"one of the only dragons we see with two wings ripped off" he's the only one. osprey is the only dragon like this. make literally any other character disabled in the way you described osprey's, don't change his disability to something more palatable. he is the ONLY dragon missing both wings. do you know how cool that is? what great representation that is for people like myself (amputees)? do you know how cool it was to see a character like me, who used to have so much freedom but was now limited? i understand that osprey dies and has only a few lines. i also understand that osprey, the wingless dragon, is an amputee (willing or not). let him be an amputee. let LITERALLY any other dragon fulfill the role you have given osprey
Okay. I want to preface everything by saying anon, I know where you're coming from on this stance, and no, I didn't portray Osprey in this way to make his disability "more palpable". In no way did I ever intend to come off that way, nor would I ever downplay a disability for something like that.
Like I stated in my original post, I acknowledged that Osprey was "one of the only dragons with two wings ripped off" that we see. I phrased it in that way due to my memory being complete shit and me being unsure if we actually see any other dragons with two wings gone. I can list two dragons off the top of my head each with one individual ripped wings, but not two. Nonetheless, in case I did forget someone, I didn't want to mistakenly just say one.
But, yes, Osprey is the only dragon with BOTH (emphasis of both) wings either damaged or completely ripped off. No other wof dragon that I know has two wings ripped off. But... That's. Not in the novels.
In the novels written by Tui, Osprey is never stated to not have both wings. He canonically has both. The reason he can't fly in the novels is due to his tail paralysis, which is explicitly stated in the text. The graphic novel is the only interpretation that shows him with both wings ripped off. That's it. His basic reference on the wiki reflects his book appearance - two wings, paralyzed tail. That is his character in the book, which is what my design was taking from.
I was not "making his disability more palatable", as I explained in my post that I wanted to try and expand on his NOVEL. APPEARANCE. The novels I grew up with that formed my view on Osprey. I never imagined him to be a dragon without two wings - I imagined him to be a dragon which had a paralyzed tail that made him unable to fly. And, because of that, I wanted to be book accurate! I wanted to emphasize the possible invisibility of his disability, because I know that people with more invisible disabilities often get told they aren't "disabled enough", and I felt novel Osprey would be a good representation of that! Because yeah! He has both wings, one would probably assume he can fly, right? But no, he can't, and I wanted to emphasize that part of him.
I also stated this but why not restate it too: Osprey is one of my absolute favorite dragons in this series. This isn't about him having a handful of lines or being dead. This is about me growing up with one version of Osprey that is canon to me - tail paralysis. Do I think it's rad as fuck that he doesn't have his wings in the graphic novel? Yes! That's awesome! Do I think it's great representation? Absolutely man! But is that my version of Osprey? No. And, since these first designs are *my HEADCANONS* and *my versions of their designs*, I wanted to stick to his novel accurate appearance, the appearance I grew up with, and show a headcanon of Osprey being a dragon who struggles in day to day life without being "disabled enough" for the dragons in his kingdom. That is what I was looking to aim for, not erasing something you find solace in, anon.
And look anon, I understand being mad about this, but I also clarified this in my original post! I clarified that I wanted his design to be based off the novel, which I'm nostalgic for and fond of, compared to the graphic novels - which I am also fond of, don't get me wrong! But I also didn't grow up with them like I did with the first five novels.
And, if you wanted to, you could've sent me a far kinder ask for clarity! Hell, wingless Osprey would be a great ask to send in for a headcanoned/alternate design of him, since I offer to do those after I do my designs! But frankly claiming that I, a random artist you know NOTHING about, was trying to make my favorite character "more palpable" because showed his novel accurate disability? That's just a bad way to go about it. Can Novel Osprey never be drawn?? Will it always have to be the graphic novel version?? Cuz I hope you don't go harass ALL the artists that draw him with wings based off the novel, like, I'm sorry, but that is one of his canon fucking designs. If I completely got rid of his ripped wings when he was disabled in *both* the novel AND the comic - then yes! I am doing it with malicious intent! But, this is just what Osprey looks like in the novel. And if it makes you mad I took from the design I grew up with, then I'm sorry, but that's not my problem. Block me and move on. It's that simple.
And hey, if you want me to draw him without wings, all you have to do is send me a request instead of an angry rant you sent on anon so I wouldn't know who you were :] or hell shoot me a DM and we can talk!
I'm not trying to be mean anon, I promise, but he has two designs, and one of those I grew up with and find interesting to dig into. I would love to draw a graphic novel version of Osprey - I very much would! But I'd prefer it be requested in a kind tone rather than one yelling at me for an accurate depiction of a characters disability. Thanks.