Sealy

♡ feminism ♡ seals ♡ ☆ the animal on my pfp is a saimaa ringed seal, a critically endangered species with leopard like spots which only lives in one lake in finland! donate to conservation efforts of this beautiful creature: https://www.sll.fi/en/saimaa-ringed-seal/ ☆

[sealradfem]

so I finally decided to write one of those introductory posts ~

♡ as my username tells you, I post about radical feminism and seals 99% of the time

♡ you can call me sealy or seal

♡ 21F med student, eastern european

♡I have my own community btw!

Eastern European Radical Feminists • Community on Tumblr

59 members, 50 posts about #radical feminism #radblr #radical feminist community • ♡ Join our community of radical feminists from Eastern an

♡ you already know what my favorite animal is, but yes I do love sea lions too (I also put two in the divider, try to find them!)

♡ I like: reading, origami, cats (2nd favorite animal, but my kitten is number #1 in my heart), dinosaurs, paleontology, cryptozoology, playing boardgames (if you are on Board Game Arena hmu!!!)

♡ I am generally friendly and if you want me to clarify something I will, but I am not looking for a debate and I won't engage

♡ for some reason tumblr is broken and I can't message people first, so if you want to talk to me you'll have to message me first :(

♡ if you're wondering why we aren't moots it's probably because I see you so much on my feed I already think I am following you lol... happened many times

If you read this far, I hope you're having a nice day ᓚ₍⑅^..^₎♡

seals seals seals seals seals seals seals seals

[sealradfem]

In a few days I will be taking a break from radblr for a month or two. I love the community but being reminded of constant misogyny from all over the world is not good for mental health, and I need to focus on uni

I will still be active on my sideblog where I post only positive things tho! ^-^ (if you want to keep in touch dm me and I will tell you the @ <3)

love you all ♡

[sprinkledsalt]

A woman online: Hm, you know, it just feels a bit degrading to have female celebrities dressed like they’re on the cover of Playboy—

The illiterate squad: oh so you hate women? You think women shouldn’t show any skin at all? You think women should dress like nuns and hold off on sex until marriage? You think women are evil for being sexy, is that it? Are you seriously slut-shaming? Are you criticizing women’s choices? You think female celebrities who have entire PR teams controlling their image aren’t allowed to express their sexuality? Ummm it’s irrelevant that male celebrities never dress the same way! And there are plenty of male celebrities whose image revolves around objectifying themselves! No don’t ask me to list them. This is dangerous radfem rhetoric. You’re the real oppressor. It’s empowering for women to be sexy! No it’s a coincidence that only versions of female sexuality that appeal to the male gaze are allowed. Stop being bitter and put some makeup on, ugly 😂

[thefemaleterrorist]

what went wrong with feminism is that we started including males and started saying shit like “patriarchy hurts men too” does royalty hurt kings? does capitalism hurt billionaires? does white supremacy hate white people??

[man-go-man-go-deactivated202604]

reasons why "patriarchy hurts men too!" for @sealradfem

-according to Dr Gloria Lee

they cant play wiff dolls 🥺

they get compared to women if they're weak (at least us women are ALLOWED to be sad 😿😪)

they dont express emoshun 🥺😩so they turn to pornography...

They dont want to😪 go to therapists😩 bc they dont want to😭 look like weak women😢 bc suicide is better ☹️than being compared to😪 a woman😿

They have to go to provide food and shelter for their imprisoned house slaves 👎

their feefee's hurt again from point 3.

they argue 😢with 😩each other🥺

they cant do ballet 🩰😪

[sealsdaily]

Today's Seal Is: BLWUEAGHH

[shadows-and-starlight]

@sealradfem

[sealradfem]

[buscemieyes]

TAGGED BY: the effervescent @ifiinvadelaconiaishallturnuout 💙

RULES: answer these questions & tag people you'd like to know better

READING: No One Thinks of Greenland by John Griesemer

LAST SERIES: the andy griffith show! 

LAST MOVIE: Fargo 1996 😁 Carl my shaylaaaaa….ouhh

LAST SONG: Flovilla Thatch Vs. The Virile Garbage Man by Cherry Poppin’ Daddies…best band ever

SWEET OR SALTY: craving something…sweet

COFFEE OR TEA: tea all the way bro coffee gives me the runs

WORKING ON: my art mostly 😣 I hate drawing and especially practicing the craft itself etc etc 

PRESSUROUS TAGGING: @hyeenagurrl @chopinfantasie @pimpslaprickey @sealradfem

[sealradfem]

TAGGED BY: @buscemieyes thanks for the tag dear♡

RULES: answer these questions & tag people you'd like to know better

READING: Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky 🕷🛰🌌👨‍🚀

LAST SERIES: Prehistoric Planet! 🦕🦖

LAST MOVIE: Snowpiercer 🚄❄️

LAST SONG: Aquamarine by Addison Rae 🔵💠

SWEET OR SALTY: I have been addicted to chocolate my whole life so that answers the question. But I will soon eat chinese food!🥡🫕🍱 and biscoff salted caramel cheesecake :) 🎂

