Awe shucks I'm into the Great Gatsby 😢
I love 1920's queers
occasionally subtle
will byers stan first human second
Jules of Nature
Cosmic Funnies
Misplaced Lens Cap
Not today Justin

No title available
todays bird

if i look back, i am lost

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
KIROKAZE
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
hello vonnie

gracie abrams

blake kathryn
Cosimo Galluzzi
One Nice Bug Per Day
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
official daine visual archive
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

seen from Spain

seen from Lithuania
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Peru
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Germany
seen from Switzerland

seen from Germany
@sillypuddles
Awe shucks I'm into the Great Gatsby 😢
I love 1920's queers
I swear this was really funny in my head
Og:
"X character didn't truly love Z character, they just loved the idea of them", what does that even mean? Especially when it's used for stories with a very clear-cut, in your face romantic theme/undertone. Like, what does that mean? How does one distinguish the two? Did romeo love the idea of juliet or the real juliet? Did gatsby truly love daisy or did he love the idea of daisy? Who will tell us? Gatsby did lose his life for that woman so why does it actually matter if he loved an "idealized" version of her or the "real her"? Is it really important for the story? Does it actually change anything or is it just a catchphrase? Can you clearly distinguish the people you have loved for what they truly were, from the people you had merely idealized? Even if you can, does this distinction make your feelings for them any less real and intense and impactful for your life? Like I don't care if I loved the idea of someone or the real person, all I care about is what I felt and how it affected me and changed my life. That's what fiction does, it gives you the ability to connect with real, intense, unfiltered human emotions which are an integral part of human experience. Fiction is not therapy. Please stop sanitizing art thank you
#I wish everyone could read the princeton draft#loving the idea of daisy vs the woman herself is a very important distinction in that version of the story and it pisses me off that fitz#cut out the garden scene#If you guys need me ill be arguing with his gravestone#jay technically didnt die in that draft too#but yeah either way in the canon he died. whether he loved daisy#the idea of her#or didnt love her at all#do you love your liferaft?
I did not know about the draft, now I will have to look it up, this is so interesting!
My big issue with the statement that "gatsby only loved the idea of daisy so it wasn't true love" is that it really fundamentally misses the point of his character and his feelings. Gatsby was a deeply idealistic and romantic character. Him being so idealistic and romantic was his downfall but it was also his biggest redeeming quality and it was precisely the reason why he was the Great Gatsby, while the others were just a rotten crowd. Saying that he "didn't really love Daisy" (?) distorts the entire thing. What is the point in that statement? Fitzgerald isn't telling us "hey, look at this delulu loser and his obsession, look how it got him killed, do not be like him". Fitzgerald is telling us "hey, look at this person who is the only, singular dreamer amongst corrupted, rotten individuals, look at how they treated him and how they got him killed, the world doesn't have a place for people like him and that sucks". Saying that "Gatsby didn't truly love Daisy/loved only an idealized version of her so it's not love, it's obsession" misses the mark. Of course he didn't love the real Daisy, Daisy was a part of this rotten crowd. He could not see that. However, his feelings were authentic and real and noble and pure. This is not a cautionary tale of "oh, don't be delulu! be pragmatic!", it is a story about how our world is unmerciful and cruel for people who are like Gatsby, and that is a bad thing.
unfortunately you have touched the subject that I haven’t stopped thinking about since I was twelve
The main point of the matter is: Nick Carraway is both a fucking liar and an uninformed narrator.
There are so many things that are cut out of the final draft that add much darker shades to Jay Gatsby—things that absolutely CRUSH me that they were removed. What you need to know was that the Jay Gatsby Nick meets is a goddamn zombie. Not literally, obviously, but he is an absolute shell of the dreamer he used to be.
He planned to go to war to die. He’d essentially been banging his head against the wall of wealth inequality for TEN WHOLE YEARS by the time he met Daisy—his whole adult life—and he’d reached a point where it just seemed impossible to make his way the way he dreamed as a child (see Absolution by Fitzgerald; it was originally written as Jay’s backstory before fitz cut it down so much to retain that air of mystery, but it explains SO much)
Daisy was the last hope in a dwindling supply.
That’s what I meant by ‘do you love your life raft?’. If he didn’t have her, he had nothing, and it was all pointless, and it was because she was a symbol of all the things he’d wanted for so long and she was unattainable so he never had to worry about catching up to her.
Until he did. And he had to face that she had changed and so had he and it was irreparable and perhaps that was for the best.
The whole Princeton draft is a fantastic read and I’m working on transcribing it for those who can’t read Fitz’s handwriting, but the scene I feel is most important for this point is this, the garden scene:
After that I watched for Gatsby, and found him several evenings later, coming across my own lawn. He had lost a little of his ruddy tan and his eyes were bright and tired. We sat down on a bench in the yard.
