under Stella's leadership, and the book says she directly coauthored the new curriculum with Leith

So yeah. Let's dispense of the notion that "Stella didn't directly harm the kids". She DID directly harm the kids. This is psychological abuse at its most heinous. She might not have cut them open, but this is gaslighting, brainwashing, indoctrination, and emotional abuse all rolled in one. she harmed them directly and all of it to make the experimentation go more smoothly

[fuwaprince]

US Helplines:

Depression Hotline: [phone]

Suicide Hotline: [phone]

LifeLine: 1-800-273-8255

Trevor Project: 1-866-488-7386

Sexuality Support: 1-800-246-7743

Eating Disorders Hotline: [phone]

Rape and Sexual Assault: 1-800-656-4673

Grief Support: 1-650-321-5272

Runaway: 1-800-843-5200, 1-800-843-5678, 1-800-621-4000

Exhale: After Abortion Hotline/Pro-Voice: 1-866-4394253

Child Abuse: 1-800-422-4453

UK Helplines:

Samaritans (for any problem): 08457909090 e-mail [email protected]

Childline (for anyone under 18 with any problem): 08001111

Mind infoline (mental health information): 0300 123 3393 e-mail: [email protected]

Mind legal advice (for people who need mental-health related legal advice): 0300 466 6463 [email protected]

b-eat eating disorder support: 0845 634 14 14 (only open Mon-Fri 10.30am-8.30pm and Saturday 1pm-4.30pm) e-mail: [email protected]

b-eat youthline (for under 25’s with eating disorders): 08456347650 (open Mon-Fri 4.30pm - 8.30pm, Saturday 1pm-4.30pm)

Cruse Bereavement Care: 08444779400 e-mail: [email protected]

Frank (information and advice on drugs): 0800776600

Drinkline: 0800 9178282

Rape Crisis England & Wales: 0808 802 9999 1(open 2 - 2.30pm 7 - 9.30pm) e-mail [email protected]

Rape Crisis Scotland: 08088 01 03 02 every day, 6pm to midnight

India Self Harm Hotline: [phone]

India Suicide Helpline: 022-27546669

Kids Help Phone (Canada): 1-800-668-6868

FREE 24/7 suicide hotlines:

Argentina: 54-0223-493-0430

Australia: 13-11-14

Austria: 01-713-3374

Barbados: 429-9999

Belgium: 106

Botswana: 391-1270

Brazil: 21-233-9191

China: 852-2382-0000

(Hong Kong: 2389-2222)

Costa Rica: 606-253-5439

Croatia: 01-4833-888

Cyprus: 357-77-77-72-67

Czech Republic: 222-580-697, 476-701-908

Denmark: 70-201-201

Egypt: 762-1602

Estonia: 6-558-088

Finland: 040-5032199

France: 01-45-39-4000

Germany: 0800-181-0721

Greece: 1018

Guatemala: 502-234-1239

Holland: 0900-0767

Honduras: 504-237-3623

Hungary: 06-80-820-111

Iceland: 44-0-8457-90-90-90

Israel: 09-8892333

Italy: 06-705-4444

Japan: 3-5286-9090

Latvia: 6722-2922, 2772-2292

Malaysia: 03-756-8144

(Singapore: 1-800-221-4444)

Mexico: 525-510-2550

Netherlands: 0900-0767

New Zealand: 4-473-9739

New Guinea: 675-326-0011

Nicaragua: 505-268-6171

Norway: 47-815-33-300

Philippines: 02-896-9191

Poland: 52-70-000

Portugal: 239-72-10-10

Russia: 8-20-222-82-10

Spain: 91-459-00-50

South Africa: 0861-322-322

South Korea: 2-715-8600

Sweden: 031-711-2400

Switzerland: 143

Taiwan: 0800-788-995

Thailand: 02-249-9977

Trinidad and Tobago: 868-645-2800

Ukraine: 0487-327715

(Source)

[uie-deactivated20230402]

ALWAYS REBLOG WHEN YOU SEE SOMETHING LIKE THIS PLEASE; ITS SO MUCH MORE THAN IMPORTANT TO PEOPLE. IT MEANS EVERYTHING TO SOMEBODY AND EVEN THOUGH YOU MIGHT NOT SEE THIS IN THE SAME LIGHT, SOMEONE MIGHT. INFACT YOU REBLOGGING THIS COULD STOP SOMEONE TAKING THEIR LIFE TONIGHT.

