Anti-SJW Westeros @realjusticewesteros - Tumblr Blog

Farewell

It’s been a very long time, but I feel that I cannot be a part of this blog anymore.

No, it’s not because I’ve turned into one of those “SJWs”. I still see issue with the hypocrisy and double standards in tumblr’s attempts at equality. That hasn’t changed.

But I have grown tired of the anti community as well as the sj one. So I feel that there really isn’t much of a place for me.

I’m not sure what happened to the other mods, but perhaps they’ll come back one day.

Some blogs that I follow, in case you still want your dose of “anti sjw”.

@cheshireinthemiddle

@siryouarebeingmocked

@thecriticalfeminist

I am sorry to leave you guys and I wish you all the best!

-SS

#mod sansa #signing off for the last time

conleches

some fucking resources for all ur writing fuckin needs

body language masterlist

a translator that doesn’t eat ass like google translate does

a reverse dictionary for when ur brain freezes

550 words to say instead of fuckin said

638 character traits for when ur brain freezes again

some more body language help

machetelanding

An intelligent young woman’s satirical post results in her receiving threats of violence, rape and murder from so-called tolerant feminists and liberals, and her response is brilliant.

siryouarebeingmocked

“Feminism is against gender roles for women. But women have to support feminism. Harassing women is wrong, unless they criticize feminism.”

-feminists

#mod sansa #feminism

summahare

Next time someone says “rape culture doesn’t exist” and “there’s no such thing as female oppression” just show them this.

cheshireinthemiddle

She also claimed it was females doing it

So what you are claiming is that females are oppressing themselves

Congrats.

siryouarebeingmocked

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/23/iggy-azalea-crowd-surfing_n_5198716.html

oop

This is actually a great example of how people like OP don’t actually want to get the facts before bleating “rape culture” and “female oppression”. They just go with the first thing they see that fits the NArrative.

That, or OP was actively lying.

Also, even if this was only men, how does that make it a culture?

dannysphototherapy

So in summation.

1. One instance of a woman being sexually violated proves the existence of an entire culture that fosters/ignores/normalizes rape.

2. One instance of a woman being sexually violated by women and men needs to have the female violators ommitted in order to continue the narrative that men are violators and women are victims.

#mod sansa #sexual assault

feministontinder

Male victims of violence didn’t undergo emotional and physical abuse for anti-feminists to exploit their experience in an effort to discredit feminism. Feminists advocate for the empowerment of all victims.

spookylass

Really? Because…

Feminists threaten to kill woman for saying men need abuse shelters.

Feminists prevent a meeting about male suicide.

Feminists stage mock murders to scare men.

Feminist attacks male cartoonist and is hailed a hero of feminism.

Feminists shut down forum for battered husbands.

Propaganda campaign against male fathers wanting custody.

Feminists wish to slander accused names before convicted.

Create rape laws that exclude female rapists.

Make it impossible to charge women with rape.

Feminists against equal custody.

Female felons should serve home sentences.

Told judges to be lenient on women.

Feminists cover up female domestic violence.

Feminists don’t want the gov to help unemployed men.

Feminists launch campaigns to help girls only while boys are doing worse in every facet of education.

Males who were raped as a child still have to pay child support.

Women should have the right to put a child up for adoption before the father gets custody.

Feminists against beyond reasonable doubt when it’s male rapists.

5 rights feminism ignores for men.

Feminists blame males for their abuse.

The primary aggressor clause where only men get charged with abuse.

Shame men into going to war.

Feminists dismiss female child rapists.

Feminists say men can’t talk about domestic abuse.

Feminists mock a man who has his dick cut off.

Strawmanning MRA members.

feminists attack church.

Feminists transphobia

Feminists slander the MRM

Again,

And again,

Call them terrorists.

Feminists say Men can’t be raped.

Feminists defend female raping minor.

Feminist defends why fucking an 8 year old boy isn’t rape.

Feminists primary aggressor clause discriminates against males.

Feminists cover up female domestic abuse stats.

Woman smashing bottle in mans face in public. Nobody gives a fuck.

Jezebel mocks men who are abused.

Feminists make sure the gov doesn’t spend money on male shelters or male research.

Female on male abuse in public is at best ignored, and at worst celebrated.

Public stops a man from abusing a woman in public, same crowd laughs when the roles are reversed.

No funding for male shelter.

Founder of Canadas only male shelter for abuse forced to close due to lack of funding before committing suicide.

Feminists threaten to kill woman for saying men need abuse shelters.

Feminists prevent a meeting about male suicide.

Feminists stage mock murders to scare men.

Feminist attacks male cartoonist and is hailed a hero of feminism.

