i am a fandom old. i have been in MANY fandoms and shipped MANY things for 20+ years, so who knows what will pop up and on what days!
my posts are 95% from my queue unless i am live blogging, text posting, or at any random time. lol so i may not be here even if i am posting! if you send an ask or dm and i don't respond, this is probably why (or tumblr hates us and doesn't give me a notif) <3
not spoiler free, though i do try my best to tag properly :)
continued under the read more...
fandoms:
wwe
guns n roses
pantera
others that may pop up frequently:
always sunny
911
boy meets world
martin and lewis
spn
teen wolf
life with derek
the rookie
glow
ships:
dime x phil
slaxl
charlexa
rhiyo
priestntyre
finndamian
livdom
jhea
jeymian
macdennis
bucktommy (ex-buddie)
jeric
stuilly
sterek
dasey
samdean
and there's a ton more! lol
also i don't mind rpf-posting! you'll see me post about j2, glob/globlin, slaxl, dime and phil, dean and jerry, etc~ overall it's just like gossiping okAy :)
other interests:
evil dead franchise
scream franchise (obvs)
fnaf franchise
horror movies in general :)
taylor swift
bailey sarian
classic cars
ocean liners
dmc (devil may cry) video game franchise
•••
i edit things! videos, gifs, etc! this is my passion in fandom <3
and i sporadically write fic! usually when there's not enough in the fandom, like i'm currently working on some dime x phil stuff :)
i love posts on here that are like “>:) i love nasty dirty forbidden relationships, i love relationships that are hard to define as platonic or romantic, i love toxic dynamics, i love when characters are so close that they can’t be separated from each other and this destroys every other relationship they have (IF YOU MAKE THIS ABOUT INCEST I’LL KILL YOU)” like my brother in christ you are the one who made the sandwich
if you make a post about enjoying forbidden relationships, i think you’re gonna have to accept that incest is gonna get tagged on your post. i’m sorry if that makes you uncomfortable, but that’s like the number one forbidden relationship people enjoy. it’s on hbo for god’s sake. relax and learn to love the brotherfucking.
I found an old Buddie bachelor AU I was working on years ago and thought maybe I'd rewrite it for Dime x Phil lmao
problem with that is *lemme check* I have my year-by-year fic I've been working on since before posting the first one to ao3, I have a Trendkill-era fic started, a '99/'00 happytimes fic started, a hanahaki disease fic started bc I've always been obsessed with the idea (and what a better way to do it than to have goth!Phil choke up roses <3), aaaand I started laying down ideas for a haunted!bar AU
1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.
2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.
3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."
4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.
5. If the words are Google's, this solidifies the position of universities who demand that all answers from AI are fully cited. If all the in-line citations now have to be (Google, 2026), that's going to make it obvious when someone's trying to use Google as a source. There's still the difficulty with people who are academically dishonest by trying to pass off the AI writing as their own.
6. 91% accuracy is officially too low to use as a source of references, which means the AI can't be used as a source of references either. This makes it less legitimate for such purposes than Wikipedia of all places (Wikipedia might need date/time proof of when it was accessed for the reference to be valid, but at least it is possible to prove the link existed at a particular date and time).
7. This will help encourage the rollout of courses on how to avoid AI search for students who need academic accuracy, because it's statistically not good enough to use.
8. This strengthens the case intellectual property authors have against Google in the EU, as this is proof that an intellectual property transfer took place.
