The connection my brain has made between Daisy Domergue and 'Burn The Witch' by Shawn James is astronomical

ellievsbear
official daine visual archive
cherry valley forever

Kiana Khansmith

blake kathryn
No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON
occasionally subtle
wallacepolsom
EXPECTATIONS
One Nice Bug Per Day
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

gracie abrams
No title available
Today's Document
$LAYYYTER

No title available

No title available

shark vs the universe

titsay
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from Canada

seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from Tunisia
seen from United States
seen from Philippines

seen from Philippines

seen from United States
seen from Egypt
seen from Mexico

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from India

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
@silverfactory
The connection my brain has made between Daisy Domergue and 'Burn The Witch' by Shawn James is astronomical
surprisingly forward-thinking of jim henson and co. to make a female character in the 70's that's allowed to be loud-mouthed and violent and kind of overwhelmingly romantic and even a huge bitch at times and not have a moment where any character asks her to change
going through all the muppet movies in a row made me realize that like. miss piggy was made in the 70's. and it's so rare even today to have a character like her. she's loud, she's selfish, she's funny, she's extremely vain, she's obsessed with romance, she's violent, she's kind of annoying, and there's not a single moment in any of these films where she's asked to tone down any of these personality traits. i am not joking when i say that miss piggy might be one of the best treated female characters ever written
you might be on to something, I've never heard Miss Piggy being called problematic either
Anaïs Nin
Farnese de Andrade, Você!, 1972. (below, detail of the opened bassinet containing a dead bug inside a polyester block)
Edward Gorey, The Evil Garden
vanilla sponge swiss roll, filled with osmin purple basil whip, sweet cherry jam, topped with fresh cherries and white currants
the hateful eight script describing daisy as “once-pretty, with a once-sexy smirk” like the blood isn’t a glow up actually
when the top is scared of the bottom
day 1 of walking straight into boutiques with nothing more than a printed resume & massive balls & saying hello aren’t i cute can i please work for you 🤗 bc i wanted to add a little more ritual humiliation to job hunting
Dries Van Noten F/W 2002 ph. Yelena Yemchuk
By Melanie Miller
Cowgirls of Color: an all-black, all-female rodeo team
Ode to dandelions + details
A tribute to the misunderstood, under-appreciated, beautiful, edible, tough, wonderful dandelion!
Pencil on paper, 12”x15”, 2025. Prints are available
some people read an awful lot, but don't read very well. deep reading is itself a skill. being able to untangle the threads of theme, subtext, characterization, narrative style, and more are all things that it takes time and intentional engagement to learn.
if you've ever watched a movie with your film buff friend and chatted about it afterwards, that friend might have pulled hours more of conversation out of the same 90 minutes of screentime, and wondered how the fuck they did that - it's not raw intelligence, it's a skill that's been honed. And I learned a lot about film from talking to friends who knew about film, and reading critique by film scholars
literature works exactly the same. so if you want to get more out of your reading, there are things you can do to train that. Find a book or short story you think you've got a pretty good grasp on, preferably from a widely read & respected author like Ursula K Le Guin or Ray Bradbury (if you're new at this don't swing for the Toni Morrison or the Samuel Beckett yet unless you feel very comfortable with the complexity of the text - the point is to develop a complicated new skill on good foundations). Then go to JSTOR, create a free account, and look up criticism on the story you've chosen. Find something that looks readable to you and at least somewhat interesting. Read that article, and look at what that writer got out of the same story you've read that you didn't get. Do you see the critic's points? Did they teach you something about the text? Go reread that story and see if the criticism has changed how you read it. Are you seeing more? Are you thinking about the implications of a line that you hadn't noticed before? Does the story feel richer now?
there are other more involved ways of finding criticism. Learning to use academic databases, going to your local library to do interlibrary loans, finding critical voices you appreciate; these are all useful subskills. Literacy isn't just being able to read words, it's being able to read words in context and think about what they tell you about the text, the author, or the time and culture in which the text was produced. Literacy is the skill of being able to look at the world with open eyes and think clearly about how its parts are connected. It'll change your life
this keeps getting shared around and ive seen some different tags responding differently so i just want to make some important clarifications and distillations
you don't have to read more deeply if you don't want to (but i'd recommend it, i genuinely think it makes you a better person)
if you want to learn to read more deeply, the resources are out there. try to find critical literature (that is, academic writing that analyzes the text) on works your familiar with so you can get a sense for how to do that analysis too
learning to deep read literature can help you deep read many areas of your life
writers tend to put a lot of work into their stories. if you learn to read that work you'll (probably) appreciate the stories you love even more. And if not, then you'll have developed your taste. This too is worth doing