Nesta deserved a better author

Product Placement
taylor price
tumblr dot com
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Noah Kahan

if i look back, i am lost
EXPECTATIONS
h
Jules of Nature
untitled
RMH
NASA

roma★
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available
Keni
ojovivo
Claire Keane

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Lithuania
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Egypt
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@queenmanon
Nesta deserved a better author
you see, back when i was a kid, i used to love sjm's books. i thought rowalien and failsand was endgame. now i'm older and i'm like wtf was i doing back then? why the fuck is 300+ year old men partnered with like young adults. it's so fucking wrong. so i wanted to ask you, when did you join the anti community, because i'm not sure i'll be welcome, and you speak the truth about sjm's books (sorry, trash)
I was 17/18 I think when I made this account, if you want to join the community I don’t think you would have any trouble with anyone lmao
Saint Fayrug the Humble, High Lady of the Desk: does literally nothing to help Illyrian women, literally doesn't shut up about how fucking rich she is, doesn't give a fuck about anyone who isn't Rice, accepts an art studio from her poor subjects although she already owns 3+ big ass houses
Random Vel@ris citizen:
It's very telling that stans scream that 'golden' equals brown/black person, but are 100% convinced that Aedion is white. If you didn't know, SJM had described even him as golden at some point, but no stan would claim he's anything but white. So when they (insta stans) try to tell me that SJM meant for various characters to be black/brown, I always bring him up and they get real quiet real fast.
yep! @longsightmyth went through the books and found every instance of golden being used for a skin tone description, and canonically white characters such as Aedion, Nesta, alien, Lysandra, and more are all described as having golden skin. context clues are vital, but we really only know a couple lineages, such as Irene, who is described as having golden skin and a black father. it’s ridiculous that people are suddenly arguing that golden in sj///m’s world = a person of color, but i think Irene might be to blame for that, since she’s described as golden and is accepted canonically as a WOC. stans might just be trying to spread that to other characters who are decidedly white in order to diversify sj///m’s books (it isn’t working, at least outside stans’ circles)
I believe there was another winged race in acotar, called Peregrines or something, with feathered wings. Thesan's (HL of Dawn) lover was one of them.
yes I believe they’re called Peregryns, I didnt know sjm had added another winged race to the series when I answered the last ask. thank you!
Hey havent read the books but enjoys this blog I have to ask are the wings of the fae bug like or avian like what comes to my head when I think about it. Sorry if this is stupid!
only the Illyrians have wings in acotar and theyre described as being more bat like
Unrealistic Worldbuilding #1
The Ironteeth witches make absolutely no sense.
So we learn in Heir of Fire that they have sex with human men for pleasure and to fall pregnant with witchlings. But it's then claimed that the witchlings do not have a drop of human blood in them. This would only be possible if the witches could reproduce on their own, but no, they need sperm to fertilize their haploid eggs. The resulting diploid zygote would have half its chromosomes from the mother and half its chromosomes from the father. If the witchling is 100% witch, then that would mean she'd only have her mother's genes. But a haploid cell cannot reproduce, you stupid idiot.
The witches aren't identical copies of their mothers, though, and have some of their fathers' facial features, when it was just stated that the witchling has zero heritage from her father, which makes no sense anyway.
My brain cannot take this ridiculous contradictory arrangement of info dumping.
Then we have Elide. She's somehow a quarter witch, meaning three quarters of her is human. So how does that work, when in SJM's nonsensical world, witches + humans = pure witches with no human inheritance at all?
Manon's heritage also makes no sense. Some of the witches mate with Fae males as well, and the children have no Fae heritage from their fathers, either. Manon's father was a Crochan, and her mother was a Blackbeak. With the logic SJM dumped before, Manon should only have her mother's heritage, meaning she would be 100% Blackbeak.
I'm not going to discuss any more of this, because it's scientifically proven that if you say something enough times you'll start to believe it and the last thing I need is to mess up my knowledge with this worldbuilding.
