30 years huh?
based on this post

izzy's playlists!
sheepfilms
cherry valley forever
Three Goblin Art
I'd rather be in outer space đž
Stranger Things

pixel skylines

JVL

#extradirty
Claire Keane
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
Not today Justin
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Andulka

ellievsbear

ç„æ„ / Permanent Vacation
we're not kids anymore.
will byers stan first human second

tannertan36
i don't do bad sauce passes
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Israel
seen from Israel
seen from United States
seen from United States
@sassifer
30 years huh?
based on this post
things english speakers know, but donât know we know.
UNLESS the adjective is necessary to distinguish the noun, such that it begins to act as a compound noun. So in a world with great dragons and lesser dragons, green great dragons exist.
I suspect that in that case weâd be hyphenating or combining the compound noun, so weâd have green great-dragons or green greatdragons.
I am strongly tempted to generate a list of all possible permutations of those adjectives and then present subsets of them to a friend in a random order, because that really, really doesnât feel as ironclad as they claim.
somebody do it
Itâs not ironclad. You can switch those adjectives around but some changes work better than others and other changes do kind of cause the phrase to fall in a heap. The order they give is the one that works best and gives the smoothest description but you could just as easily say âa lovely old rectangular little green French silver whittling knifeâ without the phrase falling completely to pieces, though it does sound a little bit odd when you stop to think about it. On the other hand, âa silver lovely little old rectangular green French whittling knifeâ falls in a heap a bit right at the beginning. Not enough to render it incomprehensible but enough to make you go âwait⊠what?â. That âlovelyâ really does need to be first.
So the opinion-size-age order at the beginning does work best in most cases. In that order. Trying the other possible orders for those three words can give some⊠interesting results.
My tip? When your assembling a number of adjectives in front of a noun, say it out loud if you can. If you start to trip over your words and feel a bit mealy-mouthed, you might need to rearrange the adjective order.
so the post was interesting to begin with (if liberally salt-grained because: English! itâs impossibly quicksilver a thing, endlessly mutable; âcorrectâ is one of those things that changes depending on the intention of your sentence and what you want to convey and if I want to cummings it up i can and! it gets my point across just as well) but the comments. the comments just make everything even better.
Can someone please just invent a time machine already so i can go back in time and slap 15 year old me?
@JensenAckles | jensenackles  | Jensenâs Facebook | danneelackles512
Twins on the Way for Jensen and Danneel Harris Ackles: A Boy and a Girl!
Life is about to change in a huge way for CW sweethearts Jensen Ackles and Danneel Harris Ackles â theyâre expecting twins!A rep for the couple, who have been married since 2010, confirmed that they will welcome a son and a daughter later this year.The babies will join 3-year-old big sister Justice âJJâ Jay.
people babies
Natalie Dormer at the 66th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards.
âIâm with you âtil the end of the line.â
Bucky Barnesâ five expressions after Steve Rogers said the nine words.
Iâm legit more upset about this than Iâve been about Trump this whole time cause like I expect U.S. to make dumb ass decisions that ruin lives of thousands of their own their citizens but yâall in Europe are supposed to be smarter than that
(x)
Great Game of Thrones-Inspired Intro Done for Italy by Chiara Sapio
â You werenât made to sit on a chair in a palace. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Youâre a conqueror, Daenerys Stormborn.
Without trying to troll in any form, why was Renly not justified in his power grab for the throne at the sake of Stannis? Do you believe Renly would not been a good King, assuming he could beat stannis, unseat the lannisters and hold the throne.
He wasnât justified because he had absolutely no right to the throne, as Renly himself knew damn well.
ââyour brother is the lawful heir.â
âWhile he lives,â Renly admitted. âThough itâs a foolâs law, wouldnât you agree? Why the oldest son, and not the best-fitted? The crown will suit me, as it never suited Robert and would not suit Stannis. I have it in me to be a great king, strong yet generous, clever, just, diligent, loyal to my friends and terrible to my enemies, yet capable of forgiveness, patientââ
â- humble?â Catelyn supplied.
