Hey! Not an ask, but just an appreciation for always answering billions of questions regarding the show. I dont think even the makers could have answered in the way you do :) I just realized that tumblr makes things disappear so I just wanted to let you know I am grateful for clarifying my confusions and always giving quick answers :) Thank you
Eeeee thank you! This is amazing!! I reckon -- as with creating anything -- they’d have loads of views on what they intended and what they wanted to show, which is fascinating all by itself. One of the most illuminating things for me is when Barun Sobti compares Arnav and Advay (even though he dislikes it when others do it haha) --
What is the biggest difference you find between Arnav and Advay?
This is an unfair question because I had immense fun doing both the roles. The major reason why I had so much fun doing all the roles was that it has been appreciated so much. However, the difference between Advay and Arnav is that one Advay is absolutely lonely, he has nobody in his life so you feel bad for him. He is vocal about it and is vengeful. Advay’s losses are so deep that he can go to any extent to make the people who are behind it to make them suffer.
(source) This interview was given before they rewrote the show! It also contains his statement about how IPK3 was originally meant to be something else -- which seems to be what Gorky released a still and video of.
How different is Advay from Arnav?
Arnav had found a way to hide his misery behind his work. Arnav never really dealt with his problem, he never liked to talk about his parents. Basically, that was what ate him up and that was what the whole character was about. Advay, on the other hand, refuses to stop thinking about it and his whole agenda lies around his past life. He is not like he will not talk about it. He will talk about it and he will react and behave based on what has happened in his past life. His agenda is very clear.
I generally don’t bring the intent of the creative team into my analysis -- I have a pretty hard and fast rule about what I consider canon and what I don’t -- but I find what they have to say interesting.
For example -- Aakash’s character arc. I know I’ve answered tonnes of questions on it but one thing I rarely bring up is Akshay Dogra’s feelings on the issue. I mentioned an interview in this post, it’s since been taken down and I can’t find it anywhere!
He also says that he was a “good guy” - no character depth - and had a weak script … “even Lakshmi had something to do!”. He says that the script never called for reactions and that any reactions, any semblance of character you see in the show, is his input, not the script. He even talks about the changes in Aakash during the kidnapping track and how a lot of the roles he’d envisioned for Aakash went to NK.
One of the things he said in this interview (I’m sorry I can’t provide a link but you should read that post) is that he had no idea what was going on on the kidnapping track and tried to play Aakash as if he knew that Bhai had been kidnapped. And knowing that, when one goes back and watches those episodes, Aakash’s behaviour makes a more sense. Basically, he thought the writers had done such a poor job of explaining Aakash’s behaviour that he came up with an explanation and tried to play it that way. And it didn’t pan out for a number of reasons, including the fact that they bought NK back to play the role he thought he’d be doing.
None of that is canon and it cannot be brought into analysis about his character. But it explains so much!!
I think I’ve gotten side-tracked hahahaha, thank you so much for the compliment, and for giving me a space to just ramble about things I don’t get to talk about much! Sending you loads of love!