Fuck, this is what gave me sleepless nights, I swear to God
Someone slept through all their biology classes...or was too busy writing Ratalien smut to grasp how simple genetics work
You don't even need great biology to know that a living being is born by two cells, one coming from the mother and one coming from the father, which means that that said being takes biological and anatomical traits from both his parents.....
to be fair her logic for everything is that magic is what makes things like the witchlings being pure witch work but even then it still doesnt make sense how elide could only be a qaurter witch
Stans constantly invade or tags and our asks, but would tear us apart if we did the same. Like you can like the books in peace and in your community - we don't care & won't bother you. But have some decency and do the same. And calling ignorant, 'slightly' racist, toxic and sexist elements of her books isn't even hate. That anon is really something to be calling you out for voicing out your opinion. I guess they're bitter that every other author is cutting ties with their fave lol
Ugh where is the lie? Despite our efforts to come up with a tagging system that would ensure us that our posts won't invade stans' space and a tagging system through which we could still talk about the characters that we like (such as #anti sjm: manon; #anti sjm: mor etc.), every once in a while, one of them pops up in our inboxes and seem to run out of offenses because they always call us out for the dumbest reasons and when they truly run out of offenses, they pull the sexism card (yOu diSliKe SJ/M bEcAuse sHe iS a wOman) or, more recently, they accuse us that we actually hate romance (????). SJ/M doesn't even write romance, because even her beloved hetero relationships are problematic af because no sane straight person acts like Rice, for example. Not to mention the treatment of her LGBTQ+ characters.
And criticizing a book for its racist, homophobic toxic message is not misoginy from our part because we don't SJ/M herself and consider her a bad writer because she is a woman. Being a woman doesn't excuse your problematic writing and it's the writing that we criticize.
Me everytime a stan slides into my inbox or comments under my post
Am I the only one who noticed that SJM has changed the SKIN TONE of her characters? Like, I remember Rhys being described as white in ACOTAR and suddenly he's tan in ACOMAF + rest of series. Dorian was described as white throughout the TOG series and then at a certain point (forgot which book) he became tan(?)
Nope you’re definitely not the only one. SJ/M shamelessly retcons diversity into the back half of her series all the time. The most obvious examples of this tendency are Rice and the I/llyrians and L/ucien. These dudes were all straight up white in their introductory books. Rice was described as pale, D0rian was white, L/ucien looked like Beron. But in AC0WAR all of a sudden the I/llyrians, Rice, and L/ucien had “golden-brown” skin and L/ucien’s father was actually H/elion. In E0S, D0rian was suddenly “tan.” Stans would try to excuse it away by saying that because Rice was UtM for 50 years he became pale, but that’s legitimately not how tanning and skin color works so lmao try again. The I/llyrians were vaguely tan, and people couldn’t decide whether they were white or not and still no one knows what ethnicity they are actually supposed to be beyond them being brown MOC. There’s simply no excuse for L/ucien; that was just an obvious retcon. SJ/M thinks no one will notice when she tacks on ethnicities several books into a series, and she views/practices this tactic with no nuance. It’s so insensitive, problematic, and condescending.
SJM really said in front of everyone at her most recent event that she’d have a threesome with Rhysand and Rowan? Lmao sis you kinda gross but ok lol
Why are there no other High Ladies?
This is a serious question and one that has bothering for a long fucking time. I know that it’s only done by SJM to glorify Fryer and Ricin blah, blah, blah, but ignoring them and all of their headassery, there’s no logical reason for women, I mean females to not inherit Special Cauldron Magic.
If the mating bond ensures that the coupling of a man and woman male and female will produce power offspring, doesn’t that imply that both partners are equal in power? For example, Kallias is Viviane’s mate, meaning that they have been fated (shudders) to create uber-powerful babies. Wouldn’t Viviane also possess power that is equal to his, a high lord’s?
It doesn’t make any fucking sense for the Mother or the Cauldron or whatever does the deciding to match him up with someone with less power. Therefore, the mates of High Lords (which I’m assuming are women females ugh because I just don’t believe SJM actually intended to include same sex mates) are just as fucking powerful as them.
And what the fuck happens when a High Lord has a daughter??? You mean to tell me that none of them have never had at least one daughter??? And even if they did, why would it just fucking skip them??? I am confusion.
“Witches didn’t need blood to survive, but humans didn’t need wine, either.”
