Cat Johnston —The God of Hayfever (textiles, epoxy clay, paint, wood, 2024)
Mike Driver
art blog(derogatory)

No title available
Cosmic Funnies
AnasAbdin
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

if i look back, i am lost

@theartofmadeline
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

izzy's playlists!
Jules of Nature
$LAYYYTER
KIROKAZE
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
No title available

JVL
Three Goblin Art
tumblr dot com

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
todays bird

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Japan

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands

seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
@strix-alba
Cat Johnston —The God of Hayfever (textiles, epoxy clay, paint, wood, 2024)
genuinely i don’t think it’s possible to easily explain the explicit part of online friendships to people who don’t Understand. i don’t mean like, explicit in the sense of “oh you’re sexting” or whatever. no. i mean when you and your friend start gleefully making up explicit sexual scenarios for your shared blorbos and you get giddier and giddier as you add more detail and you’ll be grinning at your screen as you type away at mach speeds. and it’s entirely nonsexual in an interpersonal sense, you’re not really getting Into it, but ohhhhh it’s soooooo fun and satisfying. and you can NEVER tell someone who doesn’t also do this that your mood is actively improved like fivefold because you and your friend played Sexual Tuoys together because they’ll go “what the FUCK.”
I need to send a "per your last email" email because the person I'm dealing with gave me conflicting information and is now trying to make me the problem.
They even had the audacity to screenshot their own email, so I've screenshot their most recent email in the same email thread that counters that other email, and now I'm trying to find a professional way to say, "this you?"
Fun times.
"My apologies, I was under the impression that we were moving forward on the information here [include most recent screenshot] - is that incorrect? Please clarify which is most accurate."
God, thank you. I've been staring at an empty text box for 20 minutes. You're a gem.
I am doing whatever the opposite of locked in is .
I am locked out. I am in the parking lot. The rain is coming.
sorry for the dog bölls but he is dead buggin it on the couch with me rn and he's ZONKED totally asleep in this position
Can confirm. Here are my two completely unrelated pharaoh hounds.
The roaching roachers...
a small price to pay for Snail Table, in my opinion
every house needs a snable
it’s sooo funny when rude customers encounter employees who can deny them service for the first time.
i was working at a little cafe where I could deny service over bad behavior, harassment etc. & mask mandates had just ended a week before & already people were being weird about me still wearing mine—an N95, the kind shaped kinda like a duckbill.
so this man walked in, looked at me sooo scathingly, laughed at me, and said “damn. never known a woman to choose…practicality over looks.”
And I just said, “oh. you can go, you’re not getting a drink.” And he said, “what???”
I said, “sir, you just walked in at 6 am & called women impractical and me ugly in one sentence.”
And he was so astonished he didn’t even argue he just turned around and left 💀🙏🏻 it was like he suddenly became self aware
One summer I was running ferry rides across a lake so people could see the waterfalls without walking 6 miles when a guy snapped my bra strap as he was boarding the boat. So i immediately threw him off, he started yelling for my manager, my boss cheerfully informed him that, yeah, she’s the captain of the boat and she can kick off anyone she wants. He goes to storm off, looks expectantly at his girlfriend, and she just goes, “Well, I’M not walking six miles, Michael! I’ll meet you back at the car!” and sits right back down!!!!
The expression on his face when he was told that he couldn’t get on the boat, then immediately told that his girlfriend was ditching him? PRICELESS. he just blinked at her and then stormed off like a child. I gave her a free hat and was like maybe rethink this relationship…….
i once had this fucker come up to order a beer. while i pour it he shows me the wanky fucking chemical structure tattoo on his arm and he’s like “hey. you know what this is” i was like “nah sorry” (never cared abt chemistry in school, plus having to look at a some rando’s pretentious tattoo gives me the douche chills). he decides to respond with “heh. you must not read many books”
