Not The Fun Kind

Radfem~19~Irish

[immigrant]

i think this is largely also because learning accurate pregnancy information dissuades women from having babies. women are largely kept in the dark about the actual complications it's extremely disturbing how much women dont know about pregnancy until they actually do it

[radicalli57]

Intelligent women who know the reality of pregnancy, birth and recovery would never do it. You have to be brain dead to willingly go through that. Never mind letting a male stick his rod in you in the first place.

[iamxuechengmei]

Wow on the ableism and misogyny

[radicalli57]

Ableism? Misogyny?

Get up off your knees

[femmefatalecult]

Can we stop normalize sexualizing yourself as a form of empowerment? It's a dangerous mindset to have. Young girls are literally getting called prude, vanilla, loser, ugly etc. because they wont be fucking different guys each week and walk around half naked. It's not empowering it's literally making you a target.

[radicalli57]

One thing people need to accept is that evolutionary speaking, human females are the losing/inferior sex in the human race. If we don’t accept that, we cannot even begin to try to change it.

Males have controlled and abused us for their own evolutionary gains for thousands and thousands of years. Think of how many fcked up genes females been forced to carry on? There is no disputing that, it is fact, you can see it in everyday life, in the way women are treated and spoken about.

The male being a “parenting figure” is not how humans originally evolved. “Fatherhood” was invented by males in order to control females and their offspring more efficiently. Very little mammals co-parent, and ever fewer with just a male, and in none of these mammals do we see the same severity of control imposed by humans males towards human females.

However it doesn’t have to be that way, we as females can turn the tables for our own survival and evolution, but first we have to admit and see the control males hold over us, and find the fight and will to destroy that hold.

Do you want to be the inferior and controlled sex in the human species? No, of course you don’t, so fight to change the future, fight for yourself, your sisters and for all our foremothers who had to endure suffering for so long.

[radicalli57]

The amount of you all who like playing naive is unreal.

The oppression of women would never have been so successful and easy for centuries and centuries if we weren’t inferior, we are. Do we have to remain this way? No, but there’s no point acting like we weren’t/aren’t. Evolutionary/biologically, we are the weaker sex, disagree with me all you like but history proves it. Do I like that fact? Of course not, but I’m not going to sit and pretend the oppression of women just randomly started “just because”.

It’s because of this failure to accept our current position in society alongside males, that many women live in a pretend state of believing they are currently equal to males, when in every single part of life and society this is just not true. Males know we are still under their control. Even when a woman is president, she is under patriarchal male control in all her actions and more often than not, her appearance also.

Do you want to remain the inferior sex? Do you want to remain under the control of males for the rest of humanity?

Of course those of us who have had our eyes opened fight against it, properly. However we must accept that there are women who choose to go down remaining a slave to males, and we have to move on and help women who actually want to protect themselves and their sisters.

[fairymischief-deactivated202502]

What you are not understanding is that being physically or systemically less powerful does not make us the "inferior sex." By your logic, if I am bigger and stronger than you and could push you around, that makes you an "inferior woman" compared to me. I may be dumber than you, I may be less courageous, less wise, less emotionally intelligent, less skilled, less creative, less resilient, less of EVERYTHING else - but if I can just use my superior strength to physically cow you into submission, according to you that makes me the overall superior person. Does that REALLY make sense to you?

A high school senior who twists a tiny freshman's arm behind their back and takes their lunch money is the "superior person" according to this "might = superiority" worldview; when really it just makes them a bully who happens to be larger than the person they're bullying.

People and the sexes do not become inferior or superior overall based on who is stronger and who is controlling them.

Your way of thinking is shocking simplistic, male, and unnuanced. Your logic is the logic of the caveman. Evolve.

[radicalli57]

Yes, if you could push me around like that I would be considered inferior. Why are you getting so offended by definitions? Channel the anger you have for the situation towards the situation, not me. Evolutionary speaking, we are currently, and have been below males in rank. Males control us, in every aspect of society. If you don’t accept that fact how can you even begin to devise a plan to change the present?

Males have literally selectively bred us for centuries, if we weren’t inferior in some way, they wouldn’t have been able to do so.

[meganehoney]

People and the sexes do not become inferior or superior overall based on who is stronger and who is controlling them. Your way of thinking is shocking simplistic, male, and unnuanced. Your logic is the logic of the caveman. Evolve.

Yeah inferior is obviously used in bigoted context and I just can't agree. women HAVE been selected to be smaller and weaker but that's in terms of physical strength only. If you're calling us inferior for the way males have enslaved us..... That's male inferiority, not indictive of a woman's worth.

Women are mostly superior mentally ethically morally spiritually and even physically we have superior endurance.

Picking and choosing what we can define as inferior and superior in regards to women is just spreading the idea that it's women's fault for how they were born. You can point out women have been enslaved and made weak and preyed upon without implying they're worse than men because of it.... because that is the context of 'inferior'. It means 'less than'' "not enough"

[radicalli57]

Inferior= lower in rank, it’s a definition, a term.

So yes we as women ARE inferior to males evolutionary as they control us.

You are making it out that I’m saying women are worthless, when I have done no such thing. Your interpretation is incredibly surface level, you see a word, put your own interpretation on it, and run with it.

In the grand scale, us women who see and find the truth are few and far between. “We were conditioned”, the very fact that males were able to get so much control over us the first place, proves that nature has given them superiority over us. However we as women have the power to change the course nature took, the problem is majority of women aren’t strong enough mentally to even want to end patriarchy. Call me harsh all you want but it’s true, many women profit off of their and other women’s oppression, and are perfectly happy doing so.

