AnasAbdin
No title available
Discoholic đȘ©
wallacepolsom
if i look back, i am lost
Show & Tell
pixel skylines
d e v o n
ellievsbear
DEAR READER
Stranger Things
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
I'd rather be in outer space đž
we're not kids anymore.
#extradirty
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
đȘŒ
â
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Slovakia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
@santa-argues
anon asks always ON but youre a coward if you send one
dms open if youre a freak
im usually always responding in good faith but if youre being a dick ill be a dick back
if im just trying to piss you off ill tag it "santa goes fishing" or smth
i DO listen to your arguments!!!!! im debating you, not arguing, i am keeping an open mind, whether or not you do is up to you
provide your fucking sources
ask me for my source cus i will actually have them
i dont block đ«Šđ
radfem: women are female
tra: youâre literally committing an active genocide against me and this is EXACTLY like slavery and jim crow
anyone sane: women are whoever identified as such because gender is a societal concept and has no bearing on reality
terfs: youre literally committing an active genocide against me drag is to gender what blackface is to race
So do you support sex-based protections that apply to female people regardless of gender identity? Access to female-exclusive shelters, schools, scholarships, prisons, changing rooms, etc?
duh yeah i just also think we need to have safe spaces for trans women to stay safe from men too, whether in womens shelters or a separate shelter, trans women shouldnt go in mens shelters either way just like cis women shouldnt
They have access to women's shelters now. The issue is that women no longer have sex based safe spaces. In my city if a woman finally gets a spot at a shelter, that can take weeks to get because of the waitlists, she has to room with whoever the shelter picks. If that person is a transwomen and she doesn't feel comfortable, she's back on the street instantly. There are shelters where you are barred from services for even expressing that you aren't comfortable showering around males. That's the current reality for homeless women.
believe me I know, i spend a lot of time around homeless people in my city. we have no shelters in the area where the most homeless people and a couple very packed ones in the nicer parts of town. its a similar thing. again, i think a trans women shelter would be helpful. even just the opportunity to choose whether or not you care if you room with a trans woman. even if theyre post transition and post op it can definitely be uncomfortable for some women and regardless of political beliefs or whether or not you support trans rights, i think its a given that homeless women or victims of abuse who need a safe space should NOT be uncomfortable in that space. that said, (in my city at least, where we have a large queer population and a VERY large homeless population), ive not really heard of any problems with trans women in shelters. im sure there are some but its at least not a huge deal here. overall I think trans women shelters make sense, we have native womens shelters here because of the very high abuse rates, i think trans women also should get one since they have the highest rape rates. im not trying to advocate for trans women specifically in womens shelters, im advocating for them to have a safe space, specifically from men, as well.
radfem: women are female
tra: youâre literally committing an active genocide against me and this is EXACTLY like slavery and jim crow
anyone sane: women are whoever identified as such because gender is a societal concept and has no bearing on reality
terfs: youre literally committing an active genocide against me drag is to gender what blackface is to race
So do you support sex-based protections that apply to female people regardless of gender identity? Access to female-exclusive shelters, schools, scholarships, prisons, changing rooms, etc?
duh yeah i just also think we need to have safe spaces for trans women to stay safe from men too, whether in womens shelters or a separate shelter, trans women shouldnt go in mens shelters either way just like cis women shouldnt
In that case I don't think you'll find many radfems who disagree with you on that. Trans women do experience discrimination and bigotry and deserve protections from cis men who cause them harm. As long as that doesn't come at the cost of any female sex-based protections I think its an extremely reasonable position.