― Sarah J. Maas, Heir of Fire
Honestly, I hate incest, but I couldn't help noticing that Manon and Asterin had so much chemistry between them, to the point where I was really sad they were cousins. I wish SJM had made them a couple instead of Manorian, which came literally out of nowhere. Also, I love healthy male friendships, but Dorian and Chaol had more chemistry between them than any of the canonical couples. Would have to killed to see Chaorian happen 🤦
The tea is that when George RR Martin includes the rape of a 13 year old girl and Pat Rothfuss writes 100+ pages of boring fairy sex it’s “just sex” and they still get considered part of the serious fantasy canon, but when a female fantasy author does it suddenly it’s “gratuitous smut” and their books can never be considered Serious Fantasy Literature™️ because they wrote about female orgasms and powerful women finding love, and their readers are derided for enjoying the sex scenes and wanting the romance because only Stupid Silly Women™️ care about these things and besides, haven’t you heard that the only accepted literary sex is unhealthy sex that is Painful But Somehow Still Hot™️ because the only valid, serious type of relationship involves a man abusing a woman for the delectation of a male audience!!
this post is still relevant and the tea is still piping
GRR Martin also wrote about women who had great sex. GREAT sex. And female orgasm. Just sayin’.
Yes there is a rape scene, but it’s cutting pretty close to the reality of the Middle Ages. Please have a look at how old women were when they were married, and please think about how old people got and please remember that childhood is a concept that stems from the Victorian era. WHOOPS!
Daenerys gets to enjoy some sexy times, too, by the way. Later. Just sayin’.
Also, if you judge Game of Thrones only by the sex scenes, this might not be the right series for you anyway.
Edited to add: Oh, one more thing! If you look closely at each chapter, you will find a word on top of the chapter. It can be “Tyrion”, or “Arya”, or “Theon”. These are names! And it means that the chapter shows things from the character’s point of view. Some people are bad. That’s why the thoughts and sentiments portrayed are also bad. This has been a sarcastic addition to a response to a post that has shown up a few times on my dash already and manages to piss me off everytime. NOWHERE in the series Martin says that rape is normal or “just sex”. NEVER.
so because people in the comments of this post just DO NOT SEEM TO GET IT, I’m going to add two significant pieces of information here.
1. I am literally a medievalist who studies rape and marriage in the Middle Ages. There is nothing you can say to me about the topic that I do not already know, unless you also study rape in the Middle Ages at the university level. All of the comments on this post that say “it be like that in the Middle Ages” are wrong. Here’s some more specific information:
It was NOT NORMAL for women to be married at the age of 13. Most women from the later middle ages (Asoiaf is pretty much later medieval/early modern if we go off of war of the roses…which he cribbed from) were married in their 20s. If a noble woman was married at a young age, it was assumed that her spouse would wait to consummate the marriage until she was considered old enough. Dany, at 13, would have barely been considered old enough (the age of consent for girls to marry is 12 in the eyes of the church but this isn’t the norm). There’s literally a case where a woman murders her husband and part of her reasoning is that he did not wait to consummate when she was young.
It wasn’t considered *normal* for 12 and 13 year olds to be having sex. I’ve read cases where rapists are dragged through the streets for raping children that age! 12 and 13 year olds are rarely termed women, they are generally, in my sources, still girls. Children this age would not have been expected to marry yet, and as such, they weren’t expected to have sex.
It is unlikely, though, that Drogo would have seen any ramifications for consummating marriage with Dany at that age. She’s 13 which by the Church’s standards meant she could consent to marriage. And marriage meant consummation. BUT was it NORMAL and EXPECTED for girls her age to get married and have sex? No, it was not.
Furthermore, in the Middle Ages, theres all this drama going on between the Church and noble families. Basically, the Church wants children to get married later, as teenagers, when they can consent of their own free will the to the marriage. Noble families want to marry their young kids off as they please, without asking the kids for their consent and without waiting until they are of age. So Dany, as someone SOLD into marriage, as someone who is forced to marry against her will, and as the last daughter of the greatest noble house in the world….welllllll, lets just say that the entire Dany and Drogo marriage would have been BEEF that the Catholic Church would have been VERY CONCERNED ABOUT. And if you don’t consent to the marriage, well…have you really consented to the sexual acts that take place after? No, not in the Church’s eyes I don’t think anyways. There are also numerous cases that Martin could have based the Dany and Drogo saga off of, which detail what actually happened when noble girls were married at a young age/kidnapped/sold into marriage/stolen from their husbands etc. But instead he chooses to make it…really gross and not interesting.
