Lorem ipsum dolor sit 😳 amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore 🥵🥵🥵 et dolore magna 😵💫😵💫 aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud~ exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat~ 😈😈😈
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
almost home

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Show & Tell

#extradirty
Sade Olutola
occasionally subtle
todays bird

Janaina Medeiros

@theartofmadeline
dirt enthusiast
Stranger Things
Three Goblin Art
Claire Keane
Not today Justin
RMH
hello vonnie
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

titsay
Mike Driver
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Canada
seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Mexico

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@sapphicosm
Lorem ipsum dolor sit 😳 amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore 🥵🥵🥵 et dolore magna 😵💫😵💫 aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud~ exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat~ 😈😈😈
Brain empty.... pussy thinking though.
the worst part about sexting is that i have to stop masturbating to actually respond
I'll say it again, stone identities don't have to stem from trauma, stone identities are still just as valid if you have no trauma regarding your boundaries. There's nothing wrong with not being vers, only doing one thing not the other, the same way that there's not wrong with being vers.
wait, there's more, good to remember that stone bottom/stone femme/pillow princess doesn't necessarily mean submissive, stone top/stone butch doesn't necessarily mean dominant.
am I ever going to be done? Idk, also it's not situational, these identities are about our own sexual roles and boundaries, personal to us, not what we do in response to a partner having a boundary. It shouldn't need to be said that respecting a boundary is the bare minimum. If you're a switch and respect the boundary of a stone top/stone bottom that doesn't make you a stone bottom/stone top, you're still a switch who adapted to their partner's boundaries because your own allow that.
Certified Sex Ed Post!
“pillow princesses don’t do anything in bed”
Uhhhh let me stop you right there - I’m literally pretty??? I’m literally being pretty in bed? 🙄
making cute noises and looking so biteable and breedable is perhaps the best thing one can do while being fucked, pillow princesses are divine and should have their bodies appropriately worshipped (fucked into submission until they're a drooling mess in heat)
Begging is an underrated method of verifying consent in my opinion
I’m posting under the influence (horny)
wanna be the object of ur affection AND fucked up sexual fantasies
u buy me cute lingerie
i model it for u
u fuck me senseless
A sleepover where we put on a movie where I get to fuck you and have you suck on my fingers would be sooo perfect right now
does it throb when you think of me?
I love soulmates but also this-
you “accidentally” rubbing your ass against me when we’re spooning is gonna “accidentally” get you pregnant
I blog with my pussy not my brain btw
I need to be flirted with more. Like please take any opportunity to catch me off guard and make me blush.
i’m bringing this up bc my 76 year old friend heard me get called a pillow princess as a joke yesterday and today he asked me what it means because when he googled it, everything was extremely negative. one of the first results was urban dictionary, and these were the top definitions:
and you might say, “okay but who’s using urban dictionary as a source lol?”
well, my straight, 76 year old friend who has an earnest desire to learn about lesbian history and terminology and who—like many people—follows links on the first page of Google.
well-meaning allies and members of our own community shouldn’t have to be versed in academic sources on queer theory to find a quick definition for queer terminology that isn’t steeped in homophobia and misogyny.
these definitions floor me because bottoming IS work and it IS reciprocal! the only problem here is that verses who want to receive during sex may not necessarily be compatible with stone bottoms & pillow princesses. that doesn’t make bottoming bad.
for ppl asking, the issue with these definitions is the repeated notion that bottoms don’t reciprocate, that they “refuse,” that they give nothing back, that they do no work.
bottoming is work! it is inherently reciprocal to topping! if you are topping someone, they are working and reciprocating! a bottom is not an inflatable sex doll that you do sex to in a vacuum of your own experience. if you are topping someone, you are having sex with a human being, and they are a participant in that act. it’s literally impossible for a bottom to do no work or give nothing “back” to a top.
many people likewise exclusively top, and pillow princesses are their ideal partners.
if you’re a vers who expects and desires 1:1 reciprocity of sex acts (i.e. you both go down on each other), then a pillow princess or stone bottom is probably not your ideal partner, but that doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with those roles & identities.
people don’t have to have sex the way you like to have sex, and you will not be sexually compatible with everyone you meet. this is an extremely basic concept.
there is no moral superiority to topping, and there is nothing wrong with bottoming—even exclusively.
if you don’t want to have sex with a pillow princess or stone bottom, then don’t! there’s no reason to rob historical queer terms of their meaning and make them hateful.