An Interview with Richard Siken
The Stonewall Inn

shark vs the universe
Misplaced Lens Cap

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
trying on a metaphor

PR's Tumblrdome
Not today Justin
cherry valley forever

Andulka
Jules of Nature

ellievsbear
Keni

izzy's playlists!
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Kiana Khansmith
One Nice Bug Per Day
noise dept.
official daine visual archive
occasionally subtle
will byers stan first human second

seen from Greece
seen from Indonesia
seen from Taiwan
seen from Slovenia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Argentina
seen from Ecuador
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from India
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Tunisia
seen from Iraq

seen from United States
@queerpontmercy
An Interview with Richard Siken
The Allure of the Little Brown Bird: A (somewhat meandering) doodle journal about my months-long hunt for a tiny bird.
owl pic is ai, Gemini logo in the corner
MAN yeah I should've seen that. Thanks, deleted
Melon collies
I can no longer feel the infinite sadness
final show of the fabulous bodies tour last night in LA and DANG was it a wonderful time. thank you to skylight books and dynasty typewriter. thank you to my special guest @olivieblake to my buds mckenzie goodwin and mara wilson THANK YOU TO THIS TIMELINE FOR PROVING LOVE
spill for me, Muse, the wine-dark tea on a problematic man
If you follow Selmers to the poetry society meeting in Night In The Woods, this is her poem. I loved it and the themes of the game, and wanted to use it as practice to see if i can control the way readers ‘hear’ the words through images.
nip over to troy, bit of rough and tumble, big horse, bish bash bosh, back home to ithaca. simple as
the dream thieves by maggie stiefvater // how to draw a horse by emma hunsinger // alex strangelove dir. craig johnson // the miseducation of cameron post by emily danforth // jesus of suburbia by green day // the simple truth by philip levine
perchance,,,
this disability pride month lets be kinder to folks with moral ocd . no more “if you really care about this minority , you’ll reblog this post” , “someone will die if you don’t reblog this” , etc etc , and all other kinds of guilt tripping reblog bait . at the VERY LEAST tag your reblog bait so we can filter it out and avoid unnecessary spirals . it’s 2026 , we need to move past using guilt to get engagement .
My biggest tip for fanfic writers is this: if you get a character's mannerisms and speech pattern down, you can make them do pretty much whatever you want and it'll feel in character.
Logic: Characters, just like real people, are mallable. There is typically very little that's so truly, heinously out of character that you absolutely cannot make it work under any circumstance. In addition, most fans are also willing to accept characterization stretches if it makes the fic work. Yeah, we all know the villain and the hero wouldn't cuddle for warmth in canon. But if they did do that, how would they do it?
What counts is often not so much 'would the character do this?' and more 'if the character did do this, how would they do it?' If you get 'how' part right, your readers will probably be willing to buy the rest, because it will still feel like their favourite character. But if it doesn't feel like the character anymore, why are they even reading the fic?
Worry less about whether a character would do something, and more about how they'd sound while doing it.
I don't remember where I saw this piece of advice so I can't credit it, unfortunately
But it was along the lines of "instead of asking whether something is out of character, ask 'what would it take for this character to do this'"
Which I think fits really nicely with this advice of making the actual action itself also feel in character
wishing all outdoor workers, delivery drivers, people who have to walk to work, bus riders, etc a very Don't die in this heat
all the rights that come with marriage you should be able to have without marriage btw. you should be able to designate a person who can visit you in the hospital regardless of your relationship to that person.
People in the notes are saying "You can!" referring just to the hospital visitation part, and sure (depending). But people should have access to ALL of the benefits of marriage without needing to be married.
You should be able to add anyone you want on your health insurance plan.
You should be able to sponsor the visa of anyone you choose to move to your home country.
You should be able to name anyone you choose as the legal-from-birth legal coparent of any child you give birth to.
You should be able to apply for student aid on your own at any age.
And yes, yes, ideally healthcare and college should be free, international migration should be unrestricted, and the entire concept of legal parenthood should be rewritten from the ground up. But right now we're talking about marriage benefits.
You know, when I've remarked that a lot of the responses to my posts feel like people are just plucking out keywords they think they recognise based on the shape of them and replying to what they imagine the post says based on that, the possibility never occurred to me that this is actually how many American schools are currently teaching kids to read.
Like, my assumption this whole time has been that when folks go "I misunderstood this post that says [thing] as saying [unrelated thing] because I mistook [word] for [completely different word that happens to start with the same letter]", that was a bit. What do you mean they're teaching kids a reading method that's tailored to produce this exact error?
Three cueing. Once you learn about it, a whole lot of very frustrating online discourse with US Americans makes so much sense 😭
For decades, schools have taught children the strategies of struggling readers, using a theory about reading that cognitive scientists have
If you were taught to read with the three cueing method, and now struggle to read fluently, you can still learn to read properly!
-> Phonics For Adults <-
If you're a teenager, you can still use this resource.
Spin the wheel. That's who's trying to kill you.
Spin the wheel again. That’s who’s trying to protect you.
(If you have zero idea about a name you got, spin until you see someone you recognize.)
Are you safe?
Absolutely not. I'm dead. 100% dead.
I might stay alive, but it'll be a really close thing.
I'll take some hits, for certain, but I should be okay in the end.
A few attacks might get through, but nothing concerning.
The attacker might be able to get in one lucky hit. If that.
I am the opposite of worried. I'm 100% safe.
…Look. I've tried picturing this. But I honestly don't know how to answer.
(I've run this poll twice before, expanding it significantly for the second run. With about a year passed since that second run, I thought it was time to add another couple hundred names to the list and have another go.)
nip over to troy, bit of rough and tumble, big horse, bish bash bosh, back home to ithaca. simple as