So, Dany by no means represents the norm in the Middle Ages, and she in fact represents something far more interesting that’s going on in medieval Europe (Church vs noble families vs what young girls actually want) than what Martin makes it out to be, which is eroticized sexual violence against a child. Even if we think Martin knows everything I and other medievalists know (does he read medieval latin…), he’s still only representing a very small part of the medieval population, and he isn’t even representing it very accurately.
People all over this fucking post love to say BUT IT WAS THE MIDDLES AGES. Except…..,,,none of you know what you’re talking about and all of your information comes from a fictional series that is purportedly “historically accurate” and “gritty” in its “realism.” Like, you all think marriage at 13 was normal and that rape was normalized or that no one cared about it because….you all use Martin and his ilk as history rather than understanding that it’s fiction. And someone, me, dares to critique this fiction and your defense is that it’s historically accurate??? What the actual fuck, is your reading comprehension that low? Are you completely incapable of understanding that authors make things up? And that critiquing the things that author’s make up is a very important part of literary studies??
A Song of Ice and Fire is not medieval history. Stop coming onto this post and telling me, a medievalist, that it is.
2. (this is quoted from an ask I answer previously). Let’s take a look at what the ~text~ actually says shall we?:
“Afterward she could not say how far or how long they had ridden, but it was full dark when they stopped at a grassy place beside a small stream. Drogo swung off his horse and lifted her down from hers. She felt as fragile as glass in his hands, her limbs as weak as water. She stood there helpless and trembling in her wedding silks while he secured the horses, and when he turned to look at her, she began to cry.Khal Drogo stared at her tears, his face strangely empty of expression.
“No,” he said. He lifted his hand and rubbed away the tears roughly with a callused thumb.
“You speak the Common Tongue,” Dany said in wonder.
“No,” he said again.
Perhaps he had only that word, she thought, but it was one word more than she had known he had, and somehow it made her feel a little better. Drogo touched her hair lightly, sliding the silver-blond strands between his fingers and murmuring softly in Dothraki. Dany did not understand the words, yet there was warmth in the tone, a tenderness she had never expected from this man.He put his finger under her chin and lifted her head, so she was looking up into his eyes. Drogo towered over her as he towered over everyone. Taking her lightly under the arms, he lifted her and seated her on a rounded rock beside the stream. Then he sat on the ground facing her, legs crossed beneath him, their faces finally at a height.
“No,” he said.
“Is that the only word you know?” she asked him. Drogo did not reply. His long heavy braid was coiled in the dirt beside him. He pulled it over his right shoulder and began to remove the bells from his hair, one by one. After a moment Dany leaned forward to help. When they were done, Drogo gestured. She understood. Slowly, carefully, she began to undo his braid.It took a long time. All the while he sat there silently, watching her. When she was done, he shook his head, and his hair spread out behind him like a river of darkness, oiled and gleaming. She had never seen hair so long, so black, so thick. Then it was his turn. He began to undress her.His fingers were deft and strangely tender. He removed her silks one by one, carefully, while Dany sat unmoving, silent, looking at his eyes. When he bared her small breasts, she could not help herself. She averted her eyes and covered herself with her hands.
“No,” Drogo said. He pulled her hands away from her breasts, gently but firmly, then lifted her face again to make her look at him.
“No,” he repeated.“No,” she echoed back at him.
He stood her up then and pulled her close to remove the last of her silks. The night air was chilly on her bare skin. She shivered, and gooseflesh covered her arms and legs. She was afraid of what would come next, but for a while nothing happened. Khal Drogo sat with his legs crossed, looking at her, drinking in her body with his eyes.After a while he began to touch her. Lightly at first, then harder. She could sense the fierce strength in his hands, but he never hurt her. He held her hand in his own and brushed her fingers, one by one. He ran a hand gently down her leg. He stroked her face, tracing the curve of her ears, running a finger gently around her mouth. He put both hands in her hair and combed it with his fingers. He turned her around, massaged her shoulders, slid a knuckle down the path of her spine.
It seemed as if hours passed before his hands finally went to her breasts. He stroked the soft skin underneath until it tingled. He circled her nipples with his thumbs, pinched them between thumb and forefinger, then began to pull at her, very lightly at first, then more insistently, until her nipples stiffened and began to ache.He stopped then, and drew her down onto his lap. Dany was flushed and breathless, her heart fluttering in her chest. He cupped her face in his huge hands and looked into his eyes.