Out of curiosity, why do you believe that "women are whoever are identified as such"?
yeah a lot of like actual radical feminists will agree with me but some of the Tumblr exclusive activists type people will try and say trans women need to be put with the men. i don't really think trans exclusive places are necessary generally, but i do believe that a womens shelter should be a very sacred and safe space, and so womens shelters should have the right to choose who they let into it, it just kinda sucks now at a time where we dont have trans shelters which can put trans women in dangerous situations
well gender is a social construct, made up concept that exists so that you can look at a person and imagine their genitals pretty much, but because its mad up idt theres any real reason why gender shouldnt be interchangeable, like being trans isnt really about like "i feel inside that I am a female" its more like "i am uncomfortable with the labels that have been forced upon me and since theyre all made up and kinda meaningless im just gonna change all my labels to something i like" yk. i misworded it though cus identified as such doesnt dystopian as hell i meant anyone who identifies as such, granted i do think some trans women have done more work to dismantle their inherent misogyny than others and sexist trans women are probably kinda evil
radfem: women are female
tra: youâre literally committing an active genocide against me and this is EXACTLY like slavery and jim crow
anyone sane: women are whoever identified as such because gender is a societal concept and has no bearing on reality
terfs: youre literally committing an active genocide against me drag is to gender what blackface is to race
So do you support sex-based protections that apply to female people regardless of gender identity? Access to female-exclusive shelters, schools, scholarships, prisons, changing rooms, etc?
duh yeah i just also think we need to have safe spaces for trans women to stay safe from men too, whether in womens shelters or a separate shelter, trans women shouldnt go in mens shelters either way just like cis women shouldnt
I've never seen trad wives explained so perfectly. "Non-nude fetish content for sexist men"
Lmfao you say this meanwhile the left are the same people promoting online prostitution. Literally were just trying tk live a happy life but these sad people come to hate
It's strange, liberals will say they are feminists, yet support an album cover of a woman being sexually degraded and defend pornogrpahy (which mind you, basically boils down to females being beaten up + a boner)
You say we promote fetish videos yet you are the same people advocating for men in dog costumes teaching to children.
Such contradictionary people, I swear.
the only problem w this worth questioning is who tf is teaching in a dog costume outside of like spirit week or halloween đ
i've really not the slightest bit of patience for willingly turning a blind eye to or downplaying the dangerous trend of feminists colluding with the right wing. the lure of short term gain in owning the transes is not a justification. your hit of dopamine is not worth kneecapping our credibility. hobbling a movement that is already maligned and struggling to reach the women who need it the most is not an acceptable trade for clickbait, for talk show deals, for funding or for the PR of your problematic fave gender critical celebrity. stand the fuck up. do you have principles or not.
you will sanctimoniously lecture trans activist women about their denial of the misogyny, rape culture, homophobia and male violence in the trans activist movement, while in the same breath laughing and scoffing and asking "who is we?" even when other feminists try to discuss the ongoing issue of right wing well poisoning and right wing collusion. you are as eager to scream "that never happens!" as the women you think of as so intellectually beneath you. but ultimately you are ruled by the same impulse to protect your own ingroup at the expense of the facts.
i have seen full throated genocide denialism, homophobia, racism, rape apologism and more go unchallenged in this sphere until it reaches a point where it can no longer be comfortably shrugged off. and if it were only on tumblr perhaps i'd be willing to look upon it as a failure of social media and of the fact that you can claim to be a feminist regardless of whether your beliefs or actions are feminist in any which way.
but it does not stop there. when a gender critical celebrity shows up on a right wing talk show, when an ostensibly feminist organization is in the pocket and exchanging funds with christian lobbies, not only do many ignore it, but actively hush up any critical discussion of it among principled feminists. oh, we can't be choosey! we can't all be perfect! women just don't have a choice! we just have to align with the forced-birthers, we just have to discredit ourselves and degrade ourselves by behaving as though we simply cannot fight for ourselves without the church funding, without the right wing podcasts, without the homophobes whose opposition to gender ideology is based purely in revulsion for gender non conformity and a "lack of family values". we have to duck our heads and wring our hands like shrinking, wilting violets and pretend it's not happening, straight up gaslight women- feminist or trans activist -who point it out.
i'm over it. it's cult shit. everyone who is part of our ingroup is right, everyone outside the ingroup is wrong. maybe you are a principled feminist and have not looked hard enough to find what the rest of us are seeing and talking about, maybe you've been lucky not to encounter these people behaving in these ways while pretending to wave a feminist banner, in which case you can simply sit the conversation out.
