How it GENUINELY FEELS when you find a good ass fanfic Im talking its so good you bookmark.
You go to the writers page and whole time they into that incst, dead dove, rpe shit. ITS SOMEHOW EVEN FUCKING WORSE IF ITS DUBCON. JUST SAY ITS CONSENSUAL. HOW HARD IS THAT?!
Alright I'm gonna yap since I just know there's gonna be some jackasses trying to argue with me so let's get into it and btw my asks will not be anonymous so if you wanna argue between believe you will indeed be public!
We need to talk about the defense mechanism that gets thrown around every single time someone is called out for romanticizing, sexualizing, or fetishizing incest, non-con, and "dead dove" content: “But it’s my coping mechanism!” Let’s be entirely real. Having terrible things happen to you is tragic, and trauma is incredibly difficult to navigate. But using your trauma as a shield to publicly romanticize and sexualize the very things that violate human dignity is not the "healing journey" people claim it is. The argument of "it happened to me, so I can write it how I want" relies on a massive misunderstanding of how coping works. There is a psychological difference between adaptive coping (which helps you process and heal) and maladaptive coping (which keeps you trapped in the cycle).
Think of it like this: If someone is struggling with alcoholism, they do not cope by drinking more alcohol. If someone is struggling with a gambling addiction, they do not heal by going to the casino. You do not heal from trauma by continuously feeding, romanticizing, and eroticizing the very actions that traumatized you. Publicly romanticizing, sexualizing, and fetishizing the exact dynamics of your abuse is not "coping" it is a maladaptive cycle of self-harm, and publishing it for public consumption actively harms the community. Constantly re-exposing yourself to abuse under a romanticized lens isn't recovery; it is a compulsive re-enactment of trauma. It’s keeping the wound open and calling it "medicine." If your "coping mechanism" requires you to constantly engage with, eroticize, and publish the very things that violate human dignity, you do not need an archive account—you need professional help.
"Fiction Doesn’t Affect Reality" is Complete Bullshit
The absolute funniest lie fandom tries to sell is that media has zero impact on real life.
Are you serious? Look at history. Look at The Bible. It is a written text, a collection of narratives, and yet for thousands of years, people have killed, conquered, enslaved, and raped in the name of a book. Entire wars have been waged and laws enacted based on how humans interpret a text.
I can guaranfuckingTEE. That if you went up to white Christian man during the jim crow era and told him "Jesus says go skin a black person alive right now and eat it."
Take a wild fucking guess what's gonna happen.
Look at dystopian and political media like X-Men, The Hunger Games, Resident Evil, One Piece, or The Maze Runner. These aren't just "mindless entertainment" they are direct, powerful, visceral reflections of real-world politics, human struggle, biological terror, and societal corruption. Media shapes culture. It shapes what people think, what they normalize, and how they behave.
Fiction shapes our subconscious biases. When you constantly package rape, incest, and abuse as a "dark romance" or an aesthetic, you are not just "telling a story." You are actively reshaping how readers perceive power dynamics, consent, and boundaries. If media didn’t affect reality, propaganda wouldn't exist, advertising wouldn't work, and art wouldn't be powerful. You cannot claim your writing is a "powerful, transgressive masterpiece" while simultaneously claiming it has "zero impact on the real world." Pick a struggle.
Why "Just Block the Tags" is a Broken Lie"Just blacklist the tags, babes!" Except anyone who actually uses platforms like Tumblr or AO3 knows that is not how the system works.
Tumblr’s blocking system works strictly on explicit, specific tags, not on the body text of a post. If an author writes a graphic scene depicting non-consensual violence or incest but fails to tag it properly or worse, hides it under vague, aesthetic tags to pull in more readers the block list is completely useless. You can blacklist the word "rape" or "incest" in your settings, but if a writer posts a "dead dove" fic and simply tags it with the ship name and "#my writing," it will bypass your filters and land directly on your dashboard. You are forced to see it anyway. The responsibility shouldn't be on the rest of the community to perfectly dodge your untagged, triggering trash.
The Hypocrisy of "Don't Like, Don't Read"
"Don't Like, Don't Read" (DLDR) and "don't yuck my yum" are treated like absolute laws in fandom. But let’s be clear: those rules were meant for ship wars and harmless tropes, not the romanticization of literal violations of human rights. Reducing profound violations like incest and sexual assault to mere "yums" or subjective preferences is deeply dehumanizing.
And if you want to use "Don't Like, Don't Read" as a shield? Fine. But that rule goes both ways. If you don't like my posts criticizing your questionable-ass fics, don't read them. You have a block button. Use it and move TF on, babes.
You want the absolute freedom to post deeply disturbing, controversial content publicly, but you want to be immune to any social consequences or critique. It doesn't work that way. I have just as much right to talk shit about your public posts as you do to write them. This hyper-individualistic internet culture insists that no one should ever face moral judgment for what they produce or consume. But when the content in question glorifies the exploitation of minors, family members, or non-consenting individuals, critique is not "harassment" it is a necessary boundary.
You ARE weaponizing "Safe Spaces" to Protect Abuse. By claiming a fandom is a "safe space for everyone" including people who romanticize rape you are twisting the very definition of safety. Rape is not safe. It is violent, traumatic, and destructive.
When you demand that a community normalize and accommodate the romanticization of sexual violence, you are actively turning that community into an unsafe, hostile environment for actual survivors who want no part in your fetish. You are making the space unsafe for the majority just so you can feel comfortable playing with your "dark themes." Demanding that people smile and nod while you romanticize severe abuse just because you labeled it a "coping mechanism" is manipulative.
Let’s Talk Linguistics: Incest and Rape are NOT "Kinks"Dead dove defenders love to hide behind the word "kink" because it sounds friendly, modern, and socially acceptable. But there is a massive, structural difference between a kink and a fetish and incest and rape are absolutely not kinks.
Kinks are Broad, Behavioral, and Not Inherently Sexual: A kink is simply an unconventional preference or dynamic that people enjoy. Kinks are about play, power exchange, communication, and consensual fun. Many kinks don't even require a sexual context to exist. Take a praise kink, for example. You can experience and enjoy a praise kink in your day-to-day life, at work, or in casual conversations without a single shred of sexual intent. It is a psychological preference for a certain dynamic (validation and reinforcement) that does not rely on the literal destruction of a person's autonomy.
Fetishes are Highly Specific, Rigid, and Sexualized: A fetish, by psychological definition, is a highly specific, rigid sexual fixation that is directly required for sexual arousal and gratification. Rape requires sexual violation. Incest requires sexual relations within forbidden familial boundaries. These are not "playful dynamics" or "lighthearted preferences" that you can enjoy outside of an 18+ context. They are highly specific, deeply unhealthy sexual fixations on non-consent and familial violation.
By calling it a "kink," you are trying to equate the graphic eroticization of family abuse and sexual assault with harmless things like light bondage or a praise dynamic. You want the social protection and "body-positive" acceptance of the modern kink community without doing any of the actual ethical work. If your arousal is entirely dependent on the depiction of non-consent, biological violation, or severe systemic abuse, you are dealing with a dark, sexualized fetish. Stop trying to dress up your attraction to violence in the friendly language of "kink" to make it palatable to the public.
You are not being "kink-shamed." You are being called out for eroticizing real-world trauma, trying to pass it off as a healthy coping mechanism, and crying when the public refuses to validate your delusions. Before you dare to call your sick fetish a "harmless kink" to escape public judgment, you need to connect your bottom lip to your top lip and shut the fuck up.
If you are going to ship minors with adults, write incest, or romanticize sexual assault, own it and shut up. It would be one thing if "dead dove" enjoyers just minded their business, ignored the haters, and didn't care. But instead, you constantly cry, whine, and play the victim about being "harassed" or criticized.
You know what you are writing is controversial. You know it is deeply problematic. So stop acting shocked when people react with disgust. You are actively kicking the lion and crying when it bites you. If you can't handle the heat, the critique, and the social backlash, then don't post your nasty fetishes publicly. Block the critics, woman up, and handle the consequences of your own choices.
If you are going to play in the mud, do not complain that you got dirty.
If you get harassed for liking dead dove, darkship, proship, don't bitch and whine. YOU MAKE YOUR CHOICES, DECISIONS THEY HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
If I can make a post talking shit and handle the used to be turned on anon asks of ppl trying to bitch at me for "clogging up tags" or "no one cares" bullshit, guess what? You got this babes. Handle that harassment! LMAOOOOO.
Welcome to the real world.😊
vaporwave
origamiaround
germansingergirl
gummygunk
discoholicmusic
romaincrisis