“No?” he said, and she knew it was a question.She took his hand and moved it down to the wetness between her thighs.
“Yes,” she whispered as she put his finger inside her.”
Points at which the text is erotic and/or normalizes rape, and makes it out to be sexy sex, not because I am gross and read it that way, but because it’s there in the text:
-Drogo doesn’t just attack Dany, he is portrayed as gentle and loving, moving the reader away from the traditional rape script in which the rapist is a violent stranger: “He began to undress her. His fingers were deft and strangely tender. He removed her silks one by one, carefully, while Dany sat unmoving, silent, looking at his eyes.” and “Drogo touched her hair lightly, sliding the silver-blond strands between his fingers and murmuring softly in Dothraki. Dany did not understand the words, yet there was warmth in the tone, a tenderness she had never expected from this man.” Drogo is tender. He’s careful. He is explicitly and canonically portrayed in this manner, effectively moving the reader away from associating the sexual act with rape. AND THAT’S NOT BECAUSE ALL RAPE IS VIOLENT BECAUSE IT’S NOT, but *breathes deeply* it’s because most people only believe that a rape has occurred when it is violent and with a stranger. That’s literally the most common script people associate with rape—a stranger man attacking a woman outside. But most rapes actually happen between a woman and someone she knows and trust.LIKE HER HUSBAND. But that’s not what Martin is attempting to do here, he’s not attempting to portray spousal abuse. He’s fully 100% depicting this as consensual sex, and the hesitation on Dany’s part? It’s 100% supposed to be titillating. Let’s continue. -Drogo is said to “never hurt her” and spends a lot of time with foreplay, running his hand over her body etc. He’s portrayed as being caring, loving, as being the ideal man for this 13 year old girl to have her first sexual encounter with (i’m vomiting in my mouth a little as i type this). He caresses her slowly, taking his time, essentially teaching her about sex.
-He stimulates her nipples and breasts until they “ache.” How do we read this part as anything other than erotic? What other purpose does this serve aside from demonstrating that Dany is enjoying it and that Drogo is trying to make this good for her?-She’s flushed and breathless. She’s also “wet.” I mean…that is….so explicitly meant to be erotic, she is explicitly portrayed as enjoying this sexual encounter, I don’t really know how else to say it.
-finally, Dany’s hesitance is portrayed as something Drogo simply has to overcome. And yes he does that with foreplay and tenderness. But her resistance is still portrayed as a speed bump. This is how she feels at the beginning of the scene: “She felt as fragile as glass in his hands, her limbs as weak as water. She stood there helpless and trembling in her wedding silks while he secured the horses, and when he turned to look at her, she began to cry.” But by the end of the scene, we have her moving his hand between her legs, explicitly consenting to sexual acts—even though she can’t consent because she’s a child, but the point is that Martin depicts her as being able to consent, and that’s the most fucked up thing about this scene.
And I’d like to add that Martin also co-opts the r/pe victims “no” in this scene. I mean, Dany and Drogo repeat this word to one another, littering a scene that ends in the female-party’s enjoyment with the word no, spoken over and over again. I MEAN, That is such an EXPLICIT EROTICIZATION OF RAPE. It’s, I would argue, a very conscious choice on Martin’s part to meld r/pe and the erotica together here. How could it not be? We have a 13 year old child portrayed as initially resisting, and then she’s like, seduced into somehow enjoying the sex and “consenting” to it, and yet that same page is full of the word no, over and over again? The message, loud and clear, is that a woman’s inexperience or resistance is not only something that can be overcome if one tries hard enough, but also something that in itself can be titillating. Dany’s tacit resistance, the repetition of the word no (even though Drogo says it most of the time, it’s mere presence here adds to the melding of r/pe and the erotic that Martin is doing here), and her initial fears all mark this as a r/pe scene.
Except! Except. She’s wet by the end and chooses to put Drogo’s hand between her legs. If at first Dany is depicted as traumatized, by the end of the scene she is enjoying the encounter. She does not end the scene traumatized, nor spend the rest of the book upset about it. Martin didn’t write us a brilliant survivor’s story or anything. No only does Martin depict a 13 year old’s tears and resistance as something to be smooth over and placated with foreplay, but I would argue, her tears and trauma are PART OF WHY THIS SCENE IS MEANT TO BE SEXY. Dany’s nervousness at first is quickly subsumed by her desire for this random dude she just met, “helpless and trembling” become, by the end of the scene, “breathless” and “wetness.”
