currently revisiting the first book, and another thing that never made sense to me was why kell thought he needed to take lila with him and had no other choice â˘ď¸. ( beware rant incoming because i forgot abt how much this annoyed me the first time i read it â and dw, i love these books, but i also love to analyze things )
so the book acts like kell literally had no other option than to bring lila with him (both to red london and all the way to the finale) but thatâs just not true and it never was đ
iâm p confident that kell couldâve taken the black stone back from lila at any point without much struggle. sure, she couldâve conjured something to fight him with, but kell acts like the stone gives lila an instant KO against him, but weâve seen that the stone does not in fact do that (ie, the holland fight where holland does not instant KO kell despite having the stone).
also was it really that hard to just use bone magic and make lila drop it ? like kell, i get you have qualms about bone magic, but this is potentially world-shattering levels of emergency here (iâve seen you use bone magic for less đ) could you really not just take the stone back from lila and leave her in grey london where sheâll be way safer? đ
kell acts like itâs such a forced situation but itâs not. at all. i could think of a hundred ways he could cleverly use magic to get away from lila, retrieve the stone from her, and be fine. sheâs a non-bender holding a lethal grenade, but kell is the avatar with blood bending. wdym he canât figure out how to ditch her and take the grenade back?
itâs like hydrogen bomb versus coughing baby. except hydrogen bomb lays down and dies after coughing baby whines a little too much???
and yes, i get that the stone was corrupting him, and that it was convenient to have another person hold it for a little bit, but the positives of that donât outweigh the negatives of having to keep track of her all the time and knowingly endangering her life. lila doesnât care if she lives or dies, fine. but that doesnât erase kellâs moral prerogative to not let her come on this suicide mission (when heâs fully able to stop her from coming). which is the problem. kell is on level 100. lila is level 5 here. at no point was i ever convinced that lila could force kell to do anything.
his argument for leaving someone behind to tell the royal family what happened to him is also terrible. like dude, just write a letter and deliver it to the palace yourself in secret using as tascen. or leave the letter with someone trusted. or tell someone you trust, like tieren or a random sanctuary novice, and ask them to tell the royals after 48 hours have elapsed. even if they tell the king earlyâŚkell is already gone off to white london. no one can follow him anyway. kell does NOT need lila to stay behind and tell his story. in fact, coming from some random stranger from a totally different world, the story may seem even more suspicious and outlandish and is even less likely to be believed than a quick letter he wrote himself or relayed to a trusted person in the kingdom.
and then he goes one step further and brings her to white london with him simply because she asked. like what? just take the token from her and go? đ like i said above, there was no reason to endanger her. and yes, lila said she didnât care about dying and that she wanted to help. but
a rookie cop is about to go rogue and attempt the assassination of a mafia boss. a random teenage civilian from a foreign country who has never shot a gun before, doesnât know how guns work, and basically canât shoot guns at all (iâm well aware lila can shoot a gun, but guns=magic here) volunteers to go with the cop to help with the hit. the hit is in a hostile foreign country where everyone has guns and they all speak a language the civilian doesnât know. the cop expects to die and doesnât know if theyâll be able to smuggle the civilian back out of the country after itâs all over. so naturally the cop says no, they will not bring the civilian with them, because they donât want to drag an innocent teenage civilian into this mess. the civilian says âbut i want to help and i donât care about dyingâ. rookie cop, after 30 seconds of thinking says âok, if you insistđ¤ˇđťââď¸â
WHAT ? *tik tok boom sound effect*
the rookie cop is not in the right here for saying yes and allowing the inexperienced civilian who cannot shoot guns to tag along. even if the mafia boss is a big baddie and needs to die for the greater good. itâs just not right, necessary, or responsible of the rookie cop. even if the civilian doesnât care. it doesnât matter. rookie cop couldâve just driven away from the civilian and performed the hit himself. and should have.
anyway, i understand thereâs arguments to be made that kell was so super afraid of dying in the white london confrontation that he didnât put up a fight on purpose because he wanted company, but that being the only reason is so narratively disappointing and not really explored. his selfishness born of fear is not the problem, the problem is that the narrative doesnât acknowledge it and truly presented the situation like âhe had no other choiceâ. when he fully does.
i just wish kell had truly been âforcedâ into bringing lila with him. or that lila had done something more forcing. or even that kell had said no and then lila figured out a way to trick him and go to white london herself.
like imagine kell says no, lila is angry and follows him, she witnesses the holland fight, helps him win it, pickpockets the stone and the WL rook from kell during said fight, then lila uses the stone and rook combo to open a little portal to WL, she goes through, KELL now has to follow, then they end up fighting the mob of white londoners together, and then kell is finally convinced to let lila help him bc now theyâre both already in WL, Lila gets to really prove herself, and it was actually a forced situation and not just kell being the biggest doormat to ever live. (donât get me wrong, i do love that heâs a doormat sometimes, but when inter-dimensional security is at risk, there comes a point where you need to put that trait away, otherwise you just come off as selfish/stupid and/or the narrative suffers from flaws in logic.)
basically, it wouldâve been so easy to tweak the mechanics of the situation so kell ACTUALLY had a real reason to bring lila with him. because it was annoying to constantly read âkell had no other choiceâ/âlila had forced his handâ type of lines when it was SO obvious that he did in fact have a choice and lila was not forcing his hand at all.
or the reason simply couldâve been because kell liked her or was attracted to her. but lowk we just donât get that at all during the first book. ( and i do prefer the minimal romance, but in this case i think going a little harder on the attraction couldâve strengthened the reasoning for constantly giving in to lilaâs baseless demands.)
anyway, ik everything worked out in the end, some it largely BECAUSE lila was present in the finale and BECAUSE kell brought her along all those times. but what IM saying is that the luck + plot armor of the characters + the ultimate outcome do NOT erase the sin of bad in-universe reasoning for them being âstuck togetherâ and kell being forced to take lila with him.
ok iâm dropping my mic and walking away now