Sphynx II by AntarcticSpring
todays bird
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

ellievsbear
noise dept.
Stranger Things
Xuebing Du

★
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Discoholic 🪩

PR's Tumblrdome
KIROKAZE
almost home
Mike Driver
Jules of Nature

if i look back, i am lost
macklin celebrini has autism
sheepfilms
Not today Justin
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from Germany
seen from Ukraine
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Poland

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Ukraine

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Poland
seen from Australia
@rkkid
Sphynx II by AntarcticSpring
oh man i can imagine the screaming fits
#GirlsWithToys hashtag - part 47
What is this hashtag about? In short: the hashtag was born out of casual sexism by a male scientist. To read more about what spurred this response, read Kate Clancy’s (creator of the hashtag) article below:
Girls With Toys: This is what real scientists look like.
View my other posts here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, part 9, part 10, part 11, part 12, part 13, part 14, part 15, part 16, part 17, part 18, part 19, part 20, part 21, part 22, part 23, part 24, part 25, part 26, part 27, part 28, part 29, part 30, part 31, part 32, part 33, part 34, part 35, part 36, part 37, part 38, part 39, part 40, part 41, part 42, part 43, part 44, part 45 and part 46.
I think #girlswithtoys just proved that women in stem issue is baseless, and all this hyperbolic "women don't go to stem because sexism" has zero credibility. Look at all these female scientists!!! All of them exceptions?
You’re so wrong its laughable. The reason the hashtag is important is because it highlights successful women in STEM careers which gives aspiring scientists role models and encouragement to succeed. Are you really arguing that a few thousands photos of women in Science suddenly means that women are equal in STEM fields? Nothing could be further from the truth.
I’m a man, and even I understand this. I am the one who has been creating and sharing these photosets ( shychemist is my personal blog), because I realize how important movements like this are. Even when women get into stem fields, rampant sexism, discrimination and unequal treatement can push them out.
Any opportunity I get I will encourage women in STEM fields. They deserve to be there and succeed just as much as a man.
Let me educate you:
NEW RESEARCH PROVES GENDER BIAS EXTRAORDINARILY PREVALENT IN STEM CAREERS
Columbia Business School experiments show that hiring managers chose men twice as often for careers in science, technology, engineering and math
Bias Persists for Women of Science, a Study Finds
Science professors at American universities widely regard female undergraduates as less competent than male students with the same accomplishments and skills, a new study by researchers at Yale concluded.
As a result, the report found, the professors were less likely to offer the women mentoring or a job. And even if they were willing to offer a job, the salary was lower.
This is a must read which goes deeply into why women are discouraged and discriminated against in STEM fields:
Why Are There Still So Few Women in Science?
Here’s some more:
Women Deterred From Many Fields by Stereotypes of ‘Brilliance’
Teacher Prejudices Put Girls Off Math, Science
Sexual Harassment and Assault Prove Common During Scientific Field Studies
Women Scientists Share Their Awful Stories Of Sexism In Publishing
Sexism In Science? UK Study Finds Women Scientists Get Fewer Grants, Less Funding Than Male Counterparts
Gender Inequality in STEM Fields
Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, or STEM, fields are exceedingly male dominated with women making up only 24 percent of such occupations in the United States. Starting from a young age, girls are made to believe that their abilities are not sufficient enough satisfy the requirements in such ‘complicated’ fields and that boys are just more suitable for such jobs. Many are taught and that even if they were to take interest in such subjects, it would be unnecessary since the fields are male dominated and they would never be able to excel in them. Overall societal pressures and expectations force women to conform to gender norms that hinder their participation and development in STEM fields. Gender inequality in STEM fields reflect hierarchical system that further discourages women from working in them.Gender disparities in scientific field expectations start at a young age. Researchers such as Sadker and Zittleman suggest that the classroom environment in elementary schools often favor boys over girls as studies showed that “teachers called on boys more, commented more on their work, and praised them more” , creating a discouraging environment for young girls making them feel less competent in academic fields. Corroborated by researcher, Andre found that boys in the same grade feel they have a higher proficiency in physical sciences than girls , leading to girls in grades 4-6 often feeling that boys