It is, without a doubt, a confirmation of the ultimate male fantasy: the seduction of a young virgin, who at first is scared but then comes around because well, how could she resist you forever, you stud muffin? Dany’s sexual awakening takes place at Drogo’s hands, by his guidance, and only because of his presence. Rape is alright because eventually she’s gonna enjoy it! Even if she’s just a kid! I mean, that’s literally the message here.And the thing is, this isn’t even unique to Martin! If we put this against a backdrop of hundreds of years of literature that frames rape as merely foreplay, that makes kidnapping and rape into mere ravishment, that makes female sexuality dependent on male violence, ie, only when subjected to rape will a woman’s sexuality awaken—not only is this scene explicitly meant to be erotic, but it’s exactly the type of eroticism and sexual pleasure that readers are used to! This is not an outlier in literature, and not in life, if we consider how much porn depicts violent sex as good sex, and depicts women as secretly wanting to be raped.
Furthermore, the rest of the book does not depict Dany and struggling with the trauma. HER AND DROGO FALL IN LOVE. I mean, jfc. There’s actually another scene in which, while they are copulating, Martin has her convince Drogo to let her fuck him on top because she’s tired of the way that the Dothraki will only have sex doggie style and wants more loving sex. (i mean i won’t even try to unpack the not so subtle racial undertones there)
Martin has her acting as if she’s a fully grown adult woman who wants to work her way through the entire kama sutra with her new hubby
SHE’S THIRTEEN. WHAT THIRTEEN YEAR OLD ACTS LIKE THIS
let me tell you, none of them do, but maybe it’s artifacts of rape culture like Dany’s r/pe in asoiaf that help perpetuate the idea that teenage girls can be “asking for it” and are “sluts” who “wanted it.”
You can enjoy these books if you want to. Hell, I watch the show because Sansa Stark. I am not here to tell anyone not to like ASOIAF. But if you can’t be critical of something that you enjoy, then….well, take some time to reexamine your enjoyment. Because the constant pushback I get on this post just demonstrates that people are incapable of confronting the fact that they enjoy a series that is imperfect and at times disgusting. So instead, they try to say that it’s historically accurate, or they try to tell me that Martin “doesn’t normalize rape,” or they tell me I’m gross, or that I just “don’t like sex scenes.” No. Me and my analysis here are not the problem. And I’m not sorry for pointing out something wrong in a series that y’all love so much. You’re still allowed to love it. What you’re not allowed to do is excuse the rape of a 13 year old girl.
Woaaaa
I want you all to know that Celery’s “iconic” dress in Q.oS was actually a real thing
So, this 👆 dress was designed for this 👇movie:
Here’s the gown:
But SOMEHOW, this very dress made up on this cover:
With nada. Rien.
No reference, no nod, no nothing.
I know I shouldn’t be surprised anymore, but somehow I still am.
She pinned the photo, she most lilely asked the cover artist to paint Celery’s gown in that way, but somehow, none of them felt like writing a reference there.
Also really not cute that the dress was from a movie that takes place in London Chinatown.
That is a dress that was intended for a woman of color—for a Chinese woman, playing a Chinese woman. It’s modeled after a cheongsam. It is not for some stupid white colonizer to traipse around in.
E X A C T L Y
Apart from the obvious theft (because it is theft when you lift something without asking for permission and acknowledge in references), this gown - obviously designed after cheongsam with obvious Chinese details (i mean just look at the dragon) - becomes associated (and iconic) to a white woman coming from a world at least supposedly inspired by Late Middle-Age Europe. Not to mention a character with clear racist and colonialist tendencies.
This is a legitimately curious question of mine: it looks like you’ve read SJM’s books, but why would you dedicate a blog to hating an author if you read their books?
because I can do whatever the fuck I want
saw a stan post this (I hate when they come across your followed tags when they’re completely unrelated) but lemme just say one thing “I LOVE YOU” IS NOT AN APOLOGY i don’t care how often he says it, i don’t care how he words it, i don’t care about the arguments that alien had it coming “I LOVE YOU” IS NOT AN APOLOGY