“Going away?” I asked.
“No, old man. Why do you ask me that?”
“I hear you fired all your servants.”
“I had to have somebody that could keep their mouths shut,” he replied after a minute. “These two towns are pretty close together.”
“Where’d you find these?” I inquired, a little startled by the romantic revelation. ((Side note, why are you so excited that jay would be willing to fire his whole staff to keep a relationship secret? Closeted ass behavior))
“They’re some of Wolfshiem’s people.” He broke off. “Can you come to lunch at Daisy’s house next Saturday?”
“All right.”
We sat for a few minutes in silence. Then he asked me if he could tell me about something that was on his mind, something that had happened to him when he first knew Daisy several years ago.
“Will I bore you?” He looked up quickly. “For God’s sake tell me if it’ll bore you.”
“It won’t bore me.”
They had been walking together down the street one autumn night when the leaves were falling, and they came to a place where there were no trees and the sidewalk was white with moonlight. They stopped here and turned toward each other. Now it was a cool night with that mysterious excitement in it which comes at the two changes of the year and Gatsby became aware that everything was alive. The quiet lights in the houses were humming out into the darkness and there was a stir and a bustle among the stars. He took a step toward her, perceiving out of the corner of his eye that the blocks of the sidewalk formed a ladder and mounted to a roof garden above the trees where one could suck on the pap of life, gulp fown the incomparable milk of wonder.
His heart beat faster and faster as Daisy’s white face came up to his own. He knew that when he kissed this girl, and forever wed his unutterable visions to her perishable breath, his mind would never romp again like the mind of God. So he waited, listening for a moment longer to the humming and the song. Then he kissed her. At his lips touch she blossomed for him like a flower and the incarnation was complete.
…He didn’t really say any of this. What he said was that she had been an “ideal” of his, and that he’d never have such ideals about things or girls anymore.
“Well, you have Daisy,” I said. “After all she ought to be a pretty satisfactory incarnation of anything.”
“She is,” he answered without conviction. “But it’s a little like loving a place where you’ve once been happy.”
“You don’t know what you want,” I told him impatiently. “You wait three years and then after three weeks you’re tired.”
“We all grow old,” I told him. “It seems to me you’ve come pretty close to getting all your desires.”
“I haven’t got anything,” he said simply. “I thought for a while I had a lot of things, my house—“ He looked up at it for an instant— “and things like that. But the truth is I’m empty and I guess people feel it. That must be why they keep on making up things about me, so I won’t be so empty. Why,— Daisy’s all I’ve got left of a world that was so wonderful that when I think of it I feel sick all over.” He looked around with wild regret. “Let me sing you a song—I want to sing you a song!”
He began to sing a song in a low unmusical baritone. The tune seemed to be a rough compendium of all the tunes of twenty years ago. It went about like this:
“We hear the tinkle of the gay guitars
We see the shining Southern moon;
Where the fire-flies flit
And the June bugs sit
Drones the cricket’s single tune.
We hear the lapping of the wavelets
Where the lonesome nightbirds sing
And the soft warm breeze
Tell the tall palm trees
The Dreamy Song of Spring”
“I made it up when I was fourteen,” he said eagerly, “and the sound of it always makes me perfectly happy. But I don’t sing it often now because I’m afraid I’ll use it up.”
Through all he said, even through the doggerel of the song, I was reminded of something that I had heard somewhere a long time ago. For a moment a phrase tried to take shape in my mouth and my lips parted like a dumb man’s, as though there was more struggling upon them than a wisp of startled air. But they made no sound and what it was that I had almost remembered was incommunicable forever.
—
So we come to the point of Nick being a fucking LIAR. He outright admits that he made up most of the past love affair between Jay and Daisy—and then narrates that he pressured Jay into pursuing Daisy even when he said he didn’t think he should anymore.
I wish wish WISH some of the Princeton draft had been preserved in the final novel but then it wouldn’t really fit Nick’s narrative of Jay being a paragon of hope and devotion, right? Nick in all his middle class glory wouldn’t have this beautiful tragic man to put on a pedestal, right? Nick looks like he had more of an obvious hand in Jay’s death, right?
Jay reached out, begging for Nick to snap him out of it, and he didn’t. Which is why it matters so much in this version if Jay loved the real woman or the ideal, because he didn’t love the real woman anymore at all. And someone told him to cling to the ideal—reaffirmed that Daisy was his last and only hope.
I read this book because of a Just Dance map…
Why is it so complicated??
😭
“Boogie Street ‘52, Revachol” (Kim has this in his wallet)
A revamp of my 2022 Disco piece hehe
lately I’ve been Overcome With Emotion
GUESS WHO LOCKED IN
furries your elle
Legally lesbian
Legally fem
The musical
They breached containment
They breached containment
They’re having a pink themed sleepover
Lil sketch I drew for my friend after I forced her to watch legally blonde pro shot with me
Fun TikTok Legally blonde request
+all of Elle’s outfits
oh I love you Elle Woods musical edition
that I don’t like…☹️thats kinda neat..!😄 guys who wear that..get beat up on my street!!..😰 still I’ve come this far..I can’t retreat in my shellll…IM IN THE HANDS OF ELLE!!!WHAT THE HELL!!🥹💭
Legally blonde Elle and Emmett designs ^^