Feminists skewed the Definition of Domestic Abuse, resulting in only male abusers being arrested and female abusers not.

Feminists’s DV training hurts Police training

Feminist Mary

Koss denies male

rape victims.

Feminists violently protesting against Warren Farrell at U of Toronto

A mob of feminists at a recent protest attacking and sexually molesting a group of Rosary-praying Catholic men who were peacefully protecting the cathedral in the city of San Juan from threats of vandalism.

Feminists disrupt a forum for battered men

Feminists fought a law for equal custody to be the default if both parents want custody and neither parent is unfit.

Multiple times.

Feminists started a campaign against Father’s rights groups

Feminists fought against laws granting men anonymity until charged with the crime of rape—not convicted, just charged.

Feminists fought against a law to end to the justice system favoring women simply because they are women, and giving men harsher sentences simply because they are men.

Feminist fought against men want equal treatment when victims of domestic violence, and to not be arrested for the crime of “being male” under primary aggressor policies.

Feminists in India and Israel fought against female

rapists being arrested, charged and convicted of rape.

Feminists fought against a economic stimulus for male-dominated job such as construction, etc

Feminist fought a law against Paternity Fraud.

Feminist Harriet Harman has publicly requested employers to hire women in preference to White men if both job candidates are equally

Equality Minister,feminist Patricia Hewitt, was found guilty of breaching the Sex Discrimination Act by “overlooking a strong male candidate for a job in favour of a weaker female applicant”

Elected in 2009, the lesbian feminist prime minister Johanna Sigurdardottir has vowed to “end of the Age of Testosterone

Feminists want to peeing while standing illegal

Erin Pizzey had to flee the UK because she and her family received death threats and her dog murdered all because feminists didn’t like that she discovered women were equally as violent as men.

Also Suzanne Steinmetz and her children received death threats and bomb threats she discovered that the rate at which men were victimized by domestic violence was similar to the rate for women.

Richard Gelles and Murray Straus have all received death threats from feminists, simply for publishing their findings (that female-to-male family violence

was equal to the rate of male-to-female violence).

Feminists say Men can’t be raped.

Feminists defend female raping minor.

Feminist defends why fucking an 8 year old boy isn’t rape.

Most feminists backed studies are bullshit.

Beyond reasonable doubt doesn’t apply to rape.

Feminist changes mind on rape culture when her son is falsely accused.

Feminists primary aggressor clause discriminates against males.

Feminists cover up female domestic abuse stats.

Jezebel mocks men who are abused.

Feminists make sure the gov doesn’t spend money on male shelters or male research.

Feminists prevent a meeting about male suicide.

Feminists stage mock murders to scare men.

Feminist attacks male cartoonist and is hailed a hero of feminism.

Feminists shut down forum for battered husbands.

Propaganda campaign against male fathers wanting custody.

Feminists wish to slander accused names before convicted.

Try to shut down female prisons.

Create rape laws that exclude female rapists.

Make it impossible to charge women with rape.

Feminists against equal custody.

Female felons should serve home sentences.

Told judges to be lenient on women.

Feminists cover up female domestic violence.

Feminists don’t want the gov to help unemployed men.

Feminists launch campaigns to help girls only while boys are doing worse in every facet of education.

Males who were raped as a child still have to pay child support.

Women should have the right to put a child up for adoption before the father gets custody

Feminists against beyond reasonable doubt when it’s male rapists.

5 rights feminism ignores for men.

Feminists blame males for their abuse.

The primary aggressor clause where only men get charged with abuse.

Shame men into going to war.

Feminists dismiss female child rapists.

Feminists say men can’t talk about domestic abuse.

Feminists mock a man who has his dick cut off.

feminists attack church.

Feminists shut down a festival about gender equality for including men.

Feminists hope MRA’s die.

Feminists against fathers day.

Feminist makes up fake assault stories.

Female reporter bullied by feminists at the National Young Feminist Leadership Conference

But you’re probably right. Feminists advocate for the empowerment of all victims…

sammishim

You realise you just proved the point of the post?? That men/people just use male victims to attack feminists instead of actually working towards a solution to help male victims?

You realise that a list of examples proving your point does not disprove the other side?

If we are talking percentages, your list only described less than 1% of the population who label themselves as feminist.

And, lastly, just because someone labels themselves a feminist, doesn’t mean they are one. Clearly these people in your list do not understand feminism because feminism is intersectional and inclusive and so advocates for everyone (the LGBT community, POC, men, sex workers, etc).

This is what your argument looks like. There are a lot of white people who hate black people. You can check it out on google that racism is alive and well. Does that mean that all white people are racist or that white people advocate or believe in racism?