You are putting words in my mouth based on your own interpretation of the word “inferior” and you are viewing the conversation wrong, you are viewing it in terms of ethics, I’m not talking about ethics. It is not women’s fault for how we were born and the way males treat us, it’s nature that’s to blame there. If you look around, in most species nature is a females greatest enemy.

However if you can’t accept that we are currently weaker than males physically then that’s just failure to take basic facts into account.

We as women are lower in rank than males, they control us in almost every way, even when it doesn’t appear like it. This would not be the case if we weren’t the weaker sex. Yes males control us physically, but they also control almost all of us mentally.

Why are you getting offended at me pointing out the truth that we currently, as women overall, do not possess enough power, physical or mental, to be even equal to males in terms of evolutionary superiority. If we were, patriarchy wouldn’t exist.

What do you think draws radfems apart from majority of women? We have risen above male control, we are fighting to end males superiority over us, we are the ones who are no longer inferior, at least in terms of mentality. We will always be inferior in terms of physical strength, that can’t be changed.

Ethically, yes I get why you would call males the inferior ones as so would I, but I’m talking about biologically and evolutionary here.

[meganehoney]

I don't know a single person who would hear the word inferior and assume you mean lower rank. Especially since it's an insult the oppressor class popularized and regularly uses to demean women....

[radicalli57]

Their fault for not reading definitions, not understanding the topic being discussed and jumping to accusations.

Do you believe stating the basic fact that we as women are weaker than and under the control of males as demeaning women?

Trust me none of us like the truth, how painful is it to realize how horrifically our fellow women have been treated for centuries under male control and as second-class citizens but the truth is we WERE and still ARE. How was this possible? Because we are/were weaker. Throughout history, in the grand scale of things, there has only been relatively small numbers of women pushing feminism forward, we are the women who have evolved, who have the mental strength and capacity to see the lies and brainwashing pushed by males.

So overall when I see how vastly the majority of women still worship,destroy themselves and fellow women and breed with males even after being faced with the truth, I tend not to believe our mental capacity is overall superior. Our emotional one sure is, but males have also used this to their advantage.

[meganehoney]

Actually I don't think not knowing the exact definitions to words and just the widely-known versions is a character fault. If you want to talk to the average woman in the real world, she's not gonna be carrying around a dictionary and asking you to go in depth about your opinions.

Misogynists will hear your first sentence and disregard everything else you've said because you're a woman calling yourself inferior (confirmation bias)

Like-minded feminists will set aside their time to try to understand your point of view and maybe even start considering themselves inferior. They would want to know why a fellow 'feminist' is validating the internalized misogyny they've been desperately trying to prove to themselves is nonsenical (obv this isn't logical from a feminist lense but feminists are not perfect)

All this to say. It's not my business what you decide to do. I'm just sharing my opinion. That women don't deserve to be told they're inferior. Because it's the farthest thing from the truth and many women will be hurt just hearing you say 'inferior'. I can tell you don't care about the impact you have on less knowledgable women, but I do, and that's why I had to share.

(also just say lower-rank if that's actually what you mean? Is an extra word that difficult)

[radicalli57]

Listen, if other women can’t accept the present and historical reality, that’s a them issue. I don’t see what’s wrong with acknowledging that we are inferior evolutionarily, perhaps if more actually accepted how dire our situation really is there would be more of a push for change.

It is not validating internalized misogyny to accurately state that we are “inferior” ”weaker” or “lower in rank” to males. What an awful way to try and twist my words and the reality we live in and for what? To sugarcoat it? To make it more bearable? To kidd yourself?

Shall we lie and say: “oh no, women are not at all inferior/lower in rank to males, look at the pay gap, look at marriage, look at reproduction, look at assault and rape statistics, look at women’s basic rights in many countries, look at how easy it is for males to reproduce in comparison to what women are forced through but no not all all is there a power difference, definitely not, you go girl, you have the same chance as any male in this world, you won’t be treated as a second-class citizen at all!”

Are you really claiming that truthfully stating that women are weaker than males is wrong? I’m sorry but if one cant accept the reality of what we’re fighting against that’s not my issue. Majority of women just didn’t/don’t have the mental strength to accept the truth when faced with it, obviously excluding those who were/are physically unable to leave males due to entrapment.

If stating reality is going to knock out as many women as you claim, then fighting against it is going to be impossible for them. Of course accepting our reality is hard, but you know what we who had the will to fight against it did? We live with that hurt, and use it to push back. I’m not going to sugarcoat reality.

[meganehoney]

I already explained my opinion. Calling a woman inferior for physical strength, when she excels in every other aspect is a lie. Lower-rank is true, but inferior has a double meaning. You're infering one of the definitions doesn't matter, even though you seem gungho about making sure everyone knows the definition. (Because you're claiming you're NOT stating women are less than, when that's literally what inferior means.) Claiming it doesn't effect women to hear this.

You putting words in my mouth and failing to understand nuance proves to me this isn't a real conversation about ideas and points of view, but you trying to prove you're smarter. Which also doesn't make it seem like you're putting women first btw.

And me choosing not to refer to women in a demeaning way isn't "stating that women are not weaker than males." I never argued against the science.

[radicalli57]

I never claimed it doesn’t affect us to hear it, we just learn to accept current reality and then devise how to change it.