but i have also encountered people who genuinely believe that it's simply not a big deal, that sticking it to trans activists is worth selling fifty fucking years of women's blood and tears and bone breaking efforts to carve out a principled movement for female civil rights and structural change down the goddamn river. it's pathetic. stand up.
been seeing this for so fucking long, ive seen radfems argue for no abortions and then watch that shit get defended or shrugged off by other radfems
i am a radical feminist. you are a misogynist who believes women are not oppressed for being female and instead for some sort of womanly essence that leads us to "identify" as female. your politics are as anti-woman as any anti-abortionist's.
i was agreeing you dawg theres no need to be on the attack đ i do think that women are oppressed for being women, i believe in abortion, and i actually think transwomen dont experience misogyny, the prefix in transmisogyny is there to show that its a different type of oppression for a different reason
but more importantly as i was saying, the presence of regressive opinions among self identified radical feminists is a problem ive seen a lot and always tried to call out, but as you were saying it often gets completely ignored or defended. ive seen some women argue against abortion, saying that it should be illegal because any woman having sex with a men "deserves to either be raped or impregnated". on your topic of homophobia, ive also seen a lot of "radfems" saying that a lesbian whos ever been romantically or sexually involved with a man, including sexual assault and rape, isnt actually a lesbian, and is straight and looking for attention, once again shrugged off and ignored
i obviously dont have a platform within your community and, despite disagreement on a couple of issues (some of that disagreement is clear to me to be presumed on both your part and mine), i can recognize and appreciate an account with a larger following to be calling this shit out, because its harmful
edit: plus, is the point of a political ideology not to push for change? if someones agreeing im not sure why youd get so aggressive immediately. i understand that men should not be in radical feminism, that makes sense and i agree because it goes against the whole point of the ideology, but in the end game is having people outside of your sphere that agree with some of the points you make not a good thing? like a socialist saying "you grew up in a capitalist country so you cant agree with socialism" or a democrat saying a similar thing to another democrat from texas
my apologies for being brusque, but it does get exhausting on here to make a progressive post, as a radical feminist, and have my posts tagged by people taking my points and assuming that i must not be a radical feminist because i care about sex specific feminism for actual, grounded reasons- for the same reasons i care about racism, classism, homophobia, and all other forms of oppression -and not just because i think trans people are icky. it happens a lot, and it annoys me because it serves a similar confirmation bias as the one i was calling out in my fellow feminists. the idea of a principled, hard left woman who believes that gender identity is rooted in regressive stereotypes that reinforce misogyny on a structural level, even if this appears counter cultural at first blush, and who believes this due to a materialist analysis of how oppression works and how it is maintained seems impossible for most people to get their heads around. it's easier to brush me off as an outlier (not like the other girls), or to brush off my views on sexism as a glitch in my worldview rather than trying to understand how i got here. and i do get impatient with it.
yeah no i get that, sorry if my tags sounded that way it wasn't intended to be anything directed at you, just setting the other main reason i generally dislike radical feminism besides the things you brought up for clarification in case you wanted to respond to me, as theres been a couple times where ive been confused to be a radical feminist woman instead of a man who supports the transgender community, i just always just feel like i should set the expectations of where my political beliefs lay so as not to avoid confusion or accidentally start a whole thing once they realize lmao
i've really not the slightest bit of patience for willingly turning a blind eye to or downplaying the dangerous trend of feminists colluding with the right wing. the lure of short term gain in owning the transes is not a justification. your hit of dopamine is not worth kneecapping our credibility. hobbling a movement that is already maligned and struggling to reach the women who need it the most is not an acceptable trade for clickbait, for talk show deals, for funding or for the PR of your problematic fave gender critical celebrity. stand the fuck up. do you have principles or not.
