Oh. Hello.

[thewatersofmarch]

she is so unbelievably real

[woman-becomer]

ten billion years of kitties and puppies

[woman-becomer]

one year of lava. somewhere in there. I wouldn't worry about it

[thememedaddy]

[hotvampireadjacent]

[petday]

kuchipatchi doodle

[ozempicofficial]

[ozempicofficial]

[thegaymertrainer]

[zizibutik]

[motherfucker-somewhat-limited]

[thememedaddy]

[rottencore]

This post keeps making me cry laughingg

[segamascott]

[inthesensethat]

[hexthelex-deactivated20250420]

This is true btw

[letmeliedown]

the podcast If Books Could Kill has a really great episode on the original book and its legacy! just a bunch of misogynist evangelical bullshit really

[cherishedproperty]

I want to clarify something kind of important because this kinda used to be my field. The concept that people express and feel love in different ways, and that this might lead to misunderstandings, IS something with scientific merit. The idea that there are just five and we know what they are is NOT. The idea that people have a primary love language is NOT.

In science, we have a saying. All models are wrong, but some are useful. That’s how I see the love languages framework. It is inherently flawed, but some of its concepts are useful. Communicate with your partner what makes you feel loved and understand what makes them feel loved. Understand how your partner shows love. There is immense value in that. But don’t over-index on which one of the five you are. That part doesn’t matter.

[thesunflowersqueen]

#love languages#really reblogging for that last comment though#“all models are wrong but some are useful”#the concept is sound but the specifics are uhhhh not (via @mad-madam-m)

[noisepuppy]

I asked if this was an art installation and a Danish person said "no this is quite a serious impedance"

[door]

this is great. slowly we will build a house

[jumex]

Genuinely whatever

[gwyoi]

This image is killing me

[pinene]

Minnesota is so dope

[capacity2]