How do we as women “excel” in every other aspect? What aspects are you speaking of? Because far too many women certainly do not excel in many of the key aspects to our liberation. The only aspect I can see that we tend to excel in is ethics(mostly), there’s also emotional intelligence, however males also use that to their advantage.

To be fair, I do consider us women who stay away from males and denounce social conditioning to be smarter, we are more likely to survive and help other women to survive by distancing ourselves from the oppressor.

You’re also still implying I’m using the word inferior in an ethics-based way, which I’m not.

[meganehoney]

"Because far too many women certainly do not excel in many of the key aspects to our liberation. The only aspect I can see that we tend to excel in is ethics(mostly), there’s also emotional intelligence"

So you admit you DO believe women are inferior. Ladies, NEVER feel the need to argue your worth to a male supremacist. They will make up circular DISINGENOUS arguments trying to convince themselves they're correct.

But I'm gonna anyway cuz I'm bored. Here are a few facts since you're asking:

We are more flexible than male people.

We have better stamina and endurance in some extreme long-distance sports in comparison to male people (such as in ultra-marathons).

Some animals (especially other mammals such as wolves, horses, cats, etc.) are instinctively threatened by males, even if they have never been harmed by them. This is not the case with women.

We have better immune systems and survive viruses better than male people.

We survive famines and epidemics overall better than male people.

We survive variations in temperature overall better than male people.

We have better sense of smell than men.

Our chromosomes provide us with extra protection against certain genetic diseases like hemophilia, and we have more genetic diversity.

We have better balance due to our center of gravity being lower, in our pelvis's, while males have their center of gravity in their torsos. This makes us naturally better at sports like rock-climbing, gymnastics, certain martial arts, etc.

"The male fetus is at greater risk of death or damage from almost all the obstetric catastrophes that can happen before birth.2 Perinatal brain damage,3 cerebral palsy,4 congenital deformities of the genitalia and limbs, premature birth, and stillbirth are commoner in boys,5 and by the time a boy is born he is on average developmentally some weeks behind his sister: “A newborn girl is the physiological equivalent of a 4 to 6 week old boy.”

Women and girls have better color perception than males.

Multiple orgasms.

We're biologically better suited to being astronauts and living in space (note: and this was discovered 15 years ago yet this work was never published)

Some articles (debatable on credibility) suggest that we are better able to withstand complete sensory deprivation for several hours in comparison to men, who were able to withstand complete sensory deprivation for minutes.

For unknown reasons, we do not experience the same percentage of macular degeneration that men do in space.

We have a different adrenaline response. Our hormone systems work differently and so we do not lose as much decision making ability and fine motor control as men do in a crisis, making us better snipers and pilots thanks to our reaction time.

We have better life expectancy overall.

We heal quicker than males after injuries and are more likely to heal with lower rates of infection due to X-linked genes and cellular mosaicism for X-linked parental alleles.

While it's not clear whether this is due to how we are socialized since birth or concerns biological influences, women have greater spatial cognition and object location memory (furthermore, while men scan maps quicker, women remember more information from a map. Our moms seeming to be the one to always remember where lost objects were wasn't just imagined)

Women recall the appearance of other people better than male people (again, this could be more environmental than biological).

Though it's true that a child's DNA is inherited by both parents, the mitochondria inherits its genetic information from the maternal line. If you are female and choose to have offspring, you transmit your mitochondrial DNA to them and they will have only your mitochondrial DNA - while sons inherit it too, only female children are able to pass it down. Mitochondrial DNA is frequently used in evolutionary biology to construct genetic trees.

Female human beings are better able to manage glucose and store it in the muscle to be used in endurance sports and situations. We also have more adiponectin, higher concentration of fatty acids, and intramuscular triglycerides - all of which enhance endurance and may delay "hitting a wall" athletes experience.

Women have a greater proportion of "slow-twitch" muscle fibers which are more fatigue-resistant. "Fast-twitch" muscles allow for more quick powerful bursts of strength but fatigue quickly. In one study it's shown female weightlifters have more fast-twitch muscles, so this may be more dependent on exercise than sex.

I can tag you in the post I got these from that cites sources. And I can tag you in a post that PROVES males are inferior. With statistics on how terrible they are^^

Since women are not inferior, they had to be bombarded with a massive literature of religious, social, biological and, more recently, psychological ideology to explain, insist, that women are secondary to men. And to make women believe that they are inferior what better subject for this literature of religious teaching, cautionary folk tales, jokes and customs, than the female body?

Rosalind Miles, Who Cooked the Last Supper: The Women's History of the World

[radicalli57]

How are those things you listed going to free us from male control? Why have we been oppressed for so long? Why were we able to be oppressed in the first place? Again you are taking what I’m saying out of CONTEXT. I am talking about overall EVOLUTIONARILY, not in every single thing we do, but when it comes to aspects related to our liberation, majority overall lack, if we didn’t then patriarchy would have never existed in the first place, or at least would not have gone on for centuries. Why did we fall for their lies in the first place? If we are not inferior in that aspect, why were they able to oppress us in the first place?

I believe males as a base organism ARE overall inferior, however in the context of who controls who and who controls reproduction, we as women are inferior IN THAT ASPECT. I believe males are nothing but a dirty mutation nature created, I believe the female SHOULD be the leader, the top, the superior evolutionarily, we should solely determine reproduction, but we’re not and we don’t, not in the context of the original post.

[meganehoney]

I've already written you off so I'm not wasting my time on your paragraphs of goalpost shifting and strawman arguments.