There are a lot of men who rape people. Does that mean that all men are rapists or that masculinity advocates or teach men to rape?

People scream “Not All Men!!!” but then turn around and say, “but ya, feminism sucks because of the actions of a few, misguided people who call themselves feminists).

Anyways, feminism does not advocate hating on men or male victims. If you know people who are like that, I suggest distancing yourself from their company. Check out ‘thebeardedfeminist’ on instagram. He’s a cool guy who understands what feminism really is. Maybe he can help to explain some stuff to you.

Cheers

spookylass

“You realise you just proved the point of the post?? That men/people just use male victims to attack feminists instead of actually working towards a solution to help male victims?“

The only thing I was trying to “prove” is that feminists don’t give a crap about guys. You guys are afraid of statistics because you know feminists don’t help men.

"If we are talking percentages, your list only described less than 1% of the population who label themselves as feminist.”

Where, exactly, did you get that percentage? I know feminists both on tumblr and in real life who do a lot of the things the sources provided on my list say.

“And, lastly, just because someone labels themselves a feminist, doesn’t mean they are one."

Ah, yes. The classic "No true Scotsman” fallacy.

Unfortunately, these people claim to be feminists, so they’re going to give feminism a bad light. I don’t deny there are actual feminists who believe in true equality. I mean, have you seen Christina Hoff Sommers? She’s the best. But some feminists like to consider her anti-feminist because she advocates for boys, too. You see the issue?

You can’t pick and choose who is/isn’t a feminist. There are good feminists and there are bad feminists. But they are feminists, none the less. And a whole lot more than a few are making feminism look bad.

hominishostilis

You can really tell neither feministontinder nor sammishim bothered to actually read any of those links by their subsequent responses, because all of those show feminism and feminist groups directly causing these issues that feminism claims it will solve (when?). They show feminism doing exactly the opposite of what OP claims it does, and they’re tripping over themselves to sweep it under the rug and avoid owning up to it.

It’s funny that they claim anti-feminists are “using” male victims as platforms, because if bringing up issues these men face, advocating for awareness of them, and identifying the direct cause of these issues (see: feminism) is “using” them, then feminists have been using women to gain political power and wealth for over a century.

Meet feminism: If you talk about male issues, you’re “using victims”, but if you cause those problems and then use them to claim people “need” you it’s “equality”.

Regarding the original post, our next question is “how can we fix this” - and all those links you see above are exactly why none of it seems to be getting fixed.

oops.

sammishim

Wait, wait, wait. You think feminism is the cause of assault/abuse on males?? Seriously? Because I’m prettyyyyyy sure of a few things.

1) That men have been abused probably as long as women have been abused 2) That the patriarchy has been around much longer than feminism 3) The patriarchy is in fact the cause of emotional/sexual abuse faced by both women and men.

How does the patriarchy cause the issues that feminism is trying to fight against? I suggest doing a little bit of research to find that out. It could be quite enlightening.

The patriarchy (please see: not men) is what feminism is fighting against. The patriarchy (again, NOT men) is what causes the gendee stereotypes that both women and men have to follow or be ridiculed.

If you don’t believe those two sentences, then you do not follow understand feminism just yet. And that’s okay as long as you go and rectify that.

Lastly, yes, yes #notallfeminists and #notallmen etc, etc. It just seems a moot point to keep pointing that out whenever someone brings up examples of people who do bad stuff under the name of something or the other.

P.S I actually did click through some of the links and read through them but it’s 5am and I should be sleeping so excuse that.

Anyways, cheers. I’m gonna try and sleep now. Good luck with everything.

hominishostilis

No, I don’t think it’s ‘The CAUSE” (because when dealing with things like abuse and violence, trying to name one CAUSE is stupid.)

But I do blame feminism for the widespread dismissal of male abuse, abso-fucking-lutely. Because of a little thing called The Duluth Model, manifested in present day as The Primary Aggressor laws.

You see, the Duluth Model was actively advocated for by feminists, and The Primary Aggressor Laws really only slapped a new name on them. These laws make it so that men are overwhelmingly the ones arrested by domestic abuse even though multiple studies now show that domestic violence is evenly split between the sexes, and lesbian couples have the highest rates of reported abuse. Yet it’s men that now bear the stigma as abusers, and even deserving of abuse when they are the victims. (I can really tell you didn’t read those links now, because there are links for both of these things among them.)

1) Men have been systematically abused for just as long as women have, society just doesn’t seem to perceive much of it as “abuse” because men are expected to deal with it and suck it up. - good job.

