đđđđŹđ Happy Summerween! đđđđŹđ

izzy's playlists!
Xuebing Du

bliss lane
The Bowery Presents

ellievsbear
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
untitled
Noah Kahan
hello vonnie

pixel skylines

No title available
macklin celebrini has autism
YOU ARE THE REASON

oozey mess
will byers stan first human second
Stranger Things
noise dept.
h
taylor price
Monterey Bay Aquarium

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from Greece

seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from India
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Belgium
seen from T1
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Belgium

seen from United States
@softgaysonly
đđđđŹđ Happy Summerween! đđđđŹđ
hgtv show hosts: we made this dark disgusting house into a nice bright warm cozy masterpiece
the house:
needs a pop of color . . . I think some red accents would really give it that homey feel :)
â â
WHY HAVENT I BEEN FOLLOWING YOU
I thought i was doing that already. remedied this great mistake posthaste.
I LOVE YOUR INEFFABLES ART, THE MEDIEVAL WIVES GIVE ME LIVE!!
Thank you! I love them toođЎ
WHY HAVENT I BEEN FOLLOWING YOU
I thought i was doing that already. remedied this great mistake posthaste.
I LOVE YOUR INEFFABLES ART, THE MEDIEVAL WIVES GIVE ME LIVE!!
Thank you! I love them toođЎ
Pierre-Jules Boulanger
Paris fell on a Tuesday. By Wednesday, German officers were already walking the factory floor at CitroĂŤn. Their orders were simple: France's greatest automobile manufacturer would now build trucks for the Wehrmacht. Supply vehicles. Military transports. The mechanical backbone of Nazi occupation. Pierre-Jules Boulanger, the 55-year-old chairman who had spent his career building cars for French families, now faced a choice that would define everything. Refuse â and the Germans would shoot him, install someone cooperative, and build the trucks anyway. Comply fully â and he would be personally responsible for vehicles carrying soldiers to kill Allied forces, supplies sustaining the occupation, machinery enabling conquest. He refused both options. Instead, he gathered his engineers late one evening and said something they would never forget: "Production must appear respectable to the eye. But never to the heart."
The vehicle the Germans wanted was the CitroĂŤn T45 â a powerful, heavy-duty truck perfectly suited for military logistics. Reliable engine. Solid construction. Exactly what the Wehrmacht needed to keep its war machine rolling across Europe. Boulanger's engineers studied every component, looking for a vulnerability so small it would be invisible at inspection, yet catastrophic enough to matter in the field. They found it in the most ordinary place imaginable. The dipstick. That thin metal rod you pull from an engine to check the oil level â the one with a simple notch marking "full." Every German mechanic, following standard maintenance protocol, would pull it out, check the level, add oil if needed, and move on. Boulanger's engineers made one quiet adjustment. They moved the "full" notch. Not dramatically â that would be caught immediately. Just enough. A small filing. A modest repositioning. When a German mechanic checked the oil and the dipstick read full, the engine would actually be running low. Not catastrophically empty. Not enough to trigger an immediate warning. Just enough to create chronic, invisible stress on the engine's most critical components. Under normal use, nothing obvious would happen. But under sustained military operation â long supply runs, heavy loads, demanding terrain â the engine would begin destroying itself from the inside. Heat. Friction. Accelerating wear on parts designed to float in a film of oil that was never quite there. And then, eventually, on some road far from any factory inspector, the engine would seize. Every truck that left the CitroĂŤn facility passed German quality inspection perfectly. Test drives were smooth. Oil levels appeared correct. Vehicles were approved, signed off, shipped to Wehrmacht units across occupied Europe. The German mechanics who serviced them were doing everything right. They checked the oil. They topped it off when the dipstick said to. They followed every protocol. The dipstick told them everything was fine. The dipstick was lying.
Weeks later, reports began filtering back through Wehrmacht supply chains. CitroĂŤn trucks were developing unusual engine problems. Vehicles were seizing during operations. Supply convoys were breaking down at inexplicable rates. Commanders blamed driver error, poor roads, excessive loads. No one suspected the dipstick, because every truck from that factory had the same dipstick. There was no correctly calibrated reference to compare it against. The sabotage was, in the most elegant sense, self-concealing. Meanwhile, Boulanger ran a parallel campaign of productive-looking paralysis. Workers were instructed to maintain schedules â but never exceed them. No urgency. No efficiency gains. If a German officer demanded faster output, Boulanger would nod thoughtfully and cite material shortages, equipment maintenance, worker fatigue. Always polite. Always documented. Always just plausible enough. The frustration in German command was visible. Why was CitroĂŤn slower than other factories? Why were their trucks underperforming in the field? They suspected resistance. They could never prove it.
