“Come.”
sheepfilms
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

★
No title available
RMH
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Discoholic 🪩
dirt enthusiast
AnasAbdin

shark vs the universe

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

No title available
DEAR READER

Andulka
will byers stan first human second
styofa doing anything
Jules of Nature
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
d e v o n
No title available
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from Kenya
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
@starmunches
“Come.”
it's easy to mock the concept of batman's secret identity and think it's ridiculous that nobody would realize that he's bruce wayne but if some lady suddenly showed up late at night dressed in full military grade kevlar and started fighting crime in los angeles i wouldn't look at that and think "ah it's kylie jenner"
Rebellions are built on hope. Rogue One: A Star Wars Story (2016)
I’m not going to explain myself
natasha romanoff looking like a cutie
requested by anonymous
why are all of y'all like 5'3. whatcha doin down there
I hate you
Taking names and slicing achiles tendons..
SEBASTIAN STAN in CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE FIRST AVENGER, (2011). Dir. by Joe Johnston.
*gracefully flips over a quesadilla* anyone would be lucky to have me
steve rogers: dude with the shield, comedian on the field
please actively support fat butches and femmes. don’t spread the message, even with subtle, wordless exclusions or fetishization, that you must be thin to be cherished, to be seen as attractive, to be respected as people. views of weight are so gendered, and it can cause/worsen insecurities/dysphoria/etc.
no matter what anyone else says, we don’t need to change for anyone. there is no weight limit for being butch or femme. we can be confident, happy, loved.
@worth-beyond-a-number-scale !
garlic bread.
Kinda just need to be cuddled and have my back rubbed
a writer who writes the most fucked up “dead dove: do not eat” problematic pairing and fully tags and warns for the content they create will always be worthy of more respect in my eyes than people who call others weirdos because of who they ship. This is because a writer who writes disturbing things but gives me plenty of warning about them has demonstrated, regardless of what happens in the fic, that they value the consent of real people, and that they value my consent to see such content and will always offer me the option to avoid or withdraw. On the other hand, a purity cultist who demands I explain my trauma and exactly why I might be drawn to dark content, regardless of whether they’re the purest fluff writer to ever write, has demonstrated a lack of respect for my boundaries and the attitude that they are entitled to whatever they want to take from me.
There are a lot of things that bother me about purity culture, but I think the most disturbing is that it clouds the very definition of consent, and then teaches this confusing version (you must consent to deep dives into your trauma and how it affects you for the benefit of strangers who have already decided you’re a bad person, and not consenting to that automatically makes you an abuser, also no one can consent to reading or thinking about disturbing content ever because thinking about it means you want it irl) to young, vulnerable, and often traumatized individuals, thus making it harder to understand their trauma and easier for them to ignore the real warning signs of abuse (like demanding that you agree with the abuser otherwise you’re literally the worst and most harmful person ever) because it teaches that abusers only come in one type, and that all abusers are “nasty shippers”.
This is especially dangerous because real life abusers teach their victims that the abuse is happening because the victim is a bad, evil person. One of the diagnostic criteria for PTSD is literally “Places undue blame on themself or others for what happened”. Teaching traumatized people that consent is a luxury only “good” people are allowed to have is incompatible with support for abuse survivors. tl;dr a writer who tags “dead dove: do not eat” has demonstrated respect for the necessity of consent. A purity cultist who sends anon hate has demonstrated a lack of respect for consent.
Y’all better be protecting Anthony Mackie with the same ferocity you have for your white faves. He put everything on the line to say this.
"If you only can hire the Black people for the Black movie, are you saying they’re not good enough when you have a mostly white cast?"
alignment chart: bookmark edition. tag yourself i’m scrap paper
before i had gotten close with ex-catholics i was under the assumption that "catholic guilt" was mostly about sex, or serious topics.
but i was naïve. it's apparently about every positive experience. enjoying a meal? you're so lucky, children are starving. spending your day off cosy in bed? wow, so selfish, homeless people are freezing to death.
every former or present catholic i've met has a very obvious anxiety disorder and it's so painfully not a coincidence.