#agramuglia

[purpledemonlilyposting]

wasn't she already making fun of nb and agender people and saying those gender identities are bs or am I mistaking her with someone else?

Oh no, that was her

[mossyfluorite]

You'll be "critical" of Ant trying to troll Lily with a superchat but not Sai making that "parody" video cosplaying as a sexual predator? Really?

There is a big difference between the two things.

One had Ant line the pockets of a sexual predator with the promise of more monetary gain (that Lily WOULD have gotten via Ad Revenue on the video regardless if Ant actually paid her the promised 700cad or not). It is reasonable to be critical of that regardless of his supposed intent.

Sai made a parody April Fool's day video mocking the style of video Lily makes. In a way that in no way, shape, or form gave any monetary value to Lily.

Could you say it was in Poor Taste? Sure, you can. But the major aspect and difference between the two is Lily was actively profiting off of one of them.

That's the difference.

[saiandantreceipts]

[fox-that-eats-tmes]

So I want to compare two posts, one from Crimsonender and one from 4e3076. 

The post from Crimson ender reads as follows: I was thinking about making a post saying “I think trans men and nonbinary people should be allowed to hunt baeddels for sport” but I knew it would be twisted to say I’m a transmisogynist for making a dark joke about a group of people that think I would be better off dead just for virtue of being assigned female at birth and daring to identify as something other than a girl. Painting trans men as the bad guys once again when baeddels are out here saying the most evil vitriolic things about us. Anyway that’s why I think trans men and nonbinary people should be allowed to hunt baeddels for sport. End quote. 

I mainly want to focus on the last line of the post but I will talk about some of the rest of it as well. So to begin with I want to define baeddel as a term, it’s an old English word that has a debated definition but the general consensus is that the term means "gender non-conforming or effeminate man” it can also refer to intersex people, and the word is associated with another word, waepenwifestre that is defined as “a woman with a penis or masculine traits”. More recently it was used by TERFs to refer to trans activists, and within the last few years some transfeminists identified as baeddels. The wording of Crimsonender’s post makes it clear that he is using the more recent definition (although, even if he was using the old definition, that does not improve the content of the post). The next part I want to define is “I think trans men and nonbinary people should be allowed to…” Crimsonender is trans masc, so it’s clear that he is talking about himself, but the “should be allowed to” part is what I want to focus on, saying you should be allowed to do something suggests a desire to do so but not being allowed to, for example “I should be allowed to eat an entire cake” has the same meaning as “I want to eat an entire cake but I’m not allowed to”. And the last phrase to define is “hunt for sport” this is the easiest to define, sports hunting is killing an animal with no necessary reason such as survival. So if we plug our definitions into Crimsonender’s post we get this, “I want to kill transfeminists but I’m not allowed to”. For some reason, Crimsonender thinks that you need to twist his words to make him sound transmisogynistic but unless you think that twist means “define” I think he might be wrong with that point. As for his other point that “a group of people that think I would be better off dead just for virtue of being assigned female at birth and daring to identify as something other than a girl” I searched through baeddel posts from 2024 and I couldn’t find anything close to that, the closest I did find was a post saying all men should kill themselves, which does not mention non binary people and does not single out trans men or say that the reason is because they don’t identify as girls. If there are posts like this then I’m sorry that this happened but tu quoque.

The second post I wanted to look at is from 4e3076 that reads: Patricia Taxxon should be allowed to kill people. End quote.

This post doesn’t have anything I need to specifically define, it’s very straight forward, you may have noticed that the image of 4e3076’s post I used was from Agramuglia. Agramuglia shared a screenshot of the post as evidence that Patricia Taxxon is dangerous, and reblogged Crimsonender’s post endorsing it. I think the comparison of his attitude towards these two people is very interesting, a post that Patricia Taxxon did not make is evidence that she’s dangerous but a post that Crimsonender made fantasising about murdering a vulnerable minority is just a joke that he completely agrees with. Crimsonender and Agramuglia have engaged in lolcow and kiwi farms style stalking of multiple trans women and the simple reason is that they’re bad people and it's profitable for them.

[spacefrog1984]

@criticalenvy

Hi, I just saw this post, reblogs are off, and while I'm happy to talk in the comments, I want to make sure what I have to say here is very open and easy for people to see.

The person who told me that Ant's spouse was a cisgender woman and Ant's was misgnedering them was not Sai, not even close. I'm not going to say who it was becuase I'm not going to pass the buck. Besides, they're transgender themselves, so in addition to seeming like a credible source on the subject who happened to be wrong with this one, I don't want harassment to come their way or have people doubt their trans identity, like Ant did with Honeycutt's friend.

So no, it' wasn't Sai, and anon is doing the same thing they're upset about - spreading false rumors.

[postmortemlatte]

Okay so regarding what happened to Ant.

Yes it is harassment to constantly send asks even if they are just bait about how bad the person is and how he should totally go KYS or something

Yes it is harassment to make defamatory posts on the regular and find things to poke at and twist because you think the person wronged you.

No, it's not okay for the person themselves or others around them to constantly respond and only rile yourself up more.

But literally no person is perfect.

God forbid the constant shitting on got to him, god forbid he's a person with feelings and emotions.

It's also not okay to laugh at him and giggle how you're so much better because he couldn't take it anymore. Sit down, guys, it isn't a win you think it is. You drove a person off a platform with bullshit that is either entirely fake or literally just bait for a passionate possibly non neurotypical person to react.

You are literally giggling and celebrating your ragebait worked and got a person to break.

The same goes for Jazzy, you are just twisting things to get to her and get her to break and leave.

Tumblr is literally just Kiwi farms for queer people, isn't it.

[crimsonender]

Some thumbnails (and a full peak at the banner) that I made for @agramuglia in the last few months! if you're not already make sure you're subscribed!

And if you want to commission me, my prices are in my pinned post! (Regular weekly/biweekly/monthly work is discounted!)

[agramuglia]

I don't like posting personal details online, but it is so beautiful when my son reaches out for my hand when I hold him. My son is so fascinated by so many of the pictures around the house.

He is such an amazing little boy and I hope I am able to do right by him.