I feel like Robert Pattinson was born to be a strange old man actor. Like he's already great but he's really gonna hit his peak when he's around 70
𓃗
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
ojovivo

shark vs the universe
untitled
Cosimo Galluzzi
RMH
Cosmic Funnies

★

Kaledo Art
official daine visual archive
wallacepolsom
Sade Olutola
EXPECTATIONS
Misplaced Lens Cap
Mike Driver
Today's Document
tumblr dot com
hello vonnie
Monterey Bay Aquarium

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from United States
@sixteendaisies
I feel like Robert Pattinson was born to be a strange old man actor. Like he's already great but he's really gonna hit his peak when he's around 70
it really frustrates me to think about how people are inevitably going to take Remmick’s one (1) singular statement about how much he resents the way the Irish were colonized and forcibly converted to Christianity and use it as fuel for “actually he had a point” and “he was right actually” and “he’s not really the villain here” posts, when the whole point is that Remmick is, through the vampiric hive mind he’s creating, forcibly assimilating people into yet another manipulative and parasitical system. he doesn't value the cultures of the people he assimilates—notice how all the vampires he turns dance to his culture's music using his culture's dances, and how he only uses the languages or knowledge other vampires have to offer when he needs to manipulate someone. Remmick is extremely transparent about the way he sees the people he turns as resources to exploit.
he’s perpetuating a cycle that he claims to hate and resent, and I think the movie is pretty damn clear about the fact that he doesn’t see anybody as valuable or useful to him except as prey and as pawns—otherwise he would just, you know, focus solely on people who actually consent to being turned. but he looked sad in that one scene and he’s an apparently attractive white cis man so people are gonna bend over backwards justifying all the harm he did.
remmick and the vampires present a false dichotomy
Hogwood (the man who sold the twins the mill) and the KKK are very obviously bad, they are outright malicious bigotry, they use the n-word and plan to lynch the moore's and their community, they are so blatantly racist and hateful it's unavoidably obvious
remmick and the vampires however say that they believe in equality, say that they want to create a community, and yet remmick's goal throught the movie is to both metaphorically and literally steal sammie's ability for his own goal of reconnecting with his irish ancestors, a white man wants to harm a young and upcoming black man and use talents for his own goals without giving any regard to said black man's autonomy or agency
when sammie sings 'I lied to you' in the juke joint and calls forth the spirits from the past and future, it's a blend of cultures; west african, east asian, native american, and african american song and dance blend together across time and space to tell the stories of blues; where it takes its inspiration from, the music genres it then inspired, the complex history of black american culture and its intersections with other peoples of colour in the USA
when remmick and the vampires kill and turn the people in the juke joint, and then perform rocky road to dublin, only remmick's irish culture is on display, there is no influence from the black and asian people he has forcibly assimilated into his song, it's juxtaposition with the earlier scene is blatant, remmick is more than happy to assimilate people of colour into his 'community' of 'equals', and yet its only whiteness that is celebrated, that is normative
remmick claims that he's doing people a favour by turning them immortal, conviently ignoring that he literally has to suck the life out of them to do so, trapping their spirits on earth, he claims that he's the good guy, that the KKK were gonna come and lynch everyone at the joint in the morning anyways, conviently ignoring that he's doing the exact same thing; a white man leading a mob to kill a bunch of black people
in the final confrontation with sammie remmick repeatedly dunks him into the river, a forceful baptism. both the celtic irish and enslaved west africans had their religions suppressed and destroyed by colonialsm, had christianity forced upon them by the british empire, and in that scene we see remmick repeating that cycle, using christianity to inflict harm, and sammie reclaiming christianity, despite all the complex emotions he has arround it, as many colonised peoples have and still do, when he recites the lord's prayer
remmick and the vampires are no less racist than hogwood and the KKK, are no less predatory or evil, they're just less blantant about their bigotry, they represent the system, the normalised white supremacy that is seeped into the very foundation of culture in america, the point isnt that remmick would call any of the black characters in the movie the n-word, i dont think he would, the point is that his exploitation and desacration and inserting-himself-into-when-he-wasn't-invited of the juke joint is a microcosm of what white people have done to black american arts and culture since ever since there have been black and white people in america, and even before that
theres a reason vultures are shown early on in this movie
how do y’all think haymitch felt when katniss came back to him all “i want wiress, beetee, and mags as allies” in catching fire? hand-picking his two and a half men(tors)!!
“of course you do” as his response now means so much more bc he’s not just exasperated he’s like “you really are me with a braid”
i love how suzanne just gives us a little treat by mentioning the katniss plant every book. like here u go. ik u miss our girl. she's fine. enjoy lowercase katniss
The way everything is so expensive and it's not even good 😐
thinking about how the world would be better if more people understood the differences between 'the author failed to tell the story they wanted to tell' and 'the author told the story they wanted to tell, but they told it badly' and 'the author told the story they wanted to, and they told it well, but it wasn't the story I wanted to read'
I do get the difference between the first two and the last one and it's saved me a lot of anger (not the frustration or disappointment hey I'm only human) but I legit don't get what is different amongst "failed" and "told badly" ???
I took it to be about authorial intent (perceived or stated).
If someone wants to tell a light-hearted comedy story that's sold on the basis of 'minority groups can see themselves represented in a positive light', but they kill off The Disabled CharacterTM in a really dodgy way... the writers probably weren't intending to be ableist. But the actuality is that they created a product that feeds into horrific ableist ideas about 'killing disabled people is kinder, actually'. They failed at telling the story they wanted to tell, possibly because of unexplored prejudices or just a lack of skill.
If someone wants to tell a fun story for kids that involves child soldiers, but because of genre conventions, etc., this isn't actually a serious issue.... then decides they want to engage with 'child soldiers' and 'military states' and 'genocide' as the serious, fucked-up issue they are, and makes the point that this world has to change... then decides that actually, no, they're not going to dig any deeper into that, and we're all just going to accept that military states and child soldiers are a genre convention, actually, and the world doesn't need to significantly change in order for a 'happy ending' to feel earned? Then they told the story they wanted to tell, but they arguably told it badly.
All of this is, along with the distinction between these two categories, extremely subjective!
I would also understand it as being on a technical level -- the difference between "failed" and "wrote it badly" isn't so much about their ability to thoughtfully discuss Big Important Themes, and more about plain skill level.
For example: an author wants to write an enemies-to-lovers romance novel, does so, and it's a complete flop. There are two possible reasons:
Reason one: this story is not a romance. The characters may be well-written and complex and believably traumatized and have wonderfully entertaining interactions, but they never once seem to even so much as find the other useful to be around, much less like the other's company enough to fall in love with them. For 95% of the plot they visibly, vocally hate each other, and then at the end they kiss and get married and all the other characters go "ah isn't this romantic". This is a "bad story" because it failed to tell the story it was trying to tell. The author wanted to tell a romance and did not do that.
Reason two: this story is badly written. It is a romance, yes, it ticks all the boxes and hits all the plot points and the characters go on a perfectly charted arc from enemies to lovers, but the writing is just plain bad. The characters are flat and uninteresting, the prose is hard to read, the setting is generic, the plot is stupid. This is a "bad story" because it told the story it wanted to tell but told it badly. The author wanted to tell a romance and did in fact do that, but it's still badly done.
And yes, the line is easy to blur between "what counts as good writing that isn't doing what it wants to do" and "what counts as bad writing" is easy to blur -- the example I was thinking of coming up with this is actually something I can't entirely categorize -- but I personally would use this framework to determine if something is genuinely badly written or if the author just didn't do what they said they were going to do.
The Hunger Games has the FUNNIEST arranged marriage of all time btw. Katniss realizes she'll have to marry Peeta and she's obviously upset so Haymitch tries to comfort her by saying "you could do a lot worse" and Katniss is like "well DUH of course I could do worse than Peeta he's the best & handsomest person on the face of the planet but that's not the POINT I want to be able to choose for MYSELF". Then she goes and chooses Peeta anyway lol. Comedy gold I tell you
Must memorialize the tags
peak cinema if you ask me
so many snow animals are just white puff with dot eyes. amazing design
I just love this genre
oh this was delightful
Everybody in the undercity: man it sure sucks down here. I mean we're getting by I guess. Wish we could do something about all the crime
Everybody in topside for some reason: I HATE POOR PEOPLE I HATE POOR PEOPLE I HATE POOR PEOPLE
I am not taking a risk
Not risking it pals
U know what I want potato of luck
Damn right I’m reblogging. See previous post re wrath of whatever from high atop the thing.
potato I will never ask you for anything else in my lifetime please potato for fuck's sake
Please, I think we all want the same good news here potato
It’s Election Day so I’m def reblogging this
no matter what happens in the election tomorrow, don't forget: rebirth of giant basilisk in Vietnamese highlands imminent
Scope and pacing are not concrete and immutable. Not everything you write has to have the same level of detail, nor always be a 100k novel.
It's completely possible to tell the story of a romance that blooms over months or years in a 1000 words of short, snapshot scenes-- as long as you show the important scenes.
This is especially true in fanfiction where the set up is done for you, but can, in the right circumstances, be achieved in original fiction just as well.
Sometimes you don't need to write the whole novel. Sometimes you can just boil the story you want to tell down to its impactful, punchy essence. (and then it doesn't take a year to write.)
JIMMY CHOO X SAILOR MOON Collaboration 2024 if you want to support this blog consider donating to: ko-fi.com/fashionrunways
JIMMY CHOO X SAILOR MOON Collaboration 2024 if you want to support this blog consider donating to: ko-fi.com/fashionrunways
JIMMY CHOO 'Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon' Collaboration 2023 if you want to support this blog consider donating to: ko-fi.com/fashionrunways