you will sanctimoniously lecture trans activist women about their denial of the misogyny, rape culture, homophobia and male violence in the trans activist movement, while in the same breath laughing and scoffing and asking "who is we?" even when other feminists try to discuss the ongoing issue of right wing well poisoning and right wing collusion. you are as eager to scream "that never happens!" as the women you think of as so intellectually beneath you. but ultimately you are ruled by the same impulse to protect your own ingroup at the expense of the facts.
i have seen full throated genocide denialism, homophobia, racism, rape apologism and more go unchallenged in this sphere until it reaches a point where it can no longer be comfortably shrugged off. and if it were only on tumblr perhaps i'd be willing to look upon it as a failure of social media and of the fact that you can claim to be a feminist regardless of whether your beliefs or actions are feminist in any which way.
but it does not stop there. when a gender critical celebrity shows up on a right wing talk show, when an ostensibly feminist organization is in the pocket and exchanging funds with christian lobbies, not only do many ignore it, but actively hush up any critical discussion of it among principled feminists. oh, we can't be choosey! we can't all be perfect! women just don't have a choice! we just have to align with the forced-birthers, we just have to discredit ourselves and degrade ourselves by behaving as though we simply cannot fight for ourselves without the church funding, without the right wing podcasts, without the homophobes whose opposition to gender ideology is based purely in revulsion for gender non conformity and a "lack of family values". we have to duck our heads and wring our hands like shrinking, wilting violets and pretend it's not happening, straight up gaslight women- feminist or trans activist -who point it out.
i'm over it. it's cult shit. everyone who is part of our ingroup is right, everyone outside the ingroup is wrong. maybe you are a principled feminist and have not looked hard enough to find what the rest of us are seeing and talking about, maybe you've been lucky not to encounter these people behaving in these ways while pretending to wave a feminist banner, in which case you can simply sit the conversation out.
but i have also encountered people who genuinely believe that it's simply not a big deal, that sticking it to trans activists is worth selling fifty fucking years of women's blood and tears and bone breaking efforts to carve out a principled movement for female civil rights and structural change down the goddamn river. it's pathetic. stand up.
been seeing this for so fucking long, ive seen radfems argue for no abortions and then watch that shit get defended or shrugged off by other radfems
i am a radical feminist. you are a misogynist who believes women are not oppressed for being female and instead for some sort of womanly essence that leads us to "identify" as female. your politics are as anti-woman as any anti-abortionist's.
i was agreeing you dawg theres no need to be on the attack đ i do think that women are oppressed for being women, i believe in abortion, and i actually think transwomen dont experience misogyny, the prefix in transmisogyny is there to show that its a different type of oppression for a different reason
but more importantly as i was saying, the presence of regressive opinions among self identified radical feminists is a problem ive seen a lot and always tried to call out, but as you were saying it often gets completely ignored or defended. ive seen some women argue against abortion, saying that it should be illegal because any woman having sex with a men "deserves to either be raped or impregnated". on your topic of homophobia, ive also seen a lot of "radfems" saying that a lesbian whos ever been romantically or sexually involved with a man, including sexual assault and rape, isnt actually a lesbian, and is straight and looking for attention, once again shrugged off and ignored
i obviously dont have a platform within your community and, despite disagreement on a couple of issues (some of that disagreement is clear to me to be presumed on both your part and mine), i can recognize and appreciate an account with a larger following to be calling this shit out, because its harmful
edit: plus, is the point of a political ideology not to push for change? if someones agreeing im not sure why youd get so aggressive immediately. i understand that men should not be in radical feminism, that makes sense and i agree because it goes against the whole point of the ideology, but in the end game is having people outside of your sphere that agree with some of the points you make not a good thing? like a socialist saying "you grew up in a capitalist country so you cant agree with socialism" or a democrat saying a similar thing to another democrat from texas
i've really not the slightest bit of patience for willingly turning a blind eye to or downplaying the dangerous trend of feminists colluding with the right wing. the lure of short term gain in owning the transes is not a justification. your hit of dopamine is not worth kneecapping our credibility. hobbling a movement that is already maligned and struggling to reach the women who need it the most is not an acceptable trade for clickbait, for talk show deals, for funding or for the PR of your problematic fave gender critical celebrity. stand the fuck up. do you have principles or not.
