Extra Typology Vol #2 - 9. Another Take on the Hybrid Types
For those who didn’t join us in Vol #1, the main gist here is that some people don’t so much fit one of the 6 main types, but instead see to be situated somewhere ‘in-between’ on an integration line, resulting in 6 specific ‘hybrid types’ between each pair of ‘adjacent’ types, which is where the ‘12 type enneagram’ gets its epinomous 12 types from.
If you did read my thoughts on the last book, you might realize that there’s not really that much overlap between the descriptions, beyond what you’d expect from being derived from the main types (particularly with Lunar-Venus the contrast is stark as it plays them for opposites in terms of monogamy behavior) - which isn’t necessarily a contradiction as one thing the books agree on is that every hybrid type person will have a different ‘placement’ on the line between one type and the next, and will react exactly like one type in some situations/life areas and exactly like the other in others instead of being perfectly in between or randomly switching;
Personally, I think that the best approach here is to just describe the main types & let the ppl themselves decide “well im a bit like this with bits of that”, especially since the book even introduces the concept of what they call a ‘split’ type (a combination not on the standard lines), though with the usual ‘this is pretty rare & probably not you, just be honest with yourself about what your most fundamental traits are’ caveat.
Nonetheless, I will present some summaries of the portraits the author paints of the hybrid types, in case anyne finds this useful, relatable or interesting/inspiring.
combines intuitive knowledge and emotional earthyness
however, this might be a somewhat vulnerable combination as they are neither fully grounded in lunar shredwness nor Venus responsibility
dreamy innocence meets sensuous charm
the kind to reblog a marilyn monroe quote
unabashed & refresing attitude about relationships & sexuality - may thus acquire plenty of experience, but also be tempted to unduly tie their self-worth to it
might charm their way up in the world but lack the skill & dilligence required to follow through and consistently keep a job, relationship, social circle etc. - easily attracts partners but might fail to keep them due to evenually retreating into lunar dreamyness & isolation
suited for jobs that are freelance or low on ‘homework’, like actors or waiters.
Combines emotion and speed - active and social person, most likely an extrovert and/or soc first
practical and active but: may value order or expediency more than logic per se
free time is likely to be filled with very active hobbies others may find the opposite of relaxed
sensual & devoted partners but also very “out there”, not a homebody at all - partners should accept that they will spend plenty of times going out with their friends
common pitfalls include a tendency toward the flippant and superficial - think screwball comedy
feel a need to be liked/popular & likes compliment; Will discuss the feedback they get & tell everyone who said what about them
more likely to forgive & move on than a pure Venus - the people around them would do better to appreciate that than to force difficult discussions.
Combine speed and deep thought, a combination which is often prized & sucessfull these days
Not ‘deadly serious’, indeed, profound creative output might often be presented or packaged in an entertaining manner (”Dear, why is there a random flirting joke amid a treatise about the meaning of life?”)
bridge the personal and non-personal realm, might take up a position of support and then have trouble finding support for their own needs,
I personally know two individuals, both INTJ, & this does remarkably well describe common denominators between them, though I’d assing them different percentages. (as well as subtypes and 9gram types) Most INTJs are probably not all that mercury-ish socionics notes the ILI type for its relative inertia, this is probably more common among the more ‘deep’ ESTxs or some ENTPs, but, goes to show how this can be an idependent metric of sorts
combine inherent gravitas with a sense of dominance or even supremacy; These are some intense fellows
in both social & personal life, these people will be gifted in terms of their actions, ambitions and persuading others to join their causes
often actors, politicians or generally very outspoken public figures
good at “reading the mood” in a room or society at all
compared to a pure Saturn they’ll be far less inquisitive for its own sake and more visibly opinionated, but they can write impressive and deeply though-out treatises, manifestos & political books (1984 anyone?)
cause-driven - serious people with serious goals
don’t believe in staying in the shadows and may indeed see charisma and celebrity as good for business
very driven, can be ruthless in pursuit of their goals
espouse their own views and relenentlessly deny & dismantle the truth of others while using their own encyclopedic knowledge
often sucessful but their self-promotion might backfire if it comes at the cost of ignoring others
seems like a soc-first 6 with 8 or 3 fixes
characterized by ‘benevolent forcefulness’
strongest of all combinations, tough, resilent & full of energy
which is good for them because they often have huge agendas on behalf of others
unlike in a pure Jovian, the desire to help isn’t tempered by an inclination to keep the peace - so they can come off as forceful and bossy
“I’m doing this for your own good”
basically Tumblr, especially the discourse
rejects as worthless what’s not up to personal standards
takes on daunting projects with little concern for personal safety - the type to be a protester or activist, or do charitable work in a warzone
all about ideals, less concerned with personal relationships that might end up playing a lesser role, though they’ll feel genuinely bad about any failings that may happen here as they’re generally well-wishing (think of all those often-divorced politicians)
changes mind easier than a pure Mars type, especially if they view the new idea/ belief as “even more just”
The ‘fairytale friend’ - the strong, reliable ‘parental’ influence meets the innocent & childlike
their friends might be confosed as to wether they want to give support or be supported ( the answer is both, depending on context)
unlike a pure Lunar, they’re not so much ‘lost’ in a fantasy world as that they have a certain mastery over it
may have exotic beliefs because they see little distinction between it and the arbitraryness of reality (and often end up being prized in such groups as they’re willing to stick around for the boring administrative footwork others avoid)
disarms through their spontaniety - can be both very serious and excited/radiantfrom moment to moment
Matt Smith’s Eleventh Doctor comes to mind
often dreams or a family & kids that they’ll then relate to as both a benevolent guide and a friend
generally great with kids because they’re basically one themselves but, unlike a pure lunar, have the responsibility to handle the caretaking role
competency & work ethic will get them into a position of responsibility, but their own needs will be a mystery to themselves and others
can both defer & guide but might be awkward in one-to-one equal interactions in both friendships and especially romantic contexts
“I want my beloved to be happy”
may step aside in favor of other candidates even if they cannot avoid becoming friends with a potential mate
use their complex inner world to relate & empasize with others in almost all situations, forging friendships & relationships even in situations others would see as dealbreakers (widower with 3 kids? No probs!)
benevolent to the point of naivity, often distraight & dissapointed by the wickedness of the world but just as good at finding things to be positive about
frustration tends to be vented inward, in private
gravitate toward jobs in charity or caretaking
usually both competent & fun
