✅ have you updated to 1.4.1 yet?
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from Russia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Ukraine
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from China
✅ have you updated to 1.4.1 yet?
We shall have no further occasion to speak of M. Félix Tholomyès. Let us confine ourselves to saying, that, twenty years later, under King Louis Philippe, he was a great provincial lawyer, wealthy and influential, a wise elector, and a very severe juryman; he was still a man of pleasure
Hate him hate him hate him
Just absolutely fucking infuriating that this man can so thoroughly abandon Fantine and Cosette and come out on top for it, and that functionally this has not changed at all in society to this day. Terrible, wealthy men can get away with anything, and everyone else suffers for it.
I finally realized today that I’d misread an important detail on previous attempts at reading The Brick, and that baby Cosette had been in existence long before the double quartet’s day out. I had always been puzzled by Hugo’s note that “Fantine had a child” at the end of 1.3.9, and then in the next chapter, “Ten months had elapsed since the ‘pretty farce.’” wherein as far as my brain was parsing it, was apparently enough time for Fantine to have a whole pregnancy and for her baby to grow to toddler sized, which did not make any kind of sense. I wonder if that’s a translation issue? I don’t remember enough French to be able to tell you if there are different words for “had a child” meaning giving birth to a child (past tense), and “had a child” meaning being in possession of a child.
It’s bad enough thinking that Tholomyes abandoned Fantine while pregnant, but abandoning her and little Cosette together is somehow so much worse, especially since he gets to have a succesful life and career afterward, the bald toothless rat bastard.
Anyway, we meet Cosette and all of the Thenardiers except for Gavroche today... yay?
This newcomer was very cheerful; the goodness of the mother is written in the gaiety of the child; she had taken a small piece of wood, which she used as a spade, and was energetically digging a hole fit for a fly. The gravedigger’s work is fun when done by a child.
"This woman's child was the loveliest creature imaginable: a girl of two or three. She could have competed with the other little ones for the most appealing attire; there were ribbons at her shoulders and Valenciennes lace above the fine linen wings on her cap."
"[Fantine] found herself absolutely isolated, with the habit of labor lost, and the taste for pleasure acquired. Led by her liaison with Tholomyes to disdain the simple work she knew how to do, she had neglected her opportunities; now they were all gone. No resources."
"Then she thought of Tholomyes, who shrugged his shoulders at his child, and who did not take this innocent creature seriously, and her heart turned dark at the place that had been his."
Once more reading to punch Tholomyes and once more tearing up at the care and love Fantine gives her child even when she herself has nothing (which again is Tholomyes' fault) and is slipping closer and closer to destitution.
Also I'd love to draw Cosette in her little cap, the description of wings make me think of angels (which may have been the point).
Villainous teoría. Los frames ocultos en el intro del episodio 5 y la bestia que forma.
Como en todos los episodios, el capítulo 5 muestra unas imágenes ocultas después del intro. Imágenes de monstruos, lo que parece verse como colmillos, ramas de árbol, tentáculos y unos endemoniados ojos brillantes.
Al principio no sabía qué era esto. ¿Era acaso Black Hat? Se parecía a él, pero no podía encontrar una forma...
Hasta que me di cuenta que en el último frame, cuando intercambiamos las mitades de la imagen, de forma que la mitad de abajo esté arriba, se une perfectamente. De esa forma aparece una figura.
Una sombra deforme y grotesca. Ésta nos servirá de guía para colocar cada pieza del rompecabezas.
Y al pegar parte por parte, el resultado se obtiene. No eran varios monstruos, sino una única criatura. Un ser al que me gusta apodar:
La bestia
Un ser repugnante, grotesco, sin forma, inaudito, infernal, sacado de los relatos más turbios. Es por mucho el ser más espantoso visualmente visto en la serie.
Pero, en mi opinión, también es bastante lindo. Ya lo conocemos. Al menos eso es lo que creo, eso es lo que teorizo.
Su nombre oficial es Experimento 141:
The Black Spot 1.4.1 be like : Speedn't
Brick Club 1.4.1, 1.4.2
Two angelic children frolic in play amongst the horrifying remnants of a war wagon, symbolizing...the world? A brighter future among the ruin of the past? Help.
I love you Fantine, and I understand, but bébé Cosette does not need lace caps and silk dresses, please save your money.
Anyways, I’m still furious at the thought of Tholomyes living the good life, a man of pleasure, working for royalty, while Fantine dies in the street and Cosette is abused and traumatized. Speaking of which, I don’t know how common such a situation would be, but it does seem like a big ask to ask a complete stranger to watch your child while you live and work elsewhere apropos of nothing. I still wonder if taking Cosette to Montreuil-sur-Mer and simply trying to keep her secret wouldn’t have been a better choice. We know Jeanne Valjean was in a similar situation and while it certainly wasn’t a good place to be anything beats the Thenadiers. Of course, I don’t direct an ounce of blame toward Fantine, she couldn’t possibly have known and her circumstances are absolutely not her fault even a bit. It just sucks.
The illustration of Mme. Thenardier looks uncannily like Helena Bonham Carter from the movie...hmm
“They belonged to that bastard class formed of low people who have risen, and intelligent people who have fallen.” It’s funny how Hugo spends so much time explicitly telling us that the Thenardiers are evil and unredeemable, but did no such thing for the four bourgeoise men that exploited and ultimately abandoned the four grisettes of book 3. In fact, he never offers an explanation in any detail for why these wealthy men acting so cruelly. Yet, he spends an entire chapter expounding on the Thenardiers’ inherent moral failures when we have only just met them.
Final nerd out, Hugo dismisses Mme. Thenardier’s naming choices as stupid and silly, but there is actually extensive sociological research on the connection between class and naming conventions. The reason so many common folks have names that, Hugo observes, would better suit viscounts is because names have a tendency to trickle down through social class. Names that are popular in upper classes take a decade or so to catch on in lower classes while the upper class moves on to newer trends. The result is alternating periods of time where lower class families would be picking up on traditionally upper class names while upper class families turn up their noses at those same names for being outdated, probably turning to traditionally lower class names as a fresh, new trend.