you will sanctimoniously lecture trans activist women about their denial of the misogyny, rape culture, homophobia and male violence in the trans activist movement, while in the same breath laughing and scoffing and asking "who is we?" even when other feminists try to discuss the ongoing issue of right wing well poisoning and right wing collusion. you are as eager to scream "that never happens!" as the women you think of as so intellectually beneath you. but ultimately you are ruled by the same impulse to protect your own ingroup at the expense of the facts.
i have seen full throated genocide denialism, homophobia, racism, rape apologism and more go unchallenged in this sphere until it reaches a point where it can no longer be comfortably shrugged off. and if it were only on tumblr perhaps i'd be willing to look upon it as a failure of social media and of the fact that you can claim to be a feminist regardless of whether your beliefs or actions are feminist in any which way.
but it does not stop there. when a gender critical celebrity shows up on a right wing talk show, when an ostensibly feminist organization is in the pocket and exchanging funds with christian lobbies, not only do many ignore it, but actively hush up any critical discussion of it among principled feminists. oh, we can't be choosey! we can't all be perfect! women just don't have a choice! we just have to align with the forced-birthers, we just have to discredit ourselves and degrade ourselves by behaving as though we simply cannot fight for ourselves without the church funding, without the right wing podcasts, without the homophobes whose opposition to gender ideology is based purely in revulsion for gender non conformity and a "lack of family values". we have to duck our heads and wring our hands like shrinking, wilting violets and pretend it's not happening, straight up gaslight women- feminist or trans activist -who point it out.
i'm over it. it's cult shit. everyone who is part of our ingroup is right, everyone outside the ingroup is wrong. maybe you are a principled feminist and have not looked hard enough to find what the rest of us are seeing and talking about, maybe you've been lucky not to encounter these people behaving in these ways while pretending to wave a feminist banner, in which case you can simply sit the conversation out.
but i have also encountered people who genuinely believe that it's simply not a big deal, that sticking it to trans activists is worth selling fifty fucking years of women's blood and tears and bone breaking efforts to carve out a principled movement for female civil rights and structural change down the goddamn river. it's pathetic. stand up.
been seeing this for so fucking long, ive seen radfems argue for no abortions and then watch that shit get defended or shrugged off by other radfems
Apparently a guy in Norway got arrested "for playing a hentai game" (about raping children, naturally) and the moids on reddit are going nuts about "freedom to fantasise" and "thoughtcrime"
they're also ignoring that the article said that he had other illegal content on his computer, because of course that doesn't fit their argument that partaking in CSAM content is "harmless" and has no connections to irl desires
i knew a guy who had loli hentai on his phone, obviously we made fun of him and distanced ourselves. same guy, couple months later, raped a woman. he got jumped. it never isnt a calling sign of a persons actual desires.
could also change your gender if you please, people are cool like that
antizionism and antisemitism are not the same thing i think the people saying this are just losing their minds tryna defend their genocide
yup.
someone on twitter said that if israel was dropping puberty blockers onto palestinian kids instead of bombs, she wouldnât stop tweeting about it.
meanwhile, this woman has not said a single word about palestinian kids and women over the years.
itâs pretty clear to see too that her interest in helping women in afghanistan stems more from her islamophobia and white saviour complex than anything.
