The Vast @radfleur-adventures - Tumblr Blog

#important / pinned #follow / looking at blog cleanser #i shouldnt have to dig through your blog to find out what your ACTUAL stance is #this is not discourse youre just mad youre unable to get away with supporting offenders #maybe take an actual stance on whether or not you think assaulting someone is bad instead of making another vague ass 'contact stance' that #says absolutely nothing of value #'ermmm im pro consent teehee' yeah no shit sherlock now do you think a 16 year old can consent to an 22 year old #ill give you a hint #the answer is NO

fleuraison-sweetie

in a slightly better world, i would be radqueer, and i would be so happily. i support all transids, i support paraphiles whether they choose to be in recovery or don't feel the need to, i generally align with all the principles of radqueerism on paper. but i can't shake the contact discourse.

contact discourse shouldn't exist because the answers are blatantly obvious. a chronological minor cannot consent to sexual advances from a chronological adult (with the obvious exception of teens who have like 2 years of age gap), a theriform animal cannot consent to sexual advances from a bodily human, and it's been proven that sexual contact actively harms them mentally, regardless of physical harm. seems like a reasonable point of view, and it's not a point of view i'm ever going to be open to changing.

radqueers disagree. not every radqueer, but the radqueer community as a whole discourages this position. they parade around acceptance of pro-contact paraphiles, they turn a blind eye to predators openly using their tags to find victims and those potential victims seeking predators because they've been taught it's ok, and if you try to set a firm boundary against this, you have people swarming you to say you're not radqueer - you can't be, unless you learn to accept nonconsensual abuse.

then when someone in their circles is exposed as an abuser, they wonder how this could have happened, to pretend that their community hasn't been carefully crafted for the past few years to be a safe space for that behavior. it's horrible for potential victims, it's horrible for paraphiles being encouraged to offend, it's horrible for everyone.

once again, this is not the opinion of every single radqueer that exists. and i don't believe the community has always been this way. but i cannot deny that this is the way it is now, and that there is a problem with it, and that i am uncomfortable associating with the community as a whole until this changes.

123gocat

worried abt reblogging this cuz i have some radqueer followers,,. i dont h8 you guys but they r right..........

and the mudding down of contact stances . saying that anti-contact means being against it for nonharmful to act upon paras, is not true and has never meant that. https://pache-definitions.carrd.co/

contact stances have NEVER meant anything anti roleplay or anti-kink . anti contact is not against zoo4therian. anti contact is not against insys relationships . anti c doesnt include innerworld, spiritual, or psychological identity . these rules were made up for safety reasons, its not okay to be changing the terms.

fleuraison-sweetie

in a slightly better world, i would be radqueer, and i would be so happily. i support all transids, i support paraphiles whether they choose to be in recovery or don't feel the need to, i generally align with all the principles of radqueerism on paper. but i can't shake the contact discourse.

contact discourse shouldn't exist because the answers are blatantly obvious. a chronological minor cannot consent to sexual advances from a chronological adult (with the obvious exception of teens who have like 2 years of age gap), a theriform animal cannot consent to sexual advances from a non theriform, and it's been proven that sexual contact actively harms them mentally, regardless of physical harm. seems like a reasonable point of view, and it's not a point of view i'm ever going to be open to changing.

radqueers disagree. not every radqueer, but the radqueer community as a whole discourages this position. they parade around acceptance of pro-contact paraphiles, they turn a blind eye to predators openly using their tags to find victims and those potential victims seeking predators because they've been taught it's ok, and if you try to set a firm boundary against this, you have people swarming you to say you're not radqueer - you can't be, unless you learn to accept nonconsensual abuse.

then when someone in their circles is exposed as an abuser, they wonder how this could have happened, to pretend that their community hasn't been carefully crafted for the past few years to be a safe space for that behavior. it's horrible for potential victims, it's horrible for paraphiles being encouraged to offend, it's horrible for everyone.

once again, this is not the opinion of every single radqueer that exists. and i don't believe the community has always been this way. but i cannot deny that this is the way it is now, and that there is a problem with it, and that i am uncomfortable associating with the community as a whole until this changes.

#reblog #pretty much the only reason we're pre-radqueer / spiteradqueer #on top of being a fleuraison #unfortunately the community is a lot smaller #but honestly id rather stick around the the folks who dont promote abuse / assault / offending and fascism actually #something something horseshoe theory in action

"pro-contact neu-consent" what the fuck are we even doing bro

#targetted #genuinely fuck xenosatanists

averagefleurson

elaborate IMMEDIATELY

#call me permablocking how im mass blocking recommended blogs #whom say 'pro-consent' or 'pro-consensual contact'#then one search later find they support contact #like NAAAHHHHH

evansbackupblog

p1nkiek1ttie

no, actually, i can’t be friends with someone who has opposing political views. this is mostly due to the fact my views are “people deserve rights”

themurdochmemesteries

"i want old fandom back :(" y'all can't even handle people shipping fictional characters with a 2 year age gap, what makes you think you'll be able to handle all the stuff old fandom came with?

tieflingkisser

citoyen-rouge

sticksandstans

the rise of conservatism and gen z puritanism while still simultaneously trying to be hip and woke is so annoying because you have these people saying "match my freak" and then they get mad at ageplay and petplay and cnc and somno and anything raunchier than a pair of fuzzy handcuffs. you're not a "freak" if you think having a fetish is synonymous with being evil

sigh... termed right about when I was going to pay my eye tax...

#sigh #my dash feels very empty without the doctor

its-not-fate-its-destiny

Fandoms stopped being a fun escape from reality when people started spreading the belief that you should prioritize purity over pleasure and the art you create must be a reflection of your moral standards at all times.

depsidase

military-moe

if you're pro or neutral AI im gonna assume you're a right winger AND racist tbh

like hot take but praising and defending something that's killing low income communities (cough cough. mostly black communities. cough cough) makes you inherently anti-woke.

working on a coining blog. er. more central ID blog. This is mostly just a main we shall reblog in.

#not really important #general info #radqueer community #fleur community

wish there were more coins (or even the acknowledgement) of Ti & Ci identities... :(

like we're Tifrench.... where all the Tris leaning folks at...

(Ti = Tris leaning Trans, Ci = Tris leaning Cis)

#fleuraison #transid #trisid #tiid #transfrench #trisfrench #fleur community #radqueer community

Trending Blogs

Recently Viewed Blogs

The Vast