COFFEE OR TEA: BOTH!! but especially milky teas. ☕️🍵 I love coffee but I have GERD so I drink matcha in the mornings, and I adore chai and black moon lattes

WORKING ON: myself. mostly my studying and discipline, but also my spiritual journey, going to the gym, meeting new people, being a better version of myself, doing my hobbies more, listening to the wizard liz🧘‍♀️ I will also try to volunteer for dementia patients🤍 (hopefully I will have time for it with all the studying)

TAGGING: @shadows-and-starlight @radosne @yugo-lesbian @pederusa @lottiefucksbones2 @hundredheartsandmore @littletime73 and anyone who wants to ♡

[sealsdaily]

Today's Sea Lion Is: The Gamer

[sealradfem]

hello fellow eastern european who also likes dinosaurs, whats your fav dino?

hi!! omg first of all your blog is so based I support marxism as well and we need to reastablish yugo🤭

and it's the amazing amargasaurus!

did she have spikes or sails on her neck tho? we might never know

[yugo-lesbian]

amargasaurus is so based, good choice🙏 i love the spiky fellas

[sealradfem]

carnotaurus je prekul!! jedan od najstrasnijih definitivno 😎 btw pokusala sam ti poslat poruku ali tumblr mi neda...

(doodlize on tumblr)

[marbleguard]

brother: sometimes it seems like the end result of feminism will be that nobody (read: straight women) even fucks anymore. and that will be how we go extinct

dad: hahaha

[marbleguard]

men are so incapable of even imagining changing their own behavior that in the hypothetical scenario where all straight women decide to be celibate as a result of observing male’s terrible behavior, the blame is placed on feminism and not the male behavior that spawned the movement in the first place. men are very smart

[marbleguard]

personally I think that if one half of a species evolves to be so vicious and antisocial that the other half refuses to reproduce with them, it makes perfect sense for it to go extinct

[scribbles-0f-a-madwoman]

This is quite literally nature's path. That's what is so ironic about males. They have convinced themselves for so long that WOMEN are the ones who submit to reproduction as a service, so long so that this very ideology has long been forgotten as purposeful manipulation made to supplement insecurity and has instead ingrained itself as a biological fact. Look at nature. What female animal breeds with males "for the greater good" past selfish desire? What animal has males selecting females? Why would the animal tjat labors less be the one choosing a reproductive partner? Why would the one laboring more submit herself to be picked? The female is the one who needs compensation, not the male. Genuinely, it hurts to talk about because males are so god damn stupid and alienated from their nature. Their cult like fairytale of nature is becoming less intentionally curated and moreso belived as an objective truth. How far do you need to look into nature to see peacocks dancing for peahens and female bonobos beating the shit out of males? To see female tortoises launch themselves to their death rather than submit to males? Their species will die, and male humans will not learn from their example. They'll chalk it up to difficult females until they die. And our species death to me, our hypothetical death, is beautiful.

Males are the subjects. And that, ladies, is why I continue to theorize that patriarchy is a role reversal based on the absolute wound that this fact inflicts upon the male mind. Patriarchy is projection, I'm proven right almost every time. The obsession with our eggs, all to find out that sperm mutates 4x more. Saying we decrease in value when we live longer due to evolving next to the fact of matriarchy. Making maternal instincts animalize our brains whilst acting as if males just own their children, while in reality we would be matrilineal with biparental care (so males would care for children yet get no pride or status).

It is simply all projection. It is avoiding the harsh truth of sexual selection and their logistics of reproduction in the context of weighing labor. Males must MAKE themselves useful, they are not useful by just existing. Their existence and it's value is connected to their ability to appeal and be selected. I am the default that chooses. This is what male knowledge and epistemology seeks to obscure. This is why they tried to hide the fact that nature is largely matriarchal. Why so many bad studies exist with alpha male wolves and male lions leading the pack.

I want you all to just assess the linguistics around reproduction and childbirth. It is all worded as a service. And I used to get really confused by the dilemma of reproduction and its harmful risk to women, why do it? But what I was missing was a component of female desire. That is how much the priority of reproduction has been erased. How much males have made your suffering into a service for their pride. Pride over what? Ejaculation. How impressive. But in the end, just pay attention to how much true desire is wiped from the process. How much dignity is taken. How much identity is culturally eliminated. Words matter. "Giving birth" not surviving birth, focusing on the product not the woman. "His child" obsessing over the man who ejaculated and wording the birth as a service to him. In reality sperm is a tool, a tool they offer and we select. Men know it's supposed to be our event, not our performance, and they can't stand not being the priority. They can't stand serving someone else's interest. Once you uncover the truth of sexual dynamics in a logical sense, it all becomes so clear.