2) “The Patriarchy” doesn’t exist in first world countries like America, where mainstream feminism seems to think the entire world resides until they need an example of women being oppressed - then they’re glad to point to women in countries where Patriarchal systems still exist, while doing nothing to help them, while using it as an example of why *they*, as women with all the same rights as men (and a few men don’t have) in America, need feminism.

3) The Patriarchy is men, you dolt. You clearly don’t know the first thing about Patriarchy theory (because its a theory, with no basis in reality concerning first world countries). Patriarchy is described as a system of power where men hold all of the advantages - and it’s a system designed to benefit them.

So when you point at the imaginary boogeyman “Patriarchy”, you’re actively blaming men for their issues. You’re actively blaming men for their own high suicide rate, in a society that ignores mental illness and depression in males until they *snap* and off themselves or hurt someone else - then they’re only acknowledged as an example of “why men are inherently dangerous”. You’re blaming men for their abuse being ignored, for being afraid to come forward about it, you’re blaming men for being ashamed of both their masculinity and their lack of it (two sides of the same coin - shaming men for stepping out of their accepted gender practices). You’re blaming men for the issues, which are all linked above, that feminism has been demonstrated to have directly caused. (Not “Patriarchy”, feminism. The US in particular doesn’t have a single aspect of a Patriarchal society.) And then, claiming we “need feminism” to solve those issues.

That’s called “circular logic”, and it’s a fallacy. It’d be like if I stabbed you, and then told you that you needed to hire me to protect you from people with knives.

Are you starting to see how feminism’s crusade against the mythical “Patterwacky” is really just feminism demonizing men?

Women are the majority of voters since they gained the right, spend the most wealth, control the most finances , have an entire branch of the government dedicated to their health (try looking up “Menshealth.gov”).

women can (easily) control property: they can rent apartments, buy a house or land, own a business, and inherit and/or will their property to others.

there are plenty of “housewives”/stay-at-home mothers, but women are typically expected to find a job and work for a living in the same way that men are, and there is no wage gap between male and female workers.

though it’s hard to say given that domestic violence stories focus almost solely on male-on-female violence, I might argue that women often have more domestic authority than men; for example, they have more control of their family’s disposable income and are far more likely to get custody of their children in case of a divorce.

“absence of ritualized female solidarity” - well, I think we know that’s not applicable to the US, if Tumblr is any indication.

aside from states that have made abortion difficult to obtain, women control their own bodies and sexuality, and aside from where it is an issue of LGBT+ equality, women have the power to marry (and divorce) whom they choose, when they choose.

Many industries (and certainly most offices that I’ve seen) are relatively evenly balanced between men and women. As for “community decision making,” women are more likely to vote than men, so while it would be nice to have more women running for office, women nevertheless have more of a say in who gets elected.

Women have the choice to wear the kinds of clothes they like; vote; pursue almost any career; drive a car; live where and with whom they want to; have children (or not); get married (or not); cut their hair; have sex with whom they choose, etc. - the “Patriarchy” is a fabrication, a lie, and you’ve swallowed it hook, line, and sinker.

I understand “Patriarchy” and feminism far better than you, and your last statement proves this to me - you don’t understand the difference between #notallmen and #notallfeminists.

One’s a choice, the other is something you’re born as.

You choose to identify with feminism, therefore it is your job to be educated and aware of just what that means - so when ignorant feminists like yourself say “not ALL feminists!” I have no sympathy for you. No one “does bad stuff” under the name of “men”, but I’ll be damned if every time a man does do something bad feminists want to blame the whole gender and start advocating for genocide.

It’ll be a “moot point” when feminists stop blaming all men for the actions of less than a 1%, but won’t take responsibility for shitty actions that actively harm everyone.

#mod sansa #feminism #domestic violence

n3rd-love-blog

Why False Rapes is not an agument Against the awareness of rapes culture

False rapes is a whopping 2% of reported rapes cases, compare that to most crimes which have a 15-20% false accusation rate, the 60% of rapes go unreported and 97% of Rapists will never spend a day in jail.

imminentdeathsyndrome1deac

For all, being falsely accused is a lifetime sentence often dealt with internally because they are told by people like you that being falsely accused doesn’t matter and they should just get over it. For many others it means spending time in a prison cell for anywhere between a couple months to upwards of thirty years. If you’ve ever heard about how rapists are treated in prison then it becomes clear that these men probably become victims themselves while serving time. Remember, these men are innocent. While the feminist argument is that “men are raping men so its just the fault of men so who cares”, it completely absolves the women who were responsible for putting them there in the first place.