[kitten--aesthetics-blog]

I noticed there isn’t one here for Ireland, so

Irish free suicide helpline: 01-116 123

[thescientificviolist]

last time i reblogged this, i got this ask:

so please, please reblog. this could actually save a life.

[ur-local-pair-of-binoculars-dea]

Check the notes, some people have added hotlines that aren’t listed here.

[fan-girl-2]

These numbers are important to know! They have saved my life more times than I want to admit. And if you don’t want to call these hotlines, message me! I will help you any way that I can. Or talk to someone that you can trust.

SOMEONE WILL BE THERE FOR YOU 💗

[clericallyinsane]

trans suicide prevention hotline: [phone]

canada: 833-456-4566

[77ihavelemonade77]

i didn’t see one for slovakia so

0800-800-566 (adults)

0800-500-333 (youth)

116111 (youth and kids)

[creepy-spooghetti]

Be strong, keep fighting a little longer. You can get through this. I believe in you.

[yanteetle]

Always reblog these, I needed the suicide help hotline once and someone out there might need it too.

[hellaskeptical-deactivated20240]

This is incredibly useful andamazing, and to anyone reading this you are amazing too!

[casuallydyinginthecorner]

Hey! The suicide prevention hotline number is now 988!

[djsherriff-responses]

I know this is edging onto some uncomfortable territory but I don't think people really take Matthew's specific lack of person hood into consideration in regards to Doey, as people just lump him in as the token "care taker" without a second thought like how Kevin is seen as the "angry/evil" one and Jack is "innocent"

We don't have any confirmed ages for Kevin and Jack but it's a safe assumption they're both under 12 , Jack possibly 7-9ish with Kevin being 9-11ish. I'm admittedly going of off vibes with those but if feels fitting, my point being Jack and Kevin are both kids with a little age gap

But Matthew was a teenager , confirmed 15 at that. Considering how Playcare was designed to be appealing towards a young demographic , he most likely felt out of place being possibly one of the few teenagers living there. Added onto the fact Playcare had a school installed , Matthew likely didn't even get to go to high school and meet teens outside of fellow Playcare orphans

Matthew was described as a "mature" and even a "dream child" in his reports , but much like how the scientists had a bias against Kevin , should we take that at face value?

Matthew obviously cared about the younger kids and that followed through as he became Doey. But did he actually want to be looking after the younger kids, or did he feel obligated to take on such responsibilities? Chances are , intentional or not, Matthew likely got parentified when he got into Playcare as a company that's using orphans to make slave labour would definitely have their child care staff overworked and underpaid and you know , the guilt Matthew had for his family's deaths would be a factor when he sees said child care staff struggling

But even becoming a sort of big brother to younger orphans wouldn't change the fact he's a teenager going through puberty . If he wasn't actively crushing on some one, he at least would've had thoughts regarding the topic , as all boys do

Unfortunately he wouldn't have the privacy to explore such concepts since he would be sharing a bedroom with a dozen other kids, bunk beds piled on top of each other, adding onto the ever piling frustrations of being a teen forced to live in elementary

So imagine being Matthew, a traumatized teenager struggling and surrendered by much younger kids almost 24/7 , going through puberty with no privacy of your own and essentially made as an extra baby sitter as the adults are already overwhelmed with keeping up

And one day , you get chosen . You finally get to leave this place and finally get space to yourself-

Oh actually no, you're gonna be shoved into this strange dough mix with two other boys who are significantly younger than you because you're so good at handling younger kids and if you're not there to meditate between them they'd literally fall apart . You no longer have any personal space. You have share your body and mind with these two younger kids who are your responsibility now till the day you three collectively die

.....I need Matthew to have a meltdown is all I'm saying

[prototype1006defense]

Forced fusion is so scary to me

[prototype1006defense]

it feels weird to discuss this cuz I might just be influenced on a fried of mines fanfic-

But, it just, makes sense to me??? That Elliot Ludwig is the prototype?