Keep your eyes and ears open. I'll make a post on this another day. The childbirth dilemma and its ethics. I will word how much the process has been twisted into an unethical mess, but it is not intrinsically doomed.

[guorble]

keep thi one in mind...

[sealradfem]

Thoughts on the thing with raban in pluribus

I just saw this again, I assumed the first time it was asked in bad faith...

but like what is there to even think about it. carol was a closeted lesbian and made the main romantic interest of her romantasyslop book a man because she knew that was the only way to possibly make a living out of it. like we all love a sapphic lovestory but let's be real they don't sell well.

and when everyone else got plurbed and knew she was a lesbian, she got no reason to play along with the illusion anymore so she finally made Raban a woman like he was in her heart from the start anyway.

it doesn't mean raban is trans, that's pretty idiotic to think...

[sealradfem]

hello fellow eastern european who also likes dinosaurs, whats your fav dino?

hi!! omg first of all your blog is so based I support marxism as well and we need to reastablish yugo🤭

and it's the amazing amargasaurus!

did she have spikes or sails on her neck tho? we might never know

[przewalskishorsegirl]

the fact that people expect a woman to suffer thru unwanted sex more often than they expect a man to suffer thru no sex says all you need to know about how society (mostly men, but women do it as well) sees women and their role in the relationship.

[sealradfem]

if boys underperform with female teachers because they're misogynist, does this imply girls overperform with female teachers because they're misandrist or something? or are the girls neutral and would perform well with either gender as a teacher?

the premise was incorrect from the start.

but yes lmao there is no logic in all in that. schools, as well as society as a whole, was made by men for men. the fact girls are doing better in school, the institution that less than a 100 years ago was literally forbidden for them to go to, is ironic.

notice how in times when schools were male-only, teachers were highly respectable in society. today it's the opposite, and a "woman's job". to males, teaching younger generations today is seen as beneath them. funny coincidence right?

I do believe girls get lower "performance" levels with male teachers but not for the reason you think. I've experienced first hand myself many many times that male teachers were openly misogynistic to girls. in my own university it's standard for males to be done with their oral 1-1 exam in 20 minutes while girls are asked a hundred questions (psychologically tortured) for literal hours and failed for any small mistake. and this is without mentioning the awful amount of pedophile teachers in highschools (at this point I'm convinved every school has at least one). but regardless of all of this, male teachers are more respected, their classes are quieter and they are taken more seriously.

[sealradfem]

As a girl in highschool right now, I feel like people who say “Boys are underperforming because of lack of male teachers” don’t actually know much about highschools right now. My school is pretty evenly split between teachers who are women and teachers who are men. I myself have had an equal amount of male and female teachers. And since my grade is pretty small, I’m generally in multiple classes with the same people. And in my experience, the guys in my classes actually do better when the teacher is a woman. The issue isn’t “Ugh, there are no Male Teachers for boys to learn from!!!!”, it’s the fact that most teachers are more concerned about phone usage and the drama going on between students and the fact that people are vaping in the bathrooms all the damn time (which is also a reason why boys are underperforming imo, since generally guys have less strict parents when it comes to stuff like that)

you are 100% correct

the "boys perform worse because there aren't as many female teachers" is just a way, as always, to blame a male problem onto women

they need to start talking about how boys are underperforming because they are addicted to porn, videogames, social media, manosphere content, and are used to being coddled and served everything on a silver pladder so the idea of actually putting in effort to get results is foreign and too much work for them. in my society, and I believe in most others, little boys are growing up in families in which mothers clean everything after them, their sisters set the table so they can dine on it, their cousins do their homework for them, their fathers tell them to "be a man", and their peers as well as society as a whole teaches them to hate girls and women. why then, would they go to school and put in effort to listen to female teachers and do their homework and study?

but it's easier to blame women, isn't it...

[thentheysaidburnher]

To see what the natural birth rate is, give all women a house. They can share with another woman but don't have to. Everything they want to do (study, garden, cook, write) they have time and equipment for. Everything they do not want to do (study, garden, cook, or write), they do not have to do. Women who love gardening can garden for as many women's houses as they like. Cooks can cook for themselves or the neighbourhood. And women can rest.

We discover how to live peaceably on a planet with endless bounty (for the low low cost of not taking more than we need).

Then, the women who want kids have kids. The village is there. The mothers have help from those who want to help.

If it's so fucking important, treat it that way.

[sealradfem]

I've noticed this trend of media (mostly movies) finally incorporating female characters, but they're disproportionally making them villains, or villain-adjacent.

I feel like it may even be more misogynistic than the era of film when women were only romantic interests. At least they had some level of dignity. Yes they were either the madonna or the whore, but nowadays they are the madonna, or the whore-hitler.

It's only perpetuating the idea that women are lying, scheming and evil.

And as much as I love a good villainess, most of the time it's just unrealistic and they don't even have a good backstory to explain their behaviors. You can't convince me it's anything more than "if we really need to have a woman on film, might as well make her the hot villain! the audiences will eat it up!"