RECORD- BREAKING BIKE.
QUESTION 1: Determine main point: The main point of this article is to introduce us about the bike that is the fastest powered vehicle. At the very beginning of the article the author says "the strange-looking, bullet-shaped bike broke the record for fastest person-powered vehicle on Earth." So, as we go along the article, the author talks about the team aerovelo, which is a group of Canadian who built the bike, and also features and descriptions of the bike, how you ride it, and the reason to why it was built like that. Then we come to the end, Cameron a member of the team tells us about his feelings towards the success of the eta.
QUESTION 2: How the article is structured: The purpose of this article is to inform us about the new invention which has hatched on our planet. The author did it in a rather different way that made me picture myself on the bike competing against the speed of light. She included speeches of the members of the team, which made me get the idea of the bike better, because those who invent things are the ones who draw the attention of the people, since they are the ones who invented. The articles organisation is done in the right way, its introduction directly starts by saying the fastest bike which is catchy, the paragraphs with sub headings on top made it more clear and are well detailed and supported with the members quotes. The picture at the top of the article just completes the article. The authorâs weakness is her ending, she could have had an exciting conclusion to end the article.
QUESTION 3: Questions and why are you asking them? -Is the article talking in a first persons view? This well show if the author is writing the article in her own point of view, which if it is then it will mostly be opinions, not facts.
-Is the article biast? Does the article provide the reader to argue, in other word does it allow us to agree or disagree, if it is not reliable we will be able to argue, but if it is then we will have no side to argue.
QUESTION 4: Reliable or not? This article is reliable, three reasons that support my answer. First, the article's date is still fresh, meaning it was posted recently, which means that the information was recently discovered. Second reason, is that it includes the inventors quotes about the inventions which shows that the information is true. Lastly, the article is not written in the first person's view, which means that the information are facts not opinions.










