Last week the Government published:
BBC Charter Review Public Consultation: Summary of Responses
A Review of the Governance and Regulation of the BBC by Sir David Clementi
Assessment of the market impact and distinctiveness of the BBC’s services by Oliver &Ohlbaum (O&O) and Oxera
During February 2016 the following reports were also published:
HoC Culture, Media & Sport Select Committee Report on BBC Charter Review
HoL Communications Committee Report on BBC Charter Renewal: public purposes and li-cence fee.
The BBC is the market maker, it was there first; commercial broadcasters joined knowing the BBC pre-existed and is publicly funded; thus the BBC is not, as the O&O report alleges simply an‘intervention’. Key Points:
The BBC is the lynchpin of the UK’s public service broadcasting (PSB) ethos, the envy of the world
The BBC provides significant net contributions to UK GDP, employment, training, education and the UK’s international reputation
The BBC makes a great contribution to the UK’s culture, especially to the music and arts
Commonwealth countries who have dismantled their PSB broadcaster bitterly regret having done so and are unable to re-create it
The BBC sets the standards of quality in the national and international markets
The overwhelming majority of the public want the BBC to continue to inform, educate and entertain and to survive and thrive
The O&O report and others refer to audiences as consumers. Broadcasting services in the UK are not the equivalent of cans of beans; the BBC plays a pivotal role in the maintenance and development of UK citizenship; listeners, viewers and users are citizens
Since the 2003 Communications Act opened up the ownership of commercial radio we now have hundreds of stations which have conflated under two main ownership umbrellas and their output has gravitated to the middle ground in popular music because that is where the audiences and advertising are. BBC radio provides all the rich range of full diversity. Do we really want the same to happen with television and other broadcast services?
The O&O report explicitly admits (albeit buried deeply) that other criteria for assessing theBBC’s worth should be included but has been omitted, namely: “the BBC’s role in market creation and the value that accrues to consumers [sic] and citizens [our emphasis] from the BBC’s output.
Popular BBC programmes and services inform and educate as well as entertaining
The present scope, scale and remit of the BBC should be maintained and allowed to develop in line with advances in technology
The next Charter should run for eleven years to remove it from the interference now caused by fixed Parliaments
The licence fee should be set at a realistic level to allow its present outputs to continue unabated without further political interference
The funding mechanism for the BBC in future should be given a root and branch review during the coming Charter period
The BBC should increase in terms of diversity viz a viz: gender and ethnicity; and in its services to nations and regions in line with increased devolution
A single unitary board with a majority of publicly appointed members and a regulator with similar appointees smacks of Government interference
Stakeholders, ie licence fee payers, audiences and service users, should be democratically represented and such representatives should be account as in corporations and membership organisations.