Women are superior to males :)

Sorry that upsets you? Put it in your diary, cuz you ain't convincing me otherwise.

[radicalli57]

Why would that statement upset me? I obviously agree with it overall. Your thinking is incredibly surface level for radblr.

[cherrysmokez]

People who get mad at a woman for saying this seem to forget this is exactly how every man in all of history thinks. Actually, this is what every man in all of history *knows*.

men *know* we are inferior. Men *know* we are weaker. Men know pregnancy makes us vulnerable. Me *know* penetration is degrading. I mean, the way they talk about “sex” (if that’s even what you want to call it) they know sex is degrading. They know that they are the superior sex but they’re so happy that women have tricked themselves into thinking that they could be equal and that sex is empowering. Because that just means more sex for them. The entire reason the lock and key analogy exists is because men know sex is degrading to the woman. Every man knows that women are weaker, that’s why they like that we exist. We’re this perfect creation for them, to fuck and abuse and domestically control. They can even outsource reproduction, they can reproduce with none of the pain! Let’s be real, how many women wish in the moments of labour someone else could just come and do the rest of the work for them? That’s what men feel. Soooo happy someone else feels the pain for them, and they still get their DNA copied!

[radicalli57]

I think they’re genuinely still trying to grasp onto hope that not all males think like that.

Truth is when you know this truth the world does become very difficult to navigate and cope with, many would not be able to cope with it.

Nature should be considered an enemy to women as much as males. Nature is the reason why males were able to oppress us at such scale and for so long in the first place.

[radicalli57]

While the burka is obviously more extreme, makeup serves a similar purpose.

In both cultures, alteration of the female face and body is expected of all women and girls, while males in both are permitted to remain natural.

A woman’s face is sexualized in both contexts.

The burka to neutralize the perceived sexual nature of the female face and hair

The makeup to conceal, reshape or alter the face to fit misogynistic beauty and sex standards

Burka is more extreme, but both stem from the unnecessary sexualization of woman and girls.

[radicalli57]

Survival shouldn’t be any more desirable than extinction if it relies on the oppression and suffering of women and girls.

[radicalli57]

Genuinely, someone make up a new name for women who actually engage in zero dick-worshipping and don’t give anything to males.

The radical feminism label is not fit for purpose, majority of you all are hypocritical af.

You claim to understand how horrific male behavior has always been and is currently, yet majority of you are out here dating and fcking males.

Just say you can’t resist dick and don’t dare claim to stand for female liberation.

[radlizbeth]

is this person a troll/infiltrator? if not do some research about how purity politics is usually the sole downfall of every unsuccessful liberation movement and specifically women's liberation. this feels like very strategic posting with the goal of dividing the movement and having women leave radical feminism or not engage with it at all. if you're being genuine then maybe try researching the psychology of change and how shame based motivation is incredibly harmful and ineffective long term. if you can't resist being blatantly misogynistic then yeah maybe leave behind your feminist label.

[elven-supremacy-deactivated2026]

Shame-based motivation actually pushes people out of spaces where they might otherwise be able to heal, because they end up pre-occupied focusing on the mistakes they made and feeling like they don't deserve to be in a healthier space because they committed The Sin. In this case having been with males. All of society normalizes heterosexuality. There is a propaganda machine pushing the notion that women must like men. Women(especially lesbians) get correctively raped in attempts to "fix" their homosexuality. Women get coerced or even forced into situationships with males all the time, especially in countries without women's rights. It can take ~7 attempts before leaving an abusive intimate partner. Sometimes people internalize homophobia and try to force themselves and practice conversion therapy on themselves to try and "fix" their homosexuality, out of shame for not being "good/right/proper". All women are welcome in feminist spaces. Women can at any point realize they are lesbians(even if just political/4B). Gold star politics are harmful(no shade if you are a gold star, that is also valid and good for you!) because it perpetuates the rapist idea that women are defiled if they were ever sexualized by a man. Let people grow and change their minds. Extremist and shame based politics aren't great. Life is NOT black and white, and you'll find a lot more solidarity and support if you just open your mind and embrace people's unique experiences. There's no "wrong way" to have your own opinions. I support women's right and women's wrongs. Love and uplift each other!!

[radicalli57]

Homophobic bs.

There is a clear difference between willingly sleeping with a male and coercion/rape.

Any woman who willingly slept with a male is not a lesbian.

You do not randomly wake up lesbian one day.

Conditioning cannot override physical arousal.

It’s very easy to know if women turn you on or not.

Absolutely no lesbian would ever feel the need to “experiment”.

[radicalli57]

Separate yourself from males in every way you can, but also separate yourself from women who protect and pander to males in every way you can.

This is the only way we will move forward. Many women will never join us, and there’s not point wasting time trying to make them.

[its-terf-or-nothin]

In all seriousness while initially your first thought might be “This seems harsh” remember that you’re protecting yourself. Husbands/boyfriends frequently try to get back at their wives/girlfriends by harming or killing things they love, and if they don’t have pets or children, you could become the main target.

[lesbian-separatist]

when I tell you I learned this the hard way

[radicalli57]

I’m sorry you went through that ❤️

[radicalli57]

Nature is not beautiful.

Nature has decided that girls as young as 9 years old can get pregnant.

Nature has decided that women and women alone bear the reproductive burden.

Nature has decided that women’s bodies shall suffer and be torn and mutilated by birthing children .

Nature has created males, animals that use their added strength to forcefully rape and impregnate females and force them through the above.