i immediately stop pouring his beer. i reply: “heh. you must not want this beer.” thirsty boy immediately starts groveling like a worm “please please no i do want the beer im sorry im sorry” believe me when i say it was one of the most pathetic things ive ever witnessed
“羽の日光浴するアオサギ先輩 この鳥っぽくない体勢が(*´∀`) 7/1 #アオサギ” (アワビかʢ•̀رق•́ʡホタテか(@dededenmusi)さん | Twitterから)
Two older men just walked by my window.
Old man 1: Do you really think Amy is manipulative?
Me: (Oh this sounds juicy. Who is Amy. What did Amy do.)
Old man 2: I don't know. I think Laurie is a liar though.
Me: (The plot thickens, keep talking boys)
Old man 1: I don't think Amy should have burned Jo's papers, but I don't blame her for marrying Laurie. I don't think she's a puppetmaster. Jo said no. How is Laurie a liar?
Me: (shocked pikachu face)
"codify" is such a fun word. lawmakers! turn this into a fish
damn he really is an all-time poster
A very interesting inventory gives a summary of equipment that a nobleman would be using when traveling on state business. Here, a certain Willemet Croquevillain was funded by the crown in 1410 to fit himself out quite completely, from horse to pourpoint. The latter was made from leather (!) and fustian. In total, the whole invoice sums up to over 160 livres, of which the three horses constitute over 70 livres - nothing the nobles did was cheap.
Also, this apparently involved a police operation to capture a page who stole one of Willemet's new horses and his haubergeon!
-- TRANSLATED INVENTORY --
For a gelding horse that was bought from Pierre de le Mede for the said Willemet for the aforesaid journey, for which payment was made in the amount of fifteen French gold crowns — 12 livres, 3 shillings, 11 pence.
Item, to Watelot the saddler, for a saddle, a bridle, a horse breastplate, a neck-halter, two reins, a caplet, and two saddlebags, which were bought from him for the said Willemet in order to harness and equip his horse — 64 shillings, 5 pence.
Item, for a haubergeon which the said Willemet received in order to go on that journey — 15 livres, 18 shillings, 14 pence.
Item, for one grey horse likewise bought for the said Willemet to ride on that journey, which cost completely bare, and for which payment was made — 43 livres, 7 pence.
Item, for a saddle, bridle, and horse breastplate bought to place upon the said horse, and for which payment was made — 45 shillings, 7 pence.
Item, for another grey horse which the said Willemet possessed and took on the said journey, which was bought from the nobleman my lord of Calonne and cost — 14 livres, 16 shillings, 1 penny.
Item, for a set of leg armour which the said Willemet also received, and which Hannequin, his servant, personally came to fetch from the city of Paris on the first day of September in that year, for which payment was made — 33 shillings, 11 pence.
Item, for a bascinet bag and some carrying sacks in which to place the said Willemet’s padded armour, paid to the above-mentioned Watelot the saddler — 36 shillings, 8 pence.
Item, for a sword that was bought for the said Willemet and which he carried on that journey — 9 shillings, 2 pence.
Item, that there was delivered and paid to the said Willemet, in the city of Paris as elsewhere where he stayed together with the other men-at-arms, for his business and necessities — 61 livres, 18 pence.
Item, there was delivered to the said Willemet, to go to the town of Caux in pursuit of one of his servants who had carried off a haubergeon and taken away one of his horses — 4 pounds.
Item, for nine rasieres of oats which were bought to feed the horses of the said Willemet — 4 livres, 20 pence.
TOTAL of the above expenses paid in the name of and on behalf of the said Willemet — 159 livres, 12 shillings, 6 pence.
A strap and a dagger which were bought for the said Willemet — 4 shillings, 2 pence.
A cup (taisse) and a strap — 15 shillings, 7 pence.
A dagger furnished with a wooden hilt — 3 shillings, 4 pence.
For leather from which a pourpoint was made for the said Willemet — 11 shillings, 3 pence.
For ell-measures of fustian from which likewise a pourpoint was made for the said Willemet — 11 shillings, 9 pence.
The best part? This was all so he could hunt down a page who'd stolen his horse and haburgeon!
The ocean molded this clump of bricks into a rock shape
via
June 1st
Listen, marketing-as-exploitation discussions aside, Rainbow Capitalism is, has been, and continues to be the canary in the coal mine of social acceptance for the queer community.
