Entry #27: 251123
When does a wrong thing becomes right? Is it all about the intention? The outcome? Or perhaps the need to be just?
I found myself stuck in a situation wherein I keep on contemplating whether what I did was right or wrong. Earlier this semester, I caught my friends cheating on our exam. It wasn't just some little 'wrote some keywords on their palms' nor a 'don't cover your paper, so I can see your answers' type of cheating; it was the kind of cheating in which they got the exam paper AND the answer key from another department. I reported them right after the exam, of course. But it has caused me to lose our friendship as well as the subject of bullying because of being a 'backstabber'. I find it so ironic how I'm studying Political Science, yet my classmates are not keen on upholding their morals. We are considered to be the future lawyers and lawmakers, but our class has become nothing but a breeding ground for future corrupt officials. I realized that corrupt officials doesn't just become corrupt overnight. Their nature started from mere cheating in school, anti-poor mentality, lack of empathy for the people, and even turning a blind eye whenever someone is getting bullied by their friend. The problem is that people only want to obey or incorporate the law if it's not someone they know involved. They are only anti-drugs when it's not their friend using it. They are only advocates of bullying when they are not the one committing it. They are only anti-capitalists when they don't benefit from it and so on and so forth. Why is it that something becomes 'okay' to a certain degree when you know the people involved? Ah, my friend cheated because they are desperate to get high grades. Ah, she committed jaywalking because her foot hurts and will have trouble using the overpass. Ah, my mom stole our neighbor's mangoes while they weren't home, so it doesn't count because no one saw her. The thing is that people should stop putting 'exceptions' for others as if they hold the power to do so in the first place. Tolerance is just the same thing as being an acquaintance because you are fully aware that something is not right, yet you turned a blind eye on it. The people who keep on saying that the law is unjust are the same people who contributes to it being unjust and unfair. You can't advocate for the marginalized, if you yourself are the reason why they are in that position. It just doesn't work that way.










