Which is why on this blog we remember that fictional stories like ATLA are contemporary myths and the nature of myths and legends and storytelling all throughout human history has been that they get reinterpreted and changed countless times and with every classic myth there are numerous versions of it that exist.
In some later versions of the story of Heracles, storytellers added in their own little side fic to it, where Heracles is getting force-fem'd and has to live as the maidservant of this wealthy dominatrix lady and this addition to the story got so popular in retellings that it's considered its own equally valid version of the myth. Literally someone's Heracles femdom fanfic that got so popular it was accepted as a "canon" part of the story by the people of the time, most of whom probably didn't know that it wasn't in the older versions of the myth because it was the only version they'd ever heard. So now someone's dominatrix OC they created to ship with Heracles is an official part of Heracles lore and listed as one of his wives on Wikipedia (with the caveat that she's not in every version). This part of the story arose at a time when ideas about gender and sexuality were shifting somewhat, so I think we can see why people in a time period like that found this addition to the story to be intriguing and wanted to explore them through a popular myth.
"Canon" is a modern concept born from a religious concept that was designed as a tool of social and mental control. Canon should be considered like draft 1 of the contemporary myth and all fanfic and retellings are just alternative versions of the same story just like how classical mythology has multiple versions depending on who's telling it and when.
Was Iphegenia sacrificed by her father or did the goddess Artemis step in at the last moment to spare her? Both, because both versions exist and are equally valid and real because both are fictional. The one where she IS sacrificed came first (I believe) but was changed in later tellings, probably because human sacrifice was a huge no-no in Ancient Greek religion and practitioners were probably not buying the idea that a god would demand a human sacrifice when such things were strictly prohibited, and they decided that they were ignoring and rewriting that part of the "canon" because they couldn't make sense of it in the context of how they understood their religion. Kind of like how I cannot make sense of a highschool aged girl wanting to make out with a 6th grader based on my understanding of teenage girls as someone who used to be one. It was one of the first ever instances of "she would not fucking say that," so the folk fixed the error they saw in the story, and we do the same thing today with fanon and fanfiction.
They weren't buying that Artemis would ask for a human sacrifice, they decided she was acting OOC and to fix it, just like how I do not buy that Katara wanted to kiss that little boy or that Zuko would be happy with Mai, and as a result I am changing the story in the way I retell it.
So if I decide that Zuko ended up happily married to Katara and they had beautiful steambabies, then fuck it, that's what happened. Because I said so. Because that is how telling stories has worked since the dawn of humankind.
The version of ATLA where Zuko and Katara end up together is just another version of the contemporary myth. It might not be canon, but it is just as valid and just as real, because neither are real, both are imaginary, and arguing that people aren't "allowed" to disregard canon and decide for themselves what happened is basically like arguing that your imaginary friend is more real than someone else's imaginary friend. Both are imaginary. Neither are real. These are not historical events they are fictional stories and no one can stop you from deciding that something else happened because thought crime is not real and you have free will.
Deciding to disregard canon and make up your own version of fictional events is using free will to its fullest extent tbh. More people should do it when a story they like ends in an unsatisfying way. It's very fun.
Ending this rant on some Henry Jenkins wisdom.
"'Fandom' is a vehicle of marginalized subcultural groups (women, the young, gays, etc.) to pry open space for their cultural concerns within dominant representations; it is a way of appropriating media texts and rereading them in a way that serves different interests, a way of transforming mass culture into a popular culture."
Jenkins, Henry. āStar Trek Rerun, Reread, Rewritten: Fan Writing as Textual Poaching.ā Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5, no. 2 (1988): 85ā107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038809366691.
Thank you for listening. Zutara forever.