Why is it whenever people correctly say that more people need to be engaged in militant tactics on the ground bc whats happening is too little are and too many are engaging with non violent tactics or social media, that the immediate response is "well not everyone is able to be involved on the ground like disabled people" there are certainly people who cannot be directly involved or leave the house without support but i dont see those posts as centering disabled people. If they were theyd be productively add on to the discussion about where to include disabled people in militant tactics? Again, we know the path forward is masses shutting down embassies, weapons factories, railroads and so on. There is no debate that this is the most effective tactic and i dont see how centering that discussion decenters disabled people. Especially since the tactic of empires like israel is too mass disable people when they revolt so we need to have these discussions
Also just to say I watched this vid today of PIJ in in gaza distributing candy and below is a screenshot of a palestinian militant with one leg and obviously I cant predict whether this is a result of war or whether he was born that way but heres an example of disabled peoples inclusion in militant efforts
Also whats happening is when a select few decide to bravely engage with the state and face extreme repercussions, is that instead of many people joining and sustaining the action, everyone just praises them and moves on. Not good
stormborns
kaledo-art
yousharknotpass
baratheonpilled
snowghoul
vaporwave
discoholicmusic
gummygunk
prguitarman
izzy806
