No matter what your source is, you deserve to be respected. Even if your source is "problematic" or "childish", you still deserve to be respected.

roma★

blake kathryn
art blog(derogatory)
Cosimo Galluzzi

Love Begins

Kaledo Art
taylor price

tannertan36
sheepfilms
almost home
No title available

izzy's playlists!

Discoholic 🪩
noise dept.
wallacepolsom
KIROKAZE

PR's Tumblrdome
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

★
todays bird
seen from Brazil
seen from South Africa
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from Brazil

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Singapore

seen from Australia
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Australia

seen from Italy
@shattered-starlights
No matter what your source is, you deserve to be respected. Even if your source is "problematic" or "childish", you still deserve to be respected.
sometimes you're watching/reading/etc something and you're like. was anyone going to tell me that character was plural. because that character is definitely plural
funny plurality is introjecting the same guy numerous separate times, but no one wants to make all of them profiles, so everyone else gets to play the game of „so, it says this guy was fronting, but which this guy?“
this is funny plurality!
I really hope it isn't that obvious when we switch
genshin impact? (game)
Does It Introject: Genshin Impact
YES
NO
RESULTS
YOU ARE BEING BERY SUPPORTIVE SINGLET FRIENDS BUT I DONT THINK YOU GET THE CONCEPT!!
Gofundme is up to help my spouse and I get back to America after dealing with a lot of abuse from the dutch government
every time we see someone say "i wish [character] was real" we hear "i'm right the fuck here??" from somewhere, without fail
endogenic systems can use the term system if we want btw. it’s not exclusive to any type of system regardless of some insinuating it is.
we quite literally function as a system with roles and shit, our origins be damned
genuine question wrt the anti-"endo neutral" post you reblogged: why is it not okay to not know? the post says its not okay to be neutral because "you either think they exist or you don't it's that fucking simple"; so "i don't know" is never an acceptable option??? must everyone immediately pick a side, even singlets, even if they don't know/understand/care, even if they don't want to engage with it? genuine question. is this actually what you believe or am i not understanding/somehow pissing on the poor? thank you in advance for clearing it up
Calling it "picking a side" when the argument is whether or not someone exists is wild. I'm sorry, but my pre-trauma headmates exist. If you are "neutral" to the argument of "do you exist or not", I don't know what to say to you.
Think of it in context of any other oppressed group. Let me use some of my own identities as an example
"Intersex people exist" "intersex people don't exist" "I'm intersex neutral" - how do you think that sounds? How can you be neutral on the existence of an intersex person? Either you believe in a sexual dichotomy or you dont.
"Nonbinary people exist" "Nonbinary people don't exist" "I'm nonbinary neutral" - how can you be neutral about enben? You either believe their genders & nongenders are real or you don't.
"Psychotic people exist" "Psychotic people don't exist" "I'm psychotic neutral" - Again, what? Neutral on the existence of psychosis in people?
You cannot be "neutral" over whether someone exists or not. You cannot be neutral on whether someone's experience is real or not.
I am an endotrauma system. I have diagnosed DID too. My system started off endogenic. If you say you're neutral about endogenic systems, y'know what you're saying? You're saying that you're "neutral" about the debate over whether my headmates Ally and Gwen exist. And that's fucked up. Their existence isn't something to be "neutral" about.
You can't be neutral about someone's existence and oppression. You can be uninformed on what's going on, but in such a case, I think it's super weird to call yourself "neutral" because that communicates that you're fine with hanging around bigots, that you're fine with hanging around fakeclaimers. Just say you're uneducated.
It's literally like saying you're "LGBTQIA+ neutral" or "autism neutral" or neutral to whatever other oppressed group.
(And before people take this out of context, no, I'm not saying that endogenics are more oppressed than traumagenics. We are equally oppressed cuz we live in a singletnormative world and struggle in different ways. I am endotrauma, I know what it's like on both sides.)
-Marco, she/he
This is pluralphobia and endopluralphobia.
Having fictives is so funny cause like yeah the character is reblogging your art of the character, have fun with that
Drawing from a couple of weeks ago. It's me!
-Chara (They/It)
On vacation so we don't have access to the brushes we normally use for drawing. Oh well
-Chara (They/It)
Alice in Wonderland
Does It Introject: Alice In Wonderland
YES
NO
RESULTS
your plurality is valid and authentically plural. that does not change with origins, which also includes if the entire origin of your system is purely created. all plurality is true and real, every system on the plural spectrum.
nonhuman plurality culture is cat im a kitty cat and i dance dance dance and i dance dance dance /ref
-⚕️
this is nonhuman plural culture! cat im a kitty cat. and i meowmeowmeow and i meowmeowmeow
Polyfrag culture is wishing there were more Polyfrag focused spaces so that I could meet people like me and not feel so alone in my experiences.
Mood, we ourselves got sad when we followed polyfrag/polyplural culture blogs and they ended up being inactive or they deactivated. Plus the fact how we find very few polyfrag/polyplural-specific posts in general around here