(donât get me wrong, islam is horrendous - but, anyone who genuinely cares about women is anti-religion across all religions, not just islam.)
shes literally letting women and children get raped without saying a word about it and radfems still are defending her, feels like a lot of these people prioritize facts like her being transphobic (mostly that one tbh) to defend her being a zionist, that or some of these radfems are also just zionists
i keep seeing people say this like "shes not a perfect activist shit" too and like its probably the least hard fucking thing in the world to condemn israel, shes supporting it though!
crazy that so many radfems still choose to champion a woman who participated in partial holocaust denial, donates to political campaigns that actively harm other countries chance of freedom from english ownership, and does not give a fuck about any of the victims of the men she hates in palestine, and im willing to bet she doesnt care because of skin color and religion
exactly, why are they so shocked that an old, filthy rich, white british woman is a zionist, racist and actually rather conservative and has a lot of problematic views?
and, how are they defending her as if anything justifies someone being pro-genocide?
i pointed that out once and someone told me jk rowling didnt count as rich because she was woman and uses that money towards terf-y causes, its all just white, zionist billionaires changing governmental policy for their own wants
Coming out on here as pro-life, so that hopefully, annoying feminists stop following me.
Those of you who know how I'm for women's liberation might wonder why.
It's very simple to not have an unwanted pregnancy; stop having intercourse with men. The lot of you are sick for thinking not only that you can't avoid unwanted pregnancies, but that it's a flex to brag about deliberately getting pregnant just to get abortions.
If you all had reasoning skills and not only high emotional intelligence but high spiritual intelligence, you would understand how evil it is to be "pro-choice". You would understand that there's no love or logic in carnal acts which you know can result in pregnancy, when you don't want pregnancy.
The real women's liberation in this is to liberate ourselves from any risk (aside from of course possible rape) of pregnancy, by living lifestyles where we don't defile ourselves by having sex when we don't want children.
Further, from a spiritual standpoint, when you have sex without wanting to become pregnant, you are putting out contradictory energy and attracting confusing, painful experiences towards yourselves as a result. Then you have the nerve to whine when you're unhappy with your life - even though you're the ones causing problems for yourselves! Align your actions with your desires to get the results you want.
LMAO in a couple months im bouta start seeing "as a superior feminist to you, i dont believe that women should be allowed to vote đ€" the more extremist feminist belief areas just get more and more conservative istg
might be a smart move tho cus if shit hits the fan you are fs not gonna be considered to be against the current administration, maybe not an ally but definitely a supporter
ill check back in with you in a couple months and i hope i can learn your take on women owning property cus this shit is some crazy christian fundamentalist ass take đ dont defile yourself is crazy, and the whole you dont gotta be with a man so abortions should be illegal is mad disrespectful. we're calling forcing women to give birth, even when that babys father is their rapist, feminist now? fed ass post
I'm not a feminist. Feminism is for women who want bigger cages, but still want to be owned by men. Don't presume that every woman who wants womens liberation is a feminist. Some of us don't want to join your pointless, all-talk-and-no-action cosplay club.
You can presume you know about my beliefs all you want, but that doesn't mean you do. I'm not a christian either, or a fundamentalist of any type, but I know that to simple-minded people like you, you feel better when you can falsely label everyone you disagree with.
I said nothing about, "abortions should be illegal". That's you jumping to conclusions and being foolish.
Most pregnancies happen through consensual sex. Thinking that you're clever by trying to obfuscate from my clear point only makes you look even more foolish.
As you've proven yourself too be far too irrational to try and reason with, I'll neither be reading, nor responding to anything from you further.
Consider therapy, instead of embarrassing yourself like that again. Only miserable people with issues behave like you, and as people online are not professionals, we're not qualified to help you. There are qualified professionals out there, and I have compassion even for rude people like you, so good luck getting help.
oh yeah my bad dude, abortions should be legal but nobody should access them? and wanting access to them is evil. the really funny part is you never actually said youre pro life only when it comes to consensual sex, and you keep telling people that we're obfuscating your point by bringing up a very valid concern about, while not the majority, a chunk of pregnancies that occur. and im sure you think you dont have to but maybe clarifying whether or not you think people pregnant by rape should be allowed abortions would be nice. you shouldnt go yet though i havent even talked about this whole "actually you should do what i want because of spirituality thing"
onto the whole not conservative thing, i am sure youre not. you are echoing conservative talking points word for word (sex is for pregnancy, its evil to get abortions, having sex defiles you) and if the government cracked down a lot more on profiling us due to whats said on our social media accounts, you would not be a target, because youre pretty much asking for the same things they are
yup.
someone on twitter said that if israel was dropping puberty blockers onto palestinian kids instead of bombs, she wouldnât stop tweeting about it.
meanwhile, this woman has not said a single word about palestinian kids and women over the years.
itâs pretty clear to see too that her interest in helping women in afghanistan stems more from her islamophobia and white saviour complex than anything.