I see a lot of women in radfem spaces acting like nature is a goddess of sorts, that nature somehow places females on top. It is utterly bizarre that one could think along such lines given what cards nature has delt females. It’s almost religious-like in some instances.

Remember the reason why women and girls suffer so much to begin with is because of nature, nature is the enemy as much as males themselves.

[chondrichthyes-x-mantodea]

Tell me you've never observed nature without telling me you've never observed nature. Holy shit this is embarrassing. As someone who is going into animal sciences, please stop regurgitating what male scientists have fed you since the beginning of scientific research. Just because females can concieve as early as 9 doesn't mean that it's supposed to happen. Female wolves can concieve earlier than they do. They stay with their pack (mom, dad, and siblings) until they mature and find a mate of their own. Animals are not all "xyz patriarchal mechanics" there are so many different types of reproductive methods (of which I don't see rape being an effective common method like ever.) Humans, psychologically, are meant to be biparental and monogamous. You also totally negate the fact that sexual selection has been proven and observed. When an animal has the harder part in reproduction, it is going to be pickier about who it mates with. The adult females' well-being depends on it. Sperm quality affects her ability to survive pregnancy. Nature will also almost always prioritize an adult over an infant. That makes the most sense, too. Even my bettas that I breed show this, and it's intentional not even the female body involuntarily aborting. The father doesn't get fed well? He mouthbrooded the fry for weeks, so he'll eat them. When I bred livebearing fish, if you stress the female out she will abort the fry. As someone who has seen this come from male mouths, it's a shame all I've seen your type do is take their words as truth and just use it to say "men are inherently evil". Even in that sense you take away male accountability

[radicalli57]

Nature still gave the ability.

Don’t know why you’ve gone off on fish when it has nothing to do with what I was saying.

[ypeorescosasvendran]

Nature is not an entity with will, genius

[radicalli57]

I’m aware it’s not conscious

[ypeorescosasvendran]

Then don't describe it as such.

[radicalli57]

“Evolution” “nature” are the processes that give traits.

[radicalli57]

Nature is not beautiful.

Nature has decided that girls as young as 9 years old can get pregnant.

Nature has decided that women and women alone bear the reproductive burden.

Nature has decided that women’s bodies shall suffer and be torn and mutilated by birthing children .

Nature has created males, animals that use their added strength to forcefully rape and impregnate females and force them through the above.

I see a lot of women in radfem spaces acting like nature is a goddess of sorts, that nature somehow places females on top. It is utterly bizarre that one could think along such lines given what cards nature has delt females. It’s almost religious-like in some instances.

Remember the reason why women and girls suffer so much to begin with is because of nature, nature is the enemy as much as males themselves.

[chondrichthyes-x-mantodea]

Tell me you've never observed nature without telling me you've never observed nature. Holy shit this is embarrassing. As someone who is going into animal sciences, please stop regurgitating what male scientists have fed you since the beginning of scientific research. Just because females can concieve as early as 9 doesn't mean that it's supposed to happen. Female wolves can concieve earlier than they do. They stay with their pack (mom, dad, and siblings) until they mature and find a mate of their own. Animals are not all "xyz patriarchal mechanics" there are so many different types of reproductive methods (of which I don't see rape being an effective common method like ever.) Humans, psychologically, are meant to be biparental and monogamous. You also totally negate the fact that sexual selection has been proven and observed. When an animal has the harder part in reproduction, it is going to be pickier about who it mates with. The adult females' well-being depends on it. Sperm quality affects her ability to survive pregnancy. Nature will also almost always prioritize an adult over an infant. That makes the most sense, too. Even my bettas that I breed show this, and it's intentional not even the female body involuntarily aborting. The father doesn't get fed well? He mouthbrooded the fry for weeks, so he'll eat them. When I bred livebearing fish, if you stress the female out she will abort the fry. As someone who has seen this come from male mouths, it's a shame all I've seen your type do is take their words as truth and just use it to say "men are inherently evil". Even in that sense you take away male accountability

[radicalli57]

Nature still gave the ability.

Don’t know why you’ve gone off on fish when it has nothing to do with what I was saying.

[ypeorescosasvendran]

Nature is not an entity with will, genius

[radicalli57]

I’m aware it’s not conscious

[radicalli57]

Your boyfriend/husband is no different from the males from 50 years ago in the west or the males in countries like Afghanistan.

If you pursue relationships with males, you are supporting every bit of oppression they ever placed upon us.

If you date males, you let them win.

You have the blood of every woman and girl who ever died or was abused by males on your hands.

Find your dignity.

[its-terf-or-nothin]

Your white boyfriend isn’t special. White men will oppress you the same way afghan men oppress afghan women if they ever get a chance.

[skyiedior]

exactly they would, hence why we have the feminism movement to make sure that doesn't happen at all. if men feel the same way they too have their own movement called MENIMISM. feminism is here to counter act that and make sure women and children are safe because honestly how esle do you think it ought to be ? I mean this for real

[radicalli57]

Women and girls will never be safe as long as they seek relationships with males.

[radicalli57]

Your boyfriend/husband is no different from the males from 50 years ago in the west or the males in countries like Afghanistan.

If you pursue relationships with males, you are supporting every bit of oppression they ever placed upon us.

If you date males, you let them win.

You have the blood of every woman and girl who ever died or was abused by males on your hands.

Find your dignity.