are better at math and sciences, particularly physical sciences. A decrease in science ability perception for students in grades 5-8 existed for girls only ; these misconceptions reflect career aspirations as a report by the US Department of Education found that, “boys were more than twice as likely as girls to aspire to be scientists or engineers (9 and 3 percent, respectively)” as early as the eighth grade . This evidence points to a societal perception that young girls experience and believe that science is for boys and not for girls. While these girls were taught names of great scientists such as Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, and Galileo Galilei, all who were males, they were never exposed to any female professionals in such fields. Without any women role models to look up to, the girls were subconsciously made to believe that women were just not fit to do such jobs. This perception continued to exist in the home as well as the school with even parents having higher expectations for boys’ scientific abilities ; girls had no place to stand in STEM subjects.Even after entering STEM majors, women continue to face societal pressures and negative stereotypes about their abilities in colleges. A survey of college freshmen by the Higher Education Research Institute showed that 29 percent of male freshmen planned to enter STEM majors while only 15 female freshmen planned to enter similar majors. Gender roles tie women to certain fields even within STEM that are more generally seen as jobs for ‘caregivers’ as seen in 1999 while 4 percent of women and 20 percent of men planned to major in computer science and engineering, in biological or health sciences, the percentages between men and women were very similar. At post-secondary level, women were less likely to earn a degree in STEM fields than men, with the exception to this gender imbalance is in the life sciences. Historically biological sciences were tied with medical fields that were seen as ‘nurturing’ acts, tied with women’s place in society. This ties back in with women’s childhoods in which they were encouraged to believe that they did not have the mental capacity to analyze mathematical concepts as sufficiently as boys. This has nothing to do with actual ability, however as, “on average, high school girls take more math and science credits and earn higher grades in these subjects than boys”. Women also have higher GPAs on average than men in all majors, including STEM majors. The fact that there is no disparity between men and women in their STEM ability, and that elementary school girls and boys generally have equal interest in science suggests that there are societal expectations prevent women from entering STEM majors as they mature.The workforce also demonstrates gender inequality in STEM fields. This inequality is often measured by the pay gap, as “women working full time in engineering and architecture earned only about 93 percent of what their male colleagues earned”. While women engineers and architects earn an average of 105 percent of their male colleagues in their first year out of college, attributing to efforts to encourage girls to enter engineering fields, this gap soon reversed over time. As much as 38% of female students who remained in STEM fields expressed concerns that they would be in a better financial situation if they had not taken up these male dominated careers, leading them to experience less satisfaction with the workplace environment in STEM fields than men as evidenced by their greater faculty turnover (Xu 2008). Despite women being equally committed to their jobs, the STEM workplace is more supportive to men than women. At work, the bosses expect less participation in the job from women than from men (Xu 2008), suppressing them from expressing their full potential. Even after thirty years since Congress’s outlawing of sex discrimination in education, the gender divided in career and technical education (CTE) has narrowed barely at all (Toglia 2013).With constant suppression from society, women cannot prosper or enter as a dominant figure in scientific fields. To allow more women to participate in such fields, it is essential that the same academic opportunities are given to girls as the boys at an early stage at their lives. Without an equal distribution of gender in specific STEM roles, a hierarchical society will continue to build, going against the foundation of American ideals focusing on equality for all. Women are constantly undermined for their abilities to perform adequately in technological fields and are forced to conform under such misconceptions. The patriarchal stereotypes trap women seeking an opportunity in STEM fields in the United States of America.
Works CitedToglia, Thomas V. “Gender Equity Issues In CTE And STEM Education.” Tech Directions 72.7 (2013): 14-17. Academic Search Complete. Web. 11 Dec. 2014.Xu, Yonghong. “Gender Disparity In STEM Disciplines: A Study Of Faculty Attrition And Turnover Intentions.” Research In Higher Education 49.7 (2008): 607-624. Academic Search Complete. Web. 11 Dec. 2014.
