“stop shaming people for liking harry potter!!!” no actually im not gonna stop. your “comfort series” is not worth the lives and livelihoods of trans people.
No title available

blake kathryn
cherry valley forever
occasionally subtle
Not today Justin
Interview Vampire Daily
RMH

bliss lane

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Show & Tell
noise dept.
Claire Keane
tumblr dot com
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
almost home
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
🪼

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Poland

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Canada

seen from T1
seen from Dominican Republic
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Panama
seen from Ghana

seen from United States
@scalesandfeathersandfur
“stop shaming people for liking harry potter!!!” no actually im not gonna stop. your “comfort series” is not worth the lives and livelihoods of trans people.
when you ask people to stop engaging in harry potter fandom they act like you've asked them to pull the plug on their own ventilator after murdering their entire family in front of them. like holy shit my bad i didn't realise that you formed emotional attachments that were that unhealthy
Free reign to say Jk Rowling is a predator who shared an upskirt picture of a trans woman and said she shouldn't have worn a skirt if she didn't want to be sexually harassed, enjoys the company of open child predators, and thinks Lolita is a tragic romance story. She is a danger to women and children.
marauders fans are so much worse than garden variety hp fans bc they've deluded themselves into having a superiority complex. "ackshually we don't support jkr and our fandom has queer & poc representation" girl...your fandom is the worst mass delusion since the dancing plague of 1518, your "representation" is a series of headcanons for characters who are little more than names in a series whose worldbuilding you continue to use in your art and whose existence has material consequences for trans people in the uk. you cannot headcanon your way out of supporting one of if not the most famous transphobe in the world. there are fantasy books by real life queer people and people of colour that will never get a fraction of of support that jkr does. read those instead and take a personality quiz oh my GOD
Always blocking people who have the gall to list Harry Potter as one of the fandoms they actively partake in in their bio or pinned post. Nope. Not dealing with that.
As a trans person, and as a person who just gives a damn about others, it makes me wildly uncomfortable. You can yell about how much of a trans ally you are, but that doesn’t erase that you are giving money and attention to someone who is actively trying to ruin trans people’s lives and any little rights they (I’m USAmerican, not from UK) had to begin with. You’re not a trans ally if you support JKR in any way, and she sees even free fan engagement as endorsing her bigotry.
Like, either drop the franchise/fandom, or get used to people blocking you and rightfully calling you anything but a trans ally.
I’m done giving the benefit of the doubt. She has been at this for years now, and I feel like, if you are someone who takes part in that fandom, that you would learn about her shitty views and policies. It’s not a secret. You are being complicit in this.
You know it's kinda insane how a male character with 3 seconds of screen time or 5 panels in a comic that gives him nothing characterization or story wise will still have a bigger fandom than a female character with double the appearances and with also a 40 times more interesting story, and instead of having fans she just dissappears from public conciousness
It's insane no?
"Racialised" is much better than PoC but I've been leaning a lot on the concept of racial markedness. Because that allows us to make statements like "the name Jamal is racially marked in USA". Rather than saying something like "Jamal is a PoC name", a nonsense statement, saying it's racially marked in USA allows us to contrast with societies like Albania or the Arab countries where the name Jamal is ordinary, thus unmarked.
It's a concept I've kind of imported from linguistic analysis; saying a speech pattern is more or less marked does not really allow us to avoid the subject of who's doing the marking. A statement like "womens' speech is more marked in Lakota" necessitates that we understand that it's the Lakota who are marking womens' speech. A foreigner can't tell the difference and probably doesn't understand why it would thus be weird to see a man using speech patterns associated with women, in the same way an Albanian wouldn't understand why USA people would think Jamal is a Black name.
You! You get it. In my view, if someone is saying "racialised" or "racially marked" without acknowledgement of context, they are doing it in a way that is gramatically incorrect.
too many people have the idea that racism is a nothingburger thing. like. people die from that. it’s not “cancel culture” to call out racism. and if you’re white and you say anything close to that you have some serious self-reflecting to do. idc if you’re a content creator. idc if “it could happen to you.” having a platform on the internet and saying stupid bullshit doesn’t make you more oppressed than the marginalized groups you’re criticizing for being upset
Listen idk if this is some type of kink shit but this is absurdly insensitive, considering the state of the fucking world
Type of shit they say to us down at the asylum ('Correctional Women's Facility') while pumping electric shocks.
'the shocks aren't going to stop till you're in a dress with your nails painted'. For fucks sake this is a real method of conversion therapy, not your fucking haha moment.
Wake up babe the transandrophobe "transfeminist" crowd is starting to eat their own by not allowing women to be butch.
Just like I said would happen
just reblogged a post that said that anakin is always pissy because his robes are so big. like you can't even see his hands. and my honest first thought was "i bet obi-wan gave him robes that didn't fit on purpose." unlike my other anakin rambles, this is fully headcanon, but it really does feel on-brand.
if you like obi-wan, this is not the post you're looking for. move along. also, if you know lore about how jedi get their robes, cool. i don't care about canon, and i am especially uninterested in hearing all the reasons that my headcanon is invalid.
love yourself
people online are on a mission to hold every single random person "accountable" in the same way as a thief in the middle ages who is about to be beheaded in the town square for stealing a tomato
fandom approaches male characters from a watsonian perspective and female characters from a doylist perspective
by virtue of being made up constructs everything about fictional characters only exists as far as what is told about them, and yet underdeveloped male characters are assumed to have rich inner lives that the writer have simply not tapped into - when they actually did not give them any - and it's therefore up to fans to rescue the character from the writer's assumed negligence and explore him themselves through headcanon-ing the shit outta them picking up small bits of characterization and expanding from it, whereas female characters are taken at extreme face value: if the writer did not give them an inner life then she doesn't have one period, even within the universe of the story where everyone is a living breathing person, and it's not worth exploring. even when the small bits of context and characterization about her insinuate something interesting about inner world and leave room to spin an interesting backstory and motivations there seems to be no interest in fandom to do so.
and 9 times out of 10 this only applies to the white male characters. black and brown male characters are assumed to be as shallowly written and imagined as all female characters are, sometimes even when the show DOES depict their rich inner life.
"Women are more oppressed then men, it's basic feminism!"
Basic feminism doesn't account for the men who have uteruses. A large part of women's oppression is about their uteri and how it supposedly makes them inferior to men.
No that doesn't mean women who don't have uteruses aren't oppressed by misogyny (having a uterus as a women is a damned if you do damned if you don't situation) but reproductive rights have always been a large part of feminism.
That's why we don't need basic feminism, we need intersectional feminism that takes into account men who have uteruses and women who don't and acknowledges the material conditions of both groups.
It's been said before and I'll say it again
"Basic feminism" is just "basic biology" all over again.