[skyiedior]

you are being a dishonest conceated prick and you are too deep in the pussy you are hiding in because focusing on real solutions and how you don't have any is too much work for a woman who called her bloodline self-hating whores for sucking cocks. talking about teaching myself English? I know what you are and it's any other thing expect smart. you truly believe you had tve weapons for this discussion but you couldn't even muster a counter attack and went for musty character remarks that flayed like your entire point. your world view is so narrow I wonder how your brain fits in your skull. you are out here being emotional and throwing tantrums like the men you claim to hate, I wouldn't be surprised if ever when you open your mouth on topics like these flies come to twerk on your mouth because you speaking pure monkey shit.

you: stop sucking dick and we will be on our way to revolution, the revolution of women who stops sucking dick

me: you can't override biological wiring. women have fought, had kids and husbands and still maintained legacies

you : men will always win , let's stop fighting we will all die but the difference is I am now upgraded to eating pussy so I love myself and y'all don't.

me: fight for women and hold men accountable for the crimes they commit against humanity, bring partriachy to its knees so we can see a way forward

you: I cant believe you said women can't think for themselves....OHHH MY GOSH. BLASPHEMY . she does not even know English. Look at me, I am so right and she is so wrong.

girl I know a self-hating wanna be lesbian crooked Karen when I see one. you ain't beating the allegations . one person here told you to go touch some grass but i wonder if you even know what it looks like. the mere fact that you even tried to weaponize female sexuality and reduced it to nothing but dick sucking already tells me what exactly you are.

[radicalli57]

You’re the one going off like a fucking looney, take a breath would you?

Whatever what you want to believe about female heterosexuality, the male will always view you as nothing but a tool built for his pleasure. Heterosexuality is inherently a humiliation ritual for women. The fact that you can look at a male and even consider anything with him after how horrifically they have treated us since the beginning shows a clear lack of intelligence.

My world view is far from narrow, I have considered every point and realistic situation. You refuse to separate from males and look at reality without their sperm dulling your senses.

No woman who engages sexually or romantically with a male cares about herself nor any other woman or girl.

[pharmalandlord]

Most women would rather be SA'd on the regular and be seen by men than be safe but invisible. That's the humiliating reality of the female ego, it's built like that. very narcissistic in a phallocentred way,

Stripping away male desire from their bodies would be the death of their female self. It's the organizing principle of their self-concept and that's also partly why they are harsher and more finicky with gay male misogyny

So the “rape is worse than death” “i wouldn't wish being lusted after by men to my worst enemy” is more bluff than anything else when you are aware of their dick-narcissistic psychology. we should Ask more often to these women why don't they make themselves unattractive if being desirable is such a nasty curse, why do they actively choose to keep a look that appeals to men?

[radicalli57]

I wouldn’t say they’d necessarily “rather it” but they certainly aren’t all that concerned about it.

Many women are well aware of how dangerous males can be, yet they don’t take any precautions whatsoever. They denounce their behavior yet then encourage it. For example, the amount of women who “get off” on extreme dominance/submissive behaviors and BDSM.

We should be able to live in a world where we can for example walk alone at night, but we can’t, so do the sensible thing and avoid such situations. This isn’t victim blaming, this is simply being cautious and smart.

Majority of women build their whole identify upon male approval and refuse to acknowledge it while actively performing.

Everyone has heard the women who go on about how no male has ever treated her right and done x y x but yet they still keep getting with males after males. This is because they have zero self esteem, are cowards and therefore could not live without males and their hyper-sexualized behavior.

I am sick of “feminists” on here acting like every single woman is a victim in every single situation. Like these dick-obsessed women are absolute angels who are just misguided, when said women have zero respect for themselves and don’t give a flying fuck about you or other women and girls.

[radicalli57]

Your boyfriend/husband is no different from the males from 50 years ago in the west or the males in countries like Afghanistan.

If you pursue relationships with males, you are supporting every bit of oppression they ever placed upon us.

If you date males, you let them win.

You have the blood of every woman and girl who ever died or was abused by males on your hands.

Find your dignity.

[i-think-therefore-i-radfem-deac]

you people have genuinely gone insane. i am begging y’all to reduce your screen time and stop treating millions of women’s entire humanity as simply a political agent for your anti-pragmatic ideology.

in your own misandry, you have also become blind to your own misogyny.

[radicalli57]

Sleeping with your oppressor who views you as a pleasure tool is severe internalized misogyny.

Misandry doesn’t exist

[skyiedior]

your feminists ideologies are very aggressive and dehumanizing,you are standing on an edge cliff and if you don't take two steps back you will fall my darling . you are this very close to being misogynistic and wrapping your flawed rhetorics in truth.

let me demonstrate to you using your own logic and how flawed your so called solution to ending this is. when marriage was a published institution married women told unmarried women to reject their men viciously because if the men don't have nobody to cheat with then they won't cheat... what you are basically saying is that if women stopped sleeping with men then all the violence and wrong doings will drastically decrease because men are one dimensional and pander to pussy and that's where you have it wrong. men are out here killing and raping women and the huge crime women are commiting here is literally choosing to lay with men because that is setting us a couple of centuries behind? wait hold on, you think the women that got us here were unmarried or didn't have kids by men? because almost every single one of them did. I don't think you realise you sound exactly like the men you talk down about ... you basically red pilling women in the name of reclaiming their freedom and hoping to get better results outta men. and that line about sleeping with your predator is internalized misogyny is not the bulldozer you ought to think it is, misandry is not a sexuality it's a reaction to the hate men give women. you are not directly blaming women for the prevalent actions of men but you are implying them still being throat goats is a huge contributor to men being unmoved by women's protests and cries for a better world where men stop harming women. had you actually seen, read and educated yourself of what the kind of society you are crying about you'd know you are DEAD WRONG and too proud to admit it

you should been advocating for killing rapists , castrasting pedophiles, burning sex offenders, abolishing sex offenders, supporting sex workers but working to dismantle the sex working environment that men maintain etc and since the majority of these crimes are committed by men the trash will simply take itself out. waver for stricter no nonsense rules that will pass more than they fail, that will enterrogate exploited gray areas and leave no stone unturned.

if you think not ass rimming men will solve centuries and centuries of dehumanization I think you need to take several seats back, and I mean this respectfully.