To put it simply, men who are falsely accused and convicted of rape often become the victims of brutal, reoccurring sexual assault during their sentences. So when feminists downplay false accusations what they are really saying is that innocent men who are sexually assaulted over and over again in a confined space with no hope of escape or help either deserve it or aren’t at all important.

This is what happens to rapists in prison:

DO THE FALSELY ACCUSED DESERVE THIS VERY SAME TREATMENT? DO THE FALSELY ACCUSED DESERVE THIS VERY SAME TREATMENT? DO THE FALSELY ACCUSED DESERVE THIS VERY SAME TREATMENT? DO THE FALSELY ACCUSED DESERVE THIS VERY SAME TREATMENT?

97% of rapists never spend a day in jail? Wrong.

According to the most recent analysis of data involving sexual assault and sex offenders, felony convictions are sought for 80% of all rape arrests, as seen here:

Information on the adjudication of rape offenders is also contrary to the 97% statistic, as seen here:

The time a rapist served may be less than the sentence imposed by the courts but nonetheless it is still contrary to the idea that 97% of all rapists do not serve one day in jail, as seen here:

And while it can be argued that punishments for rape are not harsh enough, there are virtually no punishments for false accusers who ruin lives and as previously mentioned above are responsible for innocent men being sexually assaulted on a constant basis in prison. For vindictive women there is only reward. Therefore, what is the deterrent if false accusers are rarely punished?

Examining the 2-8% false rape statistic and the numbers it represents

The widely accepted statistic for false rape accusations is between 2-8% even though 14 out of 20 studies have placed them at a much higher rate. But even if we accept the 2-8% statistic, the numbers are not low as the statistic would suggest. For example, in 2009 there were 88,097 rapes reported according to the Department of Justice. If we take 5%, the median of 2-8% that people widely accept as the true statistic of false accusations, that would mean out of 88,097 reported rapes that 4,404 men were falsely accused of rape. That’s four thousand four hundred and four men falsely accused of rape just in 2009 alone.

Just let that sink in for a minute.

That is in no way a small number and quite frankly a very disturbing realization. Now apply the same calculation to every figure since 1990:

1990 // 5,127 falsely accused 1991 // 5,329 falsely accused 1992 // 5,453 falsely accused 1993 // 5,300 falsely accused 1994 // 5,110 falsely accused 1995 // 4,873 falsely accused 1996 // 4,812 falsely accused 1997 // 4,807 falsely accused 1998 // 4,657 falsely accused 1999 // 4,470 falsely accused 2000 // 4,508 falsely accused 2001 // 4,543 falsely accused 2002 // 4,761 falsely accused 2003 // 4,694 falsely accused 2004 // 4,754 falsely accused 2005 // 4,717 falsely accused 2006 // 4,739 falsely accused 2007 // 4,593 falsely accused 2008 // 4,593 falsely accused 2009 // 4,404 falsely accused

That’s 96,244 men falsely accused from 1990 to 2009 according to the figures provided by the Department of Justice in correlation to the median of 5% from the 2-8% false rape accusation statistic.

Now consider the fact that 14 out of 20 studies on the prevalence of false rape accusations place them at a much higher rate, as seen here:

False rape accusations: from propaganda to reality

So, lately, this so-called infographic (which spreads nothing but disinformation) has been circulated on Tumblr:

Since so many people don’t seem to realize the numerous faults in it, I shall attempt to cast light on them and update the above graphic accordingly.

1.) It lists victims of false accusations in the “not reported” group I wonder if the people at the Enliven Project even know what a false rape accusation IS, seeing as they apparently think it doesn’t involve reporting it. The correct place for them would be in the “reported” group, as follows:

2.) Padding data with “unreported” cases It’s quite fascinating to see all the supposed statistics on what people never report. Newsflash, everyone: statistics are DIRECTLY BASED ON REPORTS. You can estimate the number of unreported cases, but that’s called GUESSING, and has no place in actual statistics. Thus, the “unreported” block should be removed in its entirety.

(Funnily enough, upon removing the “unreported” group, it comes down to exactly 100 figures, and they represented the 2% of all cases being false with 2 figures… Proof of padding? You be the judge.)

3.) It assumes “guilty unless proven innocent” Note how before its removal, the “unreported” block actually said “rapists”? Apparently, while false accusation cases should be held to the highest standard of evidence (requiring one not only that they did not commit rape, but that they had absolutely no means to commit it in the first place), rape cases should be held to the lowest, and if someone says they have been raped, we should just take it at face value (unlike ANY OTHER crime) and consider the accused a rapist right away! Blatantly skewed. Truth is, without decisive evidence, a case cannot be proven, thus it could be one, it could be the other. And since for the purposes of this reasoning, the difference between whether or not a case reaches court doesn’t matter, the two groups will be meshed together here.