Cuz the usual "creator gets turned into creation" has the creators as bad evil men, and with Elliot=prototype theory, i think it gives a new light.

A man who kept loosing those he cared and loved(first his wife, then his daughter, then finally Harley), growing more and more desperate, trying to fix things only to unknowingly make things worse and for it to come back and bite him in the ass.

Just-oUGH, THE ✨TRAGEDY✨

It is a pretty cool theory! I don't personally believe it but I have a friend who does and it definitely has a lot of angst protential!

[prototype1006defense]

Ask Box is now open!

It was switched off before and I just realized that! If you have any questions or concerns about the Prototype to address, please send them my way! If you have any other questions, those are welcome too! :)

[prototype1006defense]

The Prototype - Poppy Double Standard, Part 1

I won't deny Prototype was really unnecessarily scary and over-the-top with the whole 'Ollie' reveal.

I mean I'm not saying that Prototype is completely innocent here, especially since what Poppy said was in response to him repeating Ollie's "I'm here for you, Poppy." which must have baggage.

But Prototype didn't do anything to attack Poppy's self esteem before she taunted him about Catnap. which probably has some baggage. (Though Poppy doesn't seem to realize Ollie was the Prototype all along, she thinks Prototype did something to Ollie until he says "You can come home.")

Still, I can't entirely fault him. He sounds annoyed and bitter. Prototype isn't a saint but neither is Poppy.

I think we're seeing two really angry and bitter people duke it out. (Honestly though I'm still siding with the Prototype) However, the thing that provokes Prototype into saying the thing that everyone jumps him for, for being cruel. Everyone takes the "stop pretending to be stronger then you think you are" and labels it as the ultimate act of cruelty, but what Poppy said just before that was EQUALLY cruel. And the Prototype was audibly shaken by it.

Poppy: "You… What did you do with Ollie?"

Ollie: "I'm right here, Poppy. For you, I'll ALWAYS be here."

Poppy: "The Doctor, CatNap, Mommy, and Huggy. They're all dead. You… You have nothing now. No one. And soon, you'll have less than THAT."

The Prototype: "Stop that."

It's subtle but it's not an emotionless "Stop that". I do think that it got under his skin. Like yeah, Prototype hated The Doctor, and Mommy never liked Prototype too much, and we don't know how Huggy and Prototype got along (though Huggy isn't really dead) , but it seems like they were on good terms. But Catnap and Prototype go way back. And Poppy just helped kill him. And now she's reminding him that he's DEAD. As a TAUNT.

What Prototype said in response was cruel, but you know what? People are more likely to say cruel things when something cruel has just been said to them. And what Poppy said to Prototype was very cruel.

So please do not take what Prototype told her out of context, unless you're willing to remember that Poppy can give as good as she gets.

(Part 2 will come out when I think of another poppy vs prototype double standard to call out XD)

[prototype1006defense]

Dog Day's "12 Day of Playtime" entry shows the reason for his torture might go a little deeper then being a "heretic"

I mean it never justifies torture, but it's clearly not a case of "Dog Day wouldn't worship the prototype and so prototype tortured him"

combined with Dog Day being confirmed to be part of Safe Haven at some point and probably The Bomb Plan and it does really call into question the assumption Prototype just lets Catnap DO this to whoever disagrees with him.

[prototype1006defense]

Do you think the prototype used to be someone before he was the prototype, and if so, who?

Elliot Ludwig

Rich

Nobody, the prototype was created in the labs

Someone else

Voting ended onMay 13, 2025

[valluvslana]

:3

[prototype1006defense]

me showing PPT fans how to love prototype

[i-will-help-you-swim]

Reblog if you think asexuality is a legitimate sexuality.

I'm trying to prove something.

[cmoon-rabbit4-blog]

Reblog if your blog is a safe place for asexuals.

[gamercat09]

Reblog if your blog is a safe space for aromantic, asexual, and aroace people

[olliethekat]

reblog if all the above

[prototype1006defense]

5 posts!