[radicalli57]

Never did I say male violence would decrease if women stop sleeping with them. I never said it would solve our oppression, I am well aware it wouldn’t. However this is about personal dignity and what message you send to other women and girls.

The truth is, as long as males exist women will never be free. There is no way to completely eliminate patriarchy, the more we push back against it the more aggressive they will get, the question is, do you want to die having been a submissive slave to males? Or do you want to die with your dignity?

If every woman in the world turned against males overnight, refused to sleep with them, refused to allow them to enforce patriarchy any longer, it would never work. If every woman on this earth is fighting against every male on this earth males will always win. Males hold the upper hand in physical strength, as well as controlling majority of the world’s resources. That is the dark truth, and the sooner women accept that and try to make the best of a shitty fate the better.

The only way women will ever be free is in extinction of the human species.

[skyiedior]

you say you do understand that wouldn't solve anything but then back pedal yapping about " personal disginity" like laying with men and having kids by them has any correlation to biolical wiring like even most women want to have kids and families this is a natural reflex and always has been like this since the beginning of time and isn't something that be unrewired by simply looking at the stats and deciding to go against biology, since when did having sex with men directly reflected a woman's level of self respect or you just saying a whole Lotta nothing and burying them under more nothing ? the message is that woman are allowed to advocate for themselves and others like them whilst working towards a world without oppression because someone is born with a vagina, women are allowed to be attracted to men, biological wiring has nothing to do with all of that you written wirght there . not to even mention you yourself by your own words said you are depriving yourself of intimacy with men and yes I went to your Timeline and saw that and that alone already tells me you are exactly like the women you call slaves only difference is you are not Gawking your master.

then in your second paragraph say that women will never never be truly free (talk about delusions of grandeur) then what exactly are you standing for because it seems like men will win either way in your books? the you go ahead and talk of women being slaves like I don't even think you realise what that says about your mother, does she know she was a slave for your sucking your father's dick because regardless of the level of education, knowledge or empowerment women still get obliterated by patriarchy so to say she wasn't aware or weaponized with knowledge like you and me does not matter in this case, in your eyes she is still a slave for dick. GURL you are so misogynistic it boils my blood.

what about your future daughter if you are planning to have any of which I think you need to tie your tubes because either way why would give birth to more slaves for patriarchy ? or you are going to get pregnant by medical procedures and not by your master because it doesn't matter whether how you bring her here because why would you subject her to a world that might turn her into a slave ...either way you choose not to have kids of which it will be a great service to the universe because nobody needs more of you but there is no way you are fully being honest about your stance because those kids can choose to lay with men and are you gonna call them for self-hating because they slept with men? like HeLLLllllOoooo .

if women are never gonna win against this no matter what fight they put up then why do you still have expectations for women? you say men are gonna put up an ugly fight if women faught for themselves like honey women faught and died, you are literally exiling women to early Graves, you typed that statement and I bet you beat your chest and clicked post like baby girl that is not the gotcha you think it is. does brain density run in your blood line or is it only you ?

I don't know if you are purposely being obtuse or you are obtuse and flexing it because you didn't even address any of my points because you are all opinions and no substance , honey if you are going to be wrong the least you can do is not be loud - pick a struggle.

[radicalli57]

You seriously need to study English better before you try to speak on complex topics like this because you are almost impossible to understand.

Go back to sucking dick and piss off, you clearly aren’t evolved enough to participate in this conversation, especially since you believe women cannot think and go above their basic instincts.

[radicalli57]

If every woman in the world turned against males overnight, refused to sleep with them, refused to allow them to enforce patriarchy any longer, it would never end patriarchy or female suffering.

If every woman on this earth is fighting against every male on this earth males will always win. Males hold the upper hand in physical strength, as well as controlling majority of the world’s resources. That is the dark truth, and the sooner women accept that and decide which side they’re on the better.

The argument I always hear with this is “oh but we have guns! Physical strength isn’t everything in today’s world!” but who holds the majority of access to firearms and weapons?

Most feminists foam at the mouth when males make comments like “we could take this all away if we wanted”, but it is true, they could, and would.

Women before us pushed for the changes we have in the west today, but we are walking a fine line. Males ‘tolerated’ the rights we fought for so far, however I can guarantee if all women decided to stop sleeping with males and birthing children then they would force us into submission in a heartbeat, because they have the ability to.

The only way women will ever fully be free from patriarchy and nature’s suffering is through the extinction of the human species.

The question is, do you want to lie under your oppressor? Do you want to be a slave to males? Or do you want to die with dignity? Do you want to die knowing you never bowed down to males? That you fought for your freedom til the end?

I hate that this is our reality, but realistically it is. No point in denying it. Denying it is just being naive and clinging to a fantasy.