I really could go on and on and on, but I really hope this is enough. I encourage you and everyone else to read all about this and leave your prejudiced notions behind.
Thank you for your excellent response to this, and for posting so many #Girlswithtoys! It’s great to see people standing up against such silly attempts to ignore and erase the issue of sexism in the sciences. I think he was too eager to go “gotcha, feminists!” to actually think about what he was writing. “Look, some lady scientists! All that research was just feminist propoganda!”
15 tweets that expose the hypocrisy of conservative child molester Josh Duggar
Josh Duggar, a star of the TLC hit 19 Kids and Counting and professional moralizer, has resigned his position as executive director of the Family Research Council’s lobbying arm after admitting to sexually molesting a number of underage teenage girls 12 years ago. Some of the victims were reportedly his own sisters. He was never charged for a crime — and likely never will be.
“no homo” I whisper as I look at my garden of pea plants. The progeny had expressed a 1:2:1 ratio of phenotypes. I am Gregor Mendel.
This joke is lethal
Funny how two rival biker gangs can have a full blown shootout in the front of a supermarket that leaves 18 injured and 9 dead and not be killed, shot at, tased, chased, tear gassed, or even hand cuffed but if a few minorities gather together to peacefully protest the murder of a child the police come militarized.
still think white privilege doesn’t exist?
‘A Californian congressmen has just introduced a law to make it illegal to keep orcas in captivity. This could change everything — but SeaWorld is already mounting a vicious campaign to defeat this congressman’s brave move. We need to tell the State of California that the public won’t accept SeaWorld’s imprisonment of orcas any longer.’
Enact the Orca Welfare and Safety Act to make it illegal to hold orcas in captivity for performance or entertainment purposes
sign this petition
THIS IS SERIOUSLY SO CLOSE, SIGNAL BOOST SO HARD
LESS THAN 7000 LEFT.
Can anyone help with an ID? My uncle found this for me and I don’t know what it belongs to. It’s quite large, I’m thinking moose?
First rattlesnake I’ve had to dispatch this year, I hate to do it, but it is a threat to fisherman, especially when it didn’t warn us at all and my buddy @cash4fish was a foot away from stepping on it. #flyfishing #rattlesnake
So let me get this right.
You go out into the wild.
Into this animal’s habitat.
Happen across it.
And kill it?
Do you realize how much of an asshole that makes you? There was no reason to kill this animal, nor animal animal because “its a potential threat” By that logic you should also kill every dog you see because they can potentially kill people.
Do you realize how much of a pussy you are? I had a rattlesnake chase me from the back field to my back door. Where I dispatched it with a fucking stick. If it DOESN’T RATTLE ITS A DANGER. A rattle snake that doesn’t rattle is an ASSHOLE.
Rattlesnakes do not chase people, they don’t chase anything. When they feel threatened they either try to escape, or they stand their ground. So congrats on using a story that has no basis in reality to try to justify killing a snake. You are also an asshole.
And trying to defend the fact that this person went into the snake’s habitat and killed it in its home is a very low thing to do.
These are the kind of people that make me believe the theory that rattlers are no longer rattling so they don’t draw attention to themselves. What a fucking pisscake.
“The rattlesnake was chasing me all the way to my house!”
That bullshit story is faker than grandma’s hip. If you can’t handle wild animals around you, stay inside where you belong with the rest of the fearful children.
“You’re a pussy, I ran from a timid small reptile that has pretty much zero chance of killing me thanks to modern medicine.”
Do these snake-killing tough guys even listen to themselves?
It EXISTED it was a THREAT better KILL THE SHIT OUT OF IT to protect all the women and children. Seriously though, what kind of logic is “it didn’t rattle it must have been trying to sneak up on me and kill me”?