(donât get me wrong, islam is horrendous - but, anyone who genuinely cares about women is anti-religion across all religions, not just islam.)
shes literally letting women and children get raped without saying a word about it and radfems still are defending her, feels like a lot of these people prioritize facts like her being transphobic (mostly that one tbh) to defend her being a zionist, that or some of these radfems are also just zionists
i keep seeing people say this like "shes not a perfect activist shit" too and like its probably the least hard fucking thing in the world to condemn israel, shes supporting it though!
crazy that so many radfems still choose to champion a woman who participated in partial holocaust denial, donates to political campaigns that actively harm other countries chance of freedom from english ownership, and does not give a fuck about any of the victims of the men she hates in palestine, and im willing to bet she doesnt care because of skin color and religion
Coming out on here as pro-life, so that hopefully, annoying feminists stop following me.
Those of you who know how I'm for women's liberation might wonder why.
It's very simple to not have an unwanted pregnancy; stop having intercourse with men. The lot of you are sick for thinking not only that you can't avoid unwanted pregnancies, but that it's a flex to brag about deliberately getting pregnant just to get abortions.
If you all had reasoning skills and not only high emotional intelligence but high spiritual intelligence, you would understand how evil it is to be "pro-choice". You would understand that there's no love or logic in carnal acts which you know can result in pregnancy, when you don't want pregnancy.
The real women's liberation in this is to liberate ourselves from any risk (aside from of course possible rape) of pregnancy, by living lifestyles where we don't defile ourselves by having sex when we don't want children.
Further, from a spiritual standpoint, when you have sex without wanting to become pregnant, you are putting out contradictory energy and attracting confusing, painful experiences towards yourselves as a result. Then you have the nerve to whine when you're unhappy with your life - even though you're the ones causing problems for yourselves! Align your actions with your desires to get the results you want.
LMAO in a couple months im bouta start seeing "as a superior feminist to you, i dont believe that women should be allowed to vote đ€" the more extremist feminist belief areas just get more and more conservative istg
might be a smart move tho cus if shit hits the fan you are fs not gonna be considered to be against the current administration, maybe not an ally but definitely a supporter
ill check back in with you in a couple months and i hope i can learn your take on women owning property cus this shit is some crazy christian fundamentalist ass take đ dont defile yourself is crazy, and the whole you dont gotta be with a man so abortions should be illegal is mad disrespectful. we're calling forcing women to give birth, even when that babys father is their rapist, feminist now? fed ass post
it is my mission to remove all therapy and hotline bots, if you created one then i suggest take it down before i message you with screenshots that the bot encouraged suicide
You know when the West started caring about "Human rights"? It was right around the time the holocaust happened. The entire West was shocked because this was a violence inflicted by white people towards...white people. And that was somehow so intolerable for these people they finally realised- omg you know what, maybe people shouldn't be mass murdered???
But the fact is human history has been frought with violence on African and Asian communities. White people conquered Asian and African lands, looted them and left these people with nothing but hunger, poverty and diseases. Yet none of these deaths ever made a dent in their ideologies. The holocaust received it's infamy not because it was a large scale torture but only because the ones dying were white people and the ones inflicting death were white people. Because large scale torture has always existed and none of it led to talks about human rights and what not.
Similarly with terrorism. 9/11 happens and boom... Suddenly people give a shit about terrorism. Why? Because the victims were white.
And suddenly everyone cares about death and "kids" as soon as a white man is killed. Are charlie's kids the only kids to exist? Do Palestinians not have kids? Are Palestinians not being killed?