This stream of narcissistic hogwash - neatly punctured by Catelyn - shows a man, contrary to his own beliefs, who should never be allowed to wield monarchical power. Look at the staggeringly selfish disregard he shows for a bedrock law which is key to maintaining stability in the realm, the law of inheritance, because he, Renly, thinks itâs âa foolâs lawâ and heâs the beesâ knees. Bear in mind a king is supposed to be the seat of all justice and enforcer of laws, and here we have a would-be king cherry-picking which laws to follow according to what suits his self-interest. Itâs utterly amoral, itâs illegal, and had he managed to beat Stannis and the Lannisters, he would have presided over the dawn of anarchy and rule by force. Younger brothers throughout the realm would have looked at his example and decided that the laws of inheritance shouldnât apply to them either, so Westeros begins to drown in blood as a bloody free-for-all ensues every time a lord or king diesâŠat best. The precedent Renly sets - âIâm king because I have the biggest army, nothing else mattersâ - might even have led to near constant challenges to someoneâs rule if another noble felt assured enough to challenge them on the battlefield.Â
That legacy alone would have put Renly among the very worst kings of the Seven Kingdoms, but you also have various other unpleasant acts and characteristics indicative of a tyrant: he plans to forcibly detain Catelyn in his camp, an envoy there in good faith, until heâs beaten Stannis; not so subtly threatens to attack Robb and his host if he doesnât fall in line and accept him as king; he is casually and completely comfortable with ordering the assassination of a pregnant teenager who has committed no treason, even suggesting they should have done it sooner; he planned to have Ned Stark do his dirty work in staging a coup against the Lannisters while he took steps to usurp the throne; he would replace a corrupt Lannister regime with an equally corrupt Tyrell regime, and heâs remarkably callous towards his family members (he calls Shireen ugly and plans to have Stannis killed with a total lack of concern). Good King Renly is a figment of his vain imagination, the actual Renly isnât fit to be king of a dunghill, let alone Westeros.Â
my favorite thing about âcaptain america: the winter soldierâ is that if you strip them of their supersoldier names the title is literally âsteve rogers: bucky barnesâ
â Jaime in Game of Thrones 6.06 âBlood of My Bloodâ ©
âwhat if the wolves come?â                    âyieldâ
Arya Stark / Daenerys Targaryen + badass
âYou have a dragonâs eye, khaleesi, thatâs plain to see.â
âYou have the eyes of a wolf, and a taste for blood.â
Hello! I was trying to find an answer to a question I've had for a long time, but I can't seem to find any meta on the topic, and I apologize if you consider this a more basic question. Do you think that Lady Stoneheart and the Stark children will ever meet in the books? If so, how do you think they'd react to each other?
Yes. Badly. As has been said, you donât create a horrible zombie version of a character and not have her interact with her living children.
To expand on this, while the Stark kids seeing their mother alive might seem to be a dream at first, when they see what she really is â a living corpse, motivated only by vengeance â itâll soon prove to be a nightmare. On Stoneheartâs end, while we know sheâs been looking for Arya, itâs possible that if she were to meet one of her children she might refuse to recognize them because of how much theyâve changed. Or sheâd take some other weird offense (cf. Brienne) and things would not work out well from there.
And to summarize what I think could happen, for each of the Stark children:
Bran: will almost certainly see Lady Stoneheart in his weirwood visions; hopefully will not realize what exactly heâs seeing, or if he does he may repress it.
Rickon: god I hope they donât meet, that would be horrible; but I donât think Stoneheartâs leaving the Riverlands, and Rickon has no reason to go there, so weâre hopefully safe with this at least.
Jon: (included for completeness even though heâs not Catelynâs son) I really donât see a real plot/theme reason for them to meet, not even re her learning Ned never cheated on her, because she doesnât have the emotional capacity anymore for that to matter. Also that Great Northern Conspiracy theory is balderdash, at least the part where Stoneheartâs trying to make Jon King in the North. (because no???)
Sansa: they may encounter if she goes to the Riverlands (though if she does it may be to organize armies for the War for the Dawn and Stoneheart may be dead by then). I have the occasional hope that LS is what kills Littlefinger at last (after Sansa has foiled all his plans and shown sheâs never forgotten who her real father is), but I donât know how likely that is. And Sansa may be what ends this horrible tragic revenant of her mother, butâŠ
Arya: as linked above (and also), the themes in Aryaâs arc really make me feel this meeting is inevitable. Justice, vengeance, mercy (âMercyâ and âMother Mercilessâ, even); Aryaâs connection to the Brotherhood; the fact that Arya (as Nymeria) was the one who made Beric find Catelynâs body in the first place; itâs all coming to this deeply emotional, deeply tragic climax. Not to mention Nymeriaâs in the Riverlands so Aryaâs certainly going there⊠and sheâll see her mother again, and give her mother the gift of mercy she so desperately needs. Itâs going to be so awful and terrible and weâre all going to cry buckets.
Hope thatâs the answer youâve been looking for. (for certain definitions of âhopeâ, at least.)