[grassflowerlife-deactivated2025]

being a slave is when consensually having sex?

this feels pornbrained to me

[radicalli57]

You think the male views you as a full person? Are you aware of how males speak about and view women they penetrate? Heterosexual sex will always put the women in a vulnerable position, it is not compatible with liberation.

[grassflowerlife-deactivated2025]

ma’am you saw a nasty reddit or 4chan post and you thought you could use that to diagnose half the population. until i have proof that every single man to ever exist was evil i just dont care

[radicalli57]

Why the fuck are you interacting then? No need to announce your zero survival instincts here.

[grassflowerlife-deactivated2025]

yeah sorry i don’t have bpd like you, i don’t see a mean 4chan post compilation and become radicalized lol

[radicalli57]

I don’t have Bpd🤣

[radicalli57]

If every woman in the world turned against males overnight, refused to sleep with them, refused to allow them to enforce patriarchy any longer, it would never end patriarchy or female suffering.

If every woman on this earth is fighting against every male on this earth males will always win. Males hold the upper hand in physical strength, as well as controlling majority of the world’s resources. That is the dark truth, and the sooner women accept that and decide which side they’re on the better.

The argument I always hear with this is “oh but we have guns! Physical strength isn’t everything in today’s world!” but who holds the majority of access to firearms and weapons?

Most feminists foam at the mouth when males make comments like “we could take this all away if we wanted”, but it is true, they could, and would.

Women before us pushed for the changes we have in the west today, but we are walking a fine line. Males ‘tolerated’ the rights we fought for so far, however I can guarantee if all women decided to stop sleeping with males and birthing children then they would force us into submission in a heartbeat, because they have the ability to.

The only way women will ever fully be free from patriarchy and nature’s suffering is through the extinction of the human species.

The question is, do you want to lie under your oppressor? Do you want to be a slave to males? Or do you want to die with dignity? Do you want to die knowing you never bowed down to males? That you fought for your freedom til the end?

I hate that this is our reality, but realistically it is. No point in denying it. Denying it is just being naive and clinging to a fantasy.

[grassflowerlife-deactivated2025]

being a slave is when consensually having sex?

this feels pornbrained to me

[radicalli57]

You think the male views you as a full person? Are you aware of how males speak about and view women they penetrate? Heterosexual sex will always put the women in a vulnerable position, it is not compatible with liberation.

[grassflowerlife-deactivated2025]

ma’am you saw a nasty reddit or 4chan post and you thought you could use that to diagnose half the population. until i have proof that every single man to ever exist was evil i just dont care

[radicalli57]

Why the fuck are you interacting then? No need to announce your zero survival instincts here.

[radicalli57]

If every woman in the world turned against males overnight, refused to sleep with them, refused to allow them to enforce patriarchy any longer, it would never end patriarchy or female suffering.

If every woman on this earth is fighting against every male on this earth males will always win. Males hold the upper hand in physical strength, as well as controlling majority of the world’s resources. That is the dark truth, and the sooner women accept that and decide which side they’re on the better.

The argument I always hear with this is “oh but we have guns! Physical strength isn’t everything in today’s world!” but who holds the majority of access to firearms and weapons?

Most feminists foam at the mouth when males make comments like “we could take this all away if we wanted”, but it is true, they could, and would.

Women before us pushed for the changes we have in the west today, but we are walking a fine line. Males ‘tolerated’ the rights we fought for so far, however I can guarantee if all women decided to stop sleeping with males and birthing children then they would force us into submission in a heartbeat, because they have the ability to.

The only way women will ever fully be free from patriarchy and nature’s suffering is through the extinction of the human species.

The question is, do you want to lie under your oppressor? Do you want to be a slave to males? Or do you want to die with dignity? Do you want to die knowing you never bowed down to males? That you fought for your freedom til the end?

I hate that this is our reality, but realistically it is. No point in denying it. Denying it is just being naive and clinging to a fantasy.

[grassflowerlife-deactivated2025]

being a slave is when consensually having sex?

this feels pornbrained to me

[radicalli57]

You think the male views you as a full person? Are you aware of how males speak about and view women they penetrate? Heterosexual sex will always put the women in a vulnerable position, it is not compatible with liberation.

[radicalli57]

If every woman in the world turned against males overnight, refused to sleep with them, refused to allow them to enforce patriarchy any longer, it would never end patriarchy or female suffering.

If every woman on this earth is fighting against every male on this earth males will always win. Males hold the upper hand in physical strength, as well as controlling majority of the world’s resources. That is the dark truth, and the sooner women accept that and decide which side they’re on the better.

The argument I always hear with this is “oh but we have guns! Physical strength isn’t everything in today’s world!” but who holds the majority of access to firearms and weapons?

Most feminists foam at the mouth when males make comments like “we could take this all away if we wanted”, but it is true, they could, and would.

Women before us pushed for the changes we have in the west today, but we are walking a fine line. Males ‘tolerated’ the rights we fought for so far, however I can guarantee if all women decided to stop sleeping with males and birthing children then they would force us into submission in a heartbeat, because they have the ability to.

The only way women will ever fully be free from patriarchy and nature’s suffering is through the extinction of the human species.

The question is, do you want to lie under your oppressor? Do you want to be a slave to males? Or do you want to die with dignity? Do you want to die knowing you never bowed down to males? That you fought for your freedom til the end?

I hate that this is our reality, but realistically it is. No point in denying it. Denying it is just being naive and clinging to a fantasy.