A peer reviewer’s suggestion that two female researchers find “one or two male biologists” to co-author and help them strengthen a manuscript they had written and submitted to a journal has unleashed an avalanche of disbelief and disgust on Twitter today – and prompted an apology from the journal’s publisher. Evolutionary geneticist Fiona Ingleby was shocked when she read the review accompanying the rejection for her latest manuscript, which investigates gender differences in the Ph.D.-to-postdoc transition, so she took the issue to Twitter. Earlier today, Ingleby, a postdoc at the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom, posted two excerptsof the anonymous review. “It would probably … be beneficial to find one or two male biologists to work with (or at least obtain internal peer review from, but better yet as active co-authors)” to prevent the manuscript from “drifting too far away from empirical evidence into ideologically biased assumptions,” the reviewer wrote in one portion. “Perhaps it is not so surprising that on average male doctoral students co-author one more paper than female doctoral students, just as, on average, male doctoral students can probably run a mile a bit faster than female doctoral students,” added the reviewer (whose gender is not known).
In today’s episode of Why I Need Feminism…
“drifting too far away from empirical evidence into ideologically biased assumptions,” the reviewer wrote in one portion. “…as the manuscript was rejected for ideologically biased assumptions…
This is why blind review is bullshit. If you are going to be a heinous asshole, there should be some comeuppance.
Ugh.
This is absolutely disgusting.
PSA
Guysss dont do the thing when writing an essay you write random words after a paragraph and then turn them white to increase word count!!! My college english teacher has been catching people left and right trying this because his computer screen formats the paper differently so he can see where the added words are, and he also turns the papers into audio with some program and he can hear all of the words you turned white. Its considered cheating and some of these students are in BIG trouble! Please just turn words like don’t, couldnt and didn’t ect into do not, could not and did not. It increases your word count and is not something that will get you in trouble!
you’d also be screwed if your teacher is someone like me who highlights words as they read them
Instead of putting all that effort into fucking around, put it into writing a decent paper. When I mark papers I’m usually more concerned with whether or not you semi-coherently made your point (or if you plagiarized) than your word count. The silliness that goes on in university classes is astounding.
if you cant handle me at my worst then leave because i dont have a best im always awful
Hey, fucknovegans: it’s this shit again!
You heard her: If you use tools, you’re not a real predator. Quit that at once, you cheating otters and chimps and ravens.
Now, on a more serious note? While I may be a bit rusty now, I’m sure I can still catch fish, frogs, arthropods, and mollusks with my bare hands. Not only can humans eat raw meat, but it’s a delicacy in some cultures; look up sashimi or carpaccio. And when are people going to learn that bringing taxonomy into it is false equivalence to the point of being a complete non sequitur?
Look: You’re your own person; no one is stopping you from being vegan. (I won’t say nothing is,” because something damned well could be; such things, like it or not, happen.) But if you feel the need to not only treat what should be entirely a matter of personal principle as a matter of objective morality, but outright lie to justify it? That’s where I have a quarrel with you.
Liking “nekkid Brie with wings,” too. For a certain value of “like” that involves a hell of a lot of secondhand embarrassment.
I guess no one told chimps, otters, ravens, crows, baboons, or elephants that if you have to use tools to eat something it’s not your natural diet. Those cheaters should really stop using their naturally evolved intelligence to adapt and survive according to the laws of nature because that shit just isn’t natural… oh wait.
I feel like some of these people have never learned a single thing about animals in their lives. What kind of ignorant argument is this? Tool usage is of great important to a variety of animals- it doesn’t invalidate their actions and it doesn’t make them unnatural. You can’t just pick and chose what aspects of animal behavior- including human- is acceptable in order to fit your agenda.
Humans are omnivores. You can chose to eat a plant based diet but don’t spread lies and pseudoscience in order to make others do the same or convince them that there’s science behind it. Remember, it can be harmful to animals to spread misinformation about how the natural world works, as education is key in protecting many species. Isn’t that the opposite of what vegans want to do? Keep to ethical arguments.
Isn’t it cute how the American Revolution was started over just over taxes and angry white people destroyed the tea because they didn’t want to pay a tax and they’re heralded as patriots but when black people damage property because they’re sick of being killed by the system that’s supposed to protect and serve them we’re barbarians 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
Louis C.K.