Mercy and Loyalty
[The merciful leader’s], after all, is a lasting and grounded greatness, whom all know to be beyond himself as well as for himself; whose care they by experience know keeps watch daily over the welfare of individual men as well as for all men; from whom, when he comes forth, they do not scatter, as when some evil or injurious animal leaps from its den, but toward whom they fly as toward a bright and auspicious star. They are most ready to fling themselves upon the blades of ambush and lay forth their bodies, if by this slaughter the path toward human welfare will by him be erected; over his sleep does the nighttime watch keep guard; exposed and surrounding him, they defend his flank; they set themselves against the dangers that assail him. Seneca, de clementia, II 2-3 --- I really just love the passage because of the imagery Seneca presents in contrasting the aliquod noxium animal e cubili prosiliens and the clarum et beneficum sidus An instrumental view does Seneca seem to take of mercy in this section, but like many virtues, a thing can be both good in itself and also have effects that are useful for other ends - does that render the practice of the virtue sordid?Perhaps Seneca would say no, seeing that he’s a Stoic and his school focuses, as far as I am aware, on virtue as the way or even the very image of beatitude. But I still need to read more. On the one hand, moreover, blind loyalty is unwise - but on the other, Seneca does not seem to describe a blind loyalty. These followers are loyal to the leader that is honorable because of his mercy and virtue. Loyalty for the right reasons than for the wrong. I’m also making a choice to agree humanam with salutem rather than stragem to soften the imagery, unless Seneca did want to pair stragem with humanam lol.