And finally…

4.) Calculating with the lowest possible number of false accusations Even according to the Enliven Project, the reports of (conclusively) false cases range from 2% to 8%. Why, then, did they choose to use the absolute lowest value? To diminish its importance, of course. Unlike them, I will be fair, and instead of using the maximum value, use its median: 5%.

Here’s reality, stripped of propaganda. 10% of cases are conclusively true. 5% of cases are conclusively false. And any amount of the remaining 85% could be true/false.

And you expect us to believe that even though one-third of the conclusive cases have been proven false, none of the remaining 85% are?

But why would a woman lie about rape?

This question is often asked as if to suggest that women do not lie about being raped even though its been proven that women will lie about being raped for any amount of reasons including covering up an affair to having an excuse for skipping work to not getting enough sympathy from friends to not wanting to pay a $13 cab fare to simply not liking the men they’re with anymore to motivations of racism to being obsessed with the victim to no reason at all among many, many more absolutely absurd reasons. Asking this question implies that women are saints when the truth is that they are just about as much a saint as men are. Its important to remember that people are individuals and everyone has motivations and agendas, some being criminal or vindictive. Some people have mental issues and are sociopaths. So please, stop acting like women have no reason to lie about being raped because you just make yourself out to be someone who isn’t at all in touch with reality or how completely horrible people can be.

“Those who suffer genuine rape are undermined by people like you. You undermine the whole system of justice.” - Judge Ian Pringles, talking to a false rape accuser

Rape is a very serious crime that should come with very harsh punishments. However, we should be very diligent in separating the truth from the lies and this means asking the tough questions and getting information no matter what.

The feminist outcry of “rape apologist” and “victim blamer” only works on those simple minded enough to fall for buzzwords that hardly make up for lack of a good argument. While its true that rape can sometimes be hard to prove, false accusations are virtually impossible to prove especially when no proof can be provided to support either claim which only comes down to “he said, she said” and is open to personal opinion.

The overall truth is that women can use the power of being perceived as victims to their advantage while men cannot. Whether they choose to use this advantage or not really depends on their character. Obviously not all women are this way but many are and its an insult to the victims of false accusations to suggest that because the rate is supposedly low that it means they are inconsequential. Feminists will believe this up until someone they love is falsely accused and when that happens, what then?

False accusations are the sole reason for doubt when a real victim comes forward to make a report. Essentially, false accusations are more responsible for under reporting than the so-called rape culture. The sooner feminists and others realize this, the sooner real victims will find justice instead of a cloud of doubt.

In the end, false accusers should be punished for potentially ruining the life of another person and for harming the credibility of real victims. If you don’t agree with that then consider yourself a terrible person.

nunyabizni

How much you want to bet OP didn’t pay attention to any of this and just deleted their original post, changed their blog URL, and are still spouting nonsense.

cheshireinthemiddle

It seems that both of them deactivated.

#mod sansa #false rape accusation

patricianus-maximus-deactivated

Hmmm…. I’m seeing a suspicious lack of coverage of this story on Tumblr. I’m sure it’s just sheer coincidence™

spillywolf-deactivated20190920

Source?

manonfireforchrist-deactivated2

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dailycaller.com/2017/01/26/womens-march-featured-speaker-who-kidnapped-raped-and-tortured-a-man/

Within an article is a link to an article about her in Psychology Today from the time

spillywolf-deactivated20190920

Unbelievable.

alwaysabeautifullife

How does this even…happen?

???????????

#mod sansa #sexism

loremerchant

The highest number of women’s suicides is only just approaching the lowest number for men based on their own categorical divisions. This is gynocentrism in visual format. It’s not a problem until it affects women, then suddenly it’s a STARTLING ISSUE, but primarily for women. Recognize gynocentrism as the underlying cause to the indifference or indignant behaviors found in various women’s rights groups. They are symptomatic, but not the root. Address the flaws in the foundation.

anti-feminism-pro-equality

I know right? Huffington Post is do fucking sexist it hurts

Look at that comment “This is a gender gap we don’t want to close” like wow…even when it’s about men…. It’s about women

hexiac-deactivated20170128

Part of me suspects HuffPo does this intentionally to piss people off so we’ll keep clicking on their articles and rage-reading them.

If this was meant to be genuine, they could easily have said that the gap would be best closed by bringing the male rate down instead.

You know, instead of “this gap shouldn’t close” which a person apparently received compensation for writing.