If you’ll all pardon my Americentrism for a moment, the amount, visibility, and flamboyance of Pride merch available in clothing, home goods, and comestibles stores is a DIRECT reflection of how safe it is to be queer in public in the United States.
How? Simple. Out groups aren’t profitable. If you’re not “acceptable” in the current social climate, big franchise businesses will not market to you. (Prime example - Look how quickly Target dropped all their Pride merch after having been wall-to-wall rainbows every June for almost a decade prior.)
Sure, capitalism sucks and being viewed as an exploitable marketing demographic isn’t a fun concept.
HOWEVER.
The grim truth is that being normalized enough to be considered profitable by corporations IS A GOOD THING in terms of the barometer of social acceptance.
Same thing goes for smaller businesses that throw kitschy Pride events or even just put a token rainbow flag in the window or somewhere inside the shop. That’s a level of acceptance that DID NOT EXIST thirty years ago, and I can tell you because I was there.
The fact that we can scoff and bitch about being an exploitable marketing demographic nowadays means we have made GIGANTIC strides since the 1990s. It also speaks to the fact that the drive and the conversation surrounding LGBTQ+ rights and acceptance are continuing. And getting louder.
You can be cynical about it if you want. But I will take a store that puts out lip-service rainbow merch over a world that pretends we don’t exist any day of the week. Because that will always mean something.
Sincerely, An Elder Queer
Agreed, and also, it has always struck me as a little bit of a double-standard in queer politics when people used to point out the exclusion of queerness from mainstream capitalist products as evidence of their marginalization (e.g., there are no m/m or f/f wedding cards)
Yet, when they start being included, they are like “well, that’s just capitalism taking advantage of us, so it doesn’t count.” Like, you can’t use your EXCLUSION from something as evidence of general societal marginalization and then claim that once you’ve started to be included, it is politically meaningless. You don’t really get to have it both ways. That’s moving the political goal posts.
I get that we shouldn’t consider Target pride merchandise as like the pinnacle of queer politics or even the pinnacle of queer inclusion. I get that inclusion in capitalist intuitions is a very ambivalent form of social progress. But the truth is, capitalism is a big part of what creates our social reality right now (unfortunately).
Capitalism makes TV shows, and movies, and books, and ads, and greeting cards, and toys, and clothing, and, and…
When every single aspect of commercial social reality excludes queerness, that DOES create a real sense of social alienation. I don’t love that capitalism is responsible for creating so much of our collective social reality. But granting that it does, I think we’re forced to accept that our inclusion in it IS politically and socially important.
And yes we should still be trying to resist capitalism as the primary means of meeting human needs. But we can resist treating capitalism as an inevitability or an inherent good, AND ALSO acknowledge that our inclusion within it remains politically important while it still holds so much power and responsibility for creating our shared reality.
See also a recent article from NPR (published May 30, 2026) discussing how pride celebrations have struggled financially with the loss of corporate sponsorships. Organizing big visible events (and fairly compensating the labor of those who make them possible) is expensive.
Public support for the LGBTQ+ community by corporations has become politically risky, public relations expert says.
You know I think if I boycotted everything that some random internet person told me to boycott I would actually have no way to watch television of any kind
Not that I think boycotts aren’t important or something. Well coordinated boycotts can be quite effective. But when individual people are just saying boycott this or that and have no coordinated plan that does nothing, my friends.
Yes every entertainment company and video hosting website is evil. I also can’t afford dvds.
The only ethical way to consume media is to meditate so hard that you gain access to the central nervous system of the oversoul where Anansi the spider god has hidden all possible stories.
a tasty hoard for a tiny beast!🍓🐉✨
oh wait just realized i can edit my own posts.
like you can't edit reblogs anymore but you can still edit your own post even after it has a thousand notes or whatever.
i have the opportunity to do the funniest thing.