Smith Corruption Scandal Highlights Campaign Finance Reform Efforts
Outside of the Smith scandal, New York's political corruption problem is large. It contains multitudes. These aren't just a couple of politicians that dipped in and out of White Plains hotels to cut electoral rigging deals over "the fucking money." As the New York Times' Albany bureau chief Danny Hakim pointed out earlier today, "Three of the last five NY State Senate majority leaders have been indicted or are in jail." And that's not even counting all the other state lawmakers who have been charged with corruption crimes since 2007.
"Todayâs charges demonstrate, once again, that a show-me-the-money culture seems to pervade every level of New York government," U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement yesterday. "We will continue pursuing and punishing every corrupt official we find, but the public corruption crisis in New York is more than a prosecutorâs problem."
That would make it a legislator's problem, according to a coalition of unions and community organizations that have been rallying for campaign finance reform in New York state. It couldn't have been better timed: Bolstered by Governor Cuomo and the organizers involved with President Obama's presidential campaign, Fair Elections for New York, the coalition's main force, had planned to hold several events across the state this week.
"The real scandal is that so many regular New Yorkers will read tomorrowâs papers, and will check out of the process completely, because it reinforces what they already believe â that money has more influence than their votes,"Â the coalition said in a statement in response to Tuesday's corruption scandal. "Now itâs time to stand shoulder to shoulder with Governor Cuomo and the growing bipartisan majority of New Yorkers who support comprehensive campaign finance reform, which must include a system of publicly financed elections at its core."Â [[WOULD BE BETTER TO SUB DIRECT QUOTE FROM KAREN SCHARFF, PRESS PERSON FOR FENY]]
An op-ed penned by former Rep. Mike Arcuri (D-NY) and published on Monday in the Syracuse Post-Standard shared a similar, premonitory sentiment about candidates who find themselves scratching wealthy backs. Instead, the way to a "New Albany," Arcuri argued, was through instituting public funding of elections through small donors, as is done in Arizona, Maine, and Connecticut.
"Candidates for office spend inordinate amounts of time and energy courting special interests and wealthy individuals that are able to provide the funds necessary for election and re-election, even if those donors have business before them," he wrote.
But unions and scrappy reform organizations aren't the only groups pushing to remove big money from politics. Wealthy individuals like Jonathan Soros (son of George) and activist Sean Eldridge (fiancĂ© of Facebook co-founder and New Republic publisher Chris Hughes) have also launched efforts for campaign finance reform in the state. Eldridge's group, Protect Our Future, is a 501(c)(4) non-profit or a "social welfare" entity that does not have to disclose its donorsâthough the irony that these kinds of shadowy organisms have outspent super PACs in previous election cycles is not lost on the political activist. Earlier this year, Eldridge explained to Mother Jones that the paradox was part of the plan, and a necessary aspect of what he considers a wake-up call.
"The ultimate goal is we need to create a majority for reform in the Senate,â Eldridge told the New York Times last year.