#mod sansa #tw suicide #sexism

amazingatheist

Is there any issue/topic where you agree with the MRA crowd on?

I agree with feminists and MRAs on plenty. But they’re both approaching gender politics by looking at the encompassed issues through very narrow and uncritical lenses.

Feminists blame everything on the patriarchy and perceive every disadvantage any women can or may encounter as proof of oppression. MRAs fail to recognize that while their motives may be pure, they’re just embodying the inversion of feminism. And neither side will take the other the least bit seriously because they both live in bubbles of denial.

Misogyny is still out there. And sometimes it’s ingrained in our institutions. Misandry does exist and just because it’s not as deeply ingrained in our culture doesn’t negate how problematic and unfair it is to judge someone by their genitalia.

#mod sansa #sexism

explore-blog

Women between fifteen and forty-four are more likely to be injured or die from male violence than from traffic accidents, cancer, malaria, and the effects of war combined.

A difficult, important piece by Ariel Levy for The New Yorker.

Help do something about it here.

(via explore-blog)

I swear to fuck if someone tries to come up in here and be like, “SOME men are violent towards women.” NO. SOME men aren’t violent towards women. Read the article, check your shit.

(via lagoonmonsterlove)

My previous anons protesting me writing off the majority of men as being violent. Read this and then get off the internet forever.

(via factualfeminist)

Sigh.

Not only is the original quote extremely intellectually dishonest (they chopped off the “worldwide” portion of the quote to make it look like it refers to America only), it’s also 100% falsified according to the update at the bottom of the linked article.

Furthermore the data that that quote is based on was published in 1994, making it incredibly outdated.

(via geisterwand)

#mod sansa #sexism

sj-waluigi

You shouldn't generalize feminists though. It means someone who thinks women are as important as men, it can mean people who think women are more important than men, but in my case it does not. I am very willing to stand up for men's rights when I see its necessary but I'm also willing to stand up for women's rights because I stand for equality. I'm a feminist by definition, and I believe you are too, you're just not a horrible feminist who hates men, you're a cool feminist who wants equality.

Please don’t apply labels to Waluigi. He is an egalitarian. He believes in actual equality, regardless of gender, and would never identify with an unnecessarily gender specific and admittedly confused movement such as feminism.

choukoupuffs-deactivated2015091

I am thiiiis close to unfollowing you. Pick up a history book, and quit smelling your own farts about switching a label around and pretending you’re superior. Feminism doesn’t mean whatever you feel like it means at the moment to support your argument.

wiccaantje-deactivated20200820

History book about feminism: the white feather campaign. Oh so feminism was never ever about equality? Not even the first movement?

No one that has objectively researched feminism can say it’s a good thing.

I get the “educate yourself” a lot when I’m talking about feminism. Guess what, the reason I’m anti-feminism is because I educated myself. Feminism was spoonfed to me ever since I went to school and I required a wake-up call with some hard facts about feminism to snap me out of it.

At first I rejected that at well. Defending feminism, because everything I’ve been told all my life couldn’t have been a lie, right? It was. If you call yourself a feminist that I suggest you go look up what your precious feminism does. Being a part of that movement means you should know the things it does, because you will be put under the same label as them.

No member of the KKK is allowed to say: “But I didn’t know they killed people… I’m just with the KKK for white pride you know, because I’m proud to be white. Nothing wrong with that.” It’s your responsibility to know what you are part of.

choukoupuffs-deactivated2015091

Not the same thing, sweet cheeks, and if you thought for two seconds about what was coming out of your mouth you’d know it. And your confusing what the movement accomplished with what they stood for. Or are you going to ignore the black feminists and pretend it’s only about white women some more? Or ignoring the Japanese feminist movement, or the world wide one.

Are you from America? Because you sound like you’re from America.

Try world history, instead of American history.

dracofangxxx

Alright, I’m jumping in this.

World feminist history? You mean how feminists in india pressured the government to take their gender-neutral rape laws and make them women-only? Effectively erasing half of the gendered rapes and encouraging that nasty thing called rape culture you all seem to hate??

It’s the exact same thing, sweet cheeks. Feminism is a movement and a group representing an idea. Same as communism, same as religion, same as anything that unites a people towards a belief. The belief of any well-known for being ‘evil’ movement sounds good at first- otherwise, how would they ever get followers and supporters? The path to hell is paved with good intentions…

You’re successfully part of a group akin to Naziism and the KKK when you begin excusing actions in the name of the results and ideology. That’s the point of how these things form- you get brainwashed into excusing poor behaviour, and it gets perpetuated.

#mod sansa #feminism

infinitimatti

Dear Feminism

Take responsibility and DEAL with bad feminists. That is all.

mr-robert-gray-deactivated20180

is everyone who is a baptist required to wage war against the Westboro Baptist Church, though? Is every person of the Islamist faith required to explicitly disavow Jihadists? I don’t buy this line of reasoning at all, sorry.

infinitimatti

#mod sansa #feminism

jaranoc-deactivated20181114

white people telling me the solution to racism is to not talk about race is LITERALLY the epitome of white privilege please get that through your heads

johncory9mm

Yeah, that was from a famous statement made by Morgan Freeman.

#mod sansa #racism

itsawomansworld2-blog

Q: Girls are discouraged? That sounds so 1970s. A: There was a 2001 study that showed in fourth grade, 68% of boys and 66% of girls like science. Starting in sixth, seventh and eighth grade, we lose girls and boys, but we lose more girls and for different reasons: lingering stereotypes, societal pressures. It’s well known that many girls have a tendency to dumb down when they’re in middle school. Just last week, I was talking to senior executives, and a woman told me that she was the best biology student in high school and had the highest exam scores. At the end of the semester, a teacher told her: “I’m sorry, but I’m going to have to give the award in biology to a boy, because it’s more important to him.” Almost every time that I give a speech or meet with a group of women, I’ll hear such stories. Q: Boys earn 70% of the D’s and F’s in school and account for 80% of dropouts. Shouldn’t we fear more for their future? A: It’s a big problem. Women earn the majority of undergraduate degrees in the U.S. and last year earned more Ph.D.s than men. But keeping girls in the science and math pipeline is a separate problem with different causes. It’s important we address both. You don’t stop research on breast cancer just because heart disease is also deadly. You work on both. Q: Suppose you were an executive of a corporation that needs engineers. You meet a girl in high school. She scored in the 99th percentile in math on her SATs, yet says she wants to major in psychology or go to law school, because those careers sound more interesting. What do you tell her? A: I’d introduce her to the coolest female engineer in the company. Girls tend to have a stereotype of engineers being 65-year-old guys who wear lab coats and pocket protectors and look like Einstein. Try to make it personal to them and show them some of the cool things that they can do in engineering. Q: Let’s talk Lawrence Summers. The Harvard president recently resigned after giving a controversial speech a year ago suggesting that men might simply be predisposed to be better at math and science. Is there at least a grain of truth in what he said? A: (Laughs). Suppose you came across a woman lying on the street with an elephant sitting on her chest. You notice she is short of breath. Shortness of breath can be a symptom of heart problems. In her case, the much more likely cause is the elephant on her chest. For a long time, society put obstacles in the way of women who wanted to enter the sciences. That is the elephant. Until the playing field has been leveled and lingering stereotypes are gone, you can’t even ask the question. Q: I will anyway. There are many obvious biological differences between men and women. This can’t be one? A: There are obvious differences, but until you eliminate the more obvious cause, it’s difficult to get at the question scientifically. Look at law, medicine and business. In 1970 — that’s not ancient history — law school was 5% female, med school was 8% and business school was 4%. You could have taken a look at those numbers and concluded that women don’t make good lawyers or doctors. The statistics might have supported you. But today, all of those fields are about 50-50.

Sally Ride (the first American woman in space) giving awesome answers to insipid questions in this interview. (via itsawomansworld2)

#mod sansa #misandry

imminentdeathsyndrome1deac

I wish I would have been more aware what woman to woman sexual violence was—what it looked like—so that I might have acknowledged for myself what had happened to me, that I had been violated. I felt violated but didn’t have words to put to the experience or the knowledge to put words to it.

Judy, from the book “Woman-to-Woman Sexual Violence: Does She Call It Rape?” (via imminentdeathsyndrome)

Wait, you mean treating sexual assault as M>F screws over women too? Who woulda thunk?

I wonder how long before someone comes up with logical contortions to explain this away. Maybe they’ll accuse me of only caring because I hate feminism women, despite the fact that I’ve made this exact point openly before.

(via siryouarebeingmocked)

#mod sansa #sexual assault

floozys-deactivated20180908

bye

tuesday99-deactivated20160223

Every clasroom caters to boys??? What the fuck.

judal-is-my-spirit-animal-deact

0_0

Until about a century ago, women in most areas of the world couldn’t even go to school ( and they still can’t in certain countries.)

capricornicis-goat

Yeah but boys right now are doing poorly in grade schools.

Watch the whole video

#mod sansa #misandry

tristyntothesea

idontcareaboutyourblog-deactiva

One of the best visual representations of the double standards subjected to all women on a daily basis. Reconsider the next time you toss about the words in column 3.