In 1944, French Resistance fighters raided Gestapo headquarters in Paris and discovered something chilling â a detailed blacklist of French civilians to be arrested and executed upon Allied invasion. Pierre-Jules Boulanger's name was on it. The Nazis had never found the tampered dipstick. They had never proved deliberate sabotage. But they knew something was wrong at CitroĂŤn, and they knew who was responsible. They were right. They were just too late. When Allied forces liberated France that same year, Boulanger didn't seek recognition or medals. He went back to his drafting table. His first post-war project became one of the most beloved vehicles in automotive history â the CitroĂŤn 2CV. A simple, honest car for ordinary French families. Cheap to run, impossible to break, designed to carry four people and fifty kilograms of potatoes across rural France on almost no fuel at all. Nearly seven million were built over four decades. The same engineers who had quietly dismantled a military machine with a filed notch on a piece of metal were now building the car that helped rebuild a nation.
Boulanger died in 1950, before he could see his full legacy take shape. But the story of what he did â or more precisely, what he chose not to fully do â traveled through generations of CitroĂŤn workers, whispered on factory floors long after the occupation ended. He didn't have weapons. He didn't lead raids. He didn't blow anything up. He just decided, very quietly, that the line marked "full" didn't have to mean full. And somewhere on a forgotten road in occupied Europe, a Wehrmacht truck's engine seized mid-convoy, stranding its soldiers and disrupting its mission. The German mechanic jumped out, frustrated, and did what he'd been trained to do. He checked the dipstick. It said the oil was fine. He never understood what had happened. That was exactly the point.
I think Tumblr in general would appreciate the newest back-of-bus advertising campaign in Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand
So-called "free thinkers" when a bus is traveling between Strathmore Park and Newtown:
Villainess: What I don't understand is why her clothes disappear...
Henchman 1: Huh? Whose clothes?
Villainess: The magical girl! Whenever she transforms to fight me, her normal clothes just dissolve into light and she spends like a full minute naked before her costume forms.
Henchman 2: Really? When she fights us there's just this flash of light and then she's all transformed.
Henchman 3: Yeah it's basically instant.
Villainess: Instant? What about all the sexy posing?
Henchman 4: I mean I'd describe her fighting stance as more tough than sexy, but I guess if you're into that...
Villainess: No no, during the transformation! She does this whole rehearsed routine, it's like something right out of a strip club. Have none of you seen it??
(henchmen discussing amongst themselves)
Henchman 5: Uh, boss, you think maybe she only does that when she's fighting you?
Villainess: Huh? But why would she... O-oh >/////<
we need to bring back the phrase "what business is it of yours" in a big way i'm serious
i know you can just say "none of your business" but phrasing it as a question with a jarringly formal tone is the ideal way to shoot an overfamiliar unwelcome overture dead in its tracks and force the person making it to confront the boundaries they're taking for granted + it would really piss people off which is funny
&also it allows you to experience the joy of talking like an autistic vampire, which i highly recommend
so many amazing words in the english language. you have clandestine and precarious and serendipity and iconoclast and then you also have staunch and sludge and slurp and smudge
where is transgender flag "I'M TOO FAT FOR THIS HEAT"
FOUND IT
it's that time of the year again folks
Get 100% cotton and/or linen clothes. I'm not joking. I am super sensitive to texture and it only bothers me putting them on and taking them off. They can't go in the dryer so it's a bit annoying, but seriously. I'm so much less overheated and so much more comfortable.
Linen is a game changer. Cotton isn't the best if you live in a very humid place because it hangs onto moisture.
I discovered a while back that most of my clothing related sensory issues were caused by poor ability to regulate my body temperature caused by polyester (which is plastic). Eliminated all of the polyester stuff from my wardrobe. now i am devoted to the ways of wool and linen
A really big, wide-brimmed hat also helps.
Wear... linen... đď¸
Remove... plastic... đď¸
Become... witch... đď¸
Saying âthis niche, properly tagged, warned, and rated piece of fiction could theoretically hurt someoneâ is not a good argument. This properly labeled cookie with the allergen information at the bottom that contains gluten could theoretically harm me very badly, but only if I consume it. Tags are like nutrition labels, and warnings are like allergy information. If you know you have an allergy to something, the logic is to stay away from it. It is the same with fiction. Iâm not running through stores yelling at people to take all the products with gluten off the shelves just because it could hurt me. Instead I ignore it and go to the gluten free section and find cookies that are right for me. And if running through a grocery store yelling sounds ridiculous, thatâs because it is. Stop doing the same with fiction.
this is the best way iâve seen this put!!
And just like with food, what might be harmful for one person to consume could be quite *beneficial* for others. One manâs trigger is another manâs catharsis.
AND if you lack the maturity/self control/awareness to stop yourself from eating things that could potentially harm you, you either 1) are too young to be making your own food choices and should be supervised by a parent/other adult who is supposed to be responsible for you (and the store clerk who put the food on the shelf is NOT) or 2) need to take accountability for your own actions, because if you deliberately consumed something you knew could hurt you as a fully autonomous adult, then you really have no one to blame but yourself.
Iâd like to add that within AO3, âChoose Not To Use Archive Warningsâ is, in this food analogy, like the food labels that read âThis product was manufactured in a facility where [potential food allergens] are used in the production of some productsâ. Itâs not telling you theyâre in there, but even more importantly, itâs not telling you theyâre not. This is not the same as âNo Archive Warnings Applyâ which would be the certified [food allergen] free food. One guarantees a certain experience, the other has given you no promises as to what may or may not be included and is very much a consume-at-your-own-risk product.
my bi queen for pride month<3
the draw of arranged marriage AUs to me is really the way the dubcon of it all binds them together. neither of them have a choice in being here, something else is foisting this upon them whether thatâs their parents or the political situation around them or expectation or something else, but the point is that they donât get that one choice. so they have to make a choice somewhere else, that now that theyâre here, theyâre going to make it work. theyâre each otherâs only allies, in this cage built around them. they may have been coerced into swearing to stand by each other through anything, but they did swear.
itâs not love at first, or second, or third sight. itâs not love in the wedding bed the first time, whether they grit their teeth through it or decide together to forgo that binding step and try to get around it as long as they can. itâs about sharing a bed with a stranger while you learn their nightmares and how they hog the covers. itâs about sharing a name before you even know each otherâs hobbies. the appearances you have to keep up, and the connection you find in both being exhausted by them, laughing together because isnât it ridiculous how you not only have to be married but you have to act like itâs perfect and lovely for everyone else watching. itâs love that creeps up quiet and slow, between shared secrets that make your wedding bands mean something for the first time, and trying to protect each other from the trap youâre both in. and itâs about having the mortifying thought of âoh my god, i have a crush on my wife.â
youâre telling me itâs sunday night?
Light Pollution: The Overuse & Misuse of Artificial Light at Night
The Dark Site Finder map lets you get a good sense of where near you might be good for stargazing.
unfortunately i dont think its queerbaiting if the creator is just so terminally heterosexual that they never remotely considered the same gender relationship their show is centered around could be read as romantic. it is deeply painful however.
Maybe accidental queer baiting? The way someone may not mean to say something rude, but it may come off rude, so it's rude. Frustrating either way.
Not being a dick, just a friendly clarification.
By definition you can't accidentally queerbait. Queerbaiting is specifically using a same sex pair from the show to market the show to queer audiences with no intention of ever following through on a romantic relationship.
There is officially licensed Destiel merch signed off on by Kripke. Teen Wolf had a commercial with the actors for Derek and Stiles draped over each other talking about being "on a ship." Both shows actively used scenes between them as marketing while actively mocking fans for wanting them together. Sherlock has multiple characters refer to Johnlock as a couple, including characters we're supposed to believe are never wrong about human behavior and pushed those scenes in marketing. Then they acted insulted when fans saw them as a couple.
That's queerbaiting.
Done on accident it would just be queer subtext. Done because they had no other choice due to censorship is queer coding.
The specific meaning of the word is really starting to get lost and it's a pretty important one to keep accurate. It describes a very specific phenomenon that was done repeatedly and maliciously for decades and is meant to examine that specifically.
Doing it on accident sucks, but it isn't a tactic of capitalism intentionally intended